Jump to content

ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ: Difference between revisions

From တႆးၽီးတီးယႃး

Tunsar (talk | contribs)

2 user groups
317 edits
VisualWikitext
Tunsar (talk | contribs)
Administrators, teacher
317 edits
Created page with "thumb|350px|The scale of the universe mapped to the branches of science '''Science''' is what we do to find out about the natural world.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Oxford companion to the history of modern science|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont0000unse_s7n3|date=2003|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-511229-0|editor-last=Heilbron|editor-first=J. L.|location=Oxford ; New York}}</ref><ref name="wilson" />..."
 
Tunsar (talk | contribs)
Administrators, teacher
317 edits
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:The Scientific Universe.png|thumb|350px|The scale of the universe mapped to the branches of science]]
ပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်လွင်ႈဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁဵတ်းသၢင်ႈ တႃႇတေႁူႉလွင်ႈလူၵ်ႈၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ မီးလၢႆလၢႆၸိူဝ်ႉ လၢႆလၢႆမဵဝ်းဝႆႉယူႇ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇၽိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်(natural science) လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ် လႄႈ လွင်ႈလူၵ်ႈတူဝ်ႁၢင်ႊ။ ၼႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ တေပႃး ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ၸႂ်(biology)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊပိုတ်ႇထၢတ်ႈ(chemistry)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလိၼ်(geology)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်(astronomy)၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊႁၢင်ႊတူဝ်(phyics)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵၼ်ႊၵူၼ်း(social science)သမ်ႉ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈၵူၼ်း လႄႈ လွင်ႈဝႃႈ တူင်ႇဝူင်းၵူၼ်းပဵၼ်ၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်။ ၼႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ ပႃးဝႆႉ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊၸႂ်(psychology)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊၵၼ်ႊၵူၼ်း(sciology)၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးမၢၵ်ႈမုၼ်း(economics)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇလွင်ႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း(applied sciences) သမ်ႉ ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းလွင်ႈတၢင်းဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁဵၼ်းႁူႉမႃးတီႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊသေယဝ်ႉ ဢဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၵေႈလိတ်ႈလွင်ႈၶွင်ႈၶမ်။ ၼႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ ပႃးဝႆႉ ပၢႆးၸၢင်ႊၾူးၵၢၼ်(engineering) လႄႈ ပၢႆးယႃႈယႃ(medicine)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လႆႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပၢႆးၼပ်ႉ(mathematics)၊ ပၢႆးသၢႆၾၢႆႇၶွမ်း(computer science)၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးလေႃးၵျိၵ်ႉ(logics) သေ၊ ပၢႆးၾၢႆႇၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ မၢင်ႊပွၵ်ႈႁိၵ်ႈႁိၵ်ႉႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊတၢင်းၵၢၼ်”(formal science)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လႆႈႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်ႉတူၺ်း လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းတူၺ်း။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ႁဵတ်းဢွၵ်ႇပၼ် ၶေႃႈတေႉ(fact)၊ ပိူင်ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ(scientific laws)၊ လႄႈ ၾိင်ႈတႅတ်ႈ(theory) တင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ။ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ယိူင်းထိုင်ပႃး ပိုၼ်ႉႁူႉတၢင်းမေႃၼမ်လၢႆး ဢၼ်ႁူပ်ႉႁၼ်ၼႂ်းၽွင်းၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၶၵ်ႉတွၼ်ႊၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉပႃးယူႇ။


'''Science''' is what we do to find out about the natural world.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Oxford companion to the history of modern science|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont0000unse_s7n3|date=2003|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-511229-0|editor-last=Heilbron|editor-first=J. L.|location=Oxford ; New York}}</ref><ref name="wilson" /> There are different kinds of science. Natural sciences study nature and the physical world. They include [[biology]], [[chemistry]], [[geology]], [[astronomy]], and [[physics]]. Social sciences study people and how societies work. They include, [[psychology]], [[sociology]], and [[economics]]. Applied sciences use the things we learn from science to solve problems. They include, [[engineering]] and [[medicine]]. Science uses [[mathematics]], [[computer science]] and [[logic]], which are sometimes called "formal sciences". Science makes [[observation]]s and [[experiment]]s. Science produces correct [[facts]], scientific laws, and [[theories]].<ref name=wilson>Wilson, Edward O. 1998. Consilience: the unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books, 49–71. {{ISBN|0-679-45077-7}}</ref><ref>Heilbron J.L. 2003. ''The Oxford companion to the history of modern science''. New York: Oxford University Press, vii. {{ISBN|0-19-511229-6}}. <br/>"...&nbsp;modern science is a discovery as well as an invention. It was a discovery that nature generally acts regularly enough to be described by laws and even by [[mathematics]]; and required invention to devise the techniques, abstractions, apparatus, and organization for exhibiting the regularities and securing their law-like descriptions".</ref> 'Science' also refers to the large amount of [[knowledge]] that has been found using this process.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science |quote= knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method... |publisher=Merriam-Webster |title=Online dictionary |accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref><ref name="Popper">{{cite book |last=Popper |first=Karl |authorlink=Karl Popper |title=The Logic of Scientific Discovery |url=https://archive.org/details/logicscientificd00popp_859 |orig-date=1959 |edition=2nd English |year=2002 |publisher=Routledge Classics |location=New York, NY |isbn=0-415-27844-9 |oclc=59377149 |page=[https://archive.org/details/logicscientificd00popp_859/page/n147 3]}}</ref>
ၵၢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်း လႆႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း လွၵ်းလၢႆးပၢႆးသၢႆႊ(scientific method)။ ၵၢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်းလၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ လႆႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၶေႃႈၶိုပ်ႊလၢမ်း(hypothesis)  ဢၼ်ဢိင်ၼိူဝ်တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်(ideas) ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် တၢင်းႁူႉဢၼ်မီးမႃးမိူဝ်ႈဢွၼ်တၢင်း၊ ၶိုၼ်းလႆႈမႄးၸႅၵ်ႈတၢင်းႁူႉ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ၸွမ်းၼင်ႇႁူဝ်ၶေႃႈလႂ်ႁူဝ်ၶေႃႈၼၼ်ႉ။ ဢဝ်ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းသေ ထတ်းတူၺ်းၶေႃႈၶိုပ်ႊလၢမ်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ။ ၵူၼ်းၸိူဝ်းဢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း တင်း ဢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်းလွင်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လႄႈ ၵူၼ်းၸိူဝ်းဢၼ်ၶတ်းၸႂ်ႁူႉၵူႊၸိူဝ်ႉၵူႊလွင်ႈၼၼ်ႉ ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ”။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈတၢင်းတင်းလၢႆ လူၺ်ႈ လၢႆးၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်းတူၺ်းလီလီ၊ လူၺ်ႈလၢႆးတႅၵ်ႈယင်ႇတူၺ်းလီလီ၊ လႄႈ လူၺ်ႈလၢႆးထတ်းၸၢမ်း လႄႈ ထတ်းထိၼ်တူၺ်း လွင်ႈတၢင်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ႁႃလၢႆးသပ်းလႅင်းပၼ်ဝႃႈ ၵွပ်ႈသင်လႄႈ လွင်ႈတၢင်းလႆႈပဵၼ်ၸိူင်ႉၼင်ႇ မၼ်းပဵၼ်ဝႆႉမီးဝႆႉ၊ လႄႈ ၶၢတ်ႈလၢမ်းပႃးဝႃႈ တေၵိူတ်ႇပဵၼ်ဢီႈသင်မႃး။


[[Research]] uses the [[scientific method]]. Scientific research uses [[hypotheses]] based on ideas or earlier knowledge, which can be categorized through different topics. Then those hypotheses are tested by [[experiments]]. People who study and research science and try to find out everything about it are called [[scientist]]s. Scientists [[Research|study]] things by [[sight|looking]] at them very carefully, by [[measure|measuring]] them, and by doing [[experiment]]s and [[test]]s. Scientists try to [[wikt:explain|explain]] why things act the way they do, and [[predict]] what will happen.
သၢႆပိုၼ်းလွင်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ ႁိုင်ၼၢၼ်းမႃးလၢႆႁဵင်ပီႊမိူင်းယူႇ။ လွင်ႈတႄႇႁႅၵ်ႈမီးမႃး ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်မႂ်ႇၼႆႉ ၸၢင်ႊၶႆႈၶိုၼ်းၵႂႃႇထိုင် ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်မိူင်းဢီႇၸိပ်ႉမိူဝ်ႈ ၵွၼ်ႇ လႄႈ ပၢၼ်မိူင်းမႅတ်ႇသူဝ်ႇပူဝ်ႇတေးမီးယႂ်း(မွၵ်ႇဢ.ပ.ၶ ၃၀၀၀-၁၂၀၀) ပီႊပူၼ်ႉမႃး။ ၸိူဝ်းၶဝ်ႁုၼ်ႈမုၼ်းမႃး တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်လွင်ႈ ပၢႆးၼပ်ႉ၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးယႃႈယႃ။ တၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉတၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ႁူမ်ႇငမ်းၼိူဝ် ၸၢဝ်းၵရိၵ်ႉမႃး၊ ၸၢဝ်းၵရိၵ်ႉၶဝ်သမ်ႉ ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပိူင်ပဵၼ်ၼႂ်းၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်သေယဝ်ႉ ၶတ်းၸႂ်သပ်းလႅင်းၼေလွင်ႈတၢင်းဢၼ်ၵိူတ်ႇပဵၼ်ၼႂ်းလူၵ်ႈၼႆႉမႃး။ ဝၢႆးလင်ၼၼ်ႉမႃး ၽွင်းၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်သီၶမ်မိူင်းဢိၼ်းတီးယႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ တိူဝ်းမီးလွင်ႈၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈမႃး။ လႆႈမီးမႃးပႃး လွင်ႈၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈ ပၵ်းပိူင်တူဝ်ၼပ်ႉ ႁိၼ်ႇတူႇ-ဢႃႇရပ်ႉပိၵ်ႉၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃး။


The [[history of science]] is thousands of years old. The beginnings of modern science can be found in [[ancient Egypt]] and [[Mesopotamia]] (around 3000–1200 BCE). They developed early ideas in [[Mathematics|math]], [[astronomy]], and [[medicine]]. They influenced the [[Ancient Greece|Greeks]], who tried to explain what happened in our world using natural causes. Later, during [[Golden Age of India|India’s Golden Age]], more progress was made. This included the creation of the Hindu–Arabic number system.<ref>{{Cite book|title=India: a history|url=https://archive.org/details/indiahistory00keay|last=Keay|first=John|date=2000|publisher=Atlantic Monthly Press|isbn=978-0-87113-800-2|edition=1st|location=New York}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=A history of natural philosophy: from the ancient world to the nineteenth century|url=https://archive.org/details/historyofnatural0000gran|last=Grant|first=Edward|date=2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-68957-1|location=Cambridge New York}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=The beginnings of western science: the European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, prehistory to A.D. 1450|url=https://archive.org/details/beginningsofwest0000lind_d9a5|last=Lindberg|first=David C.|date=2007|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-48205-7|edition=2nd|location=Chicago, Ill.}}</ref>
ဝၢႆးသေမိူင်းတုမ်ႊၵႅၼ်ႇရူမ်းမႅၼ်းလူမ်ႉလႅဝ်ၵႂႃႇ ၽွင်းမိူဝ်ႈယၢမ်းၸဝ်ႉၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ၵၢင်(ပ.ၶ ၄၀၀-၁၀၀၀)ၼၼ်ႉ လွင်ႈၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈၾၢႆႇပၢႆးသၢႆႊ တီႈလိုမ်ယူးရူပ်ႉၵေႃႈ လႆႈတႄႇထိူင်းမႃး။ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ လွင်ႈၶိုၼ်ႈယႂ်ႇၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈမၼ်း ၶိုၼ်းတႄႇႁုၼ်ႈမႃးထႅင်ႈၵမ်းၼိူင်ႈ ၼႂ်းၽွင်းၶၢဝ်းသေၵၢပ်ႈသေပၢၼ်ၶိုၼ်း။ တီႈၼႂ်းလူၵ်ႈမိူင်းဢိတ်ႇသၢမ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ ၶူးမေႃၶဝ်တိုၵ်ႉသိုပ်ႇပႂ်ႉပႃးဝႆႉပၢႆးသၢႆႊ၊ သိုပ်ႇလဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ၊​ လႄႈ သိုပ်ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵရိၵ်ႉ တိူဝ်းလီလိူဝ်မႃး ၽွင်းၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်သီၶမ်းဢိတ်ႇသလၢမ်ႇၼၼ်ႉယူႇ။ ဝၢႆးလင်ၼၼ်ႉ မိူင်းတုမ်ႊၵႅၼ်ႇလူင်ပၢႆႇၸႅၼ်ႇထၢႆးၼ်(Byzantine Empire)ၵေႃႈ ဢူၼ်ႈဢွၼ်ႇမႃးသေ ၽူႈႁူႉမေႃမၼ်းၵေႃႈ တေႃႉ ဢဝ်ပပ်ႉၵရိၵ်ႉ ၵႂႃႇၸူးယူးရူပ်ႉပွတ်းတူၵ်း၊ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈတႄႇမီးမႃး ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ယဵၼ်ႇငႄႈမုၼ်းႁိူင်း(Renaissance) ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉမႃး။


After the [[Western Roman Empire]] fell during the [[Early Middle Ages]] (400–1000 CE), scientific progress in [[Europe]] slowed down. But progress started up again during certain periods. In the [[Islamic world]], [[scholars]] kept, studied, and made Greek science better during the [[Islamic Golden Age]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=The beginnings of western science: the European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, prehistory to A.D. 1450|url=https://archive.org/details/beginningsofwest0000lind_d9a5|last=Lindberg|first=David C.|date=2007|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-48205-7|edition=2nd|location=Chicago, Ill.}}</ref> Later, when the [[Byzantine Empire]] got weaker, its scholars took Greek books to Western Europe, helping start the [[Renaissance]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=A history of natural philosophy: from the ancient world to the nineteenth century|url=https://archive.org/details/historyofnatural0000gran|last=Grant|first=Edward|date=2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-68957-1|location=Cambridge New York}}</ref>
တႄႇၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၀ တေႃႇၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၂ ၼၼ်ႉ ယူးရူပ်ႉတႄႇၶိုၼ်းလဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းၶိုၼ်းၵရိၵ်ႉ လႄႈ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းၶိုၼ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢိတ်ႇသလၢမ်ႇမႃး။ ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၵိူတ်ႇပဵၼ်မႃး ၵၢၼ်လုၵ်ႉၽိုၼ်ႉပၢႆးသၢႆႊ မိူဝ်ႈၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၆ ၼၼ်ႉမႃးယူႇယဝ်ႉ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ တႄႇလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃးတင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ။ လွင်ႈႁူပ်ႉႁၼ် ဢၼ်မႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ မႃးလူပ်းပႅတ်ႈတၢင်းယုမ်ႇယမ်ဢၼ်ၵဝ်ႇၵဝ်ႇ။ လွၵ်းလၢႆးပၢႆးသၢႆႊ တႄႇပဵၼ်ဢၼ်လမ်ႇလွင်ႈမႃ။ ထိုင်ၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၉ မႃး ပၢႆးသၢႆႊတႄႇတိူဝ်းပဵၼ် ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊလူမ်ႈ(professional) လႄႈ တိူဝ်းမီးပၵ်းမီးပိူင်မႃး။ တႅၼ်းတီႈႁွင်ႉႁိၵ်ႈဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉၾၢႆႇၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်ၼႆၼၼ်ႉ" တႄႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉမႃးဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇၽိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်” ၼႆမႃးယူႇယဝ်ႉ။


From the 10th to 13th centuries, Europe re-learned Greek and Islamic science.<ref name=":0" /> This helped cause the [[scientific revolution]] in the 16th century. Science began to change a lot. New discoveries removed old ideas.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The beginnings of western science: the European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, prehistory to A.D. 1450|url=https://archive.org/details/beginningsofwest0000lind_d9a5|last=Lindberg|first=David C.|date=2007|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-48205-7|edition=2nd|location=Chicago, Ill.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=The scientific revolution: a very short introduction|url=https://archive.org/details/scientificrevolu0000prin|last=Principe|first=Lawrence|date=2011|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-956741-6|edition=1st|series=Very short introductions|location=Oxford}}</ref> [[The scientific method]] became more important. By the 19th century, science became more professional and organized.<ref>{{Cite book|title=From natural philosophy to the sciences: writing the history of nineteenth-century science|url=https://archive.org/details/fromnaturalphilo0000unse|date=2003|publisher=Univ. of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-08928-7|editor-last=Cahan|editor-first=David|location=Chicago, Ill. London}}</ref> Instead of calling it “natural philosophy”, it was called “natural science”.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The territories of science and religion|last=Harrison|first=Peter|date=2015|publisher=The University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-18451-7|location=Chicago London}}</ref>
== '''ငိူၼ်ငဝ်ႈထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်း လႄႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉ''' ==
သၢႆပိုၼ်းလွင်ႈထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "science"(သၢႆႊ) လႄႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉ ဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ မၼ်းလၢတ်ႈၼႄႁႂ်ႈႁဝ်းႁူႉဝႃႈ ပၢႆးၾၢႆႇဢၼ်ၼႆႉ လႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃးၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်လၢႆလၢႆလႄႈ သမ်ႉမီးတီႈပွင်ႇၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်ၼႂ်းလၢႆးလၢႆၽိင်ႈငႄႈ လႄႈ ၼႂ်းလၢႆလၢႆပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉ ဢၼ်ပႅၵ်ႇပိူင်ႈၵၼ်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉၼႆယူႇ။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်း ဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "science" (သၢႆႊ)ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼႆႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "သၢႆႊယႅၼ်းသျႃႇ(scientia)" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉမႃး၊​ မီးတီႈပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "တၢင်းႁူႉ"။ မၼ်းလုၵ်ႉတီႈၶေႃႈႁိၵ်ႈဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "scire" ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "(တႃႇ)ႁူႉ” ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး။ မိူဝ်ႈၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်မိူင်းရူမ်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇၼၼ်ႉတႄႉၵေႃႈ "သၢႆႊယႅၼ်းသျႃႇ” ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ပွင်ႇဝႃႈပဵၼ်တၢင်းႁူႉမဵဝ်းၼိူင်ႈ ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊႁဵၼ်းႁူႉဢဝ်လႆႈ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊတူဝ်ထူပ်းဢဝ်လႆႈၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ မၼ်း တေပႃး ပၢႆးၾၢႆႇတင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉ၊ ပၢႆးၵၢၼ်လၢၼ်ႈ၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးၼပ်ႉ။ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ မိူဝ်ႈပၢၼ်ၼၼ်ႉ မၼ်းဢမ်ႇပွင်ႇဝႃႈ ဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁူႉၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ။ မိူဝ်ႈပၢၼ်မိူင်းၵရိၵ်ႉမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ၼင်ႇၼၼ် ယၢမ်ႈႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ဢႄးၽိတ်ႉသတိမ်း”(epistēmē)။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ဢရိတ်ႉသထူဝ်းတလ်ႇ လႄႈ ပလေးတူဝ်ႇၶဝ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ ၸႂ်ႉထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႈၼႆႉသေယဝ်ႉ ယိူင်းၸူးထိုင်တၢင်းႁူႉ ဢၼ်ဢဝ်လွင်ႈဢဝ်တၢင်းသေ ၼႄလၵ်းထၢၼ်သၢၵ်ႈသေႇလႆႈ။ ၶဝ်ႁၼ်ဝႃႈ မၼ်းပိူင်ႈၵၼ်တင်း "doxa” ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ တၢင်းႁၼ်ထိုင်၊​ ဢၼ်ပဵၼ်မဵဝ်းဢမ်ႇၸႂ်ႉလွင်ႈမၢၼ်ႈမႅၼ်ႈ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊ။


==Etymology and Terminology==
တီႈပွင်ႇ "သၢႆႊ" တႄႇလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃး ၽွင်းၶၢဝ်းၵၢၼ်လုၵ်ႉၽိုၼ်ႉပၢႆးသၢႆႊ မိူဝ်ႈၸူဝ်ႊသိပ်းပီႊ ၁၅၀၀ လႄႈ ၸူဝ်ႊသိပ်းပီႊ ၁၆၀၀။ မိူဝ်ႈၽွင်းၶၢဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ Galileo Galilei၊ Johannes Kepler၊ Francis Bacon၊ လႄႈ Isaac Newton ၶဝ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ တႄႇၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈမႃးလွၵ်းလၢႆးမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ တႃႇလဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈလုမ်ႈၾႃႉ။ ၶဝ်တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း ၵၢၼ်ၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်းတူၺ်း၊ ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်း၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးၼပ်ႉၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉသေ သွၵ်ႈႁႃၶေႃႈတွပ်ႇ။ လွၵ်းလၢႆးဢၼ်ၼႆႉ ၸွၺ်ႈသၢင်ႈပၼ်မႃး ပိူင်ပိုၼ်ႉထၢၼ်မဵဝ်းၼိူင်ႈ ဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊပၢၼ်မႂ်ႇ"(modern science)ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ မိူဝ်ႈၼၼ်ႉတႄႉၵေႃႈ ဢမ်ႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉ ဝႃႈ "သၢႆႊ" ၼႆၼင်ႇၵဝ်ႇ၊ ၶဝ်ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉၾၢႆႇၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်" ၼႆ၊ ပိူင်လူင်မၼ်း ပဵၼ်မိူဝ်ႈဢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း လူၵ်ႈၶူင်းတူဝ်ႁၢင်ႊ ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ လွင်ႈ တူင်ႉၶၢႆႉ၊ လွင်ႈလူၵ်ႈ၊​ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် လွင်ႈသၢႆလႅင်း။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ/scientist" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ တေႃႇထိုင်ပီႊ ၁၈၃၄ ၸင်ႇၵွၺ်ႈမီးမႃး။ ၵူၼ်းၵေႃႉၸိုဝ်ႈဝႃႈ William Whewell ၼၼ်ႉ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈသၢႆပိုၼ်း လႄႈ ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉလွင်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊသေယဝ်ႉ ၶူင်ႊၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႈၼၼ်ႉဢွၵ်ႇမႃး။
The history of the word “science” and the terms used in science tell us a lot about how the subject has changed over [[time]] and what it means in different [[culture]]s and [[Philosophy|philosophies]]. The word “science” comes from the [[Latin]] word “scientia,” which means “knowledge.” That word came from the verb “scire,” which means “to know.”<ref>{{Cite web|title=Science - Etymology, Origin & Meaning|url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/science|access-date=2025-07-17|website=etymonline|language=en-US}}</ref> In [[ancient Rome]], scientia just meant any kind of [[knowledge]] you could get through [[learning]] or [[experience]]. It included many subjects like [[philosophy]], [[Rhetoric|speaking (rhetoric)]], and [[Mathematics|math]]. But back then, it did not mean what we now think of as science.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Cartwright|first=Mark|date=2016-09-06|title=Roman Science|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Roman_Science/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref> In ancient Greece, a similar idea was called “epistēmē” (ἐπιστήμη). Philosophers like [[Aristotle]] and [[Plato]] used this word to mean knowledge that could be proven through [[reason]]. They saw it as different from “doxa,” which meant [[opinion]], something that might not be true or could change.<ref>{{Citation|last=Parry|first=Richard|title=Episteme and Techne|date=2024|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/episteme-techne/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Winter 2024|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref>


The meaning of “science” started to change during the [[Scientific Revolution]] in the 1500s and 1600s. During this time, famous thinkers like [[Galileo Galilei]], [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Francis Bacon]], and [[Isaac Newton]] began to create a new way of learning about the world. They used [[observation]], [[experiment]]s, and [[Mathematics|math]] to find answers. This method helped form the basis of what we now call modern science.<ref>{{Cite web|title=STEAM News - The Precursor to Modern Science: The Scientific Revolution|url=https://www.steamnews.org/articles/science/the-precursor-to-modern-science-the-scientific-revolution|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.steamnews.org|language=en-US}}</ref> Back then, people did not call it “science”, they called it “natural philosophy”, especially when studying the physical world like [[motion]], [[planet]]s, or [[light]].<ref>{{Citation|last=Blair|first=Ann|title=Natural Philosophy|date=2006|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-science/natural-philosophy/F1FD6F16ACFC81FF69E7B62B013C6FF0|work=The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 3: Early Modern Science|volume=3|pages=363–406|editor-last=Park|editor-first=Katharine|series=The Cambridge History of Science|place=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-57244-6|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Daston|editor2-first=Lorraine}}</ref> The word “scientist” was not even invented until 1834. A man named [[William Whewell]], who studied the [[History of science|history]] and [[philosophy of science]], came up with it. He suggested “scientist” in a book review to describe someone who studies the natural world in a careful, organized way, just like the word “artist” describes someone who creates [[art]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=scientist - Quick search results {{!}} Oxford English Dictionary|url=https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?q=scientist|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.oed.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ross|first=Sydney|date=1962|title=Scientist: The story of a word|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00033796200202722|journal=Annals of Science|language=en|volume=18|issue=2|pages=65–85|doi=10.1080/00033796200202722|issn=0003-3790}}</ref>
ၶေႃႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ(ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ)ၼႆႉ လႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃးၸွမ်းၵၢပ်ႈၸွမ်းပၢၼ် ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊၸွမ်းၵၢပ်ႈၸွမ်းပၢၼ်မႃးယူႇ ၼင်ႇၵဝ်ႇ။ မိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ ၶေႃႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼၼ်ႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉ လႄႈ ၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇမႃး၊ ယွၼ်ႉဝႃႈ ၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉ လႄႈ ၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇ ပဵၼ်ၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်ၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၵူၼ်းႁူႉၵူၼ်းမေႃၶဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပဵၼ်ပိူင်လူင် တီႈယူးရူပ်ႉတႃႇလၢႆလၢႆပၢၵ်ႇပီႊမိူင်းၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၿၢႆႇဢူဝ်ႇလူဝ်ႇၵျီႇ"(biology) ၼႆႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းတီႈၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၿၢႆႊဢူသ်ႉ"(bios) ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "ၸူဝ်ႊပၢၼ်" လႄႈ "လူဝ်းၵူသ်ႉ”(logos) ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း” ၼႆမႃးလႄႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၿၢႆႇဢူဝ်ႇလူဝ်ႇၵျီႇ" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ၸင်ႇမီးတီႈပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "ၵၢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈၸူဝ်ႊပၢၼ်" ၼႆၼၼ်ႉ ယဝ်ႉ။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၾီးသိၵ်ႇ”(physics)သမ်ႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈ ၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "physis"(ၾီးသိသ်ႉ) ဢၼ်မီးတီႈပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "ၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်"(nature) ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး။ ပၢႆးၶႄးမီး(ပိုတ်ႇထၢတ်ႈ) သမ်ႉ လႅပ်ႈလုၵ်ႉမႃးတီႈၵႂၢမ်းဢရပ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "al-kīmiyā" မႃး၊ ငဝ်ႈႁၢၵ်ႈမၼ်းလုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းဢီႇၸိပ်ႉမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇ လႄႈ ၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉသေမႃး၊ ပဵၼ်လွၵ်းလၢႆး ဢၼ်ဢၢၼ်းၶႂ်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊ ၶူဝ်းၶွင် လႄႈ တႃႇႁူႉဝႃႈ ၶိူင်ႈၶူဝ်းတင်းလၢႆ ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။


Science words (or scientific terms) have changed and grown over time, just like science itself. In the past, many science terms came from [[Greek language|Greek]] and [[Latin]], because those were the main [[language]]s used by educated people in [[Europe]] for many centuries.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Latinus Scientificus: The History and Culture of Scientific Latin by Barry Wood|url=https://jbh.journals.villanova.edu/article/download/2403/2325?inline=1|access-date=2025-07-17|website=jbh.journals.villanova.edu}}</ref> For example, the word “biology” comes from the Greek words bios (which means “life”) and logos (which means “study”), so [[biology]] means “the study of life.”<ref>{{Cite web|title=Biology - Etymology, Origin & Meaning|url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/biology|access-date=2025-07-17|website=etymonline|language=en-US}}</ref> The word “physics” comes from the Greek word physis, meaning “nature.”<ref>{{Cite web|title=Physics - Etymology, Origin & Meaning|url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/physics|access-date=2025-07-17|website=etymonline|language=en-US}}</ref> “Chemistry” likely comes from the Arabic word al-kīmiyāʾ, which has roots in ancient Egyptian and Greek (Hellenistic) [[alchemy]], a practice that tried to change substances and discover how materials work.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Chemistry - Etymology, Origin & Meaning|url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/chemistry|access-date=2025-07-17|website=etymonline|language=en-US}}</ref>
ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉလမ်ႇလွင်ႈတေႉတေႉ ယွၼ်ႉဝႃႈ ၶဝ်ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် လၢတ်ႈတီႈပွင်ႇမၼ်းတႅတ်ႈတႅတ်ႈတၢႆႊတၢႆႊ၊ လၢတ်ႈၸႅင်ႈၸႅင်ႈ လႅင်းလႅင်း လႄႈ ၶပ်ႉတၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉလႄႈတင်းၶေႃႈမုၼ်းလႆႈလီလီ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇလႂ်ၼင်ႇၾၢႆႇၼၼ်ႉၼႆႉ မီးထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၶိုၵ်ႉတွၼ်းႁင်းၽႂ်မၼ်း တႃႇသပ်းလႅင်း ၼႄပၼ်လွင်ႈတၢင်းဢၼ်ၶဝ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ႁၢင်ႊၼၼ်ႉ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ “momentum”၊ “entropy”၊ လႄႈ “quantum” ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ တီႈပွင်ႇၶဝ် ပိူင်ႈတင်းၵႂၢမ်းလၢတ်ႈဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၵူႊဝၼ်းဝၼ်းဝႆႉ။ ၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ၸႂ်သမ်ႉ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပၵ်းပိူင်ဢၼ် ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "Linnaean binomial nomenclature” ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉသေ တၢင်ႇၸိုဝ်ႈတူဝ်မီးၸႂ်တင်းလၢႆ။ ပၵ်းပိူင်ဢၼ်ၼႆႉ ပဵၼ်ၵၢၼ်တၢင်ႇၸိုဝ်ႈတူဝ်မီးၸႂ် ၵူႊတူဝ် တင်းၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇသေ မီးၸိုဝ်ႈသွင်တွၼ်ႊ။ သၢႆၸႆႉ(genus) လႄႈ သၢႆၾၼ်း(species)။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း ၵူၼ်းႁဝ်းၼႆႉ ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ႁူဝ်းမူဝ်ႇ သေးပျႅၼ်း”(Homo Sapines)။ လွင်ႈမီးလၵ်းၸဵင်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ လမ်ႇလွင်ႈပုၼ်ႈတႃႇႁႂ်ႈၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းၵူႊၵမ်းၵမ်းၼၼ်ႉ မၢၼ်ႇမႅၼ်ႈ၊ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ၸၢင်ႊထတ်းတူၺ်းၵၢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်းပိူၼ်ႈ၊ လႄႈ သမ်ႉဝႃႈ ၽႃႇသႃႇၵႂၢမ်းလၢတ်ႈၶိူဝ်းၶဝ် ပိူင်ႈၵၼ်သေတႃႉၵေႃႈ ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ်ပတ်းပိုၼ်ႉလူၵ်ႈလူင်ၼႆႉ ႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၸွမ်းၵၼ်လႆႈ။ 


Scientific terms are very important because they help scientists be precise (use exact meanings), communicate clearly, and organize ideas and information. Each area of science has its own set of special words to describe things it studies. For example, in [[physics]], words like “momentum,” “entropy,” and “quantum” have very specific meanings that are different from how they are used in everyday language.<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2023|title=What's in a name?|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-023-02185-2|journal=Nature Physics|language=en|volume=19|issue=8|pages=1065|doi=10.1038/s41567-023-02185-2|bibcode=2023NatPh..19.1065. |issn=1745-2481}}</ref> In [[biology]], scientists name [[living thing]]s using a system called [[Binomial nomenclature|Linnaean binomial nomenclature]]. This system gives each organism a Latin name made of two parts: the [[genus]] and [[species]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-14|title=Carolus Linnaeus - Taxonomy, Binomial Nomenclature, Systematics {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Carolus-Linnaeus/Classification-by-natural-characters|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> For example, [[human]]s are called Homo sapiens.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-16|title=Homo sapiens {{!}} Meaning, Characteristics, & Evolution {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Homo-sapiens|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Having standardized scientific words is important for making sure experiments can be repeated correctly ([[Reproducibility|replicability]]), letting scientists check each other’s work ([[peer review]]), and helping scientists from all over the world work together, even if they speak different languages.<ref>{{Citation|last=Glantz|first=Meyer D.|title=Chapter 2 - The Terminology of Addictive Behavior|date=2013-01-01|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123983367000024|work=Principles of Addiction|pages=13–22|editor-last=Miller|editor-first=Peter M.|place=San Diego|publisher=Academic Press|doi=10.1016/b978-0-12-398336-7.00002-4|isbn=978-0-12-398336-7|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref>
ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်း ဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊတင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ ၼႂ်းဝၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈလဵဝ်ၼႆႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈသၢႆပိုၼ်း လႄႈ ၽိင်ႈၶိူဝ်းၵူၼ်း ဢၼ်တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမႃးဢွၼ်တၢင်းပိူၼ်ႈၼၼ်ႉလွၼ်ႉလွၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊမၢင်ႊၶေႃႈၼႆႉ လၢတ်ႈလဵၼ်ႈလၢတ်ႈလေႃႈ ႁႂ်ႈလီၶႂ်ႈၶူဝ်သေပဵၼ်မႃး၊ မၢင်ႊပွၵ်ႈၶေႃႈ လႆႈၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈတေႉတေႉဝႃႈဝႃႈ၊ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် မၢင်ႊၶေႃႈၵေႃႈ ပဵၼ်ၶေႃႈသပ်းလႅင်းယူဝ်းယူဝ်းဢွၼ်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉလႂ်ယူႇယဝ်ႉ၊ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ သမ်ႉလႆႈပဵၼ်မႃးၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၶဝ်ႈတၢင်းၵၢၼ် ယွၼ်ႉၵွပ်ႈၵူၼ်းတင်းလၢႆ တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမႃးၼမ်ၼမ်ၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ ထွၺ်ႈၸႂ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "Big Bang"(ၾၢႆႇတႆး - တႅၵ်ႇၾူင်ႉလူင်) ၼႆၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ် ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်  Fred Hoyle တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမႃးပွၵ်ႈဢွၼ်တၢင်းသုတ်း မိူဝ်ႈမၼ်းဢွၵ်ႇလၢတ်ႈတီႈၼႂ်းဢွမ်လူမ်း(ရေႇတီႇဢူဝ်ႇ) မိူဝ်ႈပီႊ ၁၉၄၉။ မၼ်းဢမ်ႇယုမ်ႇၾိင်ႈတႅတ်ႈလွင်ႈတႅၵ်ႇၾူင်ႉလူင်လႄႈ ၸင်ႇၸႂ်ႉၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႊၼၼ်ႉသေ လၢတ်ႈၵိူဝ်ႉလဵၼ်ႈ။ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ ပိူၼ်ႈသိုပ်ႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႊၼၼ်ႉသေယဝ်ႉလႄႈ ယၢမ်းလဵဝ် ပဵၼ်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းသပ်းလႅင်းလၢတ်ႈဝႃႈ ၾႃႉမိုၼ်ႇမုင်ႊလူင် ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်တႄႇမီးမႃးၼႆဝႆႉယူႇၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ ထႅင်ႈဢၼ်ၼိူင်ႈတႄႉ ပဵၼ်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "quark" ဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းတႃႇလၢတ်ႈလွင်ႈ ၽွင်မုၼ်ႈလဵၵ်ႉလဵၵ်ႉဢွၼ်ႇ ဢၼ်ၽွတ်ႇပဵၼ် ပရူဝ်ႇတွၼ်ႇ လႄႈ ၼိဝ်ႇထရွၼ်ႇ။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးလႅင်ႊႁၢင်ႊတူဝ် Murray Gell-Mann လိူၵ်ႈဢဝ်ထွၺ်ႈၼႆႉမႃးတီႈၼႂ်းပပ်ႉလိၵ်ႈ Finnegans Wake ဢၼ်ၽူႈတႅမ်ႈမၼ်းပဵၼ် James Joyce။ လွင်ႈၼႆႉ မၼ်းၼႄပၼ်ဝႃႈ လွင်ႈတၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈ လႄႈ လွင်ႈၽႃႇသႃႇၼႆႉ လမ်ႇလွင်ႈတီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ 


Many words used in science today come from the history and culture of the time when they were first used. Some scientific terms actually started out as jokes, creative ideas, or simple descriptions, but they became official because people started using them so much. For example, the term “[[Big Bang]]” was first used by astronomer [[Fred Hoyle]] in a radio broadcast in 1949. He did not believe in the Big Bang theory and actually used the name to make fun of it. But, the name caught on and is now the main word we use for how the [[universe]] began.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kragh|first=Helge|date=2024-03-25|title=How did the Big Bang get its name? Here's the real story|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00894-z|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=627|issue=8005|pages=726–728|doi=10.1038/d41586-024-00894-z |pmid=38528166 |bibcode=2024Natur.627..726K }}</ref> Another example is the word “[[quark]],” which is used for tiny particles that make up [[proton]]s and [[neutron]]s. Physicist [[Murray Gell-Mann]] chose this word from a line in a book called Finnegans Wake by James Joyce. This shows how [[creativity]] and [[language]] play a role in science.<ref>{{Cite web|title=What Does 'Quark' Have to Do with Finnegans Wake?|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/quark|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.merriam-webster.com|language=en}}</ref>
ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ ၵႆႉလုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းၽိင်ႈတႅၵ်ႈ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ၵႂၢမ်းၼိူင်းသေယဝ်ႉ ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၵူၼ်းႁဝ်း ပွင်ႇၸႂ်တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်/တၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉ ဢၼ်သပ်းသွၼ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ - ၶေႃႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "သႅလ်း”(cell) တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ၸႂ်ၼၼ်ႉ ၽူႈတႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမၼ်း ပဵၼ် Robert Hooke မိူဝ်ႈပီႊ ၁၆၆၅။ မိူဝ်ႈမၼ်းဢဝ်သႅင်ၶႂၢၵ်ႈသေ တူၺ်းပိူၵ်ႇမႆႉၼၼ်ႉ မၼ်းႁၼ်မီးႁူးပဝ်ႇပဵၼ်လွၵ်းလဵၵ်ႉလဵၵ်ႉဢွၼ်သေ မိူၼ်ၼင်ႇႁွင်ႈလဵၵ်ႉလဵၵ်ႉ တီႈဢၼ်မုၼ်ၸဝ်ႈၼွၼ်းဝႆႉ။ ၵွပ်ႈၼႆလႄႈ ၸင်ႇမီးထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "သႅလ်း” ၼႆပေႃႇမႃးၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးၶွမ်းသမ်ႉ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ဝၢႆးရသ်ႉ” သမ်ႉ တႄႇဢဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း သပ်းလႅင်းလၢတ်ႈလွင်ႈ ပရူဝ်ႇၵရမ်ႇဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊထုတ်ႇမိူၼ်(ၵွပ်ႇပီႇ)ၶိုၼ်းတူဝ်ၵဝ်ႇသေယဝ်ႉ ၵႂႃႇၸပ်းတင်းတၢင်ႇပရူဝ်ႇၵရမ်ႇ၊ မိူၼ်ၼင်ႇမႅင်းဝၢႆးရသ်ႉတေႉတေႉ ႁဵတ်းလႆႈတီႈၼႂ်းတူဝ်ၵူၼ်းႁဝ်း။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၸိုဝ်ႈဢၼ်ၼႆႉ ယွၼ်ႉပိူဝ်ႈမၼ်းၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၵူၼ်းႁဝ်းပွင်ႇၸႂ်ဝႃႈ ပရူဝ်ႇၵရမ်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ မၼ်းမီးၽေးၸိူင်ႉႁိုင်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ ၼႄပၼ်ဝႃႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ပေႃႇမီးမႃး၊​ လႄႈ သမ်ႉၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈႁဝ်းပွင်ႇၸႂ် တၢင်းႁပ်ႉႁၼ်မႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ ဢမ်ႇ ၼၼ်တၢင်းႁပ်ႉႁၼ်ဢၼ်ယၢပ်ႇယၢပ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ လူၺ်ႈၼွင်ႇဢဝ်လွင်ႈတၢင်းမဵဝ်းဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁူႉၸၵ်းဝႆႉၼၼ်ႉၼႆယဝ်ႉ။


Scientific words often come from metaphors or comparisons to help people understand complex ideas. For example, the word “[[cell]]” in [[biology]] was first used by [[Robert Hooke]] in 1665. When he looked at [[Cork (material)|cork]] under a [[microscope]], he saw tiny box-like spaces that reminded him of the small rooms (cells) where monks lived. That is how the name “cell” was born.<ref>{{Cite web|title=What is a cell? {{!}} British Society for Cell Biology|url=https://bscb.org/learning-resources/softcell-e-learning/what-is-a-cell/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> In computer science, the word “[[Computer virus|virus]]” is used to describe a program that can copy itself and infect other programs, just like real [[virus]]es do in the [[human body]]. Scientists used this name because it helped people understand how these harmful programs behave. These examples show that scientific words often come from real-world ideas, and they help us understand new or difficult concepts by connecting them to things we already know.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Fred Cohen & Associates|url=http://all.net/books/virus/index.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=all.net}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Professor Len Adleman explains how he coined the term "computer virus"|url=https://www.welivesecurity.com/2017/11/01/professor-len-adleman-explains-computer-virus-term/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.welivesecurity.com|language=en}}</ref>
ၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ လႆႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃး တႃႇတိူဝ်းမီးလွင်ႈၽဵင်ႇပဵင်း၊ မီးလွင်ႈၸႅင်ႈလႅင်း လႄႈ မီးလွင်ႈပႃးလူမ်ႈ။ မိူဝ်ႈပူၼ်ႉမႃး ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵမ်ႈၼမ်ၼမ် လႆႈဢိင်ၼိူဝ်တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ် ဢၼ်ပၵ်းၸႂ်ၼိူဝ်လွင်ႈၵူၼ်း၊ လွင်ႈယူးရူပ်ႉ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် လွင်ႈၸၢဝ်းငႅင်ႊဢၼ်လဵဝ်ႁႅင်း။ ထိုင်ၶၢဝ်းယၢမ်းႁိုင်မႃး ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ်တႄႇဢဝ်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်တိူဝ်းပဵၼ်ၵၢင်ႊ လႄႈ ဢၼ်တိူဝ်းယမ်ၼၼ်ႉ မႃးပုတ်ႈတႅၼ်းတၢင်။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်ၼႆႉ ယူႇတီႈၸုမ်းၽွမ်ႉႁူမ်ႈၾၢႆႇလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်ၵူႊမိူင်းမိူင်း(the International Astronomical Union)ၶဝ် ၶိုၼ်းမႄးၽုၺ်ႇတီႈပွင်ႇထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "planet" (လူၵ်ႈ)ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး ႁႂ်ႈၶဝ်ႈပိူင်တၢင်းၵၢၼ် မိူဝ်ႈပီႊ ၂၀၀၆။ ၵွပ်ႈလွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊၼႆႉသေယဝ်ႉ ပလူးတူဝ်းၵေႃႈ ဢမ်ႇလႆႈသိုပ်ႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉပဵၼ်လူၵ်ႈတဵမ်တူဝ်၊ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ ပဵၼ်လူၵ်ႈဢွၼ်ႇၼႆလႄႈ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈပဵၼ်မႃး လွင်ႈဢၼ်လႆႈထဵင်ၵၼ်တေႉတေႉဝႃႈဝႃႈမႃးယူႇ။ ၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵူႊဝၼ်းဝၼ်းၵေႃႈ တႄႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "human" တႅၼ်းတၢင် "man” ၊ လႄႈ တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း "humankind" တႅၼ်းတီႈ "mankind" ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး။ လွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊၸိူဝ်းၼႆ့ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊပဵၼ် ပၢႆးဢၼ်တိူဝ်းႁပ်ႉတွၼ်ႈတေႃႇၵူၼ်းၵူႊသႅၼ်းမႃး။ 


The language used in science is always changing to become more fair, clear, and inclusive. In the past, many scientific terms were based on ideas that focused too much on [[human]]s, [[Europe]], or one [[gender]]. Over time, scientists have worked to replace these words with ones that are more neutral and accurate. For example, in [[astronomy]], the word “[[planet]]” was officially redefined in 2006 by the [[International Astronomical Union|International Astronomical Union (IAU)]]. Because of this change, [[Pluto]] was no longer called a full planet, but instead a [[dwarf planet]], which caused a lot of debate.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2023-07-22|title=What is a Planet?|url=https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/what-is-a-planet/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> In everyday science language, people now often say “human” instead of “man”, and “humankind” instead of “mankind”. These changes help make science feel more welcoming to everyone, no matter their background or identity.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Man, mankind or people ?|language=en|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/man-mankind-or-people|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref>
ၸွမ်းၼင်ႇပၢႆးသၢႆႊ သိုပ်ႇသေၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈမႃးတိၵ်းတိၵ်းၼၼ်ႉသေ ၵၢၼ်ၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်ႁူပ်ႉႁၼ်မႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇၵေႃႈ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈမီးထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇမႃး။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ်ႁူပ်ႉႁၼ် CRISPR ဢၼ်ပဵၼ်ၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်း တႃႇမႄးၸႆႉၸိူဝ်ႉ(genes)။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်တူဝ်ယေႃႈ ၶေႃႊဢၼ်ဝႃႈ Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats ။ မၼ်းၼႄဝႃႈ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ၸႂ်ႉထွၺ်ႈပွတ်းပွတ်းသေယဝ်ႉ သပ်းလႅင်း တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ဢၼ်ယႂ်ႇလူင် လႄႈ ဢၼ်သပ်းသွၼ်ႉၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ ၾၢႆႇမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ လွင်ႈၸၢၵ်ႈႁဵၼ်းႁူႉ(machine learning)၊ လွင်ႈၺၢၼ်ႇလႅၵ်း(ဢေႇဢၢႆႇ) လႄႈ လွင်ႈၵၢၼ်ၼပ်းၶႂၢၼ်ႇတမ်ႇ(quantum computing) ၶဝ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉၼၼ်ႉၵေႃႈ ၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈမႃး ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇဝႆႉယူႇ။ လူဝ်ႇလႆႈမီး လွင်ႈမႄးၽုၺ်ႇတီႈပွင်ႇၶိုၼ်း ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ႁႂ်ႈၸႅင်ႈၸႅင်ႈလႅင်းလႅင်း ၼင်ႇႁိုဝ်ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လၢႆလၢႆၾၢႆႇလၢႆလၢႆလႅၼ်ႊၵေႃႈ တေပွင်ႇၸႂ်ၵၼ် လႄႈ တေဢမ်ႇမီးတၢင်းၵႂင်သင်သေ ႁူမ်ႈႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၸွမ်းၵၼ်လႆႈ။


As science keeps moving forward, new inventions and discoveries also bring new words. For example, scientists discovered [[CRISPR]], a tool that can edit [[gene]]s. The word CRISPR is an acronym (a short word made from initials) for “Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats.” It shows how scientists create short terms to explain big, complex ideas.<ref>{{Cite web|title=CRISPR|url=https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/CRISPR|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.genome.gov|language=en}}</ref> New fields like [[machine learning]], [[Artificial intelligence|artificial intelligence (AI)]], and [[quantum computing]] are also creating new words. These words need to be defined very clearly, so scientists from different areas can understand each other and work together without confusion.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Top scientific discoveries and breakthroughs for 2025|url=https://www.cas.org/resources/cas-insights/scientific-breakthroughs-2025-emerging-trends-watch|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.cas.org|language=en}}</ref>
== '''သၢႆပိုၼ်း''' ==


==History==
=== '''ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်း(ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ပိုၼ်းၵၢတ်ႇဢွၼ်ႇ)''' ===
===Prehistoric science===
သတူၼ်းႁဵၼ်းၶျ်ႉ(Stonehenge) ပဵၼ်ႁိၼ်ယႂ်ႇလူင် ဢၼ်ၵူၼ်းၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်းၶဝ် ၵေႃႇသၢင်ႇမႃး။
[[File:Stonehenge2007 07 30.jpg|thumb|[[Stonehenge]] was a [[megalith]] built by prehistoric humans]]
The period of prehistoric science includes the [[Palaeolithic]], [[Mesolithic]], and [[Neolithic|Neolithic age]]s, which lasted from about 2.5 million years ago to around 3000 BCE. Even though these early efforts were not "science" the way we know it today, they showed careful observation, experiments, and the start of organized thinking. One of the first and most important forms of early science was making [[stone tool]]s. It started with a human ancestor called [[Homo habilis]] and continued through different prehistoric cultures like the [[Acheulean]], [[Mousterian]], and [[Upper Paleolithic]]. People made tools like [[hand axe]]s, [[Scraper (archeology)|scraper]]s, [[Bone tool|awl]]s (used for poking holes), and [[Clacton Spear|spear tip]]s. To do this, they had to understand how [[stone]]s break, what kinds of [[rock]]s work best, and how to hit them with the right amount of [[force]]. [[Archeology|Archaeologists]] (scientists who study ancient human history) have found evidence that these early humans learned by [[trial and error]], and they shared their knowledge with others. Over time, they improved their tools to make them stronger and more useful. This kind of hands-on learning and passing down of skills is one of the earliest examples of using science to solve problems, especially in understanding materials and how to use them, what we now call [[materials science]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tine|first=Shalon van|date=2017|title=Prehistory|url=https://press.rebus.community/historyoftech/front-matter/prehistory/|journal=Rebus|language=en}}</ref>


Early humans also showed basic knowledge of [[astronomy]], the study of the [[sky]]. This can be seen in archaeological discoveries like the [[Blanchard bone]] (around 30,000 BCE) and the [[Lascaux|Lascaux Cave paintings]] (around 17,000 BCE). These objects and drawings may show that early people were watching the Moon’s phases or recognizing star groups like the [[Pleiades|Pleiades constellation]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Ishango and Blanchard Bones - PlanetQuest|url=https://www.planetquest.org/learn/ishango.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.planetquest.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Cottier|first=Cody|date=2023-01-17|title=Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe|url=https://www.astronomy.com/science/ancient-humans-and-their-early-depictions-of-the-universe/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Astronomy Magazine|language=en-US}}</ref> One of the earliest sky-watching structures is the [[Nabta Playa]] stone circle in [[Egypt|southern Egypt]], built around 6000 BCE. It is one of the oldest known examples of people using [[megalith]]s (large stones) to line up with the [[Summer solstice|summer solstice sunrise]], the longest day of the year. It may also have helped track seasonal rains, which were very important for survival in that dry area.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Handbook of archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy|date=2014|publisher=Springer Reference|isbn=978-1-4614-6140-1|editor-last=Ruggles|editor-first=C. L. N.|location=New York}}</ref> These structures show that early people spent years carefully watching the sky, noticing patterns, and trying to predict natural cycles, like when [[rain]] or [[season]]s would come. This was an early step toward the science of astronomy.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Astronomy Lecture Notes - Early History|url=http://www.phy.olemiss.edu/~luca/astr/Topics-Introduction/Ancient-N.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.phy.olemiss.edu}}</ref>
ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်းၼၼ်ႉ ပႃးဝႆႉ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်ၵဝ်ႇ(Palaeolithic)၊ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်(Mesolithic)၊ လႄႈ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်မႂ်ႇ(Neolithic) ၼႆသေ ႁိုင်ၼၢၼ်းတႄႇဢဝ်မွၵ်ႈ ၂.၅ လၢၼ်ႉပီႊတေႃႇထိုင်မွၵ်ႈ ဢ.ပ.ၶ ၃၀၀၀ ၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ သမ်ႉဝႃႈ လွင်ႈတၢင်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ဢမ်ႇၸႂ်ႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ" ၼင်ႇႁဝ်းႁူႉဝၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈလဵဝ်သေတႃႉၵေႃႈ မၼ်းၼႄပၼ်လွင်ႈ ၵၢၼ်ၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်းတူၺ်းလီလီ၊ ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းတူၺ်း၊ လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်တႄႇဝူၼ်ႉပဵၼ်ပၵ်းပဵၼ်ပိူင် ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃးယူႇ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢၼ်ၸဝ်ႉသုတ်းပိူၼ်ႈ လႄႈ ဢၼ်လမ်ႇလွင်ႈသုတ်းပိူၼ်ႈ လႄႈ ဢၼ်ႁႅၵ်ႈသုတ်းပိူၼ်ႈဢၼ်ၼိူင်ႈတႄႉၵေႃႈ ပဵၼ်ၵၢၼ်ႁဵတ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်းႁိၼ်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ တႄႇမႃးတီႈပူႇမွၼ်ႇၼၢႆးယႃႊၸၢဝ်းၵူၼ်း ဢၼ်ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ ႁူဝ်းမူဝ်ႇ ႁႃႇၿီးလိသ်ႉ(Homo habilis) ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉသေ သိုပ်ႇမႃးထိုင် ၽိင်ႈၶိူဝ်းၵူၼ်းၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်း ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ၽိင်ႈၶိူဝ်း Acheulean, Mousterian လႄႈ  ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်ၵဝ်ႇပွတ်းၼိူဝ်(Upper Paleolithic) ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃး။ ၵူၼ်းႁဝ်း ႁဵတ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်း ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ၶႂၢၼ်(တႃႇမႅတ်း)၊ ၶိူင်ႈၶုတ်း၊ ၸေႃး၊ လႄႈ လႅမ်ပၢႆႁွၵ်ႇ ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃး။ တႃႇတေႁဵတ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ၶဝ်လႆႈႁူႉဝႃႈ မၢၵ်ႇႁိၼ်ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်တႅၵ်ႇလႆႈ၊ မၢၵ်ႇႁိၼ်မဵဝ်းလႂ်ၶႅမ်ႉသုတ်း၊ လႄႈ တေလႆႈသႂ်ႇႁႅင်းတၢၼ်ႇလႂ်သေထုပ်ႉတွၺ်ႇ ၸဵမ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉယူႇ။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးလမ်းတိုၼ်းၶူဝ်းၵွၼ်ႇ (ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၸိူဝ်းဢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈပိုၼ်းၸၢဝ်းၵူၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇ)ၶဝ် လႆႈႁူပ်ႉႁၼ်လၵ်းထၢၼ်ဝႃႈ ၵူၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇႁူဝ်တီးၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ တင်းႁဵတ်းၽိတ်းႁဵတ်းထုၵ်ႇသေ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းမႃး၊​ ယဝ်ႉၵေႃႈ ၸိူဝ်းၶဝ်သိုပ်ႇပိုၼ်ႊၽေတၢင်းႁူႉပၼ်ပိူၼ်ႈမႃး။ ၶၢဝ်းႁိုင်မႃးသေယဝ်ႉ ၶဝ်ၵေႃႈ တိူဝ်းႁုၼ်ႈမုၼ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်းၶဝ် ႁႂ်ႈတိူဝ်းၵႅၼ်ႇၶႅင် လႄႈ ႁႂ်ႈတိူဝ်းၶဝ်ႈတၢင်းတိုဝ်းမႃး။ ၵၢၼ်ႁဵၼ်းႁူႉၸွမ်းတူဝ်ထူပ်းတေႉတေႉ လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်သိုပ်ႇယိုၼ်ႈမႅင်ႇ ၼမ်ႉၵတ်ႉၸိူဝ်းၼႇႉၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇဢၼ်ၸဝ်ႉသုတ်း လွင်ႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊသေ ၵေႈလွင်ႈၶွင်ႈၶမ်ယူႇ၊ ပိူင်လူင်မၼ်း တီႈလွင်ႈမေႃပွင်ႇၸႂ်ၶူဝ်းၶွင် လႄႈ လွင်ႈႁူႉဝႃႈ တေႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၶူဝ်း ၶွင်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ၊ လွင်ႈၼႆႉ ႁဝ်းႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇၶူဝ်းၶွင်(materials science)။


Another major scientific step happened during the [[Neolithic Revolution]], around 10,000 BCE, when humans started [[farming]]. This time period was extremely important because people learned to grow [[plant]]s and raise [[animal]]s. They had to understand [[soil]], [[water]], and [[Weather|weather pattern]]s to grow [[food]] successfully. Early farmers in places like the [[Fertile Crescent]] (in the [[Middle East]]), [[Yellow River civilization|China’s Yellow River valley]], and [[Mesoamerica]] ([[Central America]]) grew [[crop]]s like [[wheat]], [[barley]], [[millet]], [[rice]], and [[Maize|maize (corn)]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Early Agricultural Communities|url=https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/early-agricultural-communities|access-date=2025-07-17|website=education.nationalgeographic.org|language=en}}</ref> They watched how these plants grew over many generations and chose the ones with the best traits, like more food, better taste, or the ability to survive without much water. This careful choosing is the beginning of [[genetics]] (even though they did not know that word), and their work helped people settle down, build villages, and eventually start [[civilization]]s. These farming skills are the beginning of what we now call [[agricultural science]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Neolithic Revolution|url=https://www2.nau.edu/~gaud/bio301/content/neolth.htm|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www2.nau.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-17|title=What was the Neolithic Revolution?|url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/neolithic-agricultural-revolution|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Culture|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bowles|first1=Samuel|last2=Choi|first2=Jung-Kyoo|date=2019|title=The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution and the Origins of Private Property|url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/701789|journal=Journal of Political Economy|volume=127|issue=5|pages=2186–2228|doi=10.1086/701789|issn=0022-3808}}</ref>
Early humans also showed basic knowledge of astronomy, the study of the sky. This can be seen in archaeological discoveries like the Blanchard bone (around 30,000 BCE) and the Lascaux Cave paintings (around 17,000 BCE). These objects and drawings may show that early people were watching the Moon’s phases or recognizing star groups like the Pleiades constellation.<sup>[40][41]</sup> One of the earliest sky-watching structures is the Nabta Playa stone circle in southern Egypt, built around 6000 BCE. It is one of the oldest known examples of people using megaliths (large stones) to line up with the summer solstice sunrise, the longest day of the year. It may also have helped track seasonal rains, which were very important for survival in that dry area.<sup>[42]</sup> These structures show that early people spent years carefully watching the sky, noticing patterns, and trying to predict natural cycles, like when rain or seasons would come. This was an early step toward the science of astronomy.<sup>[43]</sup>


Even though prehistoric people did not write things down, they still had surprisingly advanced [[Medicine|medical knowledge]]. One of the most amazing examples is [[Trepanning|trepanation]], a kind of [[surgery]] where people removed parts of the [[skull]]. Scientists have found skulls from as far back as 7000 BCE in [[Europe]], [[Africa]], and [[South America]] that show signs of this surgery, and some of the skulls even show [[healing]], which means people survived the operation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Alt|first1=Kurt W.|last2=Jeunesse|first2=Christian|last3=Buitrago-Téllez|first3=Carlos H.|last4=Wächter|first4=Rüdiger|last5=Boës|first5=Eric|last6=Pichler|first6=Sandra L.|date=1997|title=Evidence for stone age cranial surgery|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/387360a0|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=387|issue=6631|pages=360|doi=10.1038/387360a0|pmid=9163419 |bibcode=1997Natur.387..360A |issn=1476-4687}}</ref> This suggests that early humans had basic knowledge of the body, special tools, and may have used natural medicines, like [[herb]]s, to reduce [[pain]] or stop [[infection]]. Another example is [[Ötzi the Iceman]], a frozen body found in the [[Alps]] from around 3300 BCE. His body had [[tattoo]]s that lined up with places used in [[acupuncture]], a method of healing still used today. He was also carrying a medicinal fungus called [[Fomitopsis betulina]], which may have been used to fight infection.<ref>{{Cite web|title=5000-year-old 'Iceman' may have benefited from a sophisticated health care system|url=https://www.science.org/content/article/5000-year-old-iceman-may-have-benefited-sophisticated-health-care-system|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.science.org|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Pleszczyńska|first1=Małgorzata|last2=Lemieszek|first2=Marta K.|last3=Siwulski|first3=Marek|last4=Wiater|first4=Adrian|last5=Rzeski|first5=Wojciech|last6=Szczodrak|first6=Janusz|date=2017|title=Fomitopsis betulina (formerly Piptoporus betulinus): the Iceman's polypore fungus with modern biotechnological potential|journal=World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology|volume=33|issue=5|pages=83|doi=10.1007/s11274-017-2247-0|issn=1573-0972|pmc=5380686|pmid=28378220}}</ref>
Another major scientific step happened during the Neolithic Revolution, around 10,000 BCE, when humans started farming. This time period was extremely important because people learned to grow plants and raise animals. They had to understand soil, water, and weather patterns to grow food successfully. Early farmers in places like the Fertile Crescent (in the Middle East), China’s Yellow River valley, and Mesoamerica (Central America) grew crops like wheat, barley, millet, rice, and maize (corn).<sup>[44]</sup> They watched how these plants grew over many generations and chose the ones with the best traits, like more food, better taste, or the ability to survive without much water. This careful choosing is the beginning of genetics (even though they did not know that word), and their work helped people settle down, build villages, and eventually start civilizations. These farming skills are the beginning of what we now call agricultural science.<sup>[45][46][47]</sup>


People in prehistoric times also began using [[Mathematics|math]] and [[measurement]]. They made tools like tally sticks to help them count. One of the oldest is the [[Lebombo bone]] from about 35,000 BCE, and another is the [[Ishango bone]] from around 20,000 BCE. These bones have carved marks that might show number patterns, multiples, or even prime numbers. Some scientists think they may also have tracked lunar cycles (the [[Phases of the Moon|phases of the moon]]).<ref>{{Cite book|title=Numbers and the making of us: counting and the course of human cultures|url=https://archive.org/details/numbersmakingofu0000ever|last=Everett|first=Caleb|date=2017|publisher=Harvard University press|isbn=978-0-674-50443-1|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=d'Errico|first1=Francesco|last2=Doyon|first2=Luc|last3=Colagé|first3=Ivan|last4=Queffelec|first4=Alain|last5=Le Vraux|first5=Emma|last6=Giacobini|first6=Giacomo|last7=Vandermeersch|first7=Bernard|last8=Maureille|first8=Bruno|date=2018-02-19|title=From number sense to number symbols. An archaeological perspective|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|language=en|volume=373|issue=1740|article-number=20160518|doi=10.1098/rstb.2016.0518|pmid=29292345 |issn=0962-8436|pmc=5784044}}</ref> Later, in places like [[Mesopotamia]] and the [[Indus Valley civilization|Indus Valley]], early people started using standard measurements. They needed these for storing [[grain]], trading goods, and building things. They created systems to measure [[volume]] and [[weight]], which helped them with [[farming]], [[business]], and early forms of [[engineering]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Old Babylonian metrology|url=https://myslu.stlawu.edu/~dmel/mesomath/obmetrology.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=myslu.stlawu.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Iwata|first=Shigeo|title=Weights and Measures in the Indus Valley|date=2016|url=https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-94-007-7747-7_8938|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures|pages=4473–4474|publisher=Springer, Dordrecht|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-94-007-7747-7_8938|isbn=978-94-007-7747-7|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref>
Even though prehistoric people did not write things down, they still had surprisingly advanced medical knowledge. One of the most amazing examples is trepanation, a kind of surgery where people removed parts of the skull. Scientists have found skulls from as far back as 7000 BCE in Europe, Africa, and South America that show signs of this surgery, and some of the skulls even show healing, which means people survived the operation.<sup>[48]</sup> This suggests that early humans had basic knowledge of the body, special tools, and may have used natural medicines, like herbs, to reduce pain or stop infection. Another example is Ötzi the Iceman, a frozen body found in the Alps from around 3300 BCE. His body had tattoos that lined up with places used in acupuncture, a method of healing still used today. He was also carrying a medicinal fungus called Fomitopsis betulina, which may have been used to fight infection.<sup>[49][50]</sup>


In prehistoric times, early people showed amazing skills in building large stone structures, which we now call megalithic architecture. One of the oldest examples is [[Göbekli Tepe]], built around 9600 BCE in what is now [[Turkey]]. It has huge stone pillars carved with [[animal]]s, arranged in circles. These stones are very heavy, and moving and placing them would have taken many people working together, using simple tools and their understanding of leverage (how to move heavy things using [[force]] and [[angle]]s). They probably also used basic measuring tools to plan where to put the stones.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Centre|first=UNESCO World Heritage|title=G&ouml;bekli Tepe|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en}}</ref> Other examples, like [[Stonehenge]] in [[England]] (about 3000 BCE) and the stone lines at [[Carnac]] in [[France]], show that people in different places had similar building knowledge. These projects needed not just strength, but also careful planning, measuring, and even watching the sky to line up stones with seasons or sunrise points. This shows early knowledge of [[engineering]] and [[astronomy]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Building Stonehenge|url=https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stonehenge/history-and-stories/building-stonehenge/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=English Heritage}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Megaliths of Carnac: Introduction|url=https://menhirs.tripod.com/intro.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=menhirs.tripod.com}}{{Dead link|date=May 2026 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Carnac Stones - Carnac, France|url=http://www.sacred-destinations.com/france/carnac-stones|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.sacred-destinations.com}}</ref>
People in prehistoric times also began using math and measurement. They made tools like tally sticks to help them count. One of the oldest is the Lebombo bone from about 35,000 BCE, and another is the Ishango bone from around 20,000 BCE. These bones have carved marks that might show number patterns, multiples, or even prime numbers. Some scientists think they may also have tracked lunar cycles (the phases of the moon).<sup>[51][52]</sup> Later, in places like Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley, early people started using standard measurements. They needed these for storing grain, trading goods, and building things. They created systems to measure volume and weight, which helped them with farming, business, and early forms of engineering.<sup>[53][54]</sup>


Early humans were also smart about taking care of the [[environment]]. They used [[fire]] in helpful ways. For example, [[Australian Aboriginals]] practiced something called [[fire-stick farming]]. They burned certain areas on purpose to help new plants grow, bring animals to the area, and make the land easier to manage.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bliege Bird|first1=R.|last2=Bird|first2=D. W.|last3=Codding|first3=B. F.|last4=Parker|first4=C. H.|last5=Jones|first5=J. H.|date=2008-09-30|title=The "fire stick farming" hypothesis: Australian Aboriginal foraging strategies, biodiversity, and anthropogenic fire mosaics|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=105|issue=39|pages=14796–14801|doi=10.1073/pnas.0804757105|pmid=18809925 |doi-access=free |pmc=2567447 |bibcode=2008PNAS..10514796B }}</ref> In the [[Andes Mountains]] (in [[South America]]), ancient farming communities built [[Terrace farming|terrace]]s (step-like farms on hills) and [[Irrigation|irrigation system]]s to control [[water]]. This helped them farm on steep land and stop [[soil]] from washing away. These people understood how to manage [[natural resources]], like water and soil, in ways that are similar to today’s ideas of [[sustainability]] (protecting the environment while meeting human needs).<ref>{{Cite web|title=Laraos Terraces|url=https://www.wmf.org/projects/laraos-terraces|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Laraos Terraces|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=How did the Inka control erosion and grow crops in the steep Andes terrain? {{!}} Engineering the Inka Empire|url=https://americanindian.si.edu/inkaroad/engineering/question/how-did-inka-control-erosion-and-grow-crops-steep-andes-terrain.html#:~:text=steep%20Andes%20terrain?-,How%20did%20the%20Inka%20control%20erosion%20and%20grow%20crops%20in,the%20force%20of%20the%20current.&text=The%20Inka%20avoided%20erosion%20by%20controlling%20the%20destructive%20force%20of%20water.&text=Place%20materials%20in%20the%20correct%20order%20to%20create%20a%20stable%20terrace.|access-date=2025-07-17|website=americanindian.si.edu}}</ref>
In prehistoric times, early people showed amazing skills in building large stone structures, which we now call megalithic architecture. One of the oldest examples is Göbekli Tepe, built around 9600 BCE in what is now Turkey. It has huge stone pillars carved with animals, arranged in circles. These stones are very heavy, and moving and placing them would have taken many people working together, using simple tools and their understanding of leverage (how to move heavy things using force and angles). They probably also used basic measuring tools to plan where to put the stones.<sup>[55]</sup> Other examples, like Stonehenge in England (about 3000 BCE) and the stone lines at Carnac in France, show that people in different places had similar building knowledge. These projects needed not just strength, but also careful planning, measuring, and even watching the sky to line up stones with seasons or sunrise points. This shows early knowledge of engineering and astronomy.<sup>[56][57][58]</sup>


People also started to create ways to record and share information. Early forms of writing included [[cave art]], [[petroglyph]]s (pictures carved in rock), and [[Prehistoric token|token]]s (small clay objects used for counting). In [[Mesopotamia]], around 8000 BCE, people used clay tokens to keep track of food and goods. Over time, this system turned into writing, known as [[cuneiform]]. Writing allowed people to store [[knowledge]], like farm records and star charts, and pass it on to future generations. This step, moving from oral traditions (speaking stories and knowledge) to writing things down, helped humans build on knowledge over time. It was the beginning of being able to record science and discoveries so they would not be forgotten.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Evolution of Writing {{!}} Denise Schmandt-Besserat|url=https://sites.utexas.edu/dsb/tokens/the-evolution-of-writing/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref>
Early humans were also smart about taking care of the environment. They used fire in helpful ways. For example, Australian Aboriginals practiced something called fire-stick farming. They burned certain areas on purpose to help new plants grow, bring animals to the area, and make the land easier to manage.<sup>[59]</sup> In the Andes Mountains (in South America), ancient farming communities built terraces (step-like farms on hills) and irrigation systems to control water. This helped them farm on steep land and stop soil from washing away. These people understood how to manage natural resources, like water and soil, in ways that are similar to today’s ideas of sustainability (protecting the environment while meeting human needs).<sup>[60][61]</sup>


===Ancient science===
People also started to create ways to record and share information. Early forms of writing included cave art, petroglyphs (pictures carved in rock), and tokens (small clay objects used for counting). In Mesopotamia, around 8000 BCE, people used clay tokens to keep track of food and goods. Over time, this system turned into writing, known as cuneiform. Writing allowed people to store knowledge, like farm records and star charts, and pass it on to future generations. This step, moving from oral traditions (speaking stories and knowledge) to writing things down, helped humans build on knowledge over time. It was the beginning of being able to record science and discoveries so they would not be forgotten.<sup>[62]</sup>
[[File:Plimpton_322.jpg|thumb|The [[Plimpton 322|Plimpton 322 tablet]] by the [[Babylonia]]ns records [[Pythagorean triple]]s, written {{circa|1800&nbsp;BCE}}|alt=Clay tablet with markings, three columns for numbers and one for ordinals]]
Ancient science was the early scientific knowledge and inventions created by some of the first civilizations in places like [[Mesopotamia]], [[Egypt]], [[Indus Valley civilization|the Indus Valley]], [[ancient China]], and [[Mesoamerica|Mesoamerica (Central America)]]. This period lasted from around 3000 BCE to 600 BCE.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Near East: archaeology in the "Cradle of Civilization"|last=Maisels|first=Charles Keith|date=1993|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-04742-5|series=The Experience of archaeology|location=London ; New York}}</ref> In [[Mesopotamia]], one of the first places where civilization began, science was used in areas like [[farming]], [[government]], and [[astronomy]]. The [[Sumerians]] and [[Babylonian]]s created number systems, including one based on [[Sexagesimal|60 (sexagesimal)]]. This is why we still use 60 minutes in an [[hour]] and 360 degrees in a [[circle]] today.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Friberg|first=Jöran|date=2019-03-01|title=Three thousand years of sexagesimal numbers in Mesopotamian mathematical texts|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-019-00221-3|journal=Archive for History of Exact Sciences|language=en|volume=73|issue=2|pages=183–216|doi=10.1007/s00407-019-00221-3|issn=1432-0657}}</ref> They were also great at studying the sky. On clay tablets written in cuneiform writing, they recorded things like [[star chart]]s, [[calendar]]s, and math problems. Babylonian astronomers carefully watched the [[Moon]] and [[planet]]s, and used math to predict [[eclipse]]s (when the [[Moon]] or [[Sun]] is covered) and planet alignments.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hays|first=Jeffrey|title=Ancient Babylonian and Mesopotamian Astronomy {{!}} Middle East And North Africa — Facts and Details|url=https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-1027.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=africame.factsanddetails.com|language=en}}</ref> One of their most important discoveries was the [[Metonic cycle]], which is a 19-year cycle where the Moon’s phases happen on the same days of the calendar again.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Babylonian Calendar|url=https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~gent0113/babylon/babycal.htm|access-date=2025-07-17|website=webspace.science.uu.nl}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Steele|first=John M.|title=Mesopotamian Calendars|date=2015|url=https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_189|work=Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy|pages=1841–1845|publisher=Springer, New York, NY|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_189|bibcode=2015hae..book.1841S |isbn=978-1-4614-6141-8|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref>


[[History of science|Ancient Egyptian science]] was closely tied to [[farming]], [[timekeeping]], and building large [[monument]]s. The Egyptians created a 365-day calendar by watching the star Sirius (which they called Sopdet). Every year, [[Sirius]] rose in the sky just before the Nile River flooded. This was a very important event that made the [[soil]] good for growing [[crop]]s. To prepare for this, the Egyptians had to be good at measuring the sky and water levels.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Sirius|url=https://www.gautschy.ch/~rita/archast/sirius/siriuseng.htm|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.gautschy.ch}}{{Dead link|date=July 2026 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> They also used science to build huge structures like the [[pyramid]]s. These amazing buildings needed careful [[planning]], [[geometry]] (math involving shapes), and knowledge of [[material]]s and [[surveying]] (measuring land). Egyptian engineers were skilled at all of these things.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-11-09|title=11.2: The pyramids of Egypt|url=https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Engineering/EGR_1010%3A_Introduction_to_Engineering_for_Engineers_and_Scientists/11%3A_Historical_case_studies_in_Engineering/11.02%3A_The_pyramids_of_Egypt|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Engineering LibreTexts|language=en}}</ref> A famous document called the [[Rhind Mathematical Papyrus]], written around 1650 BCE, shows that Egyptian students learned math such as [[fraction]]s, [[area]]s, [[volume]]s, and [[ratio]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Rhind papyrus {{!}} math, hieroglyphics, scribes {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Rhind-papyrus|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Rhind Mathematical Papyrus|url=https://sites.math.washington.edu//~greenber/Rhind.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=sites.math.washington.edu}}</ref>
=== '''Ancient science''' ===
The Plimpton 322 tablet by the Babylonians records Pythagorean triples, written c. 1800 BCE


The [[Indus Valley civilization|Indus Valley Civilization]] (around 2600 to 1900 BCE) also had amazing science and technology, even though we still do not fully understand it because their writing system has not been decoded yet.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Robinson|first=Andrew|date=2015-10-22|title=Ancient civilization: Cracking the Indus script|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/526499a|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=526|issue=7574|pages=499–501|doi=10.1038/526499a|pmid=26490603 |bibcode=2015Natur.526..499R |issn=0028-0836}}</ref> Cities like [[Mohenjo-Daro]] and [[Harappa]] were built in neat grid patterns, had advanced [[Drainage|drainage system]]s, and used standard sizes for things like [[Weight (object)|weight]]s and [[brick]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Indus River Valley civilization|url=https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/world-history/world-history-beginnings/ancient-india/a/the-indus-river-valley-civilizations|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.khanacademy.org|language=en}}</ref> At a site called [[Lothal]], scientists found a [[Shipyard|dockyard]], which shows that people there understood how tides worked and how to build for the [[sea]]. The use of uniform bricks and measuring tools also shows they had organized production and possibly government systems to manage it. All of this points to high-level technical knowledge and careful planning.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Centre|first=UNESCO World Heritage|title=Archaeological remains of a Harappa Port-Town, Lothal|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5918/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=World's First Port Discovered in Red Sea|url=https://hic-mena.org/activitydetails.php?id=pWtpag|access-date=2025-07-17|website=hic-mena.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Leshnik|first1=Lawrence S.|last2=Junghans|first2=K. H.|date=1968|title=The Harappan "Port" at Lothal: Another View 1|url=https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1968.70.5.02a00070|journal=American Anthropologist|language=en|volume=70|issue=5|pages=911–922|doi=10.1525/aa.1968.70.5.02a00070|issn=0002-7294}}</ref>
Ancient science was the early scientific knowledge and inventions created by some of the first civilizations in places like Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley, ancient China, and Mesoamerica (Central America). This period lasted from around 3000 BCE to 600 BCE.<sup>[63]</sup> In Mesopotamia, one of the first places where civilization began, science was used in areas like farming, government, and astronomy. The Sumerians and Babylonians created number systems, including one based on 60 (sexagesimal). This is why we still use 60 minutes in an hour and 360 degrees in a circle today.<sup>[64]</sup> They were also great at studying the sky. On clay tablets written in cuneiform writing, they recorded things like star charts, calendars, and math problems. Babylonian astronomers carefully watched the Moon and planets, and used math to predict eclipses (when the Moon or Sun is covered) and planet alignments.<sup>[65]</sup> One of their most important discoveries was the Metonic cycle, which is a 19-year cycle where the Moon’s phases happen on the same days of the calendar again.<sup>[66][67]</sup>


In [[ancient China]], science grew together with [[philosophy]] and [[government]]. People studied nature because they wanted to understand it better and use that knowledge to rule wisely. One early book called the [[I Ching]] (also called the Book of Changes) was written by at least the late 2nd millennium BCE. It used patterns and binary logic (ideas based on two choices, like yes/no or dark/light) to explain natural cycles and how the [[universe]] worked.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Cambridge history of Chinese literature edited by Kang-i Sun Chang and Stephen Owen|last1=Sun|first1=Kangyi|last2=Owen|first2=Stephen|date=2010|publisher=Cambridge university press|isbn=978-0-521-11677-0|location=Cambridge}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Ancient and early medieval Chinese literature: a reference guide|last1=Knechtges|first1=David Richard|last2=Chang|first2=Tai ping|date=2010|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-18016-1|series=Handbook of oriental studies|location=Leiden}}</ref> By the time of the [[Zhou Dynasty]] (around 1046–256 BCE), Chinese scientists had invented many useful tools and ideas. They created early earthquake detectors (called [[Seismometer|seismographs]]),<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-10-27|title=What was the first instrument that actually recorded an earthquake? {{!}} U.S. Geological Survey|url=https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-was-first-instrument-actually-recorded-earthquake|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.usgs.gov|language=en}}</ref> studied the [[star]]s ([[astronomy]]),<ref>{{Cite web|last=Devonshire|first=John|date=2025-01-19|title=Ancient Astronomy: The Remarkable Contributions of China|url=https://www.hamiltonrasc.ca/ancient-astronomy-china/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=RASC Hamilton|language=en}}</ref> used [[plant]]s as [[Drug|medicine]] ([[herbal medicine]]),<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gaur|first=Rishabh|date=2024-03-01|title=A brief history: Traditional Chinese medicinal system|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667142524000320|journal=Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine|volume=10|article-number=100387|doi=10.1016/j.prmcm.2024.100387|issn=2667-1425}}</ref> and learned how to work with [[metal]]s and [[chemical]]s ([[metallurgy]]). They also made a complex calendar based on both the Moon’s phases and solar seasons. This calendar used a 60-part cycle (called the [[sexagenary cycle]]) and showed that they had a very advanced way of measuring time using math.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Smith|first=Adam Daniel|date=2010|title=The Chinese Sexagenary Cycle and the Ritual Origins of the Calendar|url=https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8891CDX|journal=Oxford|doi=10.7916/D8891CDX}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/the-triennial-huong-exam-deducing-laureates-birth-years-2024.05.12|title=The Triennial Hương Exam Deducing Laureates' Birth Years|last=Loc Vu-Quoc|first=Hung Vu|date=2024-07-21}}</ref> The Chinese were also experts in bronze casting, making tools and objects out of melted [[metal]]. They made [[alloy]]s (mixtures of metals) that had the same recipe every time, using careful control of [[heat]] and basic understanding of [[chemistry]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Bronze Age Casting|url=https://asia-archive.si.edu/learn/ancient-chinese-bronzes/bronze-age-casting/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art|language=en-US}}</ref>
Ancient Egyptian science was closely tied to farming, timekeeping, and building large monuments. The Egyptians created a 365-day calendar by watching the star Sirius (which they called Sopdet). Every year, Sirius rose in the sky just before the Nile River flooded. This was a very important event that made the soil good for growing crops. To prepare for this, the Egyptians had to be good at measuring the sky and water levels.<sup>[68]</sup> They also used science to build huge structures like the pyramids. These amazing buildings needed careful planning, geometry (math involving shapes), and knowledge of materials and surveying (measuring land). Egyptian engineers were skilled at all of these things.<sup>[69]</sup> A famous document called the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, written around 1650 BCE, shows that Egyptian students learned math such as fractions, areas, volumes, and ratios.<sup>[70][71]</sup>


In [[Mesoamerica]], the [[Olmec]] (around 1500–400 BCE) and later the [[Maya]] made amazing discoveries in astronomy, math, and building. The Maya used a base-20 number system (instead of base-10 like we use).<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Batz|first=J. Mucía|date=2021-01-25|title="Nik" — The Zero in Vigesimal Maya Mathematics|url=https://baas.aas.org/pub/2021n1i336p03/release/2|journal=Bulletin of the AAS|language=en|volume=53|issue=1}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Maya Numerals|url=http://www.saxakali.com/historymam2.htm|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.saxakali.com|archive-date=2006-07-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060714025120/http://www.saxakali.com/historymam2.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> They invented long count [[calendar]]s that could track time for thousands of years.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-05|title=Maya calendar {{!}} System, Mesoamerica, & Astronomy {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Maya-calendar|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> They watched the sky carefully and recorded things like the movements of [[Venus]], [[eclipse]]s, [[solstice]]s, and planet alignments. Some of this information was written in books called [[Codex|codices]], like the [[Dresden Codex]]. The Maya used these observations to plan religious festivals, decide when to plant crops, and even schedule political events. They built [[pyramid]]s and [[temple]]s that lined up perfectly with events in the sky. They were constantly watching the sky and collecting data, just like modern scientists.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Aldana|first=Gerardo|date=2022-02-11|title=Maya Calendar and Mesoamerican Astronomy|url=http://ethos.lps.library.cmu.edu/article/id/520/|journal=Encyclopedia of the History of Science|volume=4|issue=1|doi=10.34758/qyyd-vx23}}</ref>
The Indus Valley Civilization (around 2600 to 1900 BCE) also had amazing science and technology, even though we still do not fully understand it because their writing system has not been decoded yet.<sup>[72]</sup> Cities like Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa were built in neat grid patterns, had advanced drainage systems, and used standard sizes for things like weights and bricks.<sup>[73]</sup> At a site called Lothal, scientists found a dockyard, which shows that people there understood how tides worked and how to build for the sea. The use of uniform bricks and measuring tools also shows they had organized production and possibly government systems to manage it. All of this points to high-level technical knowledge and careful planning.<sup>[74][75][76]</sup>


In all of these ancient civilizations, [[medicine]] was based on practical [[experience]] and [[observation]], even though it was often connected to [[religion]] or spiritual beliefs. In [[Ancient Egypt]], a medical text called the [[Edwin Smith Papyrus]] (written around 1600 BCE) showed that Egyptian doctors had a logical and scientific approach to treating injuries. It includes detailed instructions for doing [[surgery]] and describes how to treat injuries to the [[head]], [[spine]], and [[arm]]s or [[leg]]s. It even gave predictions (called [[prognosis]]) about how serious the injuries were and what might happen to the patient, depending on where the injury was.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Edwin Smith papyrus {{!}} Ancient Egyptian, Medical Texts, Surgery {{!}} Britannica|language=en|work=Encyclopedia Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Edwin-Smith-papyrus|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref> In [[Mesopotamia]], doctors used a book called the Diagnostic Handbook by a man named [[Esagil-kin-apli]] (around 1069 BCE). This book helped doctors figure out what was wrong with a [[patient]] by looking at their [[symptom]]s, then choosing [[treatment]]s. These treatments might include [[herbal medicine]], [[chant]]s or [[prayer]]s, and physical treatments like [[bandage]]s or surgeries.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Knowledge and rhetoric in medical commentary: ancient Mesopotamian commentaries on a handbook of medical diagnosis (Sa-gig)|last=Wee|first=John Z.|date=2020|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-41756-4|series=Cuneiform monographs|location=Leiden Boston}}</ref> In [[Ancient China]], a book called the [[Shennong Bencaojing]] (written in the first millennium BCE) listed hundreds of medicinal herbs and their effects on the body. This book became the base of Traditional Chinese Medicine. It showed how Chinese doctors tested herbs, classified their properties, and wrote down their results, which helped build knowledge over many generations.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Medicine in China: a history of pharmaceutics|url=https://archive.org/details/medicineinchinah0000unsc_h6r2|last=Unschuld|first=Paul U.|date=1986|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-05025-9|series=Comparative studies of health systems and medical care|location=Berkeley}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Herbal medicine: Biomolecular and clinical aspects|date=2011|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-4398-0713-2|editor-last=Benzie|editor-first=Iris F. F.|edition=2nd|series=Oxidative stress and disease|location=Boca Raton|editor-last2=Wachtel-Galor|editor-first2=Sissi}}</ref>
In ancient China, science grew together with philosophy and government. People studied nature because they wanted to understand it better and use that knowledge to rule wisely. One early book called the I Ching (also called the Book of Changes) was written by at least the late 2nd millennium BCE. It used patterns and binary logic (ideas based on two choices, like yes/no or dark/light) to explain natural cycles and how the universe worked.<sup>[77][78]</sup> By the time of the Zhou Dynasty (around 1046–256 BCE), Chinese scientists had invented many useful tools and ideas. They created early earthquake detectors (called seismographs),<sup>[79]</sup> studied the stars (astronomy),<sup>[80]</sup> used plants as medicine (herbal medicine),<sup>[81]</sup> and learned how to work with metals and chemicals (metallurgy). They also made a complex calendar based on both the Moon’s phases and solar seasons. This calendar used a 60-part cycle (called the sexagenary cycle) and showed that they had a very advanced way of measuring time using math.<sup>[82][83]</sup> The Chinese were also experts in bronze casting, making tools and objects out of melted metal. They made alloys (mixtures of metals) that had the same recipe every time, using careful control of heat and basic understanding of chemistry.<sup>[84]</sup>


These early sciences also depended on good recordkeeping, which allowed people to share and pass on knowledge over time. Each civilization created its own writing system, including [[cuneiform]] in Mesopotamia, [[hieroglyph]]s in Egypt, [[oracle bone script]] in China, and [[Maya script]] in Mesoamerica. These writing systems helped people write down important information, like [[star chart]]s and [[astronomy]], [[Mathematical table|math table]]s, medical recipes, and instructions for building things Because this knowledge was written down, it could be passed from one generation to the next, even if science back then was usually done by priests, scribes, or royal advisors, not scientists like we think of today.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Early writing systems {{!}} EBSCO Research Starters|url=https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/early-writing-systems|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.ebsco.com|language=en}}</ref>
In Mesoamerica, the Olmec (around 1500–400 BCE) and later the Maya made amazing discoveries in astronomy, math, and building. The Maya used a base-20 number system (instead of base-10 like we use).<sup>[85][86]</sup> They invented long count calendars that could track time for thousands of years.<sup>[87]</sup> They watched the sky carefully and recorded things like the movements of Venus, eclipses, solstices, and planet alignments. Some of this information was written in books called codices, like the Dresden Codex. The Maya used these observations to plan religious festivals, decide when to plant crops, and even schedule political events. They built pyramids and temples that lined up perfectly with events in the sky. They were constantly watching the sky and collecting data, just like modern scientists.<sup>[88]</sup>


===Classical antiquity===
In all of these ancient civilizations, medicine was based on practical experience and observation, even though it was often connected to religion or spiritual beliefs. In Ancient Egypt, a medical text called the Edwin Smith Papyrus (written around 1600 BCE) showed that Egyptian doctors had a logical and scientific approach to treating injuries. It includes detailed instructions for doing surgery and describes how to treat injuries to the head, spine, and arms or legs. It even gave predictions (called prognosis) about how serious the injuries were and what might happen to the patient, depending on where the injury was.<sup>[89]</sup> In Mesopotamia, doctors used a book called the Diagnostic Handbook by a man named Esagil-kin-apli (around 1069 BCE). This book helped doctors figure out what was wrong with a patient by looking at their symptoms, then choosing treatments. These treatments might include herbal medicine, chants or prayers, and physical treatments like bandages or surgeries.<sup>[90]</sup> In Ancient China, a book called the Shennong Bencaojing (written in the first millennium BCE) listed hundreds of medicinal herbs and their effects on the body. This book became the base of Traditional Chinese Medicine. It showed how Chinese doctors tested herbs, classified their properties, and wrote down their results, which helped build knowledge over many generations.<sup>[91][92]</sup>
[[File:MANNapoli 124545 plato's academy mosaic.jpg|left|thumb|[[Plato's Academy mosaic]], made between 100&nbsp;BCE and 79&nbsp;CE, shows many Greek philosophers and scholars|alt=Framed mosaic of philosophers gathering around and conversing]]
Classical science started in [[ancient Greece]], especially in a city called [[Miletus]]. There, early thinkers like [[Thales]] (around 624–546 BCE) tried to explain how the world works without using stories about [[gods]] or [[magic]]. Thales believed that [[water]] was the basic substance that everything came from. This idea started a new way of thinking called [[natural philosophy]], which focused on finding natural causes for things we observe in the world.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Thales of Miletus {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=https://iep.utm.edu/thales/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> After Thales, other thinkers from Miletus also had big ideas. [[Anaximander]] said everything came from something called the apeiron (which means “the boundless” or unlimited). Anaximenes thought [[air]] was the most important element.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Anaximander {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=https://iep.utm.edu/anaximander/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref>


Another important thinker was [[Pythagoras]] (around 570–495 BCE). He believed that [[number]]s and [[Mathematics|math]] were the true key to understanding the [[universe]]. His school studied [[geometry]], [[music]], and [[number]]s. They discovered that when strings of certain lengths were plucked, they made sounds that matched simple number [[ratio]]s. This showed a connection between music and math, and supported the idea that the whole universe had a kind of mathematical harmony, a concept called the “music of the spheres.”<ref>{{Citation|last=Huffman|first=Carl|title=Pythagoras|date=2024|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/pythagoras/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Spring 2024|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> In [[medicine]], a famous Greek named [[Hippocrates]] (around 460–370 BCE) made big changes. He said that [[illness]] was not caused by angry gods or magic, but by natural causes like [[diet]], [[environment]], and the balance of fluids in the body. He taught doctors to carefully observe patients, keep records, and study the effects of things like [[climate]] and [[food]] on [[health]]. Hippocrates also created the [[Humorism|four-humor theory]], which said the body had four fluids: [[blood]], phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile. People believed for many centuries that staying healthy meant keeping these in balance. He also introduced ethical rules for doctors, such as those in the [[Hippocratic Oath]], which is still remembered today. Because of Hippocrates, medicine became more scientific and professional.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Hippocrates {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=https://iep.utm.edu/hippocra/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref>
These early sciences also depended on good recordkeeping, which allowed people to share and pass on knowledge over time. Each civilization created its own writing system, including cuneiform in Mesopotamia, hieroglyphs in Egypt, oracle bone script in China, and Maya script in Mesoamerica. These writing systems helped people write down important information, like star charts and astronomy, math tables, medical recipes, and instructions for building things Because this knowledge was written down, it could be passed from one generation to the next, even if science back then was usually done by priests, scribes, or royal advisors, not scientists like we think of today.<sup>[93]</sup>


[[Aristotle]] (384–322 BCE) was one of the most important thinkers in ancient science. He was a student of Plato and later became the teacher of [[Alexander the Great]]. Aristotle wrote about many subjects, including [[biology]], [[physics]], [[astronomy]], [[psychology]], and [[logic]]. In biology, [[Aristotle]] studied sea animals and did some of the first [[dissection]]s (cutting open bodies to learn how they work). He grouped [[animal]]s by their physical traits, which helped create early classification systems. In physics and astronomy, he believed the [[Earth]] was at the center of the [[universe]] ([[geocentric model]]), and that everything in the sky moved in perfect circles made of a special substance called [[aether]]. He thought the heavens were unchanging, unlike Earth, which was made of [[Soil|earth]], [[water]], [[air]], and [[fire]], things that could decay and change. Aristotle also created a famous way of thinking about why things happen, called the four causes. The material cause was what something is made of, the formal cause was the shape or structure of the thing, the efficient cause was what caused it to happen, and the final cause was its purpose or goal.<ref>{{Citation|last=Shields|first=Christopher|title=Aristotle|date=2023|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/aristotle/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Winter 2023|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref>
'''Classical antiquity'''


One of Aristotle’s students, [[Theophrastus]] (around 371–287 BCE), took these ideas further, especially in [[Botany|plant science]]. He wrote books like Enquiry into Plants and On the Causes of Plants, where he tried to classify and describe [[plant]]s in a clear and organized way. He noticed details like where plants grow, how they reproduce, and how people use them. He divided plants into groups like [[tree]]s, [[shrub]]s, and [[herb]]s, and because of his work, he is known as the “father of botany”. His ideas about plants were so good that scientists still read them over a thousand years later.<ref>{{Citation|last=Ierodiakonou|first=Katerina|title=Theophrastus|date=2020|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entriesheophrastus/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Winter 2020|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17}}{{Dead link|date=July 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> After Alexander the Great died, Greek science continued to grow during the [[Hellenistic period]] (323–31 BCE). One of the most famous centers of learning was [[Alexandria]], in [[Egypt]]. It had a huge [[library]], scholars from many cultures, and support from powerful leaders. One of the most important scientists there was [[Euclid]] (around 300 BCE). He wrote a book called The Elements, which organized everything known about [[geometry]] into 13 books. He proved shapes and math rules using logic and step-by-step thinking. This method, called the [[Axiomatic system|axiomatic method]], became the model for how scientists and mathematicians would work for thousands of years.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-10|title=Euclid - Geometry, Elements, Mathematics {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Euclid-Greek-mathematician/Renditions-of-the-Elements|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
Plato's Academy mosaic, made between 100 BCE and 79 CE, shows many Greek philosophers and scholars


[[Archimedes of Syracuse]] (about 287–212 BCE) was a brilliant ancient scientist and inventor. He made important discoveries in [[physics]], [[engineering]], and [[Mathematics|math]]. One of his most famous ideas is called [[Archimedes' principle]]. It says that when you put something in [[water]] (or another [[liquid]]), the liquid pushes up on it with a [[force]] equal to the [[weight]] of the liquid the object pushes out of the way. This explains why some things float and others sink. Archimedes also studied [[lever]]s, [[pulley]]s, and other [[machine]]s, helping to create the basic rules of [[mechanical engineering]]. He figured out how to calculate the [[area]] and [[volume]] of different shapes and came up with a very good estimate for the number [[Pi|pi (π)]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-21|title=Archimedes {{!}} Facts & Biography {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Archimedes|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
Classical science started in ancient Greece, especially in a city called Miletus. There, early thinkers like Thales (around 624–546 BCE) tried to explain how the world works without using stories about gods or magic. Thales believed that water was the basic substance that everything came from. This idea started a new way of thinking called natural philosophy, which focused on finding natural causes for things we observe in the world.<sup>[94]</sup> After Thales, other thinkers from Miletus also had big ideas. Anaximander said everything came from something called the apeiron (which means “the boundless” or unlimited). Anaximenes thought air was the most important element.<sup>[95]</sup>


[[Eratosthenes]] (about 276–194 BCE) was the head librarian at the [[Library of Alexandria]], one of the greatest learning centers of the ancient world. He was good at math, astronomy, and geography, and used these skills to measure the size of the [[Earth]] very accurately. He did this by comparing shadows in two cities at the same time during the [[summer solstice]] (the longest day of the year). He also invented a system of [[latitude]] and [[longitude]] to map [[location]]s, just like the grid system used in maps today. Eratosthenes tried to create a [[map]] of the entire known world.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mark|first=Joshua J.|date=2022-03-03|title=Eratosthenes|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Eratosthenes/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref> [[Aristarchus of Samos]] (about 310–230 BCE) was an early astronomer who had a bold idea: the [[Sun]] is at the center of the [[solar system]], not the Earth. This idea is called the [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric model]]. At the time, most people believed the Earth was at the center, so his theory was not accepted, partly because they did not have strong [[telescope]]s or enough evidence. Even though his idea was ignored back then, his work later inspired scientists like [[Copernicus]], who helped start the modern understanding of the solar system.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mark|first=Joshua J.|date=2022-02-16|title=Aristarchus of Samos|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Aristarchus_of_Samos/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref>
Another important thinker was Pythagoras (around 570–495 BCE). He believed that numbers and math were the true key to understanding the universe. His school studied geometry, music, and numbers. They discovered that when strings of certain lengths were plucked, they made sounds that matched simple number ratios. This showed a connection between music and math, and supported the idea that the whole universe had a kind of mathematical harmony, a concept called the “music of the spheres.”<sup>[96]</sup> In medicine, a famous Greek named Hippocrates (around 460–370 BCE) made big changes. He said that illness was not caused by angry gods or magic, but by natural causes like diet, environment, and the balance of fluids in the body. He taught doctors to carefully observe patients, keep records, and study the effects of things like climate and food on health. Hippocrates also created the four-humor theory, which said the body had four fluids: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile. People believed for many centuries that staying healthy meant keeping these in balance. He also introduced ethical rules for doctors, such as those in the Hippocratic Oath, which is still remembered today. Because of Hippocrates, medicine became more scientific and professional.<sup>[97]</sup>


[[Claudius Ptolemy]] (about 100–170 CE) lived in Roman Egypt and was a famous ancient astronomer and scientist. He believed that the [[Earth]] was at the center of the [[universe]], and he wrote a big book called the [[Almagest]], where he explained this idea using a model called the [[geocentric model]]. To explain how the Sun, Moon, and planets move in the sky, he used epicycles, deferents, and equants, complicated ways of showing [[orbit]]s that looked like circles within circles. Even though this model was wrong (we now know the Sun is at the center), Ptolemy’s system worked well for making predictions and was used for over 1,400 years. Ptolemy did not just study [[Outer space|space]], he also worked on [[optics]] (how [[light]] and [[Sight|vision]] work), [[map]]s, and [[music]]. He even wrote about [[astrology]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Cartwright|first=Mark|date=2023-09-07|title=Claudius Ptolemy|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Claudius_Ptolemy/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref>
Aristotle (384–322 BCE) was one of the most important thinkers in ancient science. He was a student of Plato and later became the teacher of Alexander the Great. Aristotle wrote about many subjects, including biology, physics, astronomy, psychology, and logic. In biology, Aristotle studied sea animals and did some of the first dissections (cutting open bodies to learn how they work). He grouped animals by their physical traits, which helped create early classification systems. In physics and astronomy, he believed the Earth was at the center of the universe (geocentric model), and that everything in the sky moved in perfect circles made of a special substance called aether. He thought the heavens were unchanging, unlike Earth, which was made of earth, water, air, and fire, things that could decay and change. Aristotle also created a famous way of thinking about why things happen, called the four causes. The material cause was what something is made of, the formal cause was the shape or structure of the thing, the efficient cause was what caused it to happen, and the final cause was its purpose or goal.<sup>[98]</sup>


The Romans were more focused on practical science than on theories. They were great engineers and used science to build things like [[aqueduct]]s (which carried [[water]]), [[road]]s, [[bridge]]s, and [[Building|concrete building]]s. They understood how water flows, how to balance weight, and how to use strong building materials.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Cartwright|first=Mark|date=2016-09-06|title=Roman Science|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Roman_Science/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref> A Roman engineer named [[Vitruvius]] wrote a book called De Architectura in the 1st century BCE, where he talked about [[architecture]], [[Body proportion|human body proportion]]s, and [[machine]]s. He combined art and science to show how buildings should look beautiful but also work well.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Babbs|first=Sean|title=Research Guides: HIST 1061, The Rise and Fall of Ancient Rome (Jobin) - Rare Books Collection: Vitruvius' de Architectura: the Roman World in Renaissance Architecture|url=https://libguides.colorado.edu/c.php?g=1084056&p=7902486|access-date=2025-07-17|website=libguides.colorado.edu|language=en}}</ref> In medicine, a Roman doctor named [[Galen]] (around 129–200 CE) became very important. He studied how the body works by examining [[animal]]s, learning about [[organ]]s, [[bone]]s, and how [[disease]]s spread. He believed in the four humors (like Hippocrates) and thought that keeping these in balance kept people healthy. Galen’s medical ideas were used in Europe and the Islamic world for many hundreds of years.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-03|title=Galen {{!}} Biography, Achievements, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Galen|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
One of Aristotle’s students, Theophrastus (around 371–287 BCE), took these ideas further, especially in plant science. He wrote books like Enquiry into Plants and On the Causes of Plants, where he tried to classify and describe plants in a clear and organized way. He noticed details like where plants grow, how they reproduce, and how people use them. He divided plants into groups like trees, shrubs, and herbs, and because of his work, he is known as the “father of botany”. His ideas about plants were so good that scientists still read them over a thousand years later.<sup>[99]</sup> After Alexander the Great died, Greek science continued to grow during the Hellenistic period (323–31 BCE). One of the most famous centers of learning was Alexandria, in Egypt. It had a huge library, scholars from many cultures, and support from powerful leaders. One of the most important scientists there was Euclid (around 300 BCE). He wrote a book called The Elements, which organized everything known about geometry into 13 books. He proved shapes and math rules using logic and step-by-step thinking. This method, called the axiomatic method, became the model for how scientists and mathematicians would work for thousands of years.<sup>[100]</sup>


===Islamic Golden Age===
Archimedes of Syracuse (about 287–212 BCE) was a brilliant ancient scientist and inventor. He made important discoveries in physics, engineering, and math. One of his most famous ideas is called Archimedes' principle. It says that when you put something in water (or another liquid), the liquid pushes up on it with a force equal to the weight of the liquid the object pushes out of the way. This explains why some things float and others sink. Archimedes also studied levers, pulleys, and other machines, helping to create the basic rules of mechanical engineering. He figured out how to calculate the area and volume of different shapes and came up with a very good estimate for the number pi (π).<sup>[101]</sup>
[[File:Hunayn ibn-Ishaq al-'Ibadi Isagoge.jpg|thumb|upright|The Christian physician [[Hunayn ibn Ishaq]] led the translation of works.]]
[[File:Astrolabe planisférique closeup800x600x300.jpg|thumb|215px|Improvements to the [[astrolabe]] were one of the achievements of this era]]
Science during the [[Islamic Golden Age]] (from about the 8th to the 14th century CE) was one of the most creative and important times in history. During this period, Muslim scholars made huge advances in [[astronomy]], [[Mathematics|math]], [[medicine]], [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[geography]], and [[engineering]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=David A.|date=1983|title=The Astronomy of the Mamluks|url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/353360|journal=Isis|language=en|volume=74|issue=4|pages=531–555|doi=10.1086/353360|issn=0021-1753}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=History Of Science And Technology In Islam|url=http://www.history-science-technology.com/Articles/articles%208.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.history-science-technology.com|language=en}}</ref> This progress happened because of several things which included leaders supported science, especially the [[Abbasid Caliphate|Abbasid caliph]]s who helped fund [[research]] and [[learning]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=BBC Radio 4 - In Our Time, Al-Kindi|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01k2bv8|access-date=2025-07-17|website=BBC|language=en-GB}}</ref> Books from [[Greece]], [[India]], [[Persia]], and [[China]] were translated into Arabic, allowing people to learn from many different cultures,<ref>{{Cite book|title=Greek thought, Arabic culture: the Graeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early ʻAbbāsid society (2nd-4th/8th-10th centuries)|url=https://archive.org/details/greekthoughtarab0000guta|last=Gutas|first=Dimitri|date=1998|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-06132-2|location=London ; New York}}</ref> and Islamic culture encouraged learning (called ‘ilm in Arabic) and logical thinking.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Renaissance of sciences in Islamic countries|last1=Salam|first1=Abdus|last2=Dalafi|first2=H. R.|last3=Hassan|first3=Mohamed|date=1994|publisher=World Scientific|isbn=978-9971-5-0946-0|location=Singapore ; River Edge, NJ}}</ref> One of the most important places during this time was the [[House of Wisdom]] (Bayt al-Hikma) in [[Baghdad]], created by Caliph [[Harun al-Rashid]] and expanded by his son [[Al-Ma'mun]]. It was a major center where scholars gathered to translate, study, and improve scientific knowledge. They translated famous works from Greek, Persian, and Indian scientists, like [[Aristotle]], [[Galen]], [[Euclid]], and [[Ptolemy]], into Arabic.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Medieval Islamic civilization: an encyclopedia|date=2006|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-96691-7|editor-last=Meri|editor-first=Josef W.|series=Routledge encyclopedias of the Middle Ages|location=New York|editor-last2=Bacharach|editor-first2=Jere L.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Bayt al-Hikmah {{!}} House of Wisdom, Islam, Time Period, Significance, & Baghdad {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Bayt-al-Hikmah|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> One key figure was [[Hunayn ibn Ishaq]], who translated over 100 medical books.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The map of knowledge: how classical ideas were lost and found: a history in seven cities|url=https://archive.org/details/mapofknowledgeth0000moll|last=Moller|first=Violet|date=2019|publisher=Doubleday|isbn=978-0-385-54177-0|edition=1st American|location=New York}}</ref>


In [[astronomy]], Muslim scientists made many improvements to older models from Greece and India. [[Al-Battani]] (also known as Albatenius, around 858–929 CE) carefully studied the [[Sun]] and calculated the length of the [[year]] as 365.2422 days, almost exactly what is known today.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Al-Battani - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Battani/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> [[Al-Zarqali]] (also called Arzachel) made the [[Toledan Tables]], which helped European scientists and even influenced Copernicus hundreds of years later.<ref>{{Cite web|title=al-Zarqali - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Zarqali/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> [[Al-Tusi]] (1201–1274 CE), working at the [[Maragheh observatory]], invented a math model called the [[Tusi couple]], which helped improve future ideas about how planets move.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Nasir al-Din al-Tusi - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Tusi_Nasir/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> Muslim astronomers also built observatories (places to study the stars) in cities like [[Baghdad]], [[Maragheh]], [[Samarkand]], and [[Shiraz]]. They invented tools like the [[astrolabe]], [[sextant]], and spherical instruments to measure [[star]]s and [[planet]]s very precisely. These tools were used to find the correct times for prayer, determine the direction of [[Mecca]] (Qibla), and create Islamic calendars.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Theme: Islamic astronomy|url=https://web.astronomicalheritage.net/show-theme?idtheme=15|website=UNESCO}}</ref>
Eratosthenes (about 276–194 BCE) was the head librarian at the Library of Alexandria, one of the greatest learning centers of the ancient world. He was good at math, astronomy, and geography, and used these skills to measure the size of the Earth very accurately. He did this by comparing shadows in two cities at the same time during the summer solstice (the longest day of the year). He also invented a system of latitude and longitude to map locations, just like the grid system used in maps today. Eratosthenes tried to create a map of the entire known world.<sup>[102]</sup> Aristarchus of Samos (about 310–230 BCE) was an early astronomer who had a bold idea: the Sun is at the center of the solar system, not the Earth. This idea is called the heliocentric model. At the time, most people believed the Earth was at the center, so his theory was not accepted, partly because they did not have strong telescopes or enough evidence. Even though his idea was ignored back then, his work later inspired scientists like Copernicus, who helped start the modern understanding of the solar system.<sup>[103]</sup>


In the field of mathematics, Islamic scholars made major breakthroughs, especially in [[algebra]], [[arithmetic]], [[geometry]], and [[trigonometry]]. One important mathematician, [[Al-Khwarizmi|Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi]] (around 780–850 CE), wrote a book called Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wal-Muqabala. This book laid the foundation for [[algebra]]. The word "algebra" actually comes from al-jabr, meaning "completion." Al-Khwarizmi also created step-by-step ways to solve quadratic equations and methods for doing calculations. In fact, the word “[[algorithm]]” comes from his name.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Al-Khwarizmi - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Khwarizmi/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> Another scholar, [[Omar Khayyam]] (1048–1131), figured out how to solve [[cubic equation]]s using geometry.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Omar Khayyam - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Khayyam/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> [[Jamshid al-Kashi|Al-Kashi]] (died 1429) calculated the number [[pi]] to 16 decimal places and improved the way decimal numbers were used, something very important for modern math.<ref>{{Cite web|title=al-Kashi - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Kashi/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> In [[trigonometry]], scientists like [[Al-Biruni]] and [[Nasir al-Din al-Tusi]] made accurate tables for [[sine]], [[cosine]], and [[tangent]], helping to turn trigonometry into its own branch of mathematics.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|title=Al-Biruni - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Biruni/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":1" />
Claudius Ptolemy (about 100–170 CE) lived in Roman Egypt and was a famous ancient astronomer and scientist. He believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe, and he wrote a big book called the Almagest, where he explained this idea using a model called the geocentric model. To explain how the Sun, Moon, and planets move in the sky, he used epicycles, deferents, and equants, complicated ways of showing orbits that looked like circles within circles. Even though this model was wrong (we now know the Sun is at the center), Ptolemy’s system worked well for making predictions and was used for over 1,400 years. Ptolemy did not just study space, he also worked on optics (how light and vision work), maps, and music. He even wrote about astrology.<sup>[104]</sup>


In medicine, Islamic scientists made great progress by using ideas from ancient Greek thinkers and combining them with careful observation and testing. A famous doctor named [[Al-Razi]] (also known as Rhazes, 854–925) wrote a huge 25-volume medical book called Kitab al-Hawi. He was the first to clearly tell the difference between [[smallpox]] and [[measles]] and believed in learning through watching and testing patients.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Amr|first1=Samir S.|last2=Tbakhi|first2=Abdulghani|date=2007|title=Abu Bakr Muhammad Ibn Zakariya Al Razi (Rhazes): Philosopher, Physician and Alchemist|journal=Annals of Saudi Medicine|language=en|volume=27|issue=4|pages=305–307|doi=10.5144/0256-4947.2007.305|pmid=17684438 |issn=0256-4947|pmc=6074295}}</ref> Another well-known doctor, [[Avicenna|Ibn Sina]] (also called Avicenna, 980–1037), combined medical knowledge from [[Greece]], [[Persia]], and [[India]] in his book The Canon of Medicine. This book was used as a guide in both Europe and the Islamic world for more than 600 years. He introduced important medical ideas like testing medicines, using [[quarantine]] to stop [[disease]]s from spreading, checking a patient’s [[pulse]], and understanding how infections work.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Amr|first1=Samir S.|last2=Tbakhi|first2=Abdelghani|date=2007|title=Ibn Sina (Avicenna): The Prince Of Physicians|journal=Annals of Saudi Medicine|language=en|volume=27|issue=2|pages=134–135|doi=10.5144/0256-4947.2007.134|pmid=17420624 |issn=0256-4947|pmc=6077049}}</ref> Muslim doctors also invented [[Surgical instrument|surgical tool]]s, used [[antiseptics]] to stop [[infection]]s, and developed special treatments for eye problems.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Majeed|first=Azeem|date=2005-12-24|title=How Islam changed medicine|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=331|issue=7531|pages=1486–1487|doi=10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1486|pmid=16373721 |issn=0959-8138|pmc=1322233}}</ref> One doctor, [[Ammar al-Mawsili|Ammar ibn Ali al-Mawsili]], even invented a [[syringe]] to remove [[cataract]]s from the eye.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Laios|first1=Konstantinos|last2=Moschos|first2=Marilita M.|last3=George|first3=Androutsos|date=2016|title=Ammar ibn Ali al-Mawsili and His Innovating Suction Method for the Treatment of Cataract|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1553350615618289|journal=Surgical Innovation|language=en|volume=23|issue=4|pages=433|doi=10.1177/1553350615618289|pmid=26603693 |issn=1553-3506}}</ref>
The Romans were more focused on practical science than on theories. They were great engineers and used science to build things like aqueducts (which carried water), roads, bridges, and concrete buildings. They understood how water flows, how to balance weight, and how to use strong building materials.<sup>[105]</sup> A Roman engineer named Vitruvius wrote a book called De Architectura in the 1st century BCE, where he talked about architecture, human body proportions, and machines. He combined art and science to show how buildings should look beautiful but also work well.<sup>[106]</sup> In medicine, a Roman doctor named Galen (around 129–200 CE) became very important. He studied how the body works by examining animals, learning about organs, bones, and how diseases spread. He believed in the four humors (like Hippocrates) and thought that keeping these in balance kept people healthy. Galen’s medical ideas were used in Europe and the Islamic world for many hundreds of years.<sup>[107]</sup>


In the study of [[light]] and [[physics]], [[Ibn al-Haytham]] (also called Alhazen, 965–1040) made discoveries that helped shape modern science. In his book Book of Optics, he showed that the Greek idea of [[Sight|vision]], where light was thought to come out of the eyes, was wrong. He explained that light bounces off objects and goes into the eye, and he correctly described how the [[retina]] and [[Lens (anatomy)|lens]] work. Ibn al-Haytham tested his ideas with experiments using things like [[mirror]]s, [[lens]]es, and a camera obscura (an early version of a [[camera]]). He believed in forming hypotheses, testing them, and repeating experiments. These are ideas that are important to the modern [[scientific method]]. He also studied [[motion]], [[mechanics]], and [[inertia]], and his work influenced later scientists in Europe, like [[Roger Bacon]] and [[Kepler]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ibn al-Haytham - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Haytham/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref>
'''Islamic Golden Age'''


In early Islamic times, [[chemistry]] was called [[alchemy]], and Muslim scientists made big discoveries while trying to understand how materials change. One of the most important alchemists was [[Jabir ibn Hayyan]] (also called Geber), who lived in the 8th century. He wrote hundreds of books about how to heat, purify, and mix substances using methods like [[distillation]] and [[crystallization]]. He even described how to make [[aqua regia]], a powerful [[acid]] that can dissolve [[gold]]. Jabir believed in testing ideas through careful experiments and recording results, which helped move alchemy closer to real, practical chemistry. He also used special lab tools like [[alembic]]s (for distilling liquids), [[crucible]]s (for heating substances), and [[furnace]]s, helping to shape the way modern chemistry labs would work.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Amr|first1=Samir S.|last2=Tbakhi|first2=Abdelghani|date=2007|title=Jabir ibn Hayyan|journal=Annals of Saudi Medicine|language=en|volume=27|issue=1|pages=52–53|doi=10.5144/0256-4947.2007.53|pmid=17337999 |issn=0256-4947|pmc=6077026}}</ref>
The Christian physician Hunayn ibn Ishaq led the translation of works. Improvements to the astrolabe were one of the achievements of this era


Muslim scientists also made great progress in [[geography]], which is the study of the [[Earth]] and how it is measured. They traveled, observed nature, and made better maps. A brilliant scholar named [[Al-Biruni]] (973–1048) used [[Mathematics|math]] and [[trigonometry]] to measure the size of the Earth from the top of a [[mountain]], and his answer was very close to what we know today. He also collected the exact locations ([[latitude]] and [[longitude]]) of over 600 cities and even suggested that the Earth spins, hundreds of years before scientists in [[Europe]] did.<ref name=":3" /> Another scholar, [[Al-Khwarizmi]], corrected mistakes in older maps from the Greek scientist [[Ptolemy]].<ref name=":2" /> Later, [[Muhammad al-Idrisi|Al-Idrisi]] made a famous world map in 1154 for a European king, using [[knowledge]] from Arab traders, sailors, and explorers.<ref>{{Cite web|title=al-Idrisi|url=https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/al-idrisi|access-date=2025-07-17|website=education.nationalgeographic.org|language=en}}</ref>
Science during the Islamic Golden Age (from about the 8th to the 14th century CE) was one of the most creative and important times in history. During this period, Muslim scholars made huge advances in astronomy, math, medicine, physics, chemistry, geography, and engineering.<sup>[108][109]</sup> This progress happened because of several things which included leaders supported science, especially the Abbasid caliphs who helped fund research and learning.<sup>[110]</sup> Books from Greece, India, Persia, and China were translated into Arabic, allowing people to learn from many different cultures,<sup>[111]</sup> and Islamic culture encouraged learning (called ‘ilm in Arabic) and logical thinking.<sup>[112]</sup> One of the most important places during this time was the House of Wisdom (Bayt al-Hikma) in Baghdad, created by Caliph Harun al-Rashid and expanded by his son Al-Ma'mun. It was a major center where scholars gathered to translate, study, and improve scientific knowledge. They translated famous works from Greek, Persian, and Indian scientists, like Aristotle, Galen, Euclid, and Ptolemy, into Arabic.<sup>[113][114]</sup> One key figure was Hunayn ibn Ishaq, who translated over 100 medical books.<sup>[115]</sup>


Islamic scientists also made amazing progress in engineering and building machines. They designed clever devices like early [[robot]]s (called [[automata]]), [[water clock]]s, and [[machine]]s that used [[water]] and [[air]] to move. In the 9th century, three brothers known as the [[Banū Mūsā brothers|Banu Musa]] wrote The Book of Ingenious Devices, which described over 100 inventions using [[gear]]s, [[valve]]s, and [[tube]]s called [[siphon]]s. Later, a brilliant inventor named [[Ismail al-Jazari|Al-Jazari]] (1136–1206) built fancy water clocks, [[mechanical toy]]s that could be programmed to move, and one of the first [[crankshaft]]s, a tool still used in [[engine]]s today. These machines were not just for show; they were used in palaces, public fountains, and farming systems to help people in everyday life.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Machines from the East: Mechanical innovations from Muslim Civilisation|url=https://artsandculture.google.com/story/machines-from-the-east-mechanical-innovations-from-muslim-civilisation/pQWBwUIF15iiLQ|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Google Arts & Culture|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Nizamoglu|first=Cem|date=2016-10-24|title=The Journey of Automatic Machines in Muslim Civilisation|url=https://muslimheritage.com/journey-of-automatic-machines/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Muslim Heritage}}</ref>
In astronomy, Muslim scientists made many improvements to older models from Greece and India. Al-Battani (also known as Albatenius, around 858–929 CE) carefully studied the Sun and calculated the length of the year as 365.2422 days, almost exactly what is known today.<sup>[116]</sup> Al-Zarqali (also called Arzachel) made the Toledan Tables, which helped European scientists and even influenced Copernicus hundreds of years later.<sup>[117]</sup> Al-Tusi (1201–1274 CE), working at the Maragheh observatory, invented a math model called the Tusi couple, which helped improve future ideas about how planets move.<sup>[118]</sup> Muslim astronomers also built observatories (places to study the stars) in cities like Baghdad, Maragheh, Samarkand, and Shiraz. They invented tools like the astrolabe, sextant, and spherical instruments to measure stars and planets very precisely. These tools were used to find the correct times for prayer, determine the direction of Mecca (Qibla), and create Islamic calendars.<sup>[119]</sup>


To spread knowledge, the Islamic world created many places for [[learning]]. These included [[school]]s called [[madrasa]]s, [[hospital]]s known as [[bimaristan]]s, [[Library|libraries]], and [[Observatory|observatories]] where people could study the [[star]]s. Famous schools like the [[Nezamiyeh]] in [[Baghdad]], [[University of al-Qarawiyyin|Al-Qarawiyyin]] in [[Fez, Morocco|Fez]] ([[Morocco]]), and [[Al-Azhar University|Al-Azhar]] in [[Cairo]] became major centers for science and [[education]]. [[Scholar]]s traveled from place to place, shared ideas, and copied books so they could be studied in different parts of the world. From [[Spain]] and [[North Africa]] all the way to [[Central Asia]] and [[India]], science and learning were an important part of Islamic culture.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bulliet|first=Richard W.|date=1983|title=The Age Structure of Medieval Islamic Education|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1595484|journal=Studia Islamica|issue=57|pages=105–117|doi=10.2307/1595484|jstor=1595484 |issn=0585-5292}}</ref>
In the field of mathematics, Islamic scholars made major breakthroughs, especially in algebra, arithmetic, geometry, and trigonometry. One important mathematician, Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi (around 780–850 CE), wrote a book called Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wal-Muqabala. This book laid the foundation for algebra. The word "algebra" actually comes from al-jabr, meaning "completion." Al-Khwarizmi also created step-by-step ways to solve quadratic equations and methods for doing calculations. In fact, the word “algorithm” comes from his name.<sup>[120]</sup> Another scholar, Omar Khayyam (1048–1131), figured out how to solve cubic equations using geometry.<sup>[121]</sup> Al-Kashi (died 1429) calculated the number pi to 16 decimal places and improved the way decimal numbers were used, something very important for modern math.<sup>[122]</sup> In trigonometry, scientists like Al-Biruni and Nasir al-Din al-Tusi made accurate tables for sine, cosine, and tangent, helping to turn trigonometry into its own branch of mathematics.<sup>[123][118]</sup>


===Medieval and Renaissance Europe===
In medicine, Islamic scientists made great progress by using ideas from ancient Greek thinkers and combining them with careful observation and testing. A famous doctor named Al-Razi (also known as Rhazes, 854–925) wrote a huge 25-volume medical book called Kitab al-Hawi. He was the first to clearly tell the difference between smallpox and measles and believed in learning through watching and testing patients.<sup>[124]</sup> Another well-known doctor, Ibn Sina (also called Avicenna, 980–1037), combined medical knowledge from Greece, Persia, and India in his book The Canon of Medicine. This book was used as a guide in both Europe and the Islamic world for more than 600 years. He introduced important medical ideas like testing medicines, using quarantine to stop diseases from spreading, checking a patient’s pulse, and understanding how infections work.<sup>[125]</sup> Muslim doctors also invented surgical tools, used antiseptics to stop infections, and developed special treatments for eye problems.<sup>[126]</sup> One doctor, Ammar ibn Ali al-Mawsili, even invented a syringe to remove cataracts from the eye.<sup>[127]</sup>
[[File:De Revolutionibus manuscript p9b.jpg|thumb|Drawing of the heliocentric model as proposed by the Copernicus's ''{{lang|la|[[De revolutionibus orbium coelestium]]}}''|alt=Drawing of planets' orbit around the Sun]]
During the [[early Middle Ages]] (around the 5th to 10th centuries), science in [[Western Europe]] slowed down after the fall of the [[Western Roman Empire]]. Many ancient books and ideas were at risk of being lost. Luckily, monks in [[monasteries]] helped save this knowledge by copying old texts written in [[Latin]]. These included the works of famous thinkers like [[Aristotle]], [[Pliny the Elder]], [[Galen]], and [[Boethius]].<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|title=The beginnings of western science: the European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, prehistory to A.D. 1450|url=https://archive.org/details/beginningsofwest0000lind_d9a5|last=Lindberg|first=David C.|date=2007|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-48205-7|edition=2nd|location=Chicago}}</ref> One important [[scholar]] from this time was [[Isidore of Seville]] (around 560–636), who tried to collect and organize all human [[knowledge]] into one big book called Etymologiae. People at the time believed that studying [[nature]] helped them better understand God’s creation.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Saint Isidore of Sevilla {{!}} Biography & Works {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Isidore-of-Sevilla|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Even though science was limited during this period, learning started to improve under [[Charlemagne]] (who ruled from 768–814). He supported [[education]] and helped start cathedral schools, which taught subjects like [[Mathematics|math]], [[geometry]], [[music]], and [[astronomy]] (called the quadrivium), along with [[grammar]], [[logic]], and [[writing]] (the trivium).<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-06|title=Charlemagne - Emperor, Franks, Holy Roman Empire {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Charlemagne/Emperor-of-the-Romans|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>


Between the 11th and 13th centuries, science in [[Europe]] came back to life thanks to a big effort to translate ancient books. In places like [[Spain]], [[Sicily]], and parts of the [[Middle East]], European scholars came in contact with the [[Islamic world]] and the [[Byzantine Empire]]. From them, they got access to many old Greek and Roman ideas, now improved by Arabic scholars.<ref name=":4" /> Translators like [[Gerard of Cremona]] worked hard to turn important Arabic and Greek books by [[Aristotle]], [[Avicenna]], [[Ibn al-Haytham|Alhazen]], and [[Galen]] into [[Latin]] so more people in Europe could understand them. These books taught about [[astronomy]], [[medicine]], [[Mathematics|math]], and [[optics]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Gherard - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Gherard/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> This sparked the rise of universities in cities like [[Bologna]], [[Paris]], [[Oxford]], and [[Salamanca]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=de la Croix|first1=David|last2=Docquier|first2=Frédéric|last3=Fabre|first3=Alice|last4=Stelter|first4=Robert|date=2024-08-01|title=The Academic Market and The Rise of Universities in Medieval and Early Modern Europe (1000–1800)|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvad061|journal=Journal of the European Economic Association|volume=22|issue=4|pages=1541–1589|doi=10.1093/jeea/jvad061|issn=1542-4766}}</ref> A new way of thinking called scholasticism became popular. Scholastic thinkers like [[Thomas Aquinas]] mixed Greek philosophy with Christian beliefs,<ref>{{Citation|last=Pasnau|first=Robert|title=Thomas Aquinas|date=2024|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/aquinas/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Winter 2024|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> and others like [[Albertus Magnus]] and [[Roger Bacon]] encouraged people to observe [[nature]] and do [[experiment]]s to learn how the world works.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Albertus Magnus 1193?-1282 – A History of Speech – Language Pathology|url=https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/history-of-cds/middle-ages/key-players-in-the-medieval-period/albertus-magnus/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sidebottom|first=Eric|date=2013|title=Roger Bacon and the beginnings of experimental science in Britain|journal=Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|language=en|volume=106|issue=6|pages=243–245|doi=10.1177/0141076813488482|pmid=23761584 |issn=0141-0768|pmc=3705416}}</ref>
In the study of light and physics, Ibn al-Haytham (also called Alhazen, 965–1040) made discoveries that helped shape modern science. In his book Book of Optics, he showed that the Greek idea of vision, where light was thought to come out of the eyes, was wrong. He explained that light bounces off objects and goes into the eye, and he correctly described how the retina and lens work. Ibn al-Haytham tested his ideas with experiments using things like mirrors, lenses, and a camera obscura (an early version of a camera). He believed in forming hypotheses, testing them, and repeating experiments. These are ideas that are important to the modern scientific method. He also studied motion, mechanics, and inertia, and his work influenced later scientists in Europe, like Roger Bacon and Kepler.<sup>[128]</sup>


By the 14th century, some smart thinkers in [[Europe]] were starting to question old ideas about how things move. Two of these thinkers, [[Nicole Oresme]] and [[Jean Buridan]], worked at the [[University of Paris]] and had new ideas about [[physics]]. Jean Buridan came up with a theory called impetus, which was an early idea similar to what we now call [[inertia]]. He said that once something is moving, it can keep moving on its own. It does not need to be pushed forever. This was a big change from the old belief (by [[Aristotle]]) that something had to keep being pushed to keep moving.<ref>{{Citation|last=Zupko|first=Jack|title=John Buridan|date=2024|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/buridan/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Spring 2024|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> [[Nicole Oresme]] did not agree with the old idea that [[Earth]] was the center of the [[universe]] (geocentric model). He also used [[graph]]s to show how things move, which was an early step toward [[kinematics]], the study of [[motion]].<ref>{{Citation|last=Kirschner|first=Stefan|title=Nicole Oresme|date=2021|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/nicole-oresme/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Fall 2021|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref>
In early Islamic times, chemistry was called alchemy, and Muslim scientists made big discoveries while trying to understand how materials change. One of the most important alchemists was Jabir ibn Hayyan (also called Geber), who lived in the 8th century. He wrote hundreds of books about how to heat, purify, and mix substances using methods like distillation and crystallization. He even described how to make aqua regia, a powerful acid that can dissolve gold. Jabir believed in testing ideas through careful experiments and recording results, which helped move alchemy closer to real, practical chemistry. He also used special lab tools like alembics (for distilling liquids), crucibles (for heating substances), and furnaces, helping to shape the way modern chemistry labs would work.<sup>[129]</sup>


The [[Renaissance]] (from the 1300s to the 1600s) was a time when science began to change a lot. People started to focus more on observing [[nature]], doing [[experiment]]s, and re-reading old science texts from [[ancient Greece]]. Scholars like [[Leonardo Bruni]] and [[Marsilio Ficino]] helped translate these important works so others could study them in more depth.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Leonardo Bruni {{!}} Humanist, Renaissance, Historian {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leonardo-Bruni|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Marsilio Ficino {{!}} Italian Renaissance Philosopher & Theologian {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Marsilio-Ficino|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> One of the most famous Renaissance thinkers was [[Leonardo da Vinci]] (1452–1519). He is known for being a "universal man", or someone who could do many things well. He was an amazing artist, but he also studied [[anatomy]] (the human body), how [[water]] flows, and how [[machine]]s work. Leonardo dissected human bodies and made some of the most accurate drawings of [[muscle]]s, [[bone]]s, and the [[heart]] for his time. He figured out many things about how the vascular system ([[blood vessel]]s) and body parts worked, even though he never published his findings while he was alive.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Leonardo da Vinci - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Leonardo/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref>
Muslim scientists also made great progress in geography, which is the study of the Earth and how it is measured. They traveled, observed nature, and made better maps. A brilliant scholar named Al-Biruni (973–1048) used math and trigonometry to measure the size of the Earth from the top of a mountain, and his answer was very close to what we know today. He also collected the exact locations (latitude and longitude) of over 600 cities and even suggested that the Earth spins, hundreds of years before scientists in Europe did.<sup>[123]</sup> Another scholar, Al-Khwarizmi, corrected mistakes in older maps from the Greek scientist Ptolemy.<sup>[120]</sup> Later, Al-Idrisi made a famous world map in 1154 for a European king, using knowledge from Arab traders, sailors, and explorers.<sup>[130]</sup>


A big moment in [[astronomy]] happened with a scientist named [[Nicolaus Copernicus]] (1473–1543). He suggested a [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric model of the universe]], which means that the [[Sun]] is at the center, not the [[Earth]]. This idea was published in his book On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. In his model, Earth spins every day and goes around the Sun once a year. At the time, most people believed the [[Geocentrism|Ptolemaic model]], which said [[Earth]] was the center of everything. Even though Copernicus kept some old ideas like epicycles (small loops in orbits), his model was a huge change and led to a new way of thinking about the [[universe]].<ref>{{Citation|last=Rabin|first=Sheila|title=Nicolaus Copernicus|date=2023|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/copernicus/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Winter 2023|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> Another important astronomer was [[Tycho Brahe]] (1546–1601). He did not use a [[telescope]], but he made very careful observations of the [[star]]s and [[planet]]s using special instruments. His data was extremely accurate and helped later scientists understand how the planets move.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Tycho Brahe (1546-1601) {{!}} High Altitude Observatory|url=https://www2.hao.ucar.edu/education/scientists/tycho-brahe-1546-1601|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www2.hao.ucar.edu}}</ref>
Islamic scientists also made amazing progress in engineering and building machines. They designed clever devices like early robots (called automata), water clocks, and machines that used water and air to move. In the 9th century, three brothers known as the Banu Musa wrote The Book of Ingenious Devices, which described over 100 inventions using gears, valves, and tubes called siphons. Later, a brilliant inventor named Al-Jazari (1136–1206) built fancy water clocks, mechanical toys that could be programmed to move, and one of the first crankshafts, a tool still used in engines today. These machines were not just for show; they were used in palaces, public fountains, and farming systems to help people in everyday life.<sup>[131][132]</sup>


[[Johannes Kepler]] (1571–1630), who used Tycho’s data, discovered three laws of planetary motion. He showed that planets do not move in perfect [[circle]]s, but in [[elliptical orbit]]s (oval-shaped). He also found that planets move faster when they are closer to the Sun.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Johannes Kepler - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Kepler/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> [[Galileo Galilei]] (1564–1642) combined experiments and astronomy. He used one of the first [[telescope]]s to look at the sky and made amazing discoveries. He saw [[Impact crater|crater]]s on the [[Moon]], [[sunspot]]s, the [[phases of Venus]], and [[Galilean moons|moon]]s orbiting [[Jupiter]]. All these things disproved the old idea that everything revolved around Earth and helped support Copernicus’s heliocentric model. Galileo also studied how objects fall, how [[pendulum]]s swing, and how things move through the [[air]]. He showed that the laws of nature follow math rules, and we can understand them by doing experiments. In 1632, he wrote a book called Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems that supported heliocentrism. Because of this, he got in trouble with the [[Catholic Church]], which still believed Earth was the center of the universe. Galileo was put on trial and spent the rest of his life under [[house arrest]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Galileo Galilei - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Galileo/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref>
To spread knowledge, the Islamic world created many places for learning. These included schools called madrasas, hospitals known as bimaristans, libraries, and observatories where people could study the stars. Famous schools like the Nezamiyeh in Baghdad, Al-Qarawiyyin in Fez (Morocco), and Al-Azhar in Cairo became major centers for science and education. Scholars traveled from place to place, shared ideas, and copied books so they could be studied in different parts of the world. From Spain and North Africa all the way to Central Asia and India, science and learning were an important part of Islamic culture.<sup>[133]</sup>


During the [[Renaissance]], there were huge changes in [[medicine]] and [[anatomy]] (the study of the [[human body]]). A scientist named [[Andreas Vesalius]] (1514–1564) made a big breakthrough by dissecting real human bodies and studying them carefully. Before this, people mostly followed the ideas of an ancient doctor named [[Galen]], but Vesalius found that Galen had made many mistakes because he studied [[animal]]s, not [[human]]s. Vesalius wrote a book called De humani corporis fabrica (which means On the Fabric of the Human Body), where he corrected hundreds of errors and showed that [[anatomy]] should be based on direct observation. This helped make anatomy a real science based on what doctors could see and study for themselves.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Zampieri|first1=Fabio|last2=ElMaghawry|first2=Mohamed|last3=Zanatta|first3=Alberto|last4=Thiene|first4=Gaetano|date=2015|title=Andreas Vesalius: Celebrating 500 years of dissecting nature|journal=Global Cardiology Science and Practice|language=en|volume=2015|issue=5|pages=66|doi=10.5339/gcsp.2015.66|pmid=28127546 |issn=2305-7823|pmc=4762440}}</ref> Later, another important doctor named [[William Harvey]] (1578–1657) discovered how [[blood]] moves through the body. He showed that the [[heart]] pumps blood in a circle, a system called circulation, which was very different from the old idea that blood came from the [[liver]] and just moved back and forth. Harvey proved this through experiments and live animal dissection (called [[vivisection]]). His work helped change medicine from just guessing and theory to something based on evidence and real body functions.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ribatti|first=Domenico|date=2009|title=William Harvey and the discovery of the circulation of the blood|journal=Journal of Angiogenesis Research|language=en|volume=1|issue=1|pages=3|doi=10.1186/2040-2384-1-3|pmid=19946411 |doi-access=free |issn=2040-2384|pmc=2776239}}</ref>
'''Medieval and Renaissance Europe'''


In [[Mathematics|math]] and [[physics]], the Renaissance also saw big advances. A man named [[Simon Stevin]] (1548–1620) came up with [[Decimal|decimal fraction]]s, which made it easier to do math with numbers. For example, instead of writing 1/10 or 1/100, people could now write 0.1 or 0.01, something used all the time today.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Simon Stevin - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Stevin/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> [[René Descartes]] (1596–1650), a French thinker, invented [[analytic geometry]], which connected [[algebra]] with [[shape]]s and [[space]]. This helped scientists describe the world more clearly using equations.<ref>{{Cite web|title=René Descartes - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Descartes/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> Another important figure was [[Francis Bacon]] (1561–1626). He believed science should be based on [[observation]] and [[experiment]]s, not just guessing or using old books. In his book Novum Organum, he explained how scientists should use [[inductive reasoning]], starting with observations and then finding general rules. His ideas became the [[philosophy of science]] and influenced many future scientists.<ref>{{Citation|last=Klein|first=Jürgen|title=Francis Bacon|date=2020|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/francis-bacon/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Fall 2020|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref> Finally, [[Isaac Newton]] (1642–1727) brought together the work of earlier scientists like Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes. In the early 1700s, he created a complete system of physics and astronomy that explained how planets move and how objects fall on Earth. His work marked the end of the Renaissance and the start of the [[Scientific Revolution]], a time when modern science truly began.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Time for science education: how teaching the history and philosophy of pendulum motion can contribute to science literacy|url=https://archive.org/details/timeforscienceed0000matt|last=Matthews|first=Michael R.|date=2000|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media, LLC|isbn=978-0-306-45880-4|series=Innovations in science education and technology|location=New York}}</ref>
Drawing of the heliocentric model as proposed by the Copernicus's ''De revolutionibus orbium coelestium''


===Age of Enlightenment===
During the early Middle Ages (around the 5th to 10th centuries), science in Western Europe slowed down after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Many ancient books and ideas were at risk of being lost. Luckily, monks in monasteries helped save this knowledge by copying old texts written in Latin. These included the works of famous thinkers like Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, Galen, and Boethius.<sup>[134]</sup> One important scholar from this time was Isidore of Seville (around 560–636), who tried to collect and organize all human knowledge into one big book called Etymologiae. People at the time believed that studying nature helped them better understand God’s creation.<sup>[135]</sup> Even though science was limited during this period, learning started to improve under Charlemagne (who ruled from 768–814). He supported education and helped start cathedral schools, which taught subjects like math, geometry, music, and astronomy (called the quadrivium), along with grammar, logic, and writing (the trivium).<sup>[136]</sup>
[[File:Newton's Principia title page.png|thumb|upright|Title page of the 1687 first edition of ''{{lang|la|[[Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica]]}}'' by Isaac Newton]]
The [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] was greatly influenced by the ideas of the Scientific Revolution, especially the work of [[Isaac Newton]] (1642–1727). In 1687, Newton wrote a book called Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, where he explained the [[Newton's laws of motion|laws of motion]] and the [[law of universal gravitation]]. He showed that the same force that makes an [[apple]] fall also keeps the [[Moon]] in [[orbit]] around the [[Earth]]. Newton also explained that [[planet]]s move in [[Elliptical orbit|elliptical (oval-shaped) path]]s because of gravity. He invented [[calculus]] (at the same time as another scientist named [[Gottfried Leibniz]]) to help describe things that change, like [[speed]] and [[movement]]. His experiments with [[light]] proved that white light is made up of many [[color]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Isaac Newton - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Newton/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref>


Because of Newton, many Enlightenment thinkers started to use math and science to understand more than just space or motion. In [[chemistry]], [[Robert Boyle]] (1627–1691) was an important figure. In his book The Sceptical Chymist (1661), he rejected old ideas from [[Aristotle]] and [[alchemy]] and introduced new scientific ideas about matter. He discovered [[Boyle's law|Boyle’s Law]], which says that when you make a gas container smaller, the [[pressure]] goes up (as long as the [[temperature]] stays the same). This showed that [[gas]]es behave in ways that can be measured and predicted. Boyle also believed that science should be based on careful [[experiment]]s that could be repeated.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Robert Boyle - Biography|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Boyle/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref> The move from [[alchemy]] (an early, unscientific form of chemistry) to modern chemistry was led by [[Antoine Lavoisier]] (1743–1794), who is often called the “father of modern chemistry.” Lavoisier discovered and named the elements [[oxygen]] and [[hydrogen]], and he proved that the old phlogiston theory (which said things burned by releasing a strange substance) was wrong. He showed that in a [[chemical reaction]], the total mass stays the same, which is now known as the [[law of conservation of mass]]. Lavoisier also created a clear system for naming chemicals, which helped scientists better organize and classify the elements.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-25|title=Antoine Lavoisier {{!}} Biography, Discoveries, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Antoine-Lavoisier|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
Between the 11th and 13th centuries, science in Europe came back to life thanks to a big effort to translate ancient books. In places like Spain, Sicily, and parts of the Middle East, European scholars came in contact with the Islamic world and the Byzantine Empire. From them, they got access to many old Greek and Roman ideas, now improved by Arabic scholars.<sup>[134]</sup> Translators like Gerard of Cremona worked hard to turn important Arabic and Greek books by Aristotle, Avicenna, Alhazen, and Galen into Latin so more people in Europe could understand them. These books taught about astronomy, medicine, math, and optics.<sup>[137]</sup> This sparked the rise of universities in cities like Bologna, Paris, Oxford, and Salamanca.<sup>[138]</sup> A new way of thinking called scholasticism became popular. Scholastic thinkers like Thomas Aquinas mixed Greek philosophy with Christian beliefs,<sup>[139]</sup> and others like Albertus Magnus and Roger Bacon encouraged people to observe nature and do experiments to learn how the world works.<sup>[140][141]</sup>


In [[biology]] and [[anatomy]], scientists during the Enlightenment started to focus more on how living things are organized. [[Carl Linnaeus]] (1707–1778) invented the system we still use today for naming living things, called [[binomial nomenclature]]. He gave each plant or animal two names, a [[genus]] and a [[species]]. This helped scientists all over the world talk about the same organisms clearly and consistently. His book, Systema Naturae, first published in 1735, listed and organized thousands of [[plant]]s and [[animal]]s and became the foundation of modern [[taxonomy]], the science of classification. At the same time, scientists were learning more about how the [[human body]] works.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-14|title=Carolus Linnaeus {{!}} Biography, Education, Classification System, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Carolus-Linnaeus|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> [[Albrecht von Haller]] studied things like how [[nerve]]s work, how [[muscle]]s move, and how the [[heart]] beats. Through experiments, he helped people understand how parts of the body function automatically, without us thinking about them. This was a big step forward in the science of [[physiology]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Albrecht von Haller {{!}} Swiss Physiologist, Poet, Botanist {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Albrecht-von-Haller|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
By the 14th century, some smart thinkers in Europe were starting to question old ideas about how things move. Two of these thinkers, Nicole Oresme and Jean Buridan, worked at the University of Paris and had new ideas about physics. Jean Buridan came up with a theory called impetus, which was an early idea similar to what we now call inertia. He said that once something is moving, it can keep moving on its own. It does not need to be pushed forever. This was a big change from the old belief (by Aristotle) that something had to keep being pushed to keep moving.<sup>[142]</sup> Nicole Oresme did not agree with the old idea that Earth was the center of the universe (geocentric model). He also used graphs to show how things move, which was an early step toward kinematics, the study of motion.<sup>[143]</sup>


During the Enlightenment, [[astronomy]] made big advances thanks to better telescopes and the growth of observatories. [[Edmond Halley]] (1656–1742) used Newton’s laws to predict when a certain [[comet]] would come back. He was right, and that comet is now named [[Halley's Comet]]. This showed that [[gravity]] could explain how objects move in space.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Edmond Halley {{!}} Astronomer, Mathematician & Comet Discoverer {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Edmond-Halley|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Later, [[William Herschel]] (1738–1822) discovered a new planet, [[Uranus]], in 1781. He also found over 2,500 objects in the night sky, like [[nebulae]] (clouds of [[gas]] and [[dust]]) and [[star cluster]]s. He built some of the biggest telescopes of his time. His work helped scientists realize that the [[universe]] is much bigger than just the [[Milky Way galaxy]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=William Herschel {{!}} Biography, Education, Telescopes, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Herschel|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Astronomy became more professional, with major observatories in cities like [[Greenwich]], [[Paris]], and [[Berlin]]. These places also helped improve navigation, which was important for travel and trade.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Cartwright|first=Mark|date=2023-10-20|title=Observatories in the Scientific Revolution|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2309/observatories-in-the-scientific-revolution/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref>
The Renaissance (from the 1300s to the 1600s) was a time when science began to change a lot. People started to focus more on observing nature, doing experiments, and re-reading old science texts from ancient Greece. Scholars like Leonardo Bruni and Marsilio Ficino helped translate these important works so others could study them in more depth.<sup>[144][145]</sup> One of the most famous Renaissance thinkers was Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519). He is known for being a "universal man", or someone who could do many things well. He was an amazing artist, but he also studied anatomy (the human body), how water flows, and how machines work. Leonardo dissected human bodies and made some of the most accurate drawings of muscles, bones, and the heart for his time. He figured out many things about how the vascular system (blood vessels) and body parts worked, even though he never published his findings while he was alive.<sup>[146]</sup>


[[Scientific institution]]s were very important during the Enlightenment. The [[Royal Society of London]] (founded in 1660) and the [[French Academy of Sciences]] (founded in 1666) brought scientists together to share ideas. They published [[Scientific journal|journal]]s, like Philosophical Transactions, that explained experiments, new discoveries, and theories. These groups helped make science more organized, trustworthy, and easy to understand by others. They also started the idea of peer review, where other scientists check your work. As more people learned to read and write, science started to spread outside of just [[school]]s and [[University|universities]]. Salons, coffeehouses, and public lectures became places where people talked about science. Scientists were no longer just private thinkers, they became public figures who shared their [[knowledge]] with everyone.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|last=Cartwright|first=Mark|date=2024-02-29|title=The Enlightenment|url=https://www.worldhistory.org/The_Enlightenment/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=World History Encyclopedia|language=en}}</ref>
A big moment in astronomy happened with a scientist named Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543). He suggested a heliocentric model of the universe, which means that the Sun is at the center, not the Earth. This idea was published in his book On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. In his model, Earth spins every day and goes around the Sun once a year. At the time, most people believed the Ptolemaic model, which said Earth was the center of everything. Even though Copernicus kept some old ideas like epicycles (small loops in orbits), his model was a huge change and led to a new way of thinking about the universe.<sup>[147]</sup> Another important astronomer was Tycho Brahe (1546–1601). He did not use a telescope, but he made very careful observations of the stars and planets using special instruments. His data was extremely accurate and helped later scientists understand how the planets move.<sup>[148]</sup>


During the Enlightenment, [[medicine]] improved because [[doctor]]s started focusing more on observing patients and learning through hospital training. One important doctor, [[Giovanni Battista Morgagni]] (1682–1771), helped create modern [[diagnosis]] by showing that [[symptom]]s were linked to specific [[organ]]s, not just to old ideas like imbalances of body fluids. This helped doctors understand that [[disease]]s could be traced to problems in certain parts of the body.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ghosh|first=Sanjib Kumar|date=2017|title=Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682–1771): father of pathologic anatomy and pioneer of modern medicine|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12565-016-0373-7|journal=Anatomical Science International|language=en|volume=92|issue=3|pages=305–312|doi=10.1007/s12565-016-0373-7|pmid=27629485 |issn=1447-6959}}</ref> Another key figure was [[Edward Jenner]] (1749–1823), who made the first successful vaccine. He noticed that people who got [[cowpox]] did not catch [[smallpox]], a deadly disease. He tested this idea and proved that cowpox could protect people. In 1798, he published his results, starting the science of [[immunology]] and [[vaccination]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Riedel|first=Stefan|date=2005-01-01|title=Edward Jenner and the History of Smallpox and Vaccination|journal=Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings|language=en|volume=18|issue=1|pages=21–25|doi=10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028|pmid=16200144 |issn=0899-8280|pmc=1200696}}</ref>
Johannes Kepler (1571–1630), who used Tycho’s data, discovered three laws of planetary motion. He showed that planets do not move in perfect circles, but in elliptical orbits (oval-shaped). He also found that planets move faster when they are closer to the Sun.<sup>[149]</sup> Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) combined experiments and astronomy. He used one of the first telescopes to look at the sky and made amazing discoveries. He saw craters on the Moon, sunspots, the phases of Venus, and moons orbiting Jupiter. All these things disproved the old idea that everything revolved around Earth and helped support Copernicus’s heliocentric model. Galileo also studied how objects fall, how pendulums swing, and how things move through the air. He showed that the laws of nature follow math rules, and we can understand them by doing experiments. In 1632, he wrote a book called Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems that supported heliocentrism. Because of this, he got in trouble with the Catholic Church, which still believed Earth was the center of the universe. Galileo was put on trial and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.<sup>[150]</sup>


During this time, science became more separate from [[religion]] and was seen as a way to improve society. Famous thinkers like [[Denis Diderot]], [[Voltaire]], and [[Jean le Rond d’Alembert]] believed that science and reason could free people’s minds and make the world better. They worked on a big project called the Encyclopédie (1751–1772), which was like an early encyclopedia. It collected all known scientific and technical knowledge into one place and made it easier for people to learn about how things work, from [[optics]] and [[anatomy]] to [[mining]] and [[tool]]s.<ref name=":5" /> Engineering and technology also made huge progress. [[James Watt]] made important changes to the [[steam engine]] in the 1760s and 1770s by adding a separate condenser, which made the [[engine]] much more efficient. His improvements helped power factories and machines, leading to the [[Industrial Revolution]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-23|title=James Watt {{!}} Biography, Inventions, Steam Engine, Significance, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-Watt|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
During the Renaissance, there were huge changes in medicine and anatomy (the study of the human body). A scientist named Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) made a big breakthrough by dissecting real human bodies and studying them carefully. Before this, people mostly followed the ideas of an ancient doctor named Galen, but Vesalius found that Galen had made many mistakes because he studied animals, not humans. Vesalius wrote a book called De humani corporis fabrica (which means On the Fabric of the Human Body), where he corrected hundreds of errors and showed that anatomy should be based on direct observation. This helped make anatomy a real science based on what doctors could see and study for themselves.<sup>[151]</sup> Later, another important doctor named William Harvey (1578–1657) discovered how blood moves through the body. He showed that the heart pumps blood in a circle, a system called circulation, which was very different from the old idea that blood came from the liver and just moved back and forth. Harvey proved this through experiments and live animal dissection (called vivisection). His work helped change medicine from just guessing and theory to something based on evidence and real body functions.<sup>[152]</sup>


===19th Century Science===
In math and physics, the Renaissance also saw big advances. A man named Simon Stevin (1548–1620) came up with decimal fractions, which made it easier to do math with numbers. For example, instead of writing 1/10 or 1/100, people could now write 0.1 or 0.01, something used all the time today.<sup>[153]</sup> René Descartes (1596–1650), a French thinker, invented analytic geometry, which connected algebra with shapes and space. This helped scientists describe the world more clearly using equations.<sup>[154]</sup> Another important figure was Francis Bacon (1561–1626). He believed science should be based on observation and experiments, not just guessing or using old books. In his book Novum Organum, he explained how scientists should use inductive reasoning, starting with observations and then finding general rules. His ideas became the philosophy of science and influenced many future scientists.<sup>[155]</sup> Finally, Isaac Newton (1642–1727) brought together the work of earlier scientists like Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes. In the early 1700s, he created a complete system of physics and astronomy that explained how planets move and how objects fall on Earth. His work marked the end of the Renaissance and the start of the Scientific Revolution, a time when modern science truly began.<sup>[156]</sup>
[[File:Darwin Tree 1837.png|thumb|upright|The first diagram of an [[Phylogenetic tree|evolutionary tree]] made by [[Charles Darwin]] in 1837|alt=Sketch of a map with captions]]
During the 1800s, science made big changes, especially in how we understand heat, energy, electricity, and atoms. In the study of [[heat]] and [[energy]], [[thermodynamics]], scientists created the [[laws of thermodynamics]]. These laws helped people understand how [[steam engine]]s work and how to make them more efficient. In 1824, a scientist named [[Sadi Carnot]] came up with the idea of the [[Carnot cycle]], which showed that an engine’s [[efficiency]] depends on the [[temperature]] difference between where the [[heat]] comes from and where it goes. This idea helped lead to the [[second law of thermodynamics]], which explains how energy spreads out.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2013-10-02|title=Carnot Cycle|url=https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Thermodynamics/Thermodynamic_Cycles/Carnot_Cycle|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Chemistry LibreTexts|language=en}}</ref> Later, [[Rudolf Clausius]] introduced the idea of [[entropy]], which measures how energy becomes more disordered over time.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Rudolf Clausius {{!}} Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, Entropy {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Rudolf-Clausius|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Scientists [[William Thomson]] (Lord Kelvin) and [[James Prescott Joule]] created the [[first law of thermodynamics]], which says that [[energy]] cannot be created or destroyed, only changed from one form to another.<ref>{{Cite web|title=James Prescott Joule {{!}} Biography & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-Prescott-Joule|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-09|title=Laws of thermodynamics {{!}} Definition, Physics, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/laws-of-thermodynamics|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>


In [[electricity]] and [[magnetism]], scientists discovered that these two forces are connected. [[Michael Faraday]], in the 1830s and 1840s, did experiments that showed how moving [[magnet]]s can create electricity, a process called [[electromagnetic induction]]. This discovery is what makes [[Electrical generator|electric generator]]s and [[transformer]]s work. Faraday also came up with the idea of [[Field (physics)|field]]s, which are invisible areas where electric or magnetic forces can act.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-27|title=Michael Faraday {{!}} Biography, Inventions, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Michael-Faraday|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Later, in the 1860s, [[James Clerk Maxwell]] built on Faraday’s work and wrote four equations, called [[Maxwell's equations]], that explain how [[Electric field|electric]] and [[magnetic field]]s move and interact. These equations also predicted the existence of [[electromagnetic wave]]s, which led to the invention of things like [[radio]]s, [[TV]]s, and [[Wireless|wireless communication]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-09|title=James Clerk Maxwell {{!}} Biography & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-Clerk-Maxwell|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
'''Age of Enlightenment'''


At the beginning of the century, [[John Dalton]] brought back the idea of [[atomic theory]]. He said that every [[Chemical element|element]] (like [[oxygen]] or [[iron]]) is made up of its own kind of [[atom]], and these atoms combine in fixed amounts to make [[Chemical compound|compound]]s (like [[water]] or [[carbon dioxide]]). His ideas helped explain important chemistry rules, like the law of multiple proportions, which says that elements always combine in certain number patterns.<ref>{{Cite web|title=John Dalton {{!}} Biography, Discoveries, Atomic Model, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Dalton|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Later, in 1869, [[Dmitri Mendeleev]] created the periodic table. He arranged the elements in order by [[atomic mass]] and grouped them by chemical properties. Mendeleev’s table was so smart that it even predicted new elements, like [[gallium]] and [[germanium]], before they were discovered. When scientists later found these elements and they matched his predictions, it showed that the [[Periodic trends|periodic law]] was a powerful way to understand and organize [[chemistry]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-27|title=Dmitri Mendeleev {{!}} Biography, Periodic Table, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Dmitri-Mendeleev|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
Title page of the 1687 first edition of ''Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica'' by Isaac Newton


Meanwhile, [[biology]] was also changing in a major way. In 1859, [[Charles Darwin]] published a book called On the Origin of Species. In it, he explained his theory of [[evolution]] by [[natural selection]]. Darwin said that [[living thing]]s change over time. These changes happen because of small differences that are passed from parents to offspring. If a trait helps an [[organism]] survive and have more babies, that trait becomes more common over generations. This is how new species can form. Darwin got many of his ideas by observing [[animal]]s and [[plant]]s during his long trip on the ship HMS Beagle. He was also influenced by [[Thomas Malthus]], who wrote about how [[population]]s grow, and [[Charles Lyell]], who studied how the Earth changes slowly over time. Darwin’s theory replaced older ideas that [[species]] never change. It gave scientists a new way to understand [[life]], one that was based on evidence, change, and history. It also started many important discussions about science, [[religion]], and [[philosophy]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-13|title=Charles Darwin {{!}} Biography, Education, Books, Theory of Evolution, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Charles-Darwin|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
The Enlightenment was greatly influenced by the ideas of the Scientific Revolution, especially the work of Isaac Newton (1642–1727). In 1687, Newton wrote a book called Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, where he explained the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation. He showed that the same force that makes an apple fall also keeps the Moon in orbit around the Earth. Newton also explained that planets move in elliptical (oval-shaped) paths because of gravity. He invented calculus (at the same time as another scientist named Gottfried Leibniz) to help describe things that change, like speed and movement. His experiments with light proved that white light is made up of many colors.<sup>[157]</sup>


At the same time as other big discoveries in the 1800s, scientists also developed the [[cell theory]], which says that all living things are made of [[cell]]s, and that the cell is the basic unit of [[life]]. This idea was first introduced in the 1830s by [[Matthias Schleiden]] and [[Theodor Schwann]]. Later, [[Rudolf Virchow]] added that all cells come from other cells, which he summed up in the Latin phrase "omnis cellula e cellula". The invention and improvement of the [[light microscope]] helped scientists look more closely at cells. They were able to discover important parts inside cells, like the [[nucleus]], [[mitochondria]], and other tiny structures called [[organelle]]s. These discoveries helped build the foundation for [[molecular biology]] and [[genetics]], which study how cells work and how traits are passed down.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Cell theory {{!}} EBSCO Research Starters|url=https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/anatomy-and-physiology/cell-theory|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.ebsco.com|language=en}}</ref>
Because of Newton, many Enlightenment thinkers started to use math and science to understand more than just space or motion. In chemistry, Robert Boyle (1627–1691) was an important figure. In his book The Sceptical Chymist (1661), he rejected old ideas from Aristotle and alchemy and introduced new scientific ideas about matter. He discovered Boyle’s Law, which says that when you make a gas container smaller, the pressure goes up (as long as the temperature stays the same). This showed that gases behave in ways that can be measured and predicted. Boyle also believed that science should be based on careful experiments that could be repeated.<sup>[158]</sup> The move from alchemy (an early, unscientific form of chemistry) to modern chemistry was led by Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794), who is often called the “father of modern chemistry.” Lavoisier discovered and named the elements oxygen and hydrogen, and he proved that the old phlogiston theory (which said things burned by releasing a strange substance) was wrong. He showed that in a chemical reaction, the total mass stays the same, which is now known as the law of conservation of mass. Lavoisier also created a clear system for naming chemicals, which helped scientists better organize and classify the elements.<sup>[159]</sup>


In [[medicine]], the 1800s were a turning point as it began to become more scientific. This progress was made thanks to new knowledge in disease research, germs, surgery, and public health. One of the most important scientists was [[Louis Pasteur]]. He showed that tiny [[organism]]s ([[Microorganism|microbe]]s) can cause [[disease]] and spoil food. This idea became known as the [[germ theory of disease]]. Pasteur proved that germs do not just appear out of nowhere (a belief called [[spontaneous generation]]). He also invented [[vaccine]]s for [[rabies]] and [[anthrax]], and created [[pasteurization]], a method to heat food and drinks to kill harmful microbes and keep them from spoiling.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Louis Pasteur {{!}} Biography, Inventions, Achievements, Germ Theory, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Louis-Pasteur|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Another important scientist was [[Robert Koch]]. He discovered the specific bacteria that cause [[tuberculosis]], [[cholera]], and [[anthrax]]. Koch also created new lab methods, like using [[agar plate]]s to grow [[bacteria]] and [[Staining|staining technique]]s to make microbes easier to see under a [[microscope]]. He developed Koch’s postulates, a set of rules that scientists use to prove that a certain germ causes a specific disease.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-05-23|title=Robert Koch {{!}} German Bacteriologist & Nobel Laureate {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Koch|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
In biology and anatomy, scientists during the Enlightenment started to focus more on how living things are organized. Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778) invented the system we still use today for naming living things, called binomial nomenclature. He gave each plant or animal two names, a genus and a species. This helped scientists all over the world talk about the same organisms clearly and consistently. His book, Systema Naturae, first published in 1735, listed and organized thousands of plants and animals and became the foundation of modern taxonomy, the science of classification. At the same time, scientists were learning more about how the human body works.<sup>[160]</sup> Albrecht von Haller studied things like how nerves work, how muscles move, and how the heart beats. Through experiments, he helped people understand how parts of the body function automatically, without us thinking about them. This was a big step forward in the science of physiology.<sup>[161]</sup>


In the 1840s, doctors began using [[anesthesia]], like [[ether]] and [[chloroform]], to perform pain-free surgeries. This was a huge breakthrough because it allowed [[surgeon]]s to do more complex operations without hurting the [[patient]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=History of Anaesthesia|url=https://wfsahq.org/about/history/history-of-anaesthesia/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=WFSA|language=en-GB}}</ref> Around the same time, [[Joseph Lister]] started using carbolic acid (also called [[phenol]]) to clean wounds and tools, which greatly reduced the number of people who died from [[infection]]s after [[surgery]]. His work helped start the use of [[Antiseptic|antiseptic technique]]s in [[hospital]]s and led to the modern idea of clean, germ-free medical care. Because of these changes, hospitals became places of real healing and science, not just places where the sick were kept.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Pitt|first1=Dennis|last2=Aubin|first2=Jean-Michel|date=2012-10-01|title=Joseph Lister: father of modern surgery|journal=Canadian Journal of Surgery|volume=55|issue=5|pages=E8–E9|doi=10.1503/cjs.007112|pmid=22992425 |pmc=3468637}}</ref> At the same time, big cities were facing many diseases due to crowding and [[pollution]] from the [[Industrial Revolution]]. This led to early [[public health]] reforms.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Health and the Industrial Revolution - Medicine and the Industrial Revolution - AQA - GCSE History Revision - AQA|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zf7yf82/revision/1|access-date=2025-07-17|website=BBC Bitesize|language=en-GB}}</ref> One important figure was [[Florence Nightingale]], who worked during the [[Crimean War]]. She pushed for clean hospitals, better nursing, and proper training, which helped improve medical care all over the world.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-08|title=Florence Nightingale {{!}} Biography & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Florence-Nightingale|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
During the Enlightenment, astronomy made big advances thanks to better telescopes and the growth of observatories. Edmond Halley (1656–1742) used Newton’s laws to predict when a certain comet would come back. He was right, and that comet is now named Halley's Comet. This showed that gravity could explain how objects move in space.<sup>[162]</sup> Later, William Herschel (1738–1822) discovered a new planet, Uranus, in 1781. He also found over 2,500 objects in the night sky, like nebulae (clouds of gas and dust) and star clusters. He built some of the biggest telescopes of his time. His work helped scientists realize that the universe is much bigger than just the Milky Way galaxy.<sup>[163]</sup> Astronomy became more professional, with major observatories in cities like Greenwich, Paris, and Berlin. These places also helped improve navigation, which was important for travel and trade.<sup>[164]</sup>


In the study of geology, scientists began to understand that [[Earth]] is very old, much older than people once believed. [[Charles Lyell]] wrote a famous book called Principles of Geology (1830–1833), where he explained that natural processes like [[erosion]] (wearing down of land) and [[sedimentation]] (building up of layers) happen slowly and steadily over a long time. This idea is called [[uniformitarianism]]. Lyell’s work was important because it challenged the biblical view that Earth was only a few thousand years old. It also gave [[Charles Darwin]] the long time span needed for his [[Evolution|theory of evolution]] to work.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Charles Lyell - Geologist, Stratigraphy, Uniformitarianism {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Charles-Lyell/Scientific-eminence|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Other areas of [[geology]], like [[stratigraphy]] (studying rock layers) and [[fossil correlation]] (matching [[fossil]]s to different layers), helped scientists piece together Earth’s history. Studies in [[mineralogy]] (minerals) and [[paleontology]] (fossils) also helped explain what the Earth is made of and what life used to be like.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Braterman|first=Paul S.|title=How Science Figured Out the Age of Earth|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-science-figured-out-the-age-of-the-earth/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Scientific American|language=en}}</ref>
Scientific institutions were very important during the Enlightenment. The Royal Society of London (founded in 1660) and the French Academy of Sciences (founded in 1666) brought scientists together to share ideas. They published journals, like Philosophical Transactions, that explained experiments, new discoveries, and theories. These groups helped make science more organized, trustworthy, and easy to understand by others. They also started the idea of peer review, where other scientists check your work. As more people learned to read and write, science started to spread outside of just schools and universities. Salons, coffeehouses, and public lectures became places where people talked about science. Scientists were no longer just private thinkers, they became public figures who shared their knowledge with everyone.<sup>[165]</sup>


During the 19th century, people began to study human behavior and [[society]] in a more scientific way. This was the beginning of the [[social science]]s. A thinker named [[Auguste Comte]] came up with the idea of [[positivism]], which said that we should study society using facts and observations, just like scientists study [[nature]]. This led to the creation of [[sociology]], a field that tries to understand how things like cities, factories, and social classes affect people’s lives.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Conerly|first1=Tonja R.|last2=Holmes|first2=Kathleen|last3=Tamang|first3=Asha Lal|date=2021-06-03|title=1.2 The History of Sociology - Introduction to Sociology 3e {{!}} OpenStax|url=https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-2-the-history-of-sociology|access-date=2025-07-17|website=openstax.org|language=English}}</ref> In [[economics]], early ideas from [[Adam Smith]] were built upon by other thinkers like [[David Ricardo]], [[Thomas Malthus]], and [[John Stuart Mill]]. They used [[Mathematics|math]] and [[statistics]] to study how money, jobs, and resources are shared in society.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Economics|url=https://www.britannica.com/money/economics/The-unintended-effects-of-markets|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>  
During the Enlightenment, medicine improved because doctors started focusing more on observing patients and learning through hospital training. One important doctor, Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682–1771), helped create modern diagnosis by showing that symptoms were linked to specific organs, not just to old ideas like imbalances of body fluids. This helped doctors understand that diseases could be traced to problems in certain parts of the body.<sup>[166]</sup> Another key figure was Edward Jenner (1749–1823), who made the first successful vaccine. He noticed that people who got cowpox did not catch smallpox, a deadly disease. He tested this idea and proved that cowpox could protect people. In 1798, he published his results, starting the science of immunology and vaccination.<sup>[167]</sup>


At the same time, science became more organized in every area. [[Country|Countries]] created national science academies and professional journals where scientists could publish and share their discoveries. Universities and research institutes trained new scientists, and [[government]]s or private groups started to fund science projects. Science also became something the public could enjoy and learn about. Museums and big events like the [[The Great Exhibition|Great Exhibition of 1851]] in [[London]] showed off new inventions and discoveries, proving that science was important for progress.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/international-exhibition-of-1862/0F8996950F010D2D4E740F06D65996A6|title=The International Exhibition of 1862: The Illustrated Catalogue of the Industrial Department: Volume 2: British Division 2|date=2014|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-108-06729-4|series=Cambridge Library Collection - Technology|volume=2|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/cbo9781107360617}}</ref> Some amazing inventions of the time included the [[telegraph]] (for long-distance [[communication]]), the [[steamship]], the [[electric light]], and [[photography]]. These changes showed how science could improve daily life and move society forward.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Nineteenth century inventions 1800 to 1899 - Inventions of the 1800s|url=https://theinventors.org/library/weekly/aa111100a.htm|access-date=2025-07-17|website=theinventors.org}}</ref>
During this time, science became more separate from religion and was seen as a way to improve society. Famous thinkers like Denis Diderot, Voltaire, and Jean le Rond d’Alembert believed that science and reason could free people’s minds and make the world better. They worked on a big project called the Encyclopédie (1751–1772), which was like an early encyclopedia. It collected all known scientific and technical knowledge into one place and made it easier for people to learn about how things work, from optics and anatomy to mining and tools.<sup>[165]</sup> Engineering and technology also made huge progress. James Watt made important changes to the steam engine in the 1760s and 1770s by adding a separate condenser, which made the engine much more efficient. His improvements helped power factories and machines, leading to the Industrial Revolution.<sup>[168]</sup>


===20th and 21st Century Science===
'''19th Century Science'''
[[File:BBH gravitational lensing of gw150914.webm|thumb|Video simulation of the merger [[GW150914]], showing [[spacetime]] distortion from gravity as the black holes orbit and merge, showcasing [[Albert Einstein]]´s [[theory of relativity]]]]
At the start of the 20th century, scientists realized that the old ideas of physics (called [[classical mechanics]]) could not fully explain how very small things (like [[atom]]s) or very large things (like [[Galaxy|galaxies]]) work. This led to the birth of [[modern physics]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=D. G. C.|date=2007-07-01|title=The birth of modern physics|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510701661456|journal=Contemporary Physics|volume=48|issue=4|pages=227–229|doi=10.1080/00107510701661456|bibcode=2007ConPh..48..227J |issn=0010-7514}}</ref> In 1905, a young scientist named [[Albert Einstein]] wrote four important papers that changed science forever. One of these introduced the [[special theory of relativity]], which showed that [[time]] and [[space]] are not fixed. Instead, time can slow down and lengths can shrink when objects move very fast, close to the [[speed of light]]. He also came up with the famous equation E = mc², showing that [[mass]] and [[energy]] are two forms of the same thing.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Einstein States His Theory of Special Relativity {{!}} EBSCO Research Starters|url=https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/einstein-states-his-theory-special-relativity|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.ebsco.com|language=en}}</ref> Later, in 1915, Einstein created the [[general theory of relativity]], which explained [[gravity]] in a new way. Instead of thinking of gravity as a pulling force, he said that [[mass]] bends [[spacetime]], and this bending is what is felt as gravity. This idea helped scientists understand things like [[black hole]]s, [[gravitational lensing]] (how light bends around stars), and how the [[universe]] is expanding.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-07|title=General relativity {{!}} Gravitational Waves, Spacetime & Cosmology {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/general-relativity|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>


At the same time, a different kind of [[physics]] called [[quantum mechanics]] was being developed to understand how things work at the level of atoms and tiny particles. In 1900, [[Max Planck]] said that [[energy]] comes in small amounts, called [[quanta]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Max Planck: Originator of quantum theory|url=https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Planck/Max_Planck_Originator_of_quantum_theory|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.esa.int|language=en}}</ref> [[Niels Bohr]] created a model of the atom where electrons move in specific orbits, helping to explain how atoms give off light.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-06-23|title=5.6: Bohr's Atomic Model|url=https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/05%3A_Electrons_in_Atoms/5.06%3A_Bohr's_Atomic_Model|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Chemistry LibreTexts|language=en}}</ref> [[Werner Heisenberg]] and Bohr developed the [[Copenhagen interpretation]], which included the [[uncertainty principle]]. This says we cannot know exactly where a particle is and how fast it is moving at the same time.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-15|title=Uncertainty principle {{!}} Definition & Equation {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/uncertainty-principle|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> [[Erwin Schrödinger]] came up with wave mechanics, which showed how particles can also act like waves.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-06-23|title=5.11: Quantum Mechanical Atomic Model|url=https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/05%3A_Electrons_in_Atoms/5.11%3A_Quantum_Mechanical_Atomic_Model|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Chemistry LibreTexts|language=en}}</ref> [[Paul Dirac]] combined quantum theory with Einstein’s ideas and predicted the existence of [[antimatter]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Antimatter {{!}} CERN|url=https://home.cern/science/physics/antimatter|access-date=2025-07-17|website=home.cern}}</ref> These discoveries helped create many modern technologies, like [[semiconductor]]s (used in [[computer]]s), [[laser]]s, [[nuclear power]], and even the new field of [[quantum computing]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Quantum applications today {{!}} Institute for Quantum Computing {{!}} University of Waterloo|url=https://uwaterloo.ca/institute-for-quantum-computing/resources/quantum-101/quantum-applications-today|access-date=2025-07-17|website=uwaterloo.ca|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=How Are Quantum Phenomena Used in Technology Today?|url=http://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/quantum-technology|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Caltech Science Exchange|language=en}}</ref>
The first diagram of an evolutionary tree made by Charles Darwin in 1837


In the 20th century, a new area of science called [[nuclear physics]] became very important and had a big impact on the world. It started when [[Henri Becquerel]] discovered [[radioactivity]], and [[Marie Curie|Marie]] and [[Pierre Curie]] studied it further. They learned how [[atom]]s can break apart in a process called atomic decay. In 1938, scientists [[Otto Hahn]] and [[Fritz Strassmann]] discovered something called [[nuclear fission]], which is when the nucleus of an [[atom]] splits, releasing a huge amount of [[energy]]. [[Lise Meitner]] and [[Otto Frisch]] explained how it worked. This discovery led to the creation of the [[Manhattan Project]], a secret program where scientists like [[Enrico Fermi]] and [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] developed the first [[atomic bomb]], which was used in [[World War II]] in 1945. But nuclear physics was not just used for weapons. It also led to the development of [[nuclear power plant]]s, which generate [[electricity]], and medical technologies like PET scans (used to see inside the body) and [[radiation therapy]] (used to treat [[cancer]]).<ref>{{Cite web|title=Outline History of Nuclear Energy - World Nuclear Association|url=https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/outline-history-of-nuclear-energy|access-date=2025-07-17|website=world-nuclear.org}}</ref>
During the 1800s, science made big changes, especially in how we understand heat, energy, electricity, and atoms. In the study of heat and energy, thermodynamics, scientists created the laws of thermodynamics. These laws helped people understand how steam engines work and how to make them more efficient. In 1824, a scientist named Sadi Carnot came up with the idea of the Carnot cycle, which showed that an engine’s efficiency depends on the temperature difference between where the heat comes from and where it goes. This idea helped lead to the second law of thermodynamics, which explains how energy spreads out.<sup>[169]</sup> Later, Rudolf Clausius introduced the idea of entropy, which measures how energy becomes more disordered over time.<sup>[170]</sup> Scientists William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and James Prescott Joule created the first law of thermodynamics, which says that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only changed from one form to another.<sup>[171][172]</sup>


Meanwhile, in biology, scientists began to understand how traits are passed from parents to children. This started with the rediscovery of [[Mendelian inheritance|Gregor Mendel’s laws of inheritance]], which led to the science of [[genetics]]. In 1953, [[James Watson]] and [[Francis Crick]], using X-ray images from [[Rosalind Franklin]] and [[Maurice Wilkins]], discovered the double helix structure of [[DNA]]. This showed how genetic information is stored in the sequence of [[nucleotide]]s (the building blocks of DNA).<ref>{{Cite web|title=Discovery of DNA Double Helix: Watson and Crick {{!}} Learn Science at Scitable|url=http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/discovery-of-dna-structure-and-function-watson-397|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.nature.com|language=en}}</ref> This discovery led to [[molecular biology]], which helped scientists understand how [[gene]]s make [[protein]]s and how certain diseases are caused by genetic problems.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Molecular biology {{!}} Description, Techniques, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/molecular-biology|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Later, a huge international project called the [[Human Genome Project]] finished in 2003. Scientists mapped out all the DNA in a [[human]], which includes over 3 billion base pairs and more than 20,000 genes. This started the field of [[genomics]], and helped create new ways to study and treat diseases through [[personalized medicine]] and [[bioinformatics]] (the use of computers in biology).<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-30|title=Human Genome Project (HGP) {{!}} History, Timeline, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Human-Genome-Project|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
In electricity and magnetism, scientists discovered that these two forces are connected. Michael Faraday, in the 1830s and 1840s, did experiments that showed how moving magnets can create electricity, a process called electromagnetic induction. This discovery is what makes electric generators and transformers work. Faraday also came up with the idea of fields, which are invisible areas where electric or magnetic forces can act.<sup>[173]</sup> Later, in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell built on Faraday’s work and wrote four equations, called Maxwell's equations, that explain how electric and magnetic fields move and interact. These equations also predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves, which led to the invention of things like radios, TVs, and wireless communication.<sup>[174]</sup>


Biotechnology in the late 1900s and early 2000s gave scientists amazing new tools to work with [[DNA]] and [[gene]]s. These included [[Recombinant DNA technology]] which lets scientists combine DNA from different sources.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Recombinant DNA Technology|url=https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Recombinant-DNA-Technology|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.genome.gov|language=en}}</ref> PCR ([[polymerase chain reaction]]) is a method to quickly make millions of copies of a piece of DNA.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techpcr/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov}}</ref> [[CRISPR|CRISPR-Cas9]], on the other hand, is a tool that lets scientists edit [[gene]]s very precisely, like using scissors to cut and change DNA.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Redman|first1=Melody|last2=King|first2=Andrew|last3=Watson|first3=Caroline|last4=King|first4=David|date=2016|title=What is CRISPR/Cas9?|journal=Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education & Practice Edition|language=en|volume=101|issue=4|pages=213–215|doi=10.1136/archdischild-2016-310459|pmid=27059283 |issn=1743-0585|pmc=4975809}}</ref> These tools are now used in many ways. To create [[genetically modified crops]], make medicines like [[insulin]], perform [[gene therapy]] to treat diseases, and do quick and accurate disease testing.<ref>{{Citation|last=Lloyd|first=J. R.|title=Applications of Genetics|date=1986|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10391-1_6|work=Genes and Chromosomes|pages=92–102|editor-last=Lloyd|editor-first=J. R.|place=London|publisher=Macmillan Education UK|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-1-349-10391-1_6|isbn=978-1-349-10391-1|access-date=2025-07-17}}</ref> In medicine, a huge breakthrough came in 1928, when [[Alexander Fleming]] discovered [[penicillin]], the first [[antibiotic]]. This completely changed how bacterial infections were treated and saved millions of lives.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hutchings|first1=Matthew I|last2=Truman|first2=Andrew W|last3=Wilkinson|first3=Barrie|date=2019-10-01|title=Antibiotics: past, present and future|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369527419300190|journal=Current Opinion in Microbiology|series=Antimicrobials|volume=51|pages=72–80|doi=10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.008|pmid=31733401 |issn=1369-5274}}</ref> Later, [[vaccine]]s were developed for deadly diseases like [[polio]], [[measles]], and [[HPV (virus)|HPV]]. More recently, [[mRNA vaccine]]s (like some COVID-19 vaccines) have helped fight new diseases and protect public health around the world.<ref>{{Cite web|title=A Brief History of Vaccination|url=https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccination/a-brief-history-of-vaccination|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.who.int|language=en}}</ref>
At the beginning of the century, John Dalton brought back the idea of atomic theory. He said that every element (like oxygen or iron) is made up of its own kind of atom, and these atoms combine in fixed amounts to make compounds (like water or carbon dioxide). His ideas helped explain important chemistry rules, like the law of multiple proportions, which says that elements always combine in certain number patterns.<sup>[175]</sup> Later, in 1869, Dmitri Mendeleev created the periodic table. He arranged the elements in order by atomic mass and grouped them by chemical properties. Mendeleev’s table was so smart that it even predicted new elements, like gallium and germanium, before they were discovered. When scientists later found these elements and they matched his predictions, it showed that the periodic law was a powerful way to understand and organize chemistry.<sup>[176]</sup>


At the same time, information technology and computer science became a big part of science and everyday life. During [[World War II]], the first electronic computers, [[ENIAC]] and [[Colossus (computer)|Colossus]], were built.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-11|title=ENIAC {{!}} History, Computer, Stands For, Machine, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/ENIAC|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Colossus|url=https://www.tnmoc.org/colossus|access-date=2025-07-17|website=The National Museum of Computing|language=en-GB}}</ref> [[Alan Turing]] created early ideas about how [[computer]]s work and also helped crack secret codes during the war.<ref>{{Cite web|title=How Alan Turing Cracked The Enigma Code|url=https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/how-alan-turing-cracked-the-enigma-code|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Imperial War Museums|language=en}}</ref> In 1947, three scientists at [[Bell Labs]], Bardeen, Brattain, and Shockley, invented the [[transistor]], a tiny part that made it possible to build smaller and faster electronic devices. This led to the [[microprocessor]] and started the digital revolution.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Transistor - Innovation, Bell Labs, Electronics {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/transistor/Innovation-at-Bell-Labs|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref> Later, scientists created the [[internet]], which began as a government project called [[ARPANET]]. The internet grew into a huge, worldwide system that allows people to communicate, learn, shop, and share information.<ref>{{Cite web|title=A Brief History of the Internet|url=https://www.usg.edu/galileo/skills/unit07/internet07_02.phtml|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.usg.edu|archive-date=2002-02-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020218221559/https://www.usg.edu/galileo/skills/unit07/internet07_02.phtml|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Meanwhile, biology was also changing in a major way. In 1859, Charles Darwin published a book called On the Origin of Species. In it, he explained his theory of evolution by natural selection. Darwin said that living things change over time. These changes happen because of small differences that are passed from parents to offspring. If a trait helps an organism survive and have more babies, that trait becomes more common over generations. This is how new species can form. Darwin got many of his ideas by observing animals and plants during his long trip on the ship HMS Beagle. He was also influenced by Thomas Malthus, who wrote about how populations grow, and Charles Lyell, who studied how the Earth changes slowly over time. Darwin’s theory replaced older ideas that species never change. It gave scientists a new way to understand life, one that was based on evidence, change, and history. It also started many important discussions about science, religion, and philosophy.<sup>[177]</sup>


Space science made huge leaps forward in the 20th century as humans began to explore beyond [[Earth]] for the first time. In 1957, the [[Soviet Union]] launched [[Sputnik 1]], the first [[Satellite (artificial)|artificial satellite]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Sputnik|url=https://www.nasa.gov/history/sputnik/index.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.nasa.gov}}</ref> Then, in 1961, [[Yuri Gagarin]] became the first human in space.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Yuri Gagarin|url=https://www.esa.int/About_Us/50_years_of_ESA/50_years_of_humans_in_space/Yuri_Gagarin|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.esa.int|language=en}}</ref> One of the biggest milestones came in 1969, when NASA’s [[Apollo Program]] sent [[Neil Armstrong]] and [[Buzz Aldrin]] to the Moon, making them the first people to walk on the [[Moon]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Apollo 11 - NASA|url=https://www.nasa.gov/mission/apollo-11/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> Robots also helped us explore space. The [[Voyager program|Voyager probes]], launched in 1977, sent back amazing information about the outer planets and are still traveling through interstellar space (the space between stars).<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-04-09|title=Mission Overview - NASA Science|url=https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/mission-overview/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> In 1990, the [[Hubble Space Telescope]] was launched into [[orbit]]. It took detailed pictures of [[Galaxy|galaxies]], [[nebulae]], and [[supernovae]], helping scientists learn more about the expanding universe.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2023-05-10|title=Hubble Space Telescope - NASA Science|url=https://science.nasa.gov/mission/hubble/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> In the 21st century, space exploration has kept growing. NASA’s Mars rovers explore the Red Planet.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-03-22|title=Mars Exploration Rovers: Spirit and Opportunity - NASA Science|url=https://science.nasa.gov/mission/mars-exploration-rovers-spirit-and-opportunity/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref> Space telescopes like Kepler and TESS search for [[exoplanet]]s (planets around other stars).<ref>{{Cite web|date=2023-05-23|title=Kepler / K2 - NASA Science|url=https://science.nasa.gov/mission/kepler/|access-date=2025-07-17|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) {{!}} Center for Astrophysics {{!}} Harvard & Smithsonian|url=https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/facilities-technology/telescopes-instruments/transiting-exoplanet-survey-satellite-tess|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.cfa.harvard.edu}}</ref> Private companies like [[SpaceX]] and [[Blue Origin]] are working on things like Mars missions and even [[space tourism]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Technology and the History of Commercial Spaceflight - Purdue Polytechnic Institute|url=https://polytechnic.purdue.edu/purdue-online/blog/technology-and-history-of-commercial-spaceflight|access-date=2025-07-17|website=polytechnic.purdue.edu|language=en|archive-date=2024-08-31|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240831063201/https://polytechnic.purdue.edu/purdue-online/blog/technology-and-history-of-commercial-spaceflight|url-status=dead}}</ref>
At the same time as other big discoveries in the 1800s, scientists also developed the cell theory, which says that all living things are made of cells, and that the cell is the basic unit of life. This idea was first introduced in the 1830s by Matthias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann. Later, Rudolf Virchow added that all cells come from other cells, which he summed up in the Latin phrase "omnis cellula e cellula". The invention and improvement of the light microscope helped scientists look more closely at cells. They were able to discover important parts inside cells, like the nucleus, mitochondria, and other tiny structures called organelles. These discoveries helped build the foundation for molecular biology and genetics, which study how cells work and how traits are passed down.<sup>[178]</sup>


At the same time, climate and [[environmental science]] became very important. Back in 1896, scientist [[Svante Arrhenius]] said that [[Carbon dioxide|carbon dioxide (CO₂)]] in the air could raise Earth’s temperature. This is called the [[greenhouse effect]]. By the late 1900s, scientists had strong evidence that human activities, like burning [[fossil fuel]]s, were changing the [[climate]]. They got this data from things like ice cores, satellites, and ocean studies. Today, scientists around the world work together through groups like the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)]] to study [[climate change]] and warn about its dangers. They say it is urgent to reduce CO₂ emissions to protect the [[planet]]. To help with this, we now use tools like climate models, remote sensing (using satellites to study Earth), and [[renewable energy]] (like solar and wind power) to fight climate change and find better ways to live sustainably.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2024-02-08|title=The History of Climate Change {{!}} IBM|url=https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/climate-change-history|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.ibm.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Nations|first=United|title=What Is Climate Change?|url=https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change|access-date=2025-07-17|website=United Nations|language=en}}</ref>
In medicine, the 1800s were a turning point as it began to become more scientific. This progress was made thanks to new knowledge in disease research, germs, surgery, and public health. One of the most important scientists was Louis Pasteur. He showed that tiny organisms (microbes) can cause disease and spoil food. This idea became known as the germ theory of disease. Pasteur proved that germs do not just appear out of nowhere (a belief called spontaneous generation). He also invented vaccines for rabies and anthrax, and created pasteurization, a method to heat food and drinks to kill harmful microbes and keep them from spoiling.<sup>[179]</sup> Another important scientist was Robert Koch. He discovered the specific bacteria that cause tuberculosis, cholera, and anthrax. Koch also created new lab methods, like using agar plates to grow bacteria and staining techniques to make microbes easier to see under a microscope. He developed Koch’s postulates, a set of rules that scientists use to prove that a certain germ causes a specific disease.<sup>[180]</sup>


[[Neuroscience]] and [[cognitive science]] are the sciences that study the [[brain]] and how we think, feel, and make decisions. In recent years, scientists have made big discoveries thanks to new brain scanning tools like [[fMRI]] and [[Positron emission tomography|PET scan]]s, which show real-time images of brain activity. These tools helped researchers find out that the [[prefrontal cortex]] (the front part of the brain) is important for decision-making, and the [[amygdala]] (a small part deep in the brain) helps process [[emotion]]s like [[fear]] and [[anger]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=History of Neuroscience|url=https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/hist.html|access-date=2025-07-17|website=faculty.washington.edu}}</ref> Today, scientists are trying to map all the connections in the brain. This is called [[connectomics]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=A New Field of Neuroscience Aims to Map Connections in the Brain|url=https://hms.harvard.edu/news/new-field-neuroscience-aims-map-connections-brain|access-date=2025-07-17|website=hms.harvard.edu}}</ref> Also, brain-computer interfaces have been developed. These allow people who are paralyzed to move robotic arms or [[Prosthesis|prosthetic limb]]s using only their brain signals.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Mind Control Prosthesis|url=https://spotlight.engin.umich.edu//mind-control-prosthesis/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Spotlight|language=en}}</ref> At the same time, fields like [[Artificial intelligence|artificial intelligence (AI)]] and machine learning, which used to be mostly theory, are now real tools. They help with things like voice assistants, face recognition, medical diagnoses, and self-driving cars.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-23|title=History of artificial intelligence {{!}} Dates, Advances, Alan Turing, ELIZA, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/history-of-artificial-intelligence|access-date=2025-07-17|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
In the 1840s, doctors began using anesthesia, like ether and chloroform, to perform pain-free surgeries. This was a huge breakthrough because it allowed surgeons to do more complex operations without hurting the patient.<sup>[181]</sup> Around the same time, Joseph Lister started using carbolic acid (also called phenol) to clean wounds and tools, which greatly reduced the number of people who died from infections after surgery. His work helped start the use of antiseptic techniques in hospitals and led to the modern idea of clean, germ-free medical care. Because of these changes, hospitals became places of real healing and science, not just places where the sick were kept.<sup>[182]</sup> At the same time, big cities were facing many diseases due to crowding and pollution from the Industrial Revolution. This led to early public health reforms.<sup>[183]</sup> One important figure was Florence Nightingale, who worked during the Crimean War. She pushed for clean hospitals, better nursing, and proper training, which helped improve medical care all over the world.<sup>[184]</sup>


In the 21st century, scientists from different fields began working together more closely, creating powerful new areas of research. These include [[nanotechnology]] (the science of building tiny machines and materials at the scale of atoms and molecules), [[synthetic biology]] (designing and creating new living systems, such as [[bacteria]] that produce medicine), [[quantum information science]] (using the strange laws of [[quantum physics]] to make ultra-powerful computers), and [[systems biology]] (studying how all the parts of a living system work together). One of the biggest science projects of this century was at CERN, where scientists used the [[Large Hadron Collider|Large Hadron Collider (LHC)]], a huge machine that smashes particles together, to discover the [[Higgs boson]] in 2012. This particle helps explain how other particles get mass and is a key part of the [[Standard Model|Standard Model of physics]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-07-17|title=The Higgs boson|url=https://home.cern/science/physics/higgs-boson|access-date=2025-07-17|website=CERN|language=en}}</ref> Scientists are also still trying to solve big mysteries like [[dark matter]], [[dark energy]], and how to unite quantum physics with [[gravity]], which could lead to a unified theory of everything in the [[universe]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Cosmology|url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/Cosmology/|access-date=2025-07-17|website=Maths History|language=en}}</ref>
In the study of geology, scientists began to understand that Earth is very old, much older than people once believed. Charles Lyell wrote a famous book called Principles of Geology (1830–1833), where he explained that natural processes like erosion (wearing down of land) and sedimentation (building up of layers) happen slowly and steadily over a long time. This idea is called uniformitarianism. Lyell’s work was important because it challenged the biblical view that Earth was only a few thousand years old. It also gave Charles Darwin the long time span needed for his theory of evolution to work.<sup>[185]</sup> Other areas of geology, like stratigraphy (studying rock layers) and fossil correlation (matching fossils to different layers), helped scientists piece together Earth’s history. Studies in mineralogy (minerals) and paleontology (fossils) also helped explain what the Earth is made of and what life used to be like.<sup>[186]</sup>


==Branches==
During the 19th century, people began to study human behavior and society in a more scientific way. This was the beginning of the social sciences. A thinker named Auguste Comte came up with the idea of positivism, which said that we should study society using facts and observations, just like scientists study nature. This led to the creation of sociology, a field that tries to understand how things like cities, factories, and social classes affect people’s lives.<sup>[187]</sup> In economics, early ideas from Adam Smith were built upon by other thinkers like David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus, and John Stuart Mill. They used math and statistics to study how money, jobs, and resources are shared in society.<sup>[188]</sup>
===Natural sciences===
{{Multiple image
| perrow            = 2
| total_width      = 320
| image1            = Carina Nebula.jpg|thumb|upright|A fragment of [[DNA]], the chemical sequence that contains instructions for [[life]]
| image2            = DNA-fragment-3D-vdW.png
| height2          = 2482
| image3            = Topspun.jpg
| height3          = 449
| image4            = Volcano q.jpg
| height4          = 1654
| image5            = Herd of Elephants.jpg
| height5          = 1200
| footer            = The natural sciences seek to understand how the world and [[universe]] around us works. There are five major branches, indicated by the photos above taken clockwise from top left: [[astronomy]], [[chemistry]], [[Earth science]], [[biology]], and [[physics]].
}}
[[Natural science]]s are a major area of science that focuses on understanding the [[Nature|natural world]]. Scientists in this field study how things in nature work by watching carefully, doing [[experiment]]s, and creating [[Scientific model|model]]s or [[Scientific theory|theories]]. These models help explain why things happen and can even predict what might happen next. Natural sciences depend on [[evidence]] that can be seen, measured, and repeated. Scientists use the [[scientific method]], which means they make guesses (called [[Hypothesis|hypotheses]]), test them through experiments, and change their ideas if the results do not match. This process helps make sure that scientific conclusions are as accurate as possible.<ref name=":6">{{Cite book|title=Philosophy of natural science|url=https://archive.org/details/philosophyofnatu0000hemp_u7r5|last=Hempel|first=Carl Gustav|date=1966|publisher=Prentice-Hall|isbn=978-0-13-663823-0|series=Prentice-Hall foundations of philosophy series|location=Englewood Cliffs, NJ}}</ref>


There are several main areas of natural science, including [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[biology]], [[earth science]]s, and [[astronomy]]. Each area focuses on different parts of [[nature]], but they often work together in today’s research. [[Physics]] is the study of [[matter]], [[energy]], and the [[force]]s that affect them. Physicists explore everything from the tiniest particles, like [[electron]]s and [[quark]]s, to giant objects like [[star]]s and [[Galaxy|galaxies]]. They use different theories depending on the scale. [[Quantum mechanics]] for tiny particles and [[general relativity]] for huge cosmic objects. Physics has led to important laws and ideas that help explain the [[universe]], such as [[Newton's laws of motion]], the [[laws of thermodynamics]], [[Maxwell's equations]] for [[electricity]] and [[magnetism]], and the [[Standard Model]], which organizes the basic building blocks of matter.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-25|title=Physics {{!}} Definition, Types, Topics, Importance, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/physics-science|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
At the same time, science became more organized in every area. Countries created national science academies and professional journals where scientists could publish and share their discoveries. Universities and research institutes trained new scientists, and governments or private groups started to fund science projects. Science also became something the public could enjoy and learn about. Museums and big events like the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London showed off new inventions and discoveries, proving that science was important for progress.<sup>[189]</sup> Some amazing inventions of the time included the telegraph (for long-distance communication), the steamship, the electric light, and photography. These changes showed how science could improve daily life and move society forward.<sup>[190]</sup>


[[Chemistry]] is often called the central science because it connects [[physics]] and [[biology]]. It focuses on what [[matter]] is made of, how it is structured, how it behaves, and how it changes during reactions. Chemists study [[atom]]s and [[molecule]]s to understand how they bond together, break apart, and move [[energy]] during chemical changes. Chemistry is divided into different areas. [[Organic chemistry]] studies compounds that contain [[carbon]] (like [[living thing]]s do). [[Inorganic chemistry]] looks at compounds without [[carbon]]. [[Physical chemistry]] explores how chemistry and physics work together. [[Analytical chemistry]] focuses on measuring and identifying substances. [[Biochemistry]] applies chemistry to biological systems like [[cell]]s and [[DNA]]. Because of chemistry, there are [[drug]]s, [[plastic]]s, [[Battery|batteries]], [[fertilizer]]s, and many other useful materials and tools.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-22|title=Chemistry {{!}} Definition, Topics, Types, History, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/chemistry|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
'''20th and 21st Century Science'''


[[Biology]] is the science of [[living thing]]s. It explores how [[organism]]s are built, how they work, how they grow, where they come from, and how they change over time. Biology includes many branches, such as [[cell biology]] (which studies the basic units of life, [[cell]]s), [[genetics]] (which looks at [[heredity]] and [[DNA]]), [[ecology]] (which studies how [[organism]]s interact with each other and the environment), [[evolutionary biology]] (which looks at how [[life]] has changed over millions of years), and [[molecular biology]] (which focuses on life at the smallest scales, like [[protein]]s and [[gene]]s). Biologists use tools like [[microscope]]s, [[DNA sequencing]], and gene editing to explore life. Biology is important in [[health]], [[farming]], nature protection, and [[biotechnology]], helping us make [[vaccine]]s, improve [[crop]]s, and protect [[endangered species]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Biology {{!}} Definition, History, Concepts, Branches, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/biology|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
Video simulation of the merger GW150914, showing spacetime distortion from gravity as the black holes orbit and merge, showcasing Albert Einstein´s theory of relativity


[[Earth science]]s, also called geosciences, are the sciences that study the [[Earth]] and everything that affects it. This includes the solid [[Lithosphere|ground]], the [[atmosphere]] ([[air]] and [[weather]]), the [[hydrosphere]] ([[water]] and [[ocean]]s), and the [[biosphere]] (all [[living thing]]s). Earth scientists use ideas from physics, chemistry, and biology to understand how Earth’s systems work together. Earth sciences include [[geology]], which looks at the layers of the Earth, [[rock]]s, and the history of the planet; [[meteorology]], which studies [[weather]] and the [[atmosphere]]; [[oceanography]], which focuses on [[ocean]]s and [[Aquatic|sea life]]; and [[climatology]], which examines long-term climate patterns and how they change. These studies are important for learning about [[natural disaster]]s like [[earthquake]]s, [[volcano]]es, and [[hurricane]]s, and for helping us manage [[natural resource]]s and protect the [[environment]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Earth sciences {{!}} Definition, Topics, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/Earth-sciences|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
At the start of the 20th century, scientists realized that the old ideas of physics (called classical mechanics) could not fully explain how very small things (like atoms) or very large things (like galaxies) work. This led to the birth of modern physics.<sup>[191]</sup> In 1905, a young scientist named Albert Einstein wrote four important papers that changed science forever. One of these introduced the special theory of relativity, which showed that time and space are not fixed. Instead, time can slow down and lengths can shrink when objects move very fast, close to the speed of light. He also came up with the famous equation E = mc², showing that mass and energy are two forms of the same thing.<sup>[192]</sup> Later, in 1915, Einstein created the general theory of relativity, which explained gravity in a new way. Instead of thinking of gravity as a pulling force, he said that mass bends spacetime, and this bending is what is felt as gravity. This idea helped scientists understand things like black holes, gravitational lensing (how light bends around stars), and how the universe is expanding.<sup>[193]</sup>


[[Astronomy]] is the science that studies [[Outer space|space]], [[planet]]s, [[star]]s, [[Galaxy|galaxies]], and the [[universe]]. Astronomers observe the sky using [[telescope]]s and use [[Scientific theory|theories]] and [[Mathematics|math]] to understand what they see. Modern astronomy is closely connected to [[physics]], especially in a branch called [[astrophysics]], which uses physical laws to explain how space objects behave. Astronomy has helped us discover just how huge the universe is and that there are other [[Star system|solar system]]s beyond our own. Scientists study amazing objects in space like [[black hole]]s, [[neutron star]]s, and [[dark matter]], a mysterious substance that we cannot see directly. Astronomy also helps us explore big questions, like where the universe came from, how it has changed over time, and what might happen to it in the [[future]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2025-06-21|title=Astronomy {{!}} Definition, History, Discoveries, & Facts {{!}} Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/astronomy|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.britannica.com|language=en}}</ref>
At the same time, a different kind of physics called quantum mechanics was being developed to understand how things work at the level of atoms and tiny particles. In 1900, Max Planck said that energy comes in small amounts, called quanta.<sup>[194]</sup> Niels Bohr created a model of the atom where electrons move in specific orbits, helping to explain how atoms give off light.<sup>[195]</sup> Werner Heisenberg and Bohr developed the Copenhagen interpretation, which included the uncertainty principle. This says we cannot know exactly where a particle is and how fast it is moving at the same time.<sup>[196]</sup> Erwin Schrödinger came up with wave mechanics, which showed how particles can also act like waves.<sup>[197]</sup> Paul Dirac combined quantum theory with Einstein’s ideas and predicted the existence of antimatter.<sup>[198]</sup> These discoveries helped create many modern technologies, like semiconductors (used in computers), lasers, nuclear power, and even the new field of quantum computing.<sup>[199][200]</sup>


The natural sciences all use similar methods to learn about the world. First, scientists use empirical observation, which means they carefully collect [[data]] using tools or by studying things in [[nature]]. They also do [[experiment]]s, where they test [[idea]]s in controlled settings to see what happens. Another method is [[mathematical model]]ing, where scientists use math and [[computer]]s to describe and predict how things work. To make sure results are trustworthy, scientists follow rules like [[peer review]] (where other experts check their work), [[reproducibility]] (so others can repeat the experiment), and [[falsifiability]] (the idea that scientific claims must be testable and could be proven wrong). Scientists use [[number]]s and [[statistics]] to support their conclusions with solid, unbiased [[evidence]].<ref name=":6" />
In the 20th century, a new area of science called nuclear physics became very important and had a big impact on the world. It started when Henri Becquerel discovered radioactivity, and Marie and Pierre Curie studied it further. They learned how atoms can break apart in a process called atomic decay. In 1938, scientists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann discovered something called nuclear fission, which is when the nucleus of an atom splits, releasing a huge amount of energy. Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch explained how it worked. This discovery led to the creation of the Manhattan Project, a secret program where scientists like Enrico Fermi and J. Robert Oppenheimer developed the first atomic bomb, which was used in World War II in 1945. But nuclear physics was not just used for weapons. It also led to the development of nuclear power plants, which generate electricity, and medical technologies like PET scans (used to see inside the body) and radiation therapy (used to treat cancer).<sup>[201]</sup>


Today, the natural sciences often combine different subjects to solve big problems. These mixed areas are called interdisciplinary fields, like [[biophysics]] (biology + physics), [[astrochemistry]] (astronomy + chemistry), [[geobiology]] (geology + biology), and [[climate science]] (which combines many fields).<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ledford|first=Heidi|date=2015-09-01|title=How to solve the world's biggest problems|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/525308a|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=525|issue=7569|pages=308–311|doi=10.1038/525308a|pmid=26381968 |bibcode=2015Natur.525..308L |issn=1476-4687}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153|title=Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research|date=2004-04-04|publisher=National Academies Press|isbn=978-0-309-09435-1|location=Washington, D.C.|doi=10.17226/11153 |bibcode=2004nap..book11153N }}</ref> These new fields help scientists understand complex challenges, such as [[climate change]], [[disease outbreak]]s, [[clean energy]], and [[space exploration]]. For example, studying the [[climate]] means using knowledge from physics, chemistry, biology, and computer modeling.<ref name=":10">{{Cite book|title=A vast machine: computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming|last=Edwards|first=Paul N.|date=2013|publisher=The MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-51863-5|edition=1st paperback|series=Infrastructures series|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England}}</ref> Scientists in [[astrobiology]] use ideas from space science, chemistry, and biology to search for life on other [[Exoplanet|planet]]s.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Astrobiology: a multidisciplinary approach|url=https://archive.org/details/astrobiologymult0000luni|last=Lunine|first=Jonathan Irving|date=2005|publisher=Pearson Addison Wesley|isbn=978-0-8053-8042-2|location=San Franciso}}</ref>
Meanwhile, in biology, scientists began to understand how traits are passed from parents to children. This started with the rediscovery of Gregor Mendel’s laws of inheritance, which led to the science of genetics. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, using X-ray images from Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins, discovered the double helix structure of DNA. This showed how genetic information is stored in the sequence of nucleotides (the building blocks of DNA).<sup>[202]</sup> This discovery led to molecular biology, which helped scientists understand how genes make proteins and how certain diseases are caused by genetic problems.<sup>[203]</sup> Later, a huge international project called the Human Genome Project finished in 2003. Scientists mapped out all the DNA in a human, which includes over 3 billion base pairs and more than 20,000 genes. This started the field of genomics, and helped create new ways to study and treat diseases through personalized medicine and bioinformatics (the use of computers in biology).<sup>[204]</sup>


The natural sciences have led to amazing [[technology]] and discoveries that have changed our lives. Physics helped create [[nuclear energy]], [[computer]]s, and [[electronics]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=The making of the atomic bomb|url=https://archive.org/details/makingofatomicbo0000rhod_v1i2|date=2012|publisher=Simon & Schuster Paperbacks|isbn=978-1-4516-7761-4|editor-last=Rhodes|editor-first=Richard|edition=25th anniversary|location=New York, N.Y.}}</ref> Chemistry made new [[Drug|medicine]]s, better [[Agrochemical|farming product]]s, and useful materials like [[plastic]]s.<ref>{{Cite book|title=A history of chemistry|url=https://archive.org/details/historyofchemist0000bens|last1=Bensaude-Vincent|first1=Bernadette|last2=Stengers|first2=Isabelle|date=1996|publisher=Harvard Univ. Press|isbn=978-0-674-39659-3|location=Cambridge, Mass.}}</ref> Biology and medicine led to [[vaccine]]s, treatments for [[genetic diseases]], and ways to grow or repair body parts.<ref>{{Cite book|title=A history of biology|last=Morange|first=Michel|date=2021|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-18878-2|location=Princeton, NJ}}</ref> Earth science helps us predict [[natural disaster]]s and take care of the environment.<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13405|title=Earth Science and Applications from Space: A Midterm Assessment of NASA's Implementation of the Decadal Survey|date=2012-08-03|publisher=National Academies Press|isbn=978-0-309-25702-2|location=Washington, D.C.|doi=10.17226/13405}}</ref> Astronomy has led to better [[telescope]]s, [[camera]]s, and even new ways to process big [[data]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Astrophysical techniques|url=https://archive.org/details/astrophysicaltec0000kitc_m1w0_6thedi|last=Kitchin|first=C. R.|date=2014|publisher=CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group|isbn=978-1-4665-1115-6|edition=6th|location=Boca Raton}}</ref> Finally, the natural sciences are very important for [[education]], [[government]], and solving world problems. Understanding science helps people make smart choices about things like [[global warming]], [[health]], and new technology.<ref>{{Citation|last1=Sjöström|first1=Jesper|title=Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung|date=2018|url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4|work=Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education|volume=24|pages=65–88|editor-last=Dori|editor-first=Yehudit Judy|place=Cham|publisher=Springer International Publishing|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4|isbn=978-3-319-66657-0|access-date=2025-07-19|last2=Eilks|first2=Ingo|editor2-last=Mevarech|editor2-first=Zemira R.|editor3-last=Baker|editor3-first=Dale R.}}</ref> [[Government]]s use science to make rules, spend money wisely, and protect people and nature.<ref name=":12">{{Cite book|title=The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers|last=Jasanoff|first=Sheila|date=1994|publisher=Harvard University Press [u.a.]|isbn=978-0-674-30062-0|edition=2. print|location=Cambridge, Mass}}</ref> Many big science projects, like [[CERN]] (which studies tiny particles), the [[IPCC]] (which studies climate change), or the [[Human Genome Project]] (which mapped all human genes), show how countries and scientists work together around the world to learn and make progress.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Collins|first1=Francis S.|last2=Morgan|first2=Michael|last3=Patrinos|first3=Aristides|date=2003-04-11|title=The Human Genome Project: Lessons from Large-Scale Biology|url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1084564|journal=Science|language=en|volume=300|issue=5617|pages=286–290|doi=10.1126/science.1084564|pmid=12690187 |bibcode=2003Sci...300..286C |issn=0036-8075}}</ref><ref name=":13">{{Cite web|title=IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|url=https://www.ipcc.ch/|access-date=2025-07-19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} CERN|url=https://home.cern/|access-date=2025-07-19|website=home.cern}}</ref>
Biotechnology in the late 1900s and early 2000s gave scientists amazing new tools to work with DNA and genes. These included Recombinant DNA technology which lets scientists combine DNA from different sources.<sup>[205]</sup> PCR (polymerase chain reaction) is a method to quickly make millions of copies of a piece of DNA.<sup>[206]</sup> CRISPR-Cas9, on the other hand, is a tool that lets scientists edit genes very precisely, like using scissors to cut and change DNA.<sup>[207]</sup> These tools are now used in many ways. To create genetically modified crops, make medicines like insulin, perform gene therapy to treat diseases, and do quick and accurate disease testing.<sup>[208]</sup> In medicine, a huge breakthrough came in 1928, when Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, the first antibiotic. This completely changed how bacterial infections were treated and saved millions of lives.<sup>[209]</sup> Later, vaccines were developed for deadly diseases like polio, measles, and HPV. More recently, mRNA vaccines (like some COVID-19 vaccines) have helped fight new diseases and protect public health around the world.<sup>[210]</sup>


==Core Principles and Characteristics==
At the same time, information technology and computer science became a big part of science and everyday life. During World War II, the first electronic computers, ENIAC and Colossus, were built.<sup>[211][212]</sup> Alan Turing created early ideas about how computers work and also helped crack secret codes during the war.<sup>[213]</sup> In 1947, three scientists at Bell Labs, Bardeen, Brattain, and Shockley, invented the transistor, a tiny part that made it possible to build smaller and faster electronic devices. This led to the microprocessor and started the digital revolution.<sup>[214]</sup> Later, scientists created the internet, which began as a government project called ARPANET. The internet grew into a huge, worldwide system that allows people to communicate, learn, shop, and share information.<sup>[215]</sup>
===Empiricism===
[[Empiricism]] is a basic idea in science. It says that we learn things by using our senses, like [[Vision|seeing]], [[hearing]], or [[Measurement|measuring]], not just by guessing or following tradition.<ref name=":7">{{Cite web|title=The Project Gutenberg eBook of An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume I., by John Locke|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10615/10615-h/10615-h.htm#link2H_4_0002|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.gutenberg.org}}</ref><ref name=":8" /> Instead of relying only on what people believe or think is true, science depends on what we can actually observe, test, and measure. This is why scientists use special tools like [[telescope]]s, [[microscope]]s, and [[sensor]]s, to help them see things that are too small, too far, or otherwise invisible to the [[human eye]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bogen|first1=James|last2=Woodward|first2=James|date=1988|title=Saving the Phenomena|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2185445|journal=The Philosophical Review|volume=97|issue=3|pages=303|doi=10.2307/2185445 |jstor=2185445 }}</ref> For example, when scientists look for [[planet]]s outside our [[solar system]], called [[exoplanet]]s, they cannot see the planets directly. Instead, they look at tiny changes in the [[brightness]] of a [[star]]. If the star gets a little dimmer at regular times, it might mean a planet is passing in front of it. This method is based on careful observation, which is what empiricism is all about.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The exoplanet handbook|last=Perryman|first=M. A. C.|date=2018|publisher=New York, NY : Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-108-41977-2|edition=2nd|location=Cambridge}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2023-06-07|title=Exoplanets - NASA Science|url=https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/|access-date=2025-07-19|language=en-US}}</ref>


Empiricism also means that scientific results should be [[Reproducibility|reproducible]]. This means that if someone does an [[experiment]] again, they should get the same results. A good example is Gregor Mendel’s pea plant experiments, where he discovered how traits are passed down from parents to offspring. Scientists were able to repeat his work and get the same [[pattern]]s, showing that the results were reliable.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Origins of Mendelism|last=Olby|first=Robert C.|date=1985|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-62592-8|edition=2nd|location=Chicago}}</ref> The idea of empiricism was supported by philosophers like [[John Locke]], who believed that people are not born with [[knowledge]]. Instead, he said the mind starts out like a blank slate, and everything we learn comes from experience.<ref name=":7" /> This idea is different from [[rationalism]], which says we are born with certain ideas or that we can learn everything through [[logic]] alone.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes|url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/descartes/1639/meditations.htm|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.marxists.org}}</ref> In science, empiricism helps make sure our knowledge is based on real-world [[evidence]].<ref name=":9" />
Space science made huge leaps forward in the 20th century as humans began to explore beyond Earth for the first time. In 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite.<sup>[216]</sup> Then, in 1961, Yuri Gagarin became the first human in space.<sup>[217]</sup> One of the biggest milestones came in 1969, when NASA’s Apollo Program sent Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the Moon, making them the first people to walk on the Moon.<sup>[218]</sup> Robots also helped us explore space. The Voyager probes, launched in 1977, sent back amazing information about the outer planets and are still traveling through interstellar space (the space between stars).<sup>[219]</sup> In 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope was launched into orbit. It took detailed pictures of galaxies, nebulae, and supernovae, helping scientists learn more about the expanding universe.<sup>[220]</sup> In the 21st century, space exploration has kept growing. NASA’s Mars rovers explore the Red Planet.<sup>[221]</sup> Space telescopes like Kepler and TESS search for exoplanets (planets around other stars).<sup>[222][223]</sup> Private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin are working on things like Mars missions and even space tourism.<sup>[224]</sup>


Empirical methods in science are not just about watching things happen, they also include doing careful [[experiment]]s to test ideas. These experiments are done in a controlled way to help scientists figure out which things cause certain results.<ref name=":8" /> For example, when [[Alexander Fleming]] saw that a certain type of [[mold]] killed [[bacteria]], it was not enough just to notice it. Scientists had to do more experiments to prove that the mold, later called [[Penicillium notatum]], could really fight [[infection]]s. This led to the discovery of [[penicillin]], an important medicine.<ref name=":14">{{Cite journal|last=Fey|first=Paul|date=2005-02-01|title=The mold in Dr. Florey's coat The story of the penicillin miracle|url=http://www.jci.org/articles/view/24342|journal=Journal of Clinical Investigation|language=en|volume=115|issue=2|pages=199|doi=10.1172/JCI24342|issn=0021-9738}}{{Dead link|date=May 2026 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> This kind of testing is how scientists confirm what works and what does not. Galileo also used experiments with ramps ([[inclined plane]]s) to show that objects do not need a force to keep moving, which went against the old ideas from [[Aristotle]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Galileo: The Telescope & The Laws of Dynamics|url=https://www.pas.rochester.edu/~blackman/ast104/galileo12.html#:~:text=Perhaps%20Galileo's%20greatest%20contribution%20to,external%20force%20acts%20on%20it.|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.pas.rochester.edu}}</ref> In more recent times, scientists used special detectors at [[LIGO]] to find [[gravitational wave]]s, tiny ripples in space predicted by [[General relativity|Einstein’s theory of general relativity]] 100 years earlier. This discovery was another example of how scientists use careful [[observation]] and testing to confirm or disprove [[Scientific theory|scientific theories]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Abbott|first1=B. P.|last2=Abbott|first2=R.|last3=Abbott|first3=T. D.|last4=Abernathy|first4=M. R.|last5=Acernese|first5=F.|last6=Ackley|first6=K.|last7=Adams|first7=C.|last8=Adams|first8=T.|last9=Addesso|first9=P.|last10=Adhikari|first10=R. X.|last11=Adya|first11=V. B.|date=2016-02-11|title=Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger|url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102|journal=Physical Review Letters|language=en|volume=116|issue=6|article-number=061102 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102|pmid=26918975 |arxiv=1602.03837 |bibcode=2016PhRvL.116f1102A |issn=0031-9007}}</ref> Empirical methods are also used in big, complex areas like [[climate science]]. Scientists collect information from things like [[ice core]]s, [[satellite]]s, and even [[tree ring]]s to learn about Earth’s climate over time. These different sources of [[data]] help build models to understand and predict how the planet is changing.<ref name=":10" />
At the same time, climate and environmental science became very important. Back in 1896, scientist Svante Arrhenius said that carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the air could raise Earth’s temperature. This is called the greenhouse effect. By the late 1900s, scientists had strong evidence that human activities, like burning fossil fuels, were changing the climate. They got this data from things like ice cores, satellites, and ocean studies. Today, scientists around the world work together through groups like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to study climate change and warn about its dangers. They say it is urgent to reduce CO₂ emissions to protect the planet. To help with this, we now use tools like climate models, remote sensing (using satellites to study Earth), and renewable energy (like solar and wind power) to fight climate change and find better ways to live sustainably.<sup>[225][226]</sup>


Even though empiricism, the idea that [[knowledge]] comes from [[observation]] and [[experience]], is a key part of science, it is not always simple. One challenge is deciding what counts as a valid observation and how to understand what we see. Sometimes, what scientists notice or pay attention to depends on the theories they already believe in. This idea is called “theory-laden observation.” Philosopher [[Thomas Kuhn]] explained that scientists often use models or ideas they already have to decide what to look for and how to explain it. For example, early astronomers had trouble understanding why planets sometimes seemed to move backward in the sky (called [[Retrograde and direct motion|retrograde motion]]) until they used models like the Ptolemaic system or the later Copernican model, which helped them interpret what they were seeing.<ref name=":11" /> In some parts of science, such as [[quantum physics]], things get even harder. Scientists cannot always observe tiny particles directly. Instead, they have to use [[mathematical model]]s and [[experiment]]s to figure out what is happening. Phenomena like [[quantum entanglement]] or [[wavefunction collapse]] are known through indirect evidence and complex data.<ref>{{Cite web|title=What Is Quantum Physics?|url=http://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/quantum-physics|access-date=2025-07-19|website=Caltech Science Exchange|language=en}}</ref> In the [[social science]]s (like [[psychology]] or [[sociology]]), empiricism works a bit differently. Scientists use tools like [[survey]]s, [[interview]]s, and [[experiment]]s with people to gather data. But this kind of research can have its own problems. For example, people might give answers they think are expected (this is called [[social desirability bias]]), or they might act differently because they know they are being watched (called the [[Hawthorne effect]] or [[observer bias]]).<ref>{{Cite book|title=Bryman's social research methods|url=https://archive.org/details/nlsiu.300.72.cla.40484|last1=Clark|first1=Tom|last2=Foster|first2=Liam|last3=Sloan|first3=Luke|last4=Bryman|first4=Alan|last5=Bryman|first5=Alan|date=2021|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-879605-3|edition=6th|location=Oxford}}</ref>
Neuroscience and cognitive science are the sciences that study the brain and how we think, feel, and make decisions. In recent years, scientists have made big discoveries thanks to new brain scanning tools like fMRI and PET scans, which show real-time images of brain activity. These tools helped researchers find out that the prefrontal cortex (the front part of the brain) is important for decision-making, and the amygdala (a small part deep in the brain) helps process emotions like fear and anger.<sup>[227]</sup> Today, scientists are trying to map all the connections in the brain. This is called connectomics.<sup>[228]</sup> Also, brain-computer interfaces have been developed. These allow people who are paralyzed to move robotic arms or prosthetic limbs using only their brain signals.<sup>[229]</sup> At the same time, fields like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, which used to be mostly theory, are now real tools. They help with things like voice assistants, face recognition, medical diagnoses, and self-driving cars.<sup>[230]</sup>


===Rationality and Logic===
In the 21st century, scientists from different fields began working together more closely, creating powerful new areas of research. These include nanotechnology (the science of building tiny machines and materials at the scale of atoms and molecules), synthetic biology (designing and creating new living systems, such as bacteria that produce medicine), quantum information science (using the strange laws of quantum physics to make ultra-powerful computers), and systems biology (studying how all the parts of a living system work together). One of the biggest science projects of this century was at CERN, where scientists used the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a huge machine that smashes particles together, to discover the Higgs boson in 2012. This particle helps explain how other particles get mass and is a key part of the Standard Model of physics.<sup>[231]</sup> Scientists are also still trying to solve big mysteries like dark matter, dark energy, and how to unite quantum physics with gravity, which could lead to a unified theory of everything in the universe.<sup>[232]</sup>
[[Rationality]] and [[logic]] are very important in science. They help scientists make sure their ideas make sense, their theories fit together, and their conclusions are based on good reasoning. Rational thinking in science means using reason carefully. Scientists use it to come up with ideas (called [[Hypothesis|hypotheses]]), to plan [[experiment]]s, to understand results, and to compare different explanations. This helps make sure that conclusions come from real evidence, not just guesses. Logic gives rules for how to go from one idea to another. It helps scientists check if their arguments are valid.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Philosophy of logics|url=https://archive.org/details/philosophyoflogi0000haac|last=Haack|first=Susan|date=1978|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-21988-4|location=Cambridge [Eng.] ; New York}}</ref> For example, in [[biology]], if all [[mammal]]s are warm-blooded and [[whale]]s are mammals, then whales must be warm-blooded. This is a basic kind of [[Critical thinking|logical thinking]] called [[deductive reasoning]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Johnson-Laird|first=Phil|date=2010|title=Deductive reasoning|url=https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcs.20|journal=WIREs Cognitive Science|language=en|volume=1|issue=1|pages=8–17|doi=10.1002/wcs.20|pmid=26272833 |issn=1939-5078}}</ref> Science also uses the [[Law of noncontradiction|rule of non-contradiction]]. This means something cannot be both true and not true at the same time. For example, a [[chemical]] cannot both contain and not contain the same [[Chemical element|element]] under the same conditions. This helps scientists make clear and reliable chemical models.<ref>{{Citation|last=Gottlieb|first=Paula|title=Aristotle on Non-contradiction|date=2023|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/aristotle-noncontradiction/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Winter 2023|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2025-07-20|editor2-last=Nodelman|editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> There are also formal types of logic, like [[propositional logic]], [[predicate logic]], and [[modal logic]]. These are used in areas like [[computer science]], [[artificial intelligence]], and [[mathematical biology]]. They help scientists build computer programs, design experiments, and understand complex systems.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Language, proof, and logic|url=https://archive.org/details/languageprooflog0000bark|last1=Barker-Plummer|first1=Dave|last2=Barwise|first2=Jon|last3=Etchemendy|first3=John|last4=Liu|first4=Albert|last5=Murray|first5=Michael|last6=Pease|first6=Emma|date=2011|publisher=CSLI Publ|isbn=978-1-57586-632-1|edition=2nd|location=Stanford, Calif}}</ref>


Logic and rational thinking are important in science not just to support good ideas, but also to find [[mistake]]s, hidden [[problem]]s, or wrong [[assumption]]s in [[Scientific theory|scientific theories]]. In [[physics]], the discovery of [[quantum mechanics]] made scientists question old ideas. For example, [[classical physics]] said that objects behave in clear, predictable ways (called [[determinism]]) and that things far apart cannot affect each other instantly (called [[locality]]). But quantum mechanics showed that very small particles often behave in strange and random ways, so scientists had to use new kinds of logic to understand them. There is also a big problem between two important theories: [[general relativity]] and [[quantum field theory]]. Relativity explains how big things like planets and galaxies work, while quantum theory explains tiny particles. But the two theories do not fully agree with each other. This has led scientists to search for a new theory that combines both, such as [[string theory]] or [[loop quantum gravity]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Powell|first=Corey S.|date=2015-11-04|title=Relativity versus quantum mechanics: the battle for the universe|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/nov/04/relativity-quantum-mechanics-universe-physicists|access-date=2025-07-20|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Outreach|first=Research|date=2019-12-19|title=Unifying quantum mechanics with Einstein's general relativity|url=https://researchoutreach.org/articles/unifying-quantum-mechanics-einstein-general-relativity/|access-date=2025-07-20|website=Research Outreach|language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=The fabric of the cosmos: space, time, and the texture of reality|url=https://archive.org/details/fabricofcosmossp00gree|last=Greene|first=Brian|date=2005|publisher=Vintage Books|isbn=978-0-375-72720-7|edition=1st|location=New York}}</ref> Science often uses a method called [[hypothetico-deductive reasoning]]. This means scientists start with a theory, then use logic to make predictions that can be tested. If experiments agree with the prediction, the theory is stronger. If not, the theory may need to change.<ref name="Popper" /> For example, we know that [[antibiotic]]s kill [[bacteria]], not [[virus]]es. This logical idea helps doctors avoid giving antibiotics for viral infections, which helps prevent [[antibiotic resistance]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Davies|first1=Julian|last2=Davies|first2=Dorothy|date=2010|title=Origins and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance|url=https://archive.org/details/sim_microbiology-and-molecular-biology-reviews_2010-09_74_3/page/416|journal=Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews|language=en|volume=74|issue=3|pages=417–433|doi=10.1128/MMBR.00016-10|pmid=20805405 |pmc=2937522 |issn=1092-2172}}</ref> In [[social science]]s, logic is also important. [[Game theory]] is a tool that uses logic and reasoning to study how people make choices in situations where others are also making [[decision]]s. It helps explain things like [[voting]], [[diplomacy]] between countries, and even how [[government]]s sell licenses for things like radio frequencies. Game theory helps people make better decisions by thinking logically about the actions of others.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Playing for real: a text on game theory|url=https://archive.org/details/playingforrealte0000binm|last=Binmore|first=K. G.|date=2007|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-530057-4|location=Oxford ; New York}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=An introduction to game theory|url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontoga0000osbo|last=Osborne|first=Martin J.|date=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-512895-6|location=New York}}</ref>
'''Branches'''


Scientific thinking also includes the idea of parsimony, which is often called [[Occam's Razor]]. This idea says that if there are different explanations for something, the simplest one that still explains the [[fact]]s should be chosen. This rule helps scientists choose the best theories in many fields, such as [[biology]] and [[climate science]]. For example, a long time ago, people believed that the [[Earth]] was at the center of the universe (the [[Geocentrism|geocentric model]]). But this model needed many complicated parts, like epicycles, to explain how planets moved. Later, Copernicus suggested that the [[Sun]] was at the center instead (the [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric model]]). This simpler idea explained the same facts more easily, so it became the better choice.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Ockham's razors: a user's manual|last=Sober|first=Elliott|date=2015|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-69253-4|location=Cambridge}}</ref> In [[Neuroscience|brain science]], a new idea called the [[Bayesian brain hypothesis]] says that the [[brain]] works by using [[probability]] to update what it believes. This means the brain uses logic and evidence, like a smart guesser. This idea is also used in computer fields like [[robotics]] and [[machine learning]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Knill|first1=David C.|last2=Pouget|first2=Alexandre|date=2004|title=The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation|url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166223604003352|journal=Trends in Neurosciences|language=en|volume=27|issue=12|pages=712–719|doi=10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 |pmid=15541511 }}</ref> Logic is also very important in doing science in a fair and careful way. For example, [[decision theory]] is a part of logic that helps scientists decide how to run medical studies. It helps them think clearly about risks, benefits, and what is unknown when testing new treatments.<ref>{{Citation|last=Berger|first=James O.|title=Statistical Decision Theory|date=1989|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20181-5_26|work=Game Theory|pages=217–224|editor-last=Eatwell|editor-first=John|place=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-1-349-20181-5_26|isbn=978-1-349-20181-5|access-date=2025-07-20|editor2-last=Milgate|editor2-first=Murray|editor3-last=Newman|editor3-first=Peter}}</ref>
'''Natural sciences'''


== Scientific method ==
The natural sciences seek to understand how the world and universe around us works. There are five major branches, indicated by the photos above taken clockwise from top left: astronomy, chemistry, Earth science, biology, and physics.
Today, "science" usually refers to a way of pursuing [[knowledge]], not just the knowledge itself. It is mainly about the [[phenomena]] of the material world. The Greek works into Western Europe from the 6th to 7th century B.C. revived "[[Philosophy]]".<ref>Oxford English Dictionary</ref> In the 17th and 18th centuries scientists increasingly sought to formulate knowledge in terms of ''[[scientific law|laws of nature]]'' such as [[Newton's laws of motion]]. And during the 19th century, the word "science" became more and more associated with the [[scientific method]] itself. It was seen as a way to study the natural world, including [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[geology]] and [[biology]].


It was also in the 19th century that the term ''[[scientist]]'' was created by [[William Whewell]]. He meant it to tell the difference between those who looked for knowledge on nature from those who looked for other types of knowledge.<ref>The ''Oxford English Dictionary'' dates the origin of the word "scientist" to 1834.</ref>
Natural sciences are a major area of science that focuses on understanding the natural world. Scientists in this field study how things in nature work by watching carefully, doing experiments, and creating models or theories. These models help explain why things happen and can even predict what might happen next. Natural sciences depend on evidence that can be seen, measured, and repeated. Scientists use the scientific method, which means they make guesses (called hypotheses), test them through experiments, and change their ideas if the results do not match. This process helps make sure that scientific conclusions are as accurate as possible.<sup>[233]</sup>
 
There are several main areas of natural science, including physics, chemistry, biology, earth sciences, and astronomy. Each area focuses on different parts of nature, but they often work together in today’s research. Physics is the study of matter, energy, and the forces that affect them. Physicists explore everything from the tiniest particles, like electrons and quarks, to giant objects like stars and galaxies. They use different theories depending on the scale. Quantum mechanics for tiny particles and general relativity for huge cosmic objects. Physics has led to important laws and ideas that help explain the universe, such as Newton's laws of motion, the laws of thermodynamics, Maxwell's equations for electricity and magnetism, and the Standard Model, which organizes the basic building blocks of matter.<sup>[234]</sup>
 
Chemistry is often called the central science because it connects physics and biology. It focuses on what matter is made of, how it is structured, how it behaves, and how it changes during reactions. Chemists study atoms and molecules to understand how they bond together, break apart, and move energy during chemical changes. Chemistry is divided into different areas. Organic chemistry studies compounds that contain carbon (like living things do). Inorganic chemistry looks at compounds without carbon. Physical chemistry explores how chemistry and physics work together. Analytical chemistry focuses on measuring and identifying substances. Biochemistry applies chemistry to biological systems like cells and DNA. Because of chemistry, there are drugs, plastics, batteries, fertilizers, and many other useful materials and tools.<sup>[235]</sup>
 
Biology is the science of living things. It explores how organisms are built, how they work, how they grow, where they come from, and how they change over time. Biology includes many branches, such as cell biology (which studies the basic units of life, cells), genetics (which looks at heredity and DNA), ecology (which studies how organisms interact with each other and the environment), evolutionary biology (which looks at how life has changed over millions of years), and molecular biology (which focuses on life at the smallest scales, like proteins and genes). Biologists use tools like microscopes, DNA sequencing, and gene editing to explore life. Biology is important in health, farming, nature protection, and biotechnology, helping us make vaccines, improve crops, and protect endangered species.<sup>[236]</sup>
 
Earth sciences, also called geosciences, are the sciences that study the Earth and everything that affects it. This includes the solid ground, the atmosphere (air and weather), the hydrosphere (water and oceans), and the biosphere (all living things). Earth scientists use ideas from physics, chemistry, and biology to understand how Earth’s systems work together. Earth sciences include geology, which looks at the layers of the Earth, rocks, and the history of the planet; meteorology, which studies weather and the atmosphere; oceanography, which focuses on oceans and sea life; and climatology, which examines long-term climate patterns and how they change. These studies are important for learning about natural disasters like earthquakes, volcanoes, and hurricanes, and for helping us manage natural resources and protect the environment.<sup>[237]</sup>
 
Astronomy is the science that studies space, planets, stars, galaxies, and the universe. Astronomers observe the sky using telescopes and use theories and math to understand what they see. Modern astronomy is closely connected to physics, especially in a branch called astrophysics, which uses physical laws to explain how space objects behave. Astronomy has helped us discover just how huge the universe is and that there are other solar systems beyond our own. Scientists study amazing objects in space like black holes, neutron stars, and dark matter, a mysterious substance that we cannot see directly. Astronomy also helps us explore big questions, like where the universe came from, how it has changed over time, and what might happen to it in the future.<sup>[238]</sup>
 
The natural sciences all use similar methods to learn about the world. First, scientists use empirical observation, which means they carefully collect data using tools or by studying things in nature. They also do experiments, where they test ideas in controlled settings to see what happens. Another method is mathematical modeling, where scientists use math and computers to describe and predict how things work. To make sure results are trustworthy, scientists follow rules like peer review (where other experts check their work), reproducibility (so others can repeat the experiment), and falsifiability (the idea that scientific claims must be testable and could be proven wrong). Scientists use numbers and statistics to support their conclusions with solid, unbiased evidence.<sup>[233]</sup>
 
Today, the natural sciences often combine different subjects to solve big problems. These mixed areas are called interdisciplinary fields, like biophysics (biology + physics), astrochemistry (astronomy + chemistry), geobiology (geology + biology), and climate science (which combines many fields).<sup>[239][240]</sup> These new fields help scientists understand complex challenges, such as climate change, disease outbreaks, clean energy, and space exploration. For example, studying the climate means using knowledge from physics, chemistry, biology, and computer modeling.<sup>[241]</sup> Scientists in astrobiology use ideas from space science, chemistry, and biology to search for life on other planets.<sup>[242]</sup>
 
The natural sciences have led to amazing technology and discoveries that have changed our lives. Physics helped create nuclear energy, computers, and electronics.<sup>[243]</sup> Chemistry made new medicines, better farming products, and useful materials like plastics.<sup>[244]</sup> Biology and medicine led to vaccines, treatments for genetic diseases, and ways to grow or repair body parts.<sup>[245]</sup> Earth science helps us predict natural disasters and take care of the environment.<sup>[246]</sup> Astronomy has led to better telescopes, cameras, and even new ways to process big data.<sup>[247]</sup> Finally, the natural sciences are very important for education, government, and solving world problems. Understanding science helps people make smart choices about things like global warming, health, and new technology.<sup>[248]</sup> Governments use science to make rules, spend money wisely, and protect people and nature.<sup>[249]</sup> Many big science projects, like CERN (which studies tiny particles), the IPCC (which studies climate change), or the Human Genome Project (which mapped all human genes), show how countries and scientists work together around the world to learn and make progress.<sup>[250][251][252]</sup>
 
'''Core Principles and Characteristics'''
 
'''Empiricism'''
 
Empiricism is a basic idea in science. It says that we learn things by using our senses, like seeing, hearing, or measuring, not just by guessing or following tradition.<sup>[253][254]</sup> Instead of relying only on what people believe or think is true, science depends on what we can actually observe, test, and measure. This is why scientists use special tools like telescopes, microscopes, and sensors, to help them see things that are too small, too far, or otherwise invisible to the human eye.<sup>[255]</sup> For example, when scientists look for planets outside our solar system, called exoplanets, they cannot see the planets directly. Instead, they look at tiny changes in the brightness of a star. If the star gets a little dimmer at regular times, it might mean a planet is passing in front of it. This method is based on careful observation, which is what empiricism is all about.<sup>[256][257]</sup>
 
Empiricism also means that scientific results should be reproducible. This means that if someone does an experiment again, they should get the same results. A good example is Gregor Mendel’s pea plant experiments, where he discovered how traits are passed down from parents to offspring. Scientists were able to repeat his work and get the same patterns, showing that the results were reliable.<sup>[258]</sup> The idea of empiricism was supported by philosophers like John Locke, who believed that people are not born with knowledge. Instead, he said the mind starts out like a blank slate, and everything we learn comes from experience.<sup>[253]</sup> This idea is different from rationalism, which says we are born with certain ideas or that we can learn everything through logic alone.<sup>[259]</sup> In science, empiricism helps make sure our knowledge is based on real-world evidence.<sup>[260]</sup>
 
Empirical methods in science are not just about watching things happen, they also include doing careful experiments to test ideas. These experiments are done in a controlled way to help scientists figure out which things cause certain results.<sup>[254]</sup> For example, when Alexander Fleming saw that a certain type of mold killed bacteria, it was not enough just to notice it. Scientists had to do more experiments to prove that the mold, later called Penicillium notatum, could really fight infections. This led to the discovery of penicillin, an important medicine.<sup>[261]</sup> This kind of testing is how scientists confirm what works and what does not. Galileo also used experiments with ramps (inclined planes) to show that objects do not need a force to keep moving, which went against the old ideas from Aristotle.<sup>[262]</sup> In more recent times, scientists used special detectors at LIGO to find gravitational waves, tiny ripples in space predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity 100 years earlier. This discovery was another example of how scientists use careful observation and testing to confirm or disprove scientific theories.<sup>[263]</sup> Empirical methods are also used in big, complex areas like climate science. Scientists collect information from things like ice cores, satellites, and even tree rings to learn about Earth’s climate over time. These different sources of data help build models to understand and predict how the planet is changing.<sup>[241]</sup>
 
Even though empiricism, the idea that knowledge comes from observation and experience, is a key part of science, it is not always simple. One challenge is deciding what counts as a valid observation and how to understand what we see. Sometimes, what scientists notice or pay attention to depends on the theories they already believe in. This idea is called “theory-laden observation.” Philosopher Thomas Kuhn explained that scientists often use models or ideas they already have to decide what to look for and how to explain it. For example, early astronomers had trouble understanding why planets sometimes seemed to move backward in the sky (called retrograde motion) until they used models like the Ptolemaic system or the later Copernican model, which helped them interpret what they were seeing.<sup>[264]</sup> In some parts of science, such as quantum physics, things get even harder. Scientists cannot always observe tiny particles directly. Instead, they have to use mathematical models and experiments to figure out what is happening. Phenomena like quantum entanglement or wavefunction collapse are known through indirect evidence and complex data.<sup>[265]</sup> In the social sciences (like psychology or sociology), empiricism works a bit differently. Scientists use tools like surveys, interviews, and experiments with people to gather data. But this kind of research can have its own problems. For example, people might give answers they think are expected (this is called social desirability bias), or they might act differently because they know they are being watched (called the Hawthorne effect or observer bias).<sup>[266]</sup>
 
'''Rationality and Logic'''
 
Rationality and logic are very important in science. They help scientists make sure their ideas make sense, their theories fit together, and their conclusions are based on good reasoning. Rational thinking in science means using reason carefully. Scientists use it to come up with ideas (called hypotheses), to plan experiments, to understand results, and to compare different explanations. This helps make sure that conclusions come from real evidence, not just guesses. Logic gives rules for how to go from one idea to another. It helps scientists check if their arguments are valid.<sup>[267]</sup> For example, in biology, if all mammals are warm-blooded and whales are mammals, then whales must be warm-blooded. This is a basic kind of logical thinking called deductive reasoning.<sup>[268]</sup> Science also uses the rule of non-contradiction. This means something cannot be both true and not true at the same time. For example, a chemical cannot both contain and not contain the same element under the same conditions. This helps scientists make clear and reliable chemical models.<sup>[269]</sup> There are also formal types of logic, like propositional logic, predicate logic, and modal logic. These are used in areas like computer science, artificial intelligence, and mathematical biology. They help scientists build computer programs, design experiments, and understand complex systems.<sup>[270]</sup>
 
Logic and rational thinking are important in science not just to support good ideas, but also to find mistakes, hidden problems, or wrong assumptions in scientific theories. In physics, the discovery of quantum mechanics made scientists question old ideas. For example, classical physics said that objects behave in clear, predictable ways (called determinism) and that things far apart cannot affect each other instantly (called locality). But quantum mechanics showed that very small particles often behave in strange and random ways, so scientists had to use new kinds of logic to understand them. There is also a big problem between two important theories: general relativity and quantum field theory. Relativity explains how big things like planets and galaxies work, while quantum theory explains tiny particles. But the two theories do not fully agree with each other. This has led scientists to search for a new theory that combines both, such as string theory or loop quantum gravity.<sup>[271][272][273]</sup> Science often uses a method called hypothetico-deductive reasoning. This means scientists start with a theory, then use logic to make predictions that can be tested. If experiments agree with the prediction, the theory is stronger. If not, the theory may need to change.<sup>[5]</sup> For example, we know that antibiotics kill bacteria, not viruses. This logical idea helps doctors avoid giving antibiotics for viral infections, which helps prevent antibiotic resistance.<sup>[274]</sup> In social sciences, logic is also important. Game theory is a tool that uses logic and reasoning to study how people make choices in situations where others are also making decisions. It helps explain things like voting, diplomacy between countries, and even how governments sell licenses for things like radio frequencies. Game theory helps people make better decisions by thinking logically about the actions of others.<sup>[275][276]</sup>
 
Scientific thinking also includes the idea of parsimony, which is often called Occam's Razor. This idea says that if there are different explanations for something, the simplest one that still explains the facts should be chosen. This rule helps scientists choose the best theories in many fields, such as biology and climate science. For example, a long time ago, people believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe (the geocentric model). But this model needed many complicated parts, like epicycles, to explain how planets moved. Later, Copernicus suggested that the Sun was at the center instead (the heliocentric model). This simpler idea explained the same facts more easily, so it became the better choice.<sup>[277]</sup> In brain science, a new idea called the Bayesian brain hypothesis says that the brain works by using probability to update what it believes. This means the brain uses logic and evidence, like a smart guesser. This idea is also used in computer fields like robotics and machine learning.<sup>[278]</sup> Logic is also very important in doing science in a fair and careful way. For example, decision theory is a part of logic that helps scientists decide how to run medical studies. It helps them think clearly about risks, benefits, and what is unknown when testing new treatments.<sup>[279]</sup>
 
'''Scientific method'''
 
Today, "science" usually refers to a way of pursuing knowledge, not just the knowledge itself. It is mainly about the phenomena of the material world. The Greek works into Western Europe from the 6th to 7th century B.C. revived "Philosophy".<sup>[280]</sup> In the 17th and 18th centuries scientists increasingly sought to formulate knowledge in terms of ''laws of nature'' such as Newton's laws of motion. And during the 19th century, the word "science" became more and more associated with the scientific method itself. It was seen as a way to study the natural world, including physics, chemistry, geology and biology.
 
It was also in the 19th century that the term ''scientist'' was created by William Whewell. He meant it to tell the difference between those who looked for knowledge on nature from those who looked for other types of knowledge.<sup>[281]</sup>
 
The scientific method is the name given to the methods used by scientists to find knowledge. The main features of the scientific method are:


The [[scientific method]] is the name given to the methods used by scientists to find knowledge. The main [[wikt:feature|feature]]s of the scientific method are:
# Scientists identify a question or a problem about nature. Some problems are simple, such as "how many legs do flies have?" and some are very deep, such as "why do objects fall to the ground?"
# Scientists identify a question or a problem about nature. Some problems are simple, such as "how many legs do flies have?" and some are very deep, such as "why do objects fall to the ground?"
# Next, scientists investigate the problem. They work at it, and collect facts. Sometimes all it takes is to look carefully.
# Next, scientists investigate the problem. They work at it, and collect facts. Sometimes all it takes is to look carefully.
# Some questions cannot be answered directly. Then scientists suggest ideas, and test them out. They do [[experiment]]s and collect [[data]].
# Some questions cannot be answered directly. Then scientists suggest ideas, and test them out. They do experiments and collect data.
# Eventually, they find what they think is a good answer to the problem. Then they tell people about it.
# Eventually, they find what they think is a good answer to the problem. Then they tell people about it.
# Later, other scientists may agree or not agree. They may suggest another answer. They may do more experiments. Anything in science might be revised if we find out the previous solution was not good enough.
# Later, other scientists may agree or not agree. They may suggest another answer. They may do more experiments. Anything in science might be revised if we find out the previous solution was not good enough.


=== An example ===
'''An example'''
A famous example of science in action was the [[expedition]] led by [[Arthur Eddington]] to [[Principe Island]] in [[Africa]] in 1919. He went there to record where the stars were around the Sun during a [[solar eclipse]]. The observation of where the stars were shown that the apparent star positions close to the Sun were changed. In effect, the light passing the Sun was pulled towards the Sun by [[gravitation]]. This confirmed predictions of [[gravitational lensing]] made by [[Albert Einstein]] in the [[general theory of relativity]], published in 1915. Eddington's observations were considered to be the first solid proof in favour of Einstein's theory.
 
A famous example of science in action was the expedition led by Arthur Eddington to Principe Island in Africa in 1919. He went there to record where the stars were around the Sun during a solar eclipse. The observation of where the stars were shown that the apparent star positions close to the Sun were changed. In effect, the light passing the Sun was pulled towards the Sun by gravitation. This confirmed predictions of gravitational lensing made by Albert Einstein in the general theory of relativity, published in 1915. Eddington's observations were considered to be the first solid proof in favour of Einstein's theory.
 
'''Practical impacts of scientific research'''


=== Practical impacts of scientific research ===
Discoveries in fundamental science can be world-changing. For example:
Discoveries in fundamental science can be world-changing. For example:
:{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%"
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Research'''
|'''Impact'''
|-
|-
! Research !! Impact
|Static electricity and magnetism (1600)
 
Electric current (18th century)
|All electric appliances, dynamos, electric power stations, modern electronics, including electric lighting, television, electric heating, magnetic tape, loudspeaker, plus the compass and lightning rod.
|-
|-
| [[Static electricity]] and [[magnetism]] (1600)<br />[[Electric current]] (18th century) || All electric appliances, dynamos, electric power stations, modern [[electronics]], including [[electric lighting]], [[television]], [[electric heating]], [[magnetic tape]], [[loudspeaker]], plus the [[compass]] and [[lightning rod]].
|Diffraction (1665)
|Optics, hence fiber optic cable (1840s), cable TV and internet
|-
|-
| [[Diffraction]] (1665) || [[Optics]], hence [[fiber optic]] cable (1840s), [[cable TV]] and internet
|Germ theory (1700)
|Hygiene, leading to decreased transmission of infectious diseases; antibodies, leading to techniques for disease diagnosis and targeted anticancer therapies.
|-
|-
| [[Germ theory of disease|Germ theory]] (1700) || [[Hygiene]], leading to decreased transmission of infectious diseases; [[Antibody|antibodies]], leading to techniques for disease diagnosis and targeted anticancer therapies.
|Vaccination (1798)
|Leading to the elimination of most infectious diseases from developed countries and the worldwide eradication of smallpox.
|-
|-
| [[Vaccination]] (1798) || Leading to the elimination of most infectious diseases from developed countries and the worldwide eradication of [[smallpox]].
|Photovoltaics (1839)
|Solar cells (1883), hence solar power, solar powered watches, calculators and other devices.
|-
|-
| [[Photovoltaics]] (1839) || [[Solar cell]]s (1883), hence [[solar power]], solar powered [[watch]]es, [[calculator]]s and other devices.
|The strange orbit of Mercury (1859) and other research
|-
 
| {{nowrap|The strange orbit of [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]] (1859) and other research}}<br />leading to [[special relativity|special]] (1905) and [[general relativity]] (1916) || Satellite-based technology such as [[GPS]] (1973), [[satnav]] and [[communications satellite]]s.<ref name="nasa 2004">[http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2004/26mar_einstein Evicting Einstein], March 26, 2004, [[NASA]]. ''"Both [relativity and quantum mechanics] are extremely successful. The Global Positioning System (GPS), for instance, wouldn't be possible without the theory of relativity. Computers, , and the Internet, meanwhile, are spin-offs of quantum mechanics."''</ref>
leading to special (1905) and general relativity (1916)
|Satellite-based technology such as GPS (1973), satnav and communications satellites.<sup>[282]</sup>
|-
|-
| [[Radio wave]]s (1887) || Used in [[broadcasting|broadcast]]: [[radio station|radio]] (1906) and [[television]] (1927) [[entertainment]]. It is used in [[telephony]], [[emergency services]], [[radar]] ([[navigation]] and [[weather forecast]]ing), [[medicine]], [[radio telescope|astronomy]], [[wireless]] communications, and [[networking technology|networking]]. Radio research led to [[microwave]] cooking.
|Radio waves (1887)
|Used in broadcast: radio (1906) and television (1927) entertainment. It is used in telephony, emergency services, radar (navigation and weather forecasting), medicine, astronomy, wireless communications, and networking. Radio research led to microwave cooking.
|-
|-
| [[Radioactivity]] (1896) and [[antimatter]] (1932) || [[Cancer]] treatment (1896), [[Radiometric dating]] (1905), [[nuclear reactor]]s (1942) and [[Nuclear weapon|weapons]] (1945), [[PET scans]] (1961), and [[medical research]] (with [[isotope|isotopic]] labelling)
|Radioactivity (1896) and antimatter (1932)
|Cancer treatment (1896), Radiometric dating (1905), nuclear reactors (1942) and weapons (1945), PET scans (1961), and medical research (with isotopic labelling)
|-
|-
|[[X-rays]] (1896)|| [[Medical imaging]], including [[computer tomography]]
|X-rays (1896)
|Medical imaging, including computer tomography
|-
|-
| [[Crystallography]] and [[quantum mechanics]] (1900) || [[Semiconductor]] devices (1906), hence modern [[computing]] and [[telecommunications]] including the integration with wireless devices: the [[mobile phone]]<ref name="nasa 2004" />
|Crystallography and quantum mechanics (1900)
|Semiconductor devices (1906), hence modern computing and telecommunications including the integration with wireless devices: the mobile phone<sup>[282]</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Plastics]] (1907)||Starting with [[bakelite]], many types of artificial polymers for numerous applications in industry and daily life
|Plastics (1907)
|Starting with bakelite, many types of artificial polymers for numerous applications in industry and daily life
|-
|-
|[[Antibiotics]] (1880's, 1928) || [[Salvarsan]], [[Penicillin]], [[doxycycline]]. In 2018 [[Amoxicillin]] and [[amoxicillin/clavulanic acid]] were the most frequently used.<ref>{{cite news |title=UK antibiotic consumption twice that of the Netherlands, WHO report finds |url=https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/20205732.article |access-date=22 December 2018 |publisher=Pharmaceutical Journal |date=14 November 2018 |archive-date=22 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181222221210/https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/20205732.article |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|Antibiotics (1880's, 1928)
|Salvarsan, Penicillin, doxycycline. In 2018 Amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were the most frequently used.<sup>[283]</sup>
|-
|-
|[[Nuclear magnetic resonance]] (1930's) || [[Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy]] (1946), [[magnetic resonance imaging]] (1971), [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] (1990's).
|Nuclear magnetic resonance (1930's)
|Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1946), magnetic resonance imaging (1971), functional magnetic resonance imaging (1990's).
|-
|-
|[[Genomics]] (1990s)||[[Genomics]] = [[genetics]] + [[medicine]]. It is the structure, function, [[evolution]], mapping, and editing of [[genome]]s. A genome is an organism's complete set of [[DNA]] (or [[RNA]]). This makes up its [[genes]]. [[Vaccines]] for [[viruses]] are built by genomics.
|Genomics (1990s)
|Genomics = genetics + medicine. It is the structure, function, evolution, mapping, and editing of genomes. A genome is an organism's complete set of DNA (or RNA). This makes up its genes. Vaccines for viruses are built by genomics.
|}
|}
'''Philosophy of science'''
For Kuhn, the addition of epicycles in Ptolemaic astronomy was "normal science" within a paradigm, whereas the Copernican Revolution was a paradigm shift
The philosophy of science is a subject that looks closely at how science works and what it really means. It asks big questions like: How do we know something is true in science? How do scientific ideas change over time? Can science truly be objective? People who study the philosophy of science try to understand the methods scientists use, the rules they follow, and how their discoveries affect the world.<sup>[260]</sup> This field connects to other areas of philosophy, such as epistemology (the study of knowledge), metaphysics (the study of what exists), ethics, and logic.<sup>[284]</sup> It also looks at how science is actually done in both natural sciences (like physics and biology) and social sciences (like psychology and sociology).<sup>[254]</sup>
One of the biggest questions in the philosophy of science is called the demarcation problem. This means trying to figure out what counts as real science and what does not, like pseudoscience, which pretends to be scientific but doesn't follow the same rules.<sup>[285]</sup> A famous philosopher named Karl Popper said that real science should be falsifiable. This means a scientific idea must make clear predictions that could be proven wrong with evidence. For example, Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted that light would bend during a solar eclipse. Scientists tested this and confirmed it, showing the theory was falsifiable. On the other hand, Popper criticized things like Freud’s psychoanalysis, which tried to explain human behavior in ways that could not really be tested or proven wrong, because it could twist its explanations to fit any situation.<sup>[286]</sup> Some later philosophers, like Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, said that science is not always so simple. They pointed out that many great scientific ideas started out as vague or hard to test. So, the question of what counts as real science is still debated, and there may not be one easy answer.<sup>[287]</sup>
Scientific realism and anti-realism are two different ways of thinking about what science is really doing. People who support scientific realism, like Hilary Putnam and Richard Boyd, believe that scientific theories describe the world as it actually is, even the parts we cannot see, like electrons or black holes.<sup>[288][289]</sup> They argue that science works so well, like making accurate predictions and helping us build amazing technology, because its ideas are mostly true, or at least close to the truth.<sup>[290]</sup> On the other side, anti-realists, like Bas van Fraassen, believe something different. They say the job of science is not to find the absolute truth, but to come up with ideas and models that correctly predict what we can observe. This is called empirical adequacy.<sup>[291]</sup> For example, in quantum mechanics (the science of very tiny particles), the math can predict things very well, but different scientists have totally different beliefs about what is really happening. Some realists believe in things like the Many-worlds Interpretation,<sup>[292][293]</sup> while anti-realists prefer ideas like the Copenhagen Interpretation, which focus only on what we can measure and see.<sup>[294][295]</sup>
Another big idea in the philosophy of science is how science explains things. One early idea was the deductive-nomological model, created by Carl Hempel. He said that to explain something scientifically, you had to show how it follows from general laws and starting conditions. For example, explaining why a planet moves in an ellipse (oval shape) using Newton's laws of gravity and motion.<sup>[296]</sup> But not everyone agreed with this model. Some philosophers thought it did not explain things in everyday life or in complicated sciences like biology.<sup>[297]</sup> So, newer thinkers, like Nancy Cartwright and James Woodward, introduced different ways to explain things, especially using causes and mechanisms.<sup>[298][299]</sup> In this newer view, a good explanation tells us how something works step by step. For instance, if we want to explain how the heart pumps blood, we do not just give a law, we show how parts like pacemaker cells, ion channels, and muscle fibers all work together to make the heart beat. This kind of explanation is especially useful in subjects like neuroscience and medicine, where understanding the parts and how they interact is key.<sup>[300]</sup>


==Philosophy of science==
One big question in the philosophy of science is called the problem of induction. This idea was first brought up by a philosopher named David Hume in the 1700s. He asked: How do we really know that what happened in the past will keep happening in the future? For example, we believe the sun will rise tomorrow because it has always done so. But Hume pointed out that we do not have a perfect reason to believe that, just past experience.<sup>[301]</sup> Science often depends on these kinds of patterns, but there is no absolute proof that they will always hold true. Later on, a philosopher named Nelson Goodman added to this puzzle. He showed that it is not always easy to decide which patterns are meaningful. He created a strange example using the color “grue,” which means something is green before a certain time and blue after. This example showed that choosing which patterns to trust is harder than it seems.<sup>[302]</sup> Today, some philosophers and scientists try to solve this problem using probability. This is called Bayesian reasoning, where people adjust their beliefs based on how likely something is and what they already know.<sup>[303]</sup> But even this method has challenges, like being hard to calculate and including some personal judgment.<sup>[304]</sup>
[[File:Epicycle and deferent.svg|thumb|For [[Thomas Kuhn|Kuhn]], the addition of [[epicycles]] in Ptolemaic astronomy was "normal science" within a paradigm, whereas the [[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions#Copernican Revolution|Copernican Revolution]] was a paradigm shift|alt=Depiction of epicycles, where a planet orbit is going around in a bigger orbit]]
The [[philosophy of science]] is a subject that looks closely at how science works and what it really means. It asks big questions like: How do we know something is true in science? How do scientific ideas change over time? Can science truly be objective? People who study the philosophy of science try to understand the methods scientists use, the rules they follow, and how their discoveries affect the world.<ref name=":9">{{Cite book|title=Philosophy of science: a very short introduction|url=https://archive.org/details/apu.501.oka.49362|last=Okasha|first=Samir|date=2016|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-874558-7|edition=2nd|location=Oxford, United Kingdom}}</ref> This field connects to other areas of [[philosophy]], such as [[epistemology]] (the study of [[knowledge]]), [[metaphysics]] (the study of what exists), [[ethics]], and [[logic]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science|last=Godfrey-Smith|first=Peter|date=2021|publisher=The University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-77113-7|edition=2nd|location=Chicago London}}</ref> It also looks at how science is actually done in both [[natural science]]s (like [[physics]] and [[biology]]) and [[social science]]s (like [[psychology]] and [[sociology]]).<ref name=":8">{{Cite book|title=What is this thing called science?|last1=Chalmers|first1=Alan F.|last2=Chalmers|first2=Alan F.|date=1999|publisher=Hackett Publ. Company Inc|isbn=978-0-87220-452-2|edition=3. ed., reprinted|location=Indianapolis}}</ref>


One of the biggest questions in the philosophy of science is called the [[demarcation problem]]. This means trying to figure out what counts as real science and what does not, like [[pseudoscience]], which pretends to be scientific but doesn't follow the same rules.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Pseudoscience and the Demarcation Problem {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=https://iep.utm.edu/pseudoscience-demarcation/|access-date=2025-07-19|language=en-US}}</ref> A famous philosopher named [[Karl Popper]] said that real science should be [[Falsifiability|falsifiable]]. This means a scientific idea must make clear predictions that could be proven wrong with evidence. For example, [[General relativity|Einstein’s theory of general relativity]] predicted that [[light]] would bend during a [[solar eclipse]]. Scientists tested this and confirmed it, showing the theory was falsifiable. On the other hand, Popper criticized things like [[Psychoanalysis|Freud’s psychoanalysis]], which tried to explain human behavior in ways that could not really be tested or proven wrong, because it could twist its explanations to fit any situation.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Popper, Karl: Philosophy of Science {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|url=https://iep.utm.edu/pop-sci/|access-date=2025-07-19|language=en-US}}</ref> Some later philosophers, like [[Imre Lakatos]] and [[Paul Feyerabend]], said that science is not always so simple. They pointed out that many great scientific ideas started out as vague or hard to test. So, the question of what counts as real science is still debated, and there may not be one easy answer.<ref>{{Citation|last=Ladyman|first=James|title=The History of Philosophy of Science|date=2019|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-philosophy-19452015/history-of-philosophy-of-science/C6579516684BD38320C503F154931F3C|work=The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015|pages=189–209|editor-last=Thomson|editor-first=Iain D.|place=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|doi=10.1017/9781316779651.017|isbn=978-1-107-17303-3|access-date=2025-07-19|editor2-last=Becker|editor2-first=Kelly}}</ref>
Another important thinker was Thomas Kuhn, who wrote a famous book in 1962 called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. He said that science does not always grow in a straight line by slowly adding new facts. Instead, he said science works through paradigms, big ideas or frameworks that shape how scientists think, what they study, and what evidence they trust. Scientists work within a paradigm for a long time during “normal science,” but eventually they find anomalies, things that do not fit. When enough of these build up, a scientific revolution happens, and the old paradigm is replaced with a new one. For example, when scientists moved from Newton’s laws to Einstein’s theory of relativity, or from Ptolemy’s geocentric model (Earth at the center) to Copernicus’s heliocentric model (Sun at the center), these were paradigm shifts.<sup>[264]</sup> Kuhn also said that different paradigms can be incommensurable, meaning they are so different that they cannot easily be compared. This idea was controversial. Philosophers like Karl Popper and Imre Lakatos disagreed with Kuhn. Karl Popper, for example, believed that science moves forward by falsification. This means that scientists should constantly test their ideas and try to prove them wrong. If a theory fails the test, it should be rejected. Popper thought that a good scientific theory must be one that could be proven false if the evidence does not support it. For example, saying “All swans are white” is a scientific idea because it can be tested, and even disproven by finding just one black swan.<sup>[5]</sup> Another philosopher, Imre Lakatos, offered a different view. He did not think science was as dramatic as Kuhn’s idea of sudden "paradigm shifts," but he also did not fully agree with Popper. Lakatos said that science works through research programmes, groups of theories and ideas that develop over time. These programmes may face problems and make mistakes, but if they keep improving and helping us understand more, then they are still making progress. Lakatos believed science should still be rational and goal-directed, even if it changes slowly and builds on earlier ideas.<sup>[305]</sup>


[[Scientific realism]] and [[anti-realism]] are two different ways of thinking about what science is really doing. People who support scientific realism, like [[Hilary Putnam]] and [[Richard Boyd]], believe that scientific theories describe the world as it actually is, even the parts we cannot see, like [[electron]]s or [[black hole]]s.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/mathematics-matter-and-method/B3078C1C0AF323299F65D5DAFD046DC0|title=Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers|last=Putnam|first=Hilary|date=1979|publisher=Cambridge University Press|edition=2|volume=1|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/cbo9780511625268 |isbn=978-0-521-22553-3 }}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Boyd|first=Richard N.|title=On the Current Status of the Issue of Scientific Realism|date=1983|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7676-5_3|work=Methodology, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Science: Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Stegmüller on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, June 3rd, 1983|pages=45–90|editor-last=Hempel|editor-first=Carl G.|place=Dordrecht|publisher=Springer Netherlands|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-94-015-7676-5_3|isbn=978-94-015-7676-5|access-date=2025-07-19|editor2-last=Putnam|editor2-first=Hilary|editor3-last=Essler|editor3-first=Wilhelm K.}}</ref> They argue that science works so well, like making accurate predictions and helping us build amazing technology, because its ideas are mostly true, or at least close to the truth.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Boyd|first=Richard|date=1990|title=Realism, approximate truth, and philosophical method|url=https://hdl.handle.net/11299/185718|journal=University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy|hdl=11299/185718 |language=en}}</ref> On the other side, anti-realists, like [[Bas van Fraassen]], believe something different. They say the job of science is not to find the absolute truth, but to come up with ideas and models that correctly predict what we can observe. This is called [[empirical adequacy]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=The scientific image|url=https://archive.org/details/scientificimage0000vanf|last=Van Fraassen|first=Bas C.|date=1980|publisher=Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-824424-0|series=Clarendon library of logic and philosophy|location=Oxford : New York}}</ref> For example, in [[quantum mechanics]] (the science of very tiny particles), the math can predict things very well, but different scientists have totally different beliefs about what is really happening. Some realists believe in things like the [[Many-worlds Interpretation]],<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Barrett|first=Jeffrey|date=1998-06-03|title=Everett's Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/win2013/entries/qm-everett/|journal=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://academic.oup.com/book/25622|title=The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation|last=Wallace|first=David|date=2012-05-24|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-954696-1|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546961.001.0001}}</ref> while anti-realists prefer ideas like the [[Copenhagen Interpretation]], which focus only on what we can measure and see.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Einstein|first1=A.|last2=Podolsky|first2=B.|last3=Rosen|first3=N.|date=1935-05-15|title=Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?|url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777|journal=Physical Review|volume=47|issue=10|pages=777–780|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 |bibcode=1935PhRv...47..777E }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://academic.oup.com/book/27275|title=Quantum Mechanics|last=Fraassen|first=Bas C. van|date=1991-09-26|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-823980-2|doi=10.1093/0198239807.001.0001}}</ref>
The philosophy of science does not just focus on how we know things or what reality is made of. It also asks important questions about ethics (what is right or wrong) and politics (how science affects society). These questions are especially important in fields like environmental science, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and how we respond to pandemics.<sup>[306][307]</sup> For example, when scientists or governments use computer models to make decisions about public health or climate change, philosophers ask: Are these models reliable? Are they being used fairly?<sup>[308]</sup> Scientists also have to think about responsibility, how their discoveries might help or harm people.<sup>[309]</sup> One idea that comes up is called the precautionary principle. This means that if a new technology might be dangerous and we do not fully understand the risks, we should be careful and not rush into using it.<sup>[310]</sup> This idea is based on epistemic humility, which means recognizing the limits of our knowledge.<sup>[311]</sup> A good example is CRISPR, a powerful gene-editing tool. While it can be used to treat diseases, it also raises big questions: Should we change human DNA? Should we allow “designer babies”? These are not just scientific questions, they are philosophical and ethical ones, too.<sup>[312]</sup>


Another big idea in the philosophy of science is how science explains things. One early idea was the [[deductive-nomological model]], created by [[Carl Hempel]]. He said that to explain something scientifically, you had to show how it follows from general laws and starting conditions. For example, explaining why a [[planet]] moves in an [[ellipse]] (oval shape) using Newton's laws of gravity and motion.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hempel|first1=Carl G.|last2=Oppenheim|first2=Paul|date=1948|title=Studies in the Logic of Explanation|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S003182480002273X/type/journal_article|journal=Philosophy of Science|language=en|volume=15|issue=2|pages=135–175|doi=10.1086/286983|issn=0031-8248}}</ref> But not everyone agreed with this model. Some philosophers thought it did not explain things in everyday life or in complicated sciences like biology.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vkdm7|title=Four Decades of Scientific Explanation|last=Salmon|first=Wesley C.|date=1990|publisher=University of Pittsburgh Press|isbn=978-0-8229-5926-7|doi=10.2307/j.ctt5vkdm7 |jstor=j.ctt5vkdm7 }}</ref> So, newer thinkers, like [[Nancy Cartwright]] and [[James Woodward]], introduced different ways to explain things, especially using causes and mechanisms.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://academic.oup.com/book/27605|title=How the Laws of Physics Lie|last=Cartwright|first=Nancy|date=1983-06-09|publisher=Oxford University PressOxford|isbn=978-0-19-824704-3|edition=1|language=en|doi=10.1093/0198247044.001.0001}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://academic.oup.com/book/4324|title=Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation|last=Woodward|first=James|date=2004-01-08|publisher=Oxford University PressNew York|isbn=978-0-19-515527-3|edition=1|language=en|doi=10.1093/0195155270.001.0001}}</ref> In this newer view, a good explanation tells us how something works step by step. For instance, if we want to explain how the [[heart]] pumps [[blood]], we do not just give a [[Scientific law|law]], we show how parts like [[pacemaker cell]]s, [[ion channel]]s, and [[Muscle|muscle fiber]]s all work together to make the heart beat. This kind of explanation is especially useful in subjects like [[neuroscience]] and [[medicine]], where understanding the parts and how they interact is key.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2860/Discovering-ComplexityDecomposition-and|title=Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research|last1=Bechtel|first1=William|last2=Richardson|first2=Robert C.|date=2010-08-06|publisher=The MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-28917-7|language=en|doi=10.7551/mitpress/8328.001.0001}}</ref>
Philosophers also talk about whether there is only one correct way to do science. Some thinkers, like Paul Feyerabend, believed that there is no single method that all science must follow. He called this idea epistemological anarchism, which means that even unusual or untraditional approaches can lead to progress.<sup>[313]</sup> This way of thinking is called pluralism, and it accepts that different fields of science may need different tools and ways of thinking.<sup>[314][315]</sup> For instance, in climate science, scientists use a mix of physics, statistics, and information about human behavior to make predictions. In medicine, both controlled experiments and patient stories give useful, but very different, kinds of evidence. This shows that science does not always follow just one path. Instead, different methods can work together to give us a better understanding of the world.<sup>[316]</sup>


One big question in the philosophy of science is called the problem of [[induction]]. This idea was first brought up by a philosopher named [[David Hume]] in the 1700s. He asked: How do we really know that what happened in the past will keep happening in the future? For example, we believe the sun will rise tomorrow because it has always done so. But Hume pointed out that we do not have a perfect reason to believe that, just past experience.<ref name=":18">{{Cite web|title=The Project Gutenberg eBook of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, by David Hume.|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/9662/9662-h/9662-h.htm|access-date=2025-07-19|website=www.gutenberg.org}}</ref> Science often depends on these kinds of [[pattern]]s, but there is no absolute [[proof]] that they will always hold true. Later on, a philosopher named [[Nelson Goodman]] added to this [[puzzle]]. He showed that it is not always easy to decide which patterns are meaningful. He created a strange example using the [[color]] “grue,” which means something is [[green]] before a certain time and [[blue]] after. This example showed that choosing which patterns to trust is harder than it seems.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Fact, fiction, and forecast|last=Goodman|first=Nelson|date=1983|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-29071-6|edition=4th|location=Cambridge, Mass}}</ref> Today, some philosophers and scientists try to solve this problem using [[probability]]. This is called [[Bayesian reasoning]], where people adjust their beliefs based on how likely something is and what they already know.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach|last1=Howson|first1=Colin|last2=Urbach|first2=Peter|date=2005|publisher=Open Court|isbn=978-0-8126-9578-6|edition=3rd|location=Chicago}}</ref> But even this method has challenges, like being hard to calculate and including some personal judgment.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Bayes or bust? a critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory|url=https://archive.org/details/bayesorbustcriti0000earm|last=Earman|first=John|date=1992|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-51900-7|series=A Bradford book|location=Cambridge, Mass.}}</ref>
'''Science and society'''


Another important thinker was [[Thomas Kuhn]], who wrote a famous book in 1962 called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. He said that science does not always grow in a straight line by slowly adding new facts. Instead, he said science works through [[paradigm]]s, big ideas or frameworks that shape how scientists think, what they study, and what evidence they trust. Scientists work within a paradigm for a long time during “normal science,” but eventually they find anomalies, things that do not fit. When enough of these build up, a [[scientific revolution]] happens, and the old paradigm is replaced with a new one. For example, when scientists moved from [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|Newton’s laws]] to [[General relativity|Einstein’s theory of relativity]], or from [[Geocentrism|Ptolemy’s geocentric model]] ([[Earth]] at the center) to [[Heliocentrism|Copernicus’s heliocentric model]] ([[Sun]] at the center), these were paradigm shifts.<ref name=":11">{{Cite book|title=The structure of scientific revolutions|url=https://archive.org/details/structureofscien0003kuhn_k955|last=Kuhn|first=Thomas S.|date=1996|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-45807-6|edition=3rd|location=Chicago, IL}}</ref> Kuhn also said that different paradigms can be incommensurable, meaning they are so different that they cannot easily be compared. This idea was controversial. Philosophers like Karl Popper and Imre Lakatos disagreed with Kuhn. [[Karl Popper]], for example, believed that science moves forward by [[falsification]]. This means that scientists should constantly test their ideas and try to prove them wrong. If a [[Scientific theory|theory]] fails the test, it should be rejected. Popper thought that a good scientific theory must be one that could be proven false if the evidence does not support it. For example, saying “All swans are white” is a scientific idea because it can be tested, and even disproven by finding just one black [[swan]].<ref name="Popper" /> Another philosopher, [[Imre Lakatos]], offered a different view. He did not think science was as dramatic as Kuhn’s idea of sudden "paradigm shifts," but he also did not fully agree with Popper. Lakatos said that science works through research programmes, groups of theories and ideas that develop over time. These programmes may face [[problem]]s and make [[mistake]]s, but if they keep improving and helping us understand more, then they are still making [[progress]]. Lakatos believed science should still be rational and goal-directed, even if it changes slowly and builds on earlier [[idea]]s.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/methodology-of-scientific-research-programmes/8DBCEFE34A59BAD3D393FB958A4DC5FC|title=The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers|last=Lakatos|first=Imre|date=1978|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-28031-0|editor-last=Worrall|editor-first=John|volume=1|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/cbo9780511621123|editor-last2=Currie|editor-first2=Gregory}}</ref>
During the COVID-19 pandemic, groups like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gave advice based on science. They told people how to stay safe using masks, vaccines, and social distancing.


The philosophy of science does not just focus on how we know things or what [[reality]] is made of. It also asks important questions about [[ethics]] (what is right or wrong) and [[politics]] (how science affects society). These questions are especially important in fields like [[environmental science]], [[artificial intelligence]], [[biotechnology]], and how we respond to [[pandemic]]s.<ref name=":15">{{Cite book|title=Science, policy, and the value-free ideal|url=https://archive.org/details/sciencepolicyval0000doug|last=Douglas|first=Heather E.|date=2009|publisher=University of Pittsburgh Press|isbn=978-0-8229-6026-3|location=Pittsburgh, Pa}}</ref><ref name=":17">{{Cite book|title=Science in a democratic society|url=https://archive.org/details/scienceindemocra0000kitc|last=Kitcher|first=Philip|date=2011|publisher=Prometheus books|isbn=978-1-61614-407-4|location=Amherst (N.Y.)}}</ref> For example, when scientists or [[government]]s use computer models to make decisions about [[public health]] or [[climate change]], philosophers ask: Are these models reliable? Are they being used fairly?<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-and-climate-science/6ED745AB77E4388C2966265C5B28B328|title=Philosophy and Climate Science|last=Winsberg|first=Eric|date=2018|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-19569-1|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/9781108164290}}</ref> Scientists also have to think about responsibility, how their discoveries might help or harm people.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Douglas|first=H.|date=2003|title=The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility)|url=http://www.ohri.ca/newsroom/seminars/SeminarUploads/1973/Douglas%202003%20The%20Moral%20Responsibilities%20of%20Scientists.pdf|journal=American Philosophical Quarterly|volume=40|issue=1 |pages=59–68}}</ref> One idea that comes up is called the [[precautionary principle]]. This means that if a new technology might be dangerous and we do not fully understand the risks, we should be careful and not rush into using it.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Protecting public health & the environment: implementing the precautionary principle|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781559636889|date=1999|publisher=Island Press|isbn=978-1-61091-303-4|editor-last=Raffensperger|editor-first=Carolyn|location=Washington, D.C|editor-last2=Tickner|editor-first2=Joel A.}}</ref> This idea is based on [[epistemic humility]], which means recognizing the limits of our [[knowledge]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-and-the-precautionary-principle/FB666B607B8A87E3075A235F2F1530AB|title=Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy|last=Steel|first=Daniel|date=2014|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-07816-1|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/cbo9781139939652}}</ref> A good example is [[CRISPR]], a powerful gene-editing tool. While it can be used to treat diseases, it also raises big questions: Should we change human DNA? Should we allow “designer babies”? These are not just scientific questions, they are philosophical and ethical ones, too.<ref name=":16">{{Cite journal|last=Sun|first=Bob Z.|date=2020|title=Review of Altered inheritance: CRISPR and the ethics of human genome editing by Françoise Baylis|url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40592-020-00106-0|journal=Monash Bioethics Review|language=en|volume=38|issue=1|pages=91–93|doi=10.1007/s40592-020-00106-0|pmid=32314277 |issn=1321-2753}}</ref>
Scientific discoveries have played a big role in changing the world. They have helped improve how people live, work, and communicate. Some important examples include the invention of the printing press, the rise of factories during the Industrial Revolution, and modern tools like electricity, antibiotics, and the internet. These discoveries changed not only technology, but also how societies are organized.<sup>[317]</sup> For example, in the 1700s, James Watt improved the steam engine. This invention made it easier to move goods and power machines. It helped build large cities and connect countries through trade.<sup>[318]</sup> In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, the first antibiotic. This medicine saved many lives by treating infections and changed the way doctors and hospitals work all over the world.<sup>[261]</sup>


Philosophers also talk about whether there is only one correct way to do science. Some thinkers, like [[Paul Feyerabend]], believed that there is no single method that all science must follow. He called this idea [[epistemological anarchism]], which means that even unusual or untraditional approaches can lead to progress.<ref name=":19">{{Cite book|title=Against method|last=Feyerabend|first=Paul|date=2010|publisher=Verso|isbn=978-1-84467-442-8|edition=4th|location=London; New York}}</ref> This way of thinking is called [[pluralism]], and it accepts that different fields of science may need different tools and ways of thinking.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The fate of knowledge|url=https://archive.org/details/fateofknowledge0000long|last=Longino|first=Helen E.|date=2002|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-08876-1|location=Princeton, N.J}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Scientific pluralism|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780816647637|date=2006|publisher=University of Minnesota Press|isbn=978-0-8166-4763-7|editor-last=Kellert|editor-first=Stephen H.|series=Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science|location=Minneapolis, MN|editor-last2=Longino|editor-first2=Helen E.|editor-last3=Waters|editor-first3=C. Kenneth}}</ref> For instance, in [[climate science]], scientists use a mix of [[physics]], [[statistics]], and [[information]] about [[human behavior]] to make [[prediction]]s. In [[medicine]], both controlled [[experiment]]s and [[patient]] stories give useful, but very different, kinds of [[evidence]]. This shows that science does not always follow just one path. Instead, different methods can work together to give us a better understanding of the world.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Social empiricism|url=https://archive.org/details/socialempiricism0000solo|last=Solomon|first=M.|publisher=MIT Press|year=2001|isbn=9780262264648}}</ref>
Science also helps governments make better decisions. When leaders use evidence and facts, they can solve big problems like climate change, diseases, and food shortages.<sup>[249]</sup> For example, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) studies thousands of scientific papers to give advice about global warming.<sup>[251]</sup> In 1987, the Montreal Protocol helped protect the ozone layer by banning harmful gases called CFCs. Scientists showed that CFCs were damaging the atmosphere, and the agreement helped the ozone layer begin to heal.<sup>[319][320]</sup> During the COVID-19 pandemic, groups like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gave advice based on science. They told people how to stay safe using masks, vaccines, and social distancing.<sup>[321][322]</sup> However, not everyone followed or trusted this advice equally.<sup>[323]</sup> Science also helps countries work together. This is called science diplomacy. Projects like the International Space Station (ISS) or joint research in the Arctic bring scientists from different countries together. These efforts can build peace and cooperation between nations.<sup>[324]</sup>


==Science and society==
The connection between science and society goes both ways. Science changes the world, but society also shapes how science is done. People's values, culture, money, and politics all influence what research is supported and how results are used.<sup>[306]</sup> For example, during the Cold War, the U.S. focused heavily on space research after the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1 in 1957. This led to the creation of NASA and more investment in science and engineering education. Politics and fear of falling behind in space technology drove this big push.<sup>[325][326]</sup> Social movements can also change science. In the 1970s, feminist groups pointed out that medical research mostly focused on men. Because of this, rules changed so women had to be included in clinical trials. This helped scientists understand how treatments can work differently in men and women.<sup>[327]</sup> In farming, many people worry about genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This public concern has led to different rules in different places. For example, Europe uses the precautionary principle, which means being more careful about approving new GMO products than in countries like the U.S.<sup>[328]</sup> Even the way scientific papers are shared is shaped by money and business models. Many journals charge people to read studies, which has caused debates about whether scientific knowledge should be free and open to everyone.<sup>[329][330]</sup>
[[File:Covid-19 SP - UTI V. Nova Cachoeirinha.jpg|thumb|During the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], groups like the [[World Health Organization|World Health Organization (WHO)]] and the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)]] gave advice based on science. They told people how to stay safe using masks, vaccines, and social distancing.]]
Scientific discoveries have played a big role in changing the world. They have helped improve how people live, work, and communicate. Some important examples include the invention of the [[printing press]], the rise of [[Factory|factories]] during the [[Industrial Revolution]], and modern tools like [[electricity]], [[antibiotic]]s, and the [[internet]]. These discoveries changed not only technology, but also how societies are organized.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy|last=Mokyr|first=Joel|date=2011|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-12013-3|location=Princeton}}</ref> For example, in the 1700s, [[James Watt]] improved the [[steam engine]]. This invention made it easier to move goods and power machines. It helped build large cities and connect countries through trade.<ref>{{Citation|last=Hills|first=Richard L.|title=James Watt. 1: His time in Scotland, 1736 - 1774|date=2002|edition=1st|place=Ashbourne|publisher=Landmark|isbn=978-1-84306-045-1}}</ref> In 1928, [[Alexander Fleming]] discovered [[penicillin]], the first [[antibiotic]]. This medicine saved many lives by treating [[infection]]s and changed the way doctors and hospitals work all over the world.<ref name=":14" />


Science also helps [[government]]s make better [[decision]]s. When leaders use evidence and facts, they can solve big problems like climate change, diseases, and food shortages.<ref name=":12" /> For example, the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)]] studies thousands of scientific papers to give advice about [[global warming]].<ref name=":13" /> In 1987, the [[Montreal Protocol]] helped protect the [[ozone layer]] by banning harmful gases called [[CFC]]s. Scientists showed that CFCs were damaging the atmosphere, and the agreement helped the ozone layer begin to heal.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer|url=https://www.state.gov/the-montreal-protocol-on-substances-that-deplete-the-ozone-layer/|access-date=2025-07-20|website=United States Department of State|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Saving the Ozone Layer - Celebrating 30 Years of the Montreal Protocol|url=https://2017-2021.state.gov/saving-the-ozone-layer-celebrating-30-years-of-the-montreal-protocol/|access-date=2025-07-20|website=United States Department of State|language=en-US}}</ref> During the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], groups like the [[World Health Organization|World Health Organization (WHO)]] and the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)]] gave advice based on science. They told people how to stay safe using masks, vaccines, and social distancing.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Coronavirus|url=https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus|access-date=2025-07-20|website=www.who.int|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=CDC|date=2020-02-11|title=Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)|url=https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html|access-date=2025-07-20|website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|language=en-us}}</ref> However, not everyone followed or trusted this advice equally.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=van der Linden|first1=Sander|last2=Roozenbeek|first2=Jon|last3=Compton|first3=Josh|date=2020-10-23|title=Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19|journal=Frontiers in Psychology|language=English|volume=11|article-number=566790 |doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790|pmid=33192844 |doi-access=free |issn=1664-1078|pmc=7644779}}</ref> Science also helps countries work together. This is called [[science diplomacy]]. Projects like the [[International Space Station|International Space Station (ISS)]] or joint research in the [[Arctic]] bring scientists from different countries together. These efforts can build peace and cooperation between nations.<ref>{{Citation|last1=Turekian|first1=Vaughan C.|title=The Emergence of Science Diplomacy|date=2012-09-05|url=https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789814440073_0001|work=Science Diplomacy|pages=3–24|publisher=WORLD SCIENTIFIC|doi=10.1142/9789814440073_0001|isbn=978-981-4440-06-6|access-date=2025-07-20|last2=Macindoe|first2=Sarah|last3=Copeland|first3=Daryl|last4=Davis|first4=Lloyd S.|last5=Patman|first5=Robert G.|last6=Pozza|first6=Maria}}</ref>
Science also helps grow economies and create new jobs. Many big industries, like biotechnology, renewable energy, artificial intelligence, and aerospace, are based on years of scientific research.<sup>[331]</sup> For example, the semiconductor industry, which makes computer chips, came from early work in solid-state physics. Today, it is a global industry worth trillions of dollars.<sup>[332]</sup> Governments often help science and technology grow by giving tax breaks, supporting patents, and creating partnerships between public and private groups.<sup>[333]</sup> In countries like South Korea and Israel, spending more than 4% of the country’s income on research and development (R&D) has helped build strong technology industries.<sup>[334]</sup> However, new technology can also cause problems. Sometimes, machines and computers take over jobs that people used to do. This is called technological unemployment.<sup>[335]</sup> It raises hard questions about what to do when people lose their jobs because of automation. Ideas like universal basic income, job training programs, and better education are being discussed to help people adapt to these changes.<sup>[336]</sup>


The connection between science and society goes both ways. Science changes the world, but society also shapes how science is done. People's [[value]]s, [[culture]], [[money]], and [[politics]] all influence what research is supported and how results are used.<ref name=":15" /> For example, during the [[Cold War]], the [[U.S.]] focused heavily on space research after the [[Soviet Union]] launched [[Sputnik 1]] in 1957. This led to the creation of NASA and more investment in science and engineering education. Politics and fear of falling behind in space technology drove this big push.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The heavens and the earth: a political history of the space age|last=McDougall|first=Walter A.|date=1997|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|isbn=978-0-8018-5748-5|edition=Johns Hopkins paperbacks|location=Baltimore, Md}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Competing with the Soviets: science, technology, and the state in Cold War America|url=https://archive.org/details/competingwithsov0000wolf|last=Wolfe|first=Audra J.|date=2013|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|isbn=978-1-4214-0769-2|series=Johns Hopkins introductory series in the history of science|location=Baltimore}}</ref> Social movements can also change science. In the 1970s, feminist groups pointed out that medical research mostly focused on [[men]]. Because of this, rules changed so [[women]] had to be included in [[clinical trial]]s. This helped scientists understand how treatments can work differently in men and women.<ref>{{Cite web|title=History of Women's Participation in Clinical Research|url=https://orwh.od.nih.gov/toolkit/recruitment/history|access-date=2025-07-20|website=orwh.od.nih.gov |date=24 April 2024 }}</ref> In farming, many people worry about [[Genetically modified organisms|genetically modified organisms (GMOs)]]. This public concern has led to different rules in different places. For example, [[Europe]] uses the [[precautionary principle]], which means being more careful about approving new GMO products than in countries like the U.S.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tait|first=Joyce|date=2001-04-01|title=More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870010027640|journal=Journal of Risk Research|volume=4|issue=2|pages=175–189|doi=10.1080/13669870010027640|issn=1366-9877}}</ref> Even the way [[Scientific literature|scientific paper]]s are shared is shaped by [[money]] and [[business model]]s. Many journals charge people to read studies, which has caused debates about whether scientific knowledge should be free and open to everyone.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Open access|url=https://archive.org/details/9780262517638OpenAccess|last=Suber|first=Peter|date=2012|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=9780262517638|series=MIT Press essential knowledge series|location=Cambridge, Mass}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Himmelstein|first1=Daniel S|last2=Romero|first2=Ariel Rodriguez|last3=Levernier|first3=Jacob G|last4=Munro|first4=Thomas Anthony|last5=McLaughlin|first5=Stephen Reid|last6=Greshake Tzovaras|first6=Bastian|last7=Greene|first7=Casey S|date=2018-03-01|title=Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature|journal=eLife|language=en|volume=7|article-number=e32822 |doi=10.7554/eLife.32822|pmid=29424689 |doi-access=free |pmc=5832410 |issn=2050-084X}}</ref>
Understanding science is important for everyone. It helps people make smart choices, stay healthy, and take part in important debates. This is called scientific literacy.<sup>[337]</sup> When people understand basic science, they can check if information is true and avoid being misled. If many people do not understand science, it can lead to misinformation. For example, some people still believe vaccines cause autism. This false idea came from a study that was later proven wrong and taken down, but the anti-vaccine movement still exists and causes real harm.<sup>[338][339]</sup> Other examples include denying climate change or following pseudoscientific health ideas that are not supported by evidence.<sup>[340]</sup> To help the public understand science better, many things are being done. Schools are improving science classes, scientists give public talks, and science journalists write easy-to-understand articles.<sup>[341]</sup> Organizations like the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the British Science Association also organize science festivals and help scientists learn how to talk clearly to the public.<sup>[342]</sup> People can also take part in citizen science. These are projects where regular people help collect data for scientific studies. Examples include watching birds through eBird or testing water through FreshWater Watch. These projects help people feel more connected to science and show that science is for everyone, not just experts.<sup>[343]</sup>


Science also helps grow economies and create new jobs. Many big industries, like [[biotechnology]], [[renewable energy]], [[artificial intelligence]], and [[aerospace]], are based on years of [[scientific research]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths|url=https://archive.org/details/entrepreneurials0000mazz_g0r9|last=Mazzucato|first=Mariana|date=2014|publisher=Anthem Press|isbn=978-0-85728-252-1|edition=Revised|series=Anthem frontiers of global political economy|location=London ; New York}}</ref> For example, the [[semiconductor industry]], which makes [[computer chip]]s, came from early work in [[solid-state physics]]. Today, it is a global industry worth trillions of dollars.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Crystal fire: the birth of the information age|url=https://archive.org/details/crystalfirebirth00rior|last1=Riordan|first1=Michael|last2=Hoddeson|first2=Lillian|date=1997|publisher=Norton|isbn=978-0-393-04124-8|edition=1st|location=New York}}</ref> Governments often help science and technology grow by giving [[tax break]]s, supporting [[patent]]s, and creating partnerships between public and private groups.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Main Science and Technology Indicators|url=https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/main-science-and-technology-indicators_2304277x.html|access-date=2025-07-20|website=OECD|language=en}}</ref> In countries like [[South Korea]] and [[Israel]], spending more than 4% of the country’s income on research and development (R&D) has helped build strong technology industries.<ref>{{Cite web|title=UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development|url=https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377250|access-date=2025-07-20|website=unesdoc.unesco.org}}</ref> However, new [[technology]] can also cause problems. Sometimes, machines and computers take over jobs that people used to do. This is called [[technological unemployment]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Frey|first1=Carl Benedikt|last2=Osborne|first2=Michael A.|date=2017-01-01|title=The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516302244|journal=Technological Forecasting and Social Change|volume=114|pages=254–280|doi=10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019|issn=0040-1625}}</ref> It raises hard questions about what to do when people lose their jobs because of [[automation]]. Ideas like [[universal basic income]], job training programs, and better [[education]] are being discussed to help people adapt to these changes.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies|last1=Brynjolfsson|first1=Erik|last2=McAfee|first2=Andrew|date=2016|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|isbn=978-0-393-35064-7|edition=First published as a Norton paperback|location=New York London}}</ref>
As science becomes more powerful, it also raises ethical and philosophical questions.<sup>[344]</sup> New technologies like gene editing, brain-computer links, and geoengineering can change human life and the planet in big ways.<sup>[345][346]</sup> People must think carefully about what is right or wrong when using these tools.<sup>[347]</sup> For example, a tool called CRISPR-Cas9 might one day cure genetic diseases. But it could also be used to create “designer babies,” which may increase unfairness in society or bring back dangerous ideas like eugenics.<sup>[348][312]</sup> Artificial intelligence (AI) is another case. When AI is used to help police or choose job applicants, it can carry hidden biases from the data it was trained on.<sup>[349]</sup> This has led to calls for fair and transparent AI systems.<sup>[350][351]</sup> To deal with these big issues, there are special groups that work on science and ethics. These include The Hastings Center, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, and UNESCO’s Bioethics Program.<sup>[352][353][354]</sup> They help create rules and ideas that respect human rights, justice, and the limits of science. These discussions are not just for scientists. They also involve ethicists, lawyers, religious leaders, and the general public. This helps make sure that science is used in ways that are fair and good for everyone.<sup>[307][355]</sup>


Understanding science is important for everyone. It helps people make smart choices, stay healthy, and take part in important debates. This is called [[scientific literacy]].<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Snow |first1=C. E. |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK396090/|title=Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences|last2=Dibner|first2=K. A. |author3=Committee on Science Literacy and Public Perception of Science |last4=Board On Science|first4=Education |author5=Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education |author6=National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |date=2016|publisher=National Academies Press (US)|isbn=978-0-309-44756-0|editor-last=Snow|editor-first=Catherine E.|series=The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health|location=Washington (DC)|pmid=27854404|editor-last2=Dibner|editor-first2=Kenne A.}}</ref> When people understand basic science, they can check if [[information]] is true and avoid being misled. If many people do not understand science, it can lead to [[misinformation]]. For example, some people still believe [[vaccine]]s cause [[autism]]. This false idea came from a study that was later proven wrong and taken down, but the anti-vaccine movement still exists and causes real harm.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kata|first=Anna|date=2010-02-17|title=A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet|journal=Vaccine|volume=28|issue=7|pages=1709–1716|doi=10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022|issn=1873-2518|pmid=20045099}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Godlee|first1=Fiona|last2=Smith|first2=Jane|last3=Marcovitch|first3=Harvey|date=2011-01-05|title=Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent|journal=BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|volume=342|article-number=c7452|doi=10.1136/bmj.c7452|issn=1756-1833|pmid=21209060}}</ref> Other examples include denying [[climate change]] or following pseudoscientific health ideas that are not supported by evidence.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lewandowsky|first1=Stephan|last2=Ecker|first2=Ullrich K. H.|last3=Seifert|first3=Colleen M.|last4=Schwarz|first4=Norbert|last5=Cook|first5=John|date=2012|title=Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1529100612451018|journal=Psychological Science in the Public Interest|language=en|volume=13|issue=3|pages=106–131|doi=10.1177/1529100612451018|pmid=26173286 |issn=1529-1006}}</ref> To help the public understand science better, many things are being done. Schools are improving science classes, scientists give public talks, and [[Science journalism|science journalists]] write easy-to-understand articles.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Scheufele|first1=Dietram A.|last2=Krause|first2=Nicole M.|date=2019-04-16|title=Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|language=en|volume=116|issue=16|pages=7662–7669|doi=10.1073/pnas.1805871115|pmid=30642953 |doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424|pmc=6475373 |bibcode=2019PNAS..116.7662S }}</ref> Organizations like the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science|American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)]] and the [[British Science Association]] also organize science festivals and help scientists learn how to talk clearly to the public.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Baram-Tsabari|first1=Ayelet|last2=Osborne|first2=Jonathan|date=2015|title=Bridging science education and science communication research|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tea.21202|journal=Journal of Research in Science Teaching|language=en|volume=52|issue=2|pages=135–144|doi=10.1002/tea.21202|bibcode=2015JRScT..52..135B |issn=1098-2736}}</ref> People can also take part in [[citizen science]]. These are projects where regular people help collect data for scientific studies. Examples include watching birds through [[eBird]] or testing water through [[FreshWater Watch]]. These projects help people feel more connected to science and show that science is for everyone, not just experts.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bonney|first1=Rick|last2=Phillips|first2=Tina B.|last3=Ballard|first3=Heidi L.|last4=Enck|first4=Jody W.|date=2016|title=Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963662515607406|journal=Public Understanding of Science|language=en|volume=25|issue=1|pages=2–16|doi=10.1177/0963662515607406|pmid=26445860 |issn=0963-6625}}</ref>
Many of today’s biggest problems, like diseases, climate change, and food shortages, affect the whole world. Solving them requires international cooperation and fair access to scientific knowledge. But there are still big differences between richer and poorer countries, often called the Global North and the Global South. Wealthy countries usually lead in science. They have more money for research, better equipment, and more universities.<sup>[356]</sup> In contrast, many low- and middle-income countries struggle with problems like not enough funding, brain drain (when scientists leave to work in richer countries), and limited access to scientific tools and journals.<sup>[357][358]</sup> Some groups are working to close this gap. For example, TWAS (The World Academy of Sciences) and INASP (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications) help support science in developing countries. They promote regional cooperation, open-access publishing, and training programs to build research skills.<sup>[359][360]</sup> The idea of open science, supported by UNESCO, says that scientific knowledge should be freely available to everyone. It also encourages scientists to work together, share results, and be transparent about how they do their research.<sup>[361]</sup> A good example of open science is what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientists around the world used platforms like GISAID to quickly share data about the virus’s genes. This helped track new versions of the virus and develop better responses faster.<sup>[362][363]</sup> However, there are still challenges. Sometimes, patents and intellectual property rules make it hard for poorer countries to get important technologies, like vaccines or medical treatments.<sup>[364][365]</sup> This shows that fairness in science is not just about sharing knowledge, it is also about making sure everyone can use it.<sup>[366]</sup>


As science becomes more powerful, it also raises ethical and philosophical questions.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The ethics of science: an introduction|url=https://archive.org/details/ethicsofsciencei0000resn|last=Resnik|first=David B.|date=2005|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-16698-0|edition=Reprint. Digital printing|series=Philosophical issues in science|location=London}}</ref> New technologies like gene editing, brain-computer links, and geoengineering can change human life and the planet in big ways.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bostrom|first1=Nick|last2=Sandberg|first2=Anders|date=2009|title=Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5|journal=Science and Engineering Ethics|language=en|volume=15|issue=3|pages=311–341|doi=10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5|pmid=19543814 |issn=1353-3452}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315468525|title=The Ethics of Climate Engineering: Solar Radiation Management and Non-Ideal Justice|last=Svoboda|first=Toby|date=2017-05-25|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-315-46853-2|edition=1|language=en|doi=10.4324/9781315468532}}</ref> People must think carefully about what is right or wrong when using these tools.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnological revolution|url=https://archive.org/details/ourposthumanfutu0000fuku|last=Fukuyama|first=Francis|date=2003|publisher=Picador|isbn=978-0-312-42171-7|edition=1st|location=New York}}</ref> For example, a tool called [[Cas9|CRISPR-Cas9]] might one day cure [[genetic disease]]s. But it could also be used to create “designer babies,” which may increase unfairness in society or bring back dangerous ideas like [[eugenics]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Issues|date=2015-10-01|title=CRISPR Democracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation|url=https://issues.org/crispr-democracy-gene-editing-inclusive-deliberation/|access-date=2025-07-22|website=Issues in Science and Technology|language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":16" /> [[Artificial intelligence|Artificial intelligence (AI)]] is another case. When AI is used to help police or choose job applicants, it can carry hidden [[bias]]es from the [[data]] it was trained on.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hyman|first=Mikell|date=2019|title=Computers Can't Override America's Antipathy Towards the Poor - Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York, St. Martin's Press, 2018)|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie/article/abs/computers-cant-override-americas-antipathy-towards-the-poor-virginia-eubanks-automating-inequality-how-hightech-tools-profile-police-and-punish-the-poor-new-york-st-martins-press-2018/82FB435EFFF055F84915F3721DD5D56D|journal=European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie|language=en|volume=60|issue=3|pages=406–411|doi=10.1017/S0003975619000225|hdl=21.11116/0000-0005-BD47-7 |issn=0003-9756}}</ref> This has led to calls for fair and transparent AI systems.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Floridi|first1=Luciano|last2=Cowls|first2=Josh|last3=Beltrametti|first3=Monica|last4=Chatila|first4=Raja|last5=Chazerand|first5=Patrice|last6=Dignum|first6=Virginia|last7=Luetge|first7=Christoph|last8=Madelin|first8=Robert|last9=Pagallo|first9=Ugo|last10=Rossi|first10=Francesca|last11=Schafer|first11=Burkhard|date=2018|title=AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations|journal=Minds and Machines|language=en|volume=28|issue=4|pages=689–707|doi=10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5|pmid=30930541 |issn=0924-6495|pmc=6404626}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Binns|first=Reuben|date=2018-01-21|title=Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy|url=https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/binns18a.html|journal=Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency|language=en|publisher=PMLR|pages=149–159}}</ref> To deal with these big issues, there are special groups that work on science and ethics. These include [[The Hastings Center]], the [[Nuffield Council on Bioethics]], and [[UNESCO’s Bioethics Program]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Hastings Center for Bioethics — Health, Science, and Technology Ethics|url=https://www.thehastingscenter.org/|access-date=2025-07-22|website=The Hastings Center for Bioethics|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Nuffield Council on Bioethics - We're a leading independent policy and research centre that identifies, analyses and advises on ethical issues in biomedicine and health to benefit people and society.|url=https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/|access-date=2025-07-22|website=Nuffield Council on Bioethics|language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: background, principles and application|url=https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179844|access-date=2025-07-22|website=unesdoc.unesco.org|language=en}}</ref> They help create rules and ideas that respect [[human rights]], [[justice]], and the limits of science. These discussions are not just for scientists. They also involve ethicists, lawyers, religious leaders, and the general public. This helps make sure that science is used in ways that are fair and good for everyone.<ref name=":17" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jasanoff|first=Sheila|date=2003-09-01|title=Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science|url=https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320|journal=Minerva|language=en|volume=41|issue=3|pages=223–244|doi=10.1023/A:1025557512320|issn=1573-1871}}</ref>
'''Criticisms and limitations'''


Many of today’s biggest problems, like [[disease]]s, [[climate change]], and [[Food security|food shortage]]s, affect the whole world. Solving them requires international cooperation and fair access to scientific knowledge. But there are still big differences between richer and poorer countries, often called the [[Global North and Global South|Global North and the Global South]]. Wealthy countries usually lead in science. They have more money for research, better equipment, and more universities.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Chan|first1=Leslie|last2=Kirsop|first2=Barbara|last3=Arunachalam|first3=Subbiah|date=2011|title=Towards open and equitable access to research and knowledge for development|journal=PLOS Medicine|volume=8|issue=3|article-number=e1001016|doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001016|doi-access=free |issn=1549-1676|pmc=3066136|pmid=21483470}}</ref> In contrast, many low- and middle-income countries struggle with problems like not enough funding, [[brain drain]] (when scientists leave to work in richer countries), and limited access to scientific tools and journals.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gaillard|first=Jacques|date=2010-03-01|title=Measuring Research and Development in Developing Countries: Main Characteristics and Implications for the Frascati Manual|url=https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180901500104|journal=Science, Technology and Society|language=EN|volume=15|issue=1|pages=77–111|doi=10.1177/097172180901500104|issn=0971-7218}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tijssen|first=Robert J. W.|date=2007-05-01|title=Africa's contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1658-3|journal=Scientometrics|language=en|volume=71|issue=2|pages=303–327|doi=10.1007/s11192-007-1658-3|issn=1588-2861}}</ref> Some groups are working to close this gap. For example, [[The World Academy of Sciences|TWAS (The World Academy of Sciences)]] and [[International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications|INASP (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications)]] help support science in developing countries. They promote regional cooperation, open-access publishing, and training programs to build research skills.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} INASP|url=https://www.inasp.info/|access-date=2025-07-22|website=www.inasp.info}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Sciences (TWAS)|first=The World Academy of|date=2025-07-31|title=Home {{!}} TWAS|url=https://twas.org/|access-date=2025-07-22|website=twas.org|language=en}}</ref> The idea of [[open science]], supported by [[UNESCO]], says that scientific knowledge should be freely available to everyone. It also encourages scientists to work together, share results, and be transparent about how they do their research.<ref>{{Cite news|title=UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science|language=en|url=https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/about|access-date=2025-07-22}}</ref> A good example of open science is what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientists around the world used platforms like [[GISAID]] to quickly share data about the virus’s genes. This helped track new versions of the [[SARS-CoV-2|virus]] and develop better responses faster.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Shu|first1=Yuelong|last2=McCauley|first2=John|date=2017-03-30|title=GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data - from vision to reality|journal=Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen Sur les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin|volume=22|issue=13|article-number=30494|doi=10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.13.30494|issn=1560-7917|pmc=5388101|pmid=28382917}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Reardon|first=Sara|date=2021-07-21|title=How the Delta variant achieves its ultrafast spread|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01986-w|journal=Nature|language=en|doi=10.1038/d41586-021-01986-w|pmid=34290423 |issn=0028-0836}}</ref> However, there are still challenges. Sometimes, patents and intellectual property rules make it hard for poorer countries to get important technologies, like vaccines or medical treatments.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Plagues and the paradox of progress: why the world is getting healthier in worrisome ways|url=https://archive.org/details/plaguesparadoxof0000boll|last=Bollyky|first=Thomas J.|date=2018|publisher=The MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-03845-4|location=Cambridge, MA}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/RP47_WTO-role-in-IP-and-access-to-medicines_EN.pdf|title=Access to Medical Technologies in Developing Countries: The Role of Intellectual Property|last=Correa|first=C.|publisher=South Centre|year=2021}}</ref> This shows that fairness in science is not just about sharing [[knowledge]], it is also about making sure everyone can use it.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025|url=https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020924|access-date=2025-07-22|website=www.who.int|language=en}}</ref>
This funny image is an example of data dredging or p-hacking, where people find patterns in data that do not really mean anything. It shows a fake connection between the number of letters in the winning word of the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the number of people in the U.S. who died from venomous spider bites. These two things have nothing to do with each other, but the graph makes it look like they do. It shows how data can be misleading if not used carefully.


==Criticisms and limitations==
Science is the best tool humans have for understanding and predicting how nature works. But it is not perfect. Science has limits, and it is not always free from mistakes or bias.<sup>[367][368]</sup> Science depends on observation, testing, and the idea that ideas should be falsifiable, which means they can be proven wrong if new evidence shows up.<sup>[5]</sup> Because of this, science cannot answer questions that are metaphysical (about things beyond the physical world), emotional, or based on personal values. These kinds of questions cannot be tested or measured with tools and experiments.<sup>[369]</sup> For example, science can study what happens in the brain during meditation, but it cannot fully explain what a person feels during that experience. This is part of a big question in philosophy and brain science called the problem of consciousness.<sup>[254]</sup> Scientists also disagree about how best to explain complex systems. Some believe that everything can be broken down into smaller parts (reductionism), while others think that new properties appear when parts come together (emergentism). This is an important debate in areas like neuroscience and systems biology.<sup>[370]</sup>
[[File:Spurious correlations - spelling bee spiders.svg|thumb|upright=1.3|This funny image is an example of data dredging or p-hacking, where people find patterns in data that do not really mean anything. It shows a fake connection between the number of letters in the winning word of the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the number of people in the U.S. who died from venomous spider bites. These two things have nothing to do with each other, but the graph makes it look like they do. It shows how data can be misleading if not used carefully.]]
Science is the best tool humans have for understanding and predicting how [[nature]] works. But it is not perfect. Science has limits, and it is not always free from [[mistake]]s or [[bias]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry|url=https://archive.org/details/scienceassocialk0000long|last=Longino|first=Helen E.|date=1990|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-07342-2|location=Princeton, N.J}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=The price of truth: how money affects the norms of science|url=https://archive.org/details/priceoftruthhowm0000resn|last=Resnik|first=David B.|date=2007|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-530978-2|series=Practical and professional ethics series|location=Oxford ; New York}}</ref> Science depends on observation, testing, and the idea that ideas should be [[Falsifiability|falsifiable]], which means they can be proven wrong if new evidence shows up.<ref name="Popper" /> Because of this, science cannot answer questions that are metaphysical (about things beyond the physical world), emotional, or based on personal values. These kinds of questions cannot be tested or measured with tools and experiments.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem|date=2013|publisher=The University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-05179-6|editor-last=Pigliucci|editor-first=Massimo|location=Chicago|editor-last2=Boudry|editor-first2=Maarten}}</ref> For example, science can study what happens in the [[brain]] during [[meditation]], but it cannot fully explain what a person feels during that experience. This is part of a big question in [[philosophy]] and [[Neuroscience|brain science]] called the [[problem of consciousness]].<ref name=":8" /> Scientists also disagree about how best to explain complex systems. Some believe that everything can be broken down into smaller parts ([[reductionism]]), while others think that new properties appear when parts come together ([[Emergence|emergentism]]). This is an important debate in areas like [[neuroscience]] and [[systems biology]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Anderson|first=P. W.|date=1972-08-04|title=More Is Different|url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.177.4047.393|journal=Science|volume=177|issue=4047|pages=393–396|doi=10.1126/science.177.4047.393 |pmid=17796623 |bibcode=1972Sci...177..393A }}</ref>


Some philosophers have said that science is not as objective as it may seem. For example, [[Thomas Kuhn]] argued that what scientists observe is affected by the theories they already believe. This idea is called [[theory-ladenness]]. In his famous book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), Kuhn said that science does not always move forward step by step. Instead, it goes through big changes called [[paradigm shift]]s, times when one way of thinking is replaced by another. A good example is how Einstein’s relativity replaced Newton’s mechanics. Kuhn also said that during these shifts, scientists working under different theories may not agree on what counts as proof or even what questions are important. This makes it hard to compare old and new ideas fairly.<ref name=":11" /> Another thinker, [[Paul Feyerabend]], said that there is no single "scientific method" that always works. In his book Against Method (1975), he said that in the [[history of science]], sometimes “anything goes.” He believed that too many strict rules in science can actually stop progress.<ref name=":19" /> One example is how Galileo’s telescope was at first seen as untrustworthy by many scientists of his time. People did not trust what it showed because it was new and did not fit their existing ideas. This shows that new tools and ideas are sometimes rejected, not because they are wrong, but because they challenge the way people already think.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Galileo, courtier: practice of science in the culture of absolutism|last=Biagioli|first=Mario|date=2006|publisher=Univ. of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-04560-3|edition=Paperback ed., [Nachdr.]|series=Science and its conceptual foundations|location=Chicago}}</ref>
Some philosophers have said that science is not as objective as it may seem. For example, Thomas Kuhn argued that what scientists observe is affected by the theories they already believe. This idea is called theory-ladenness. In his famous book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), Kuhn said that science does not always move forward step by step. Instead, it goes through big changes called paradigm shifts, times when one way of thinking is replaced by another. A good example is how Einstein’s relativity replaced Newton’s mechanics. Kuhn also said that during these shifts, scientists working under different theories may not agree on what counts as proof or even what questions are important. This makes it hard to compare old and new ideas fairly.<sup>[264]</sup> Another thinker, Paul Feyerabend, said that there is no single "scientific method" that always works. In his book Against Method (1975), he said that in the history of science, sometimes “anything goes.” He believed that too many strict rules in science can actually stop progress.<sup>[313]</sup> One example is how Galileo’s telescope was at first seen as untrustworthy by many scientists of his time. People did not trust what it showed because it was new and did not fit their existing ideas. This shows that new tools and ideas are sometimes rejected, not because they are wrong, but because they challenge the way people already think.<sup>[371]</sup>


One basic problem in science is called the [[problem of induction]]. It was explained by philosopher [[David Hume]] in the 1700s. The problem asks: how can we be sure that something will always happen just because it has happened many times before? For example, the sun has risen every day in history, but that does not guarantee it will rise tomorrow. Yet, science often assumes that nature follows regular patterns like this.<ref name=":18" /> Philosopher [[Karl Popper]] tried to solve this problem by saying that science should focus on proving ideas false, not just confirming them. This is called [[falsifiability]]. According to Popper, science moves forward by getting rid of wrong theories. But this approach also has problems. If an experiment gives unexpected results, scientists do not always throw out the theory. Sometimes they blame the tools, the way the data was read, or unknown factors. For example, if a [[telescope]] shows strange [[data]] about a [[planet]], the issue might be with the [[telescope]], not the [[Scientific theory|theory]]. So it is not always clear when a theory has truly been disproven. This shows that scientific ideas are not final truths. They can change when new evidence appears or when old evidence is understood in a new way.<ref name=":9" />
One basic problem in science is called the problem of induction. It was explained by philosopher David Hume in the 1700s. The problem asks: how can we be sure that something will always happen just because it has happened many times before? For example, the sun has risen every day in history, but that does not guarantee it will rise tomorrow. Yet, science often assumes that nature follows regular patterns like this.<sup>[301]</sup> Philosopher Karl Popper tried to solve this problem by saying that science should focus on proving ideas false, not just confirming them. This is called falsifiability. According to Popper, science moves forward by getting rid of wrong theories. But this approach also has problems. If an experiment gives unexpected results, scientists do not always throw out the theory. Sometimes they blame the tools, the way the data was read, or unknown factors. For example, if a telescope shows strange data about a planet, the issue might be with the telescope, not the theory. So it is not always clear when a theory has truly been disproven. This shows that scientific ideas are not final truths. They can change when new evidence appears or when old evidence is understood in a new way.<sup>[260]</sup>


Social and cultural factors also affect science. They influence what gets studied, who gets to do the research, and how results are shared. Most science today is led by institutions in the Western world, and it is often written in [[English]]. This has raised concerns about [[epistemic colonialism]], where knowledge from non-Western cultures, like Indigenous traditions or ancient medical systems, is ignored or only accepted when explained in Western scientific terms.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide|url=https://www.routledge.com/Epistemologies-of-the-South-Justice-Against-Epistemicide/Santos/p/book/9781612055459|access-date=2025-07-22|website=Routledge & CRC Press|language=en}}</ref> For example, [[Ayurveda]] and [[Traditional Chinese medicine]] have been used for thousands of years. But in modern science, they are often not taken seriously unless specific parts of them are tested in lab conditions or [[clinical trial]]s.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Other-worldly: making Chinese medicine through transnational frames|url=https://archive.org/details/otherworldlymaki0000zhan|last=Zhan|first=Mei|date=2009|publisher=Duke university press|isbn=978-0-8223-4363-9|location=Durham}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Patwardhan|first=Bhushan|date=2014|title=Bridging Ayurveda with evidence-based scientific approaches in medicine|journal=The EPMA Journal|volume=5|issue=1|article-number=19|doi=10.1186/1878-5085-5-19|doi-access=free |issn=1878-5077|pmc=4230501|pmid=25395997}}</ref> There are also problems inside the scientific community. Many researchers are under pressure to publish lots of papers to keep their jobs. This is called "[[publish or perish]]." It can lead to rushed studies, weak results, and even bad practices like [[Data dredging|p-hacking]] (changing data to get the desired result).<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ioannidis|first=John P. A.|date=2005|title=Why most published research findings are false|journal=PLOS Medicine|volume=2|issue=8|article-number=e124|doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124|doi-access=free |issn=1549-1676|pmc=1182327|pmid=16060722}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Head|first1=Megan L.|last2=Holman|first2=Luke|last3=Lanfear|first3=Rob|last4=Kahn|first4=Andrew T.|last5=Jennions|first5=Michael D.|date=2015|title=The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science|journal=PLOS Biology|volume=13|issue=3|article-number=e1002106|doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106|doi-access=free |issn=1545-7885|pmc=4359000|pmid=25768323}}</ref> These issues are part of what's known as the [[replication crisis]], when other scientists try to repeat a study but do not get the same results. One big study in 2015, called the Open Science Collaboration, tried to repeat 100 famous psychology experiments. Only 36% of them gave similar results. This showed that many scientific findings may not be as reliable as once thought.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Open Science Collaboration|date=2015-08-28|title=Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science|url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716|journal=Science|volume=349|issue=6251|article-number=aac4716|doi=10.1126/science.aac4716 |pmid=26315443 }}</ref>
Social and cultural factors also affect science. They influence what gets studied, who gets to do the research, and how results are shared. Most science today is led by institutions in the Western world, and it is often written in English. This has raised concerns about epistemic colonialism, where knowledge from non-Western cultures, like Indigenous traditions or ancient medical systems, is ignored or only accepted when explained in Western scientific terms.<sup>[372]</sup> For example, Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese medicine have been used for thousands of years. But in modern science, they are often not taken seriously unless specific parts of them are tested in lab conditions or clinical trials.<sup>[373][374]</sup> There are also problems inside the scientific community. Many researchers are under pressure to publish lots of papers to keep their jobs. This is called "publish or perish." It can lead to rushed studies, weak results, and even bad practices like p-hacking (changing data to get the desired result).<sup>[375][376]</sup> These issues are part of what's known as the replication crisis, when other scientists try to repeat a study but do not get the same results. One big study in 2015, called the Open Science Collaboration, tried to repeat 100 famous psychology experiments. Only 36% of them gave similar results. This showed that many scientific findings may not be as reliable as once thought.<sup>[377]</sup>


Science works best when it is honest and independent. But sometimes, economic and political pressures can affect what scientists study, how results are shared, and whether the truth is told. For example, in the 1900s, [[Tobacco industry|tobacco companies]] paid for studies that made [[smoking]] look safer than it really was. They tried to hide the fact that smoking causes [[cancer]]. This delayed laws to protect people and led to millions of deaths. The [[fossil fuel industry]] has done something similar. By funding certain research groups and articles, they tried to make people doubt the strong scientific agreement that human actions are causing [[climate change]]. These actions are examples of corporate influence over science, which can reduce public trust and keep people from knowing the full truth.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to climate change|last1=Oreskes|first1=Naomi|last2=Conway|first2=Erik M.|date=2022|publisher=Bloomsbury|isbn=978-1-60819-394-3|edition=Paperback edition, Nachdruck|location=New York London Oxford New Delhi Sydney}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Bending science: how special interests corrupt public health research|url=https://archive.org/details/bendingscienceho0000mcga|last1=McGarity|first1=Thomas O.|last2=Wagner|first2=Wendy|date=2008|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-02815-9|location=Cambridge, Mass}}</ref> [[Government]]s can also interfere with science. During the early [[COVID-19 pandemic]], some leaders delayed sharing important data or ignored the advice of health experts. This may have made the [[pandemic]] worse and hurt people’s trust in science and government decisions.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Sachs|first1=Jeffrey D|last2=Karim|first2=Salim S Abdool|last3=Aknin|first3=Lara|last4=Allen|first4=Joseph|last5=Brosbøl|first5=Kirsten|last6=Colombo|first6=Francesca|last7=Barron|first7=Gabriela Cuevas|last8=Espinosa|first8=María Fernanda|last9=Gaspar|first9=Vitor|last10=Gaviria|first10=Alejandro|last11=Haines|first11=Andy|date=2022|title=The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic|journal=The Lancet|language=en|volume=400|issue=10359|pages=1224–1280|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9 |pmid=36115368 |pmc=9539542 |bibcode=2022Lanc..400.1224S }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Gollust|first1=Sarah E.|last2=Nagler|first2=Rebekah H.|last3=Fowler|first3=Erika Franklin|date=2020-12-01|title=The Emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis|url=https://read.dukeupress.edu/jhppl/article/45/6/967/165291/The-Emergence-of-COVID-19-in-the-US-A-Public|journal=Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law|language=en|volume=45|issue=6|pages=967–981|doi=10.1215/03616878-8641506|pmid=32464658 |issn=0361-6878}}</ref> To keep science honest, there must be transparency (open sharing of methods and results) and safeguards that protect scientists from outside pressure.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ioannidis|first=John P. A.|date=2014|title=How to make more published research true|journal=PLOS Medicine|volume=11|issue=10|article-number=e1001747|doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747|doi-access=free |issn=1549-1676|pmc=4204808|pmid=25334033}}</ref>
Science works best when it is honest and independent. But sometimes, economic and political pressures can affect what scientists study, how results are shared, and whether the truth is told. For example, in the 1900s, tobacco companies paid for studies that made smoking look safer than it really was. They tried to hide the fact that smoking causes cancer. This delayed laws to protect people and led to millions of deaths. The fossil fuel industry has done something similar. By funding certain research groups and articles, they tried to make people doubt the strong scientific agreement that human actions are causing climate change. These actions are examples of corporate influence over science, which can reduce public trust and keep people from knowing the full truth.<sup>[378][379]</sup> Governments can also interfere with science. During the early COVID-19 pandemic, some leaders delayed sharing important data or ignored the advice of health experts. This may have made the pandemic worse and hurt people’s trust in science and government decisions.<sup>[380][381]</sup> To keep science honest, there must be transparency (open sharing of methods and results) and safeguards that protect scientists from outside pressure.<sup>[382]</sup>


Science often uses controlled experiments to find clear answers. But some problems are too complex for this method to work perfectly. Fields like [[climate science]], [[epidemiology]] (the study of diseases), and [[ecology]] deal with systems that have many parts working together. Because of this, scientists must use models and probabilities to make predictions. For example, [[climate model]]s look at how things like [[greenhouse gas]]es, [[ocean current]]s, and [[Weather|weather pattern]]s interact. These models can show possible future trends, but they cannot predict exactly what will happen in a specific place at a specific time many years ahead. Sometimes people misunderstand this. They think that if science is uncertain, it must be wrong. But in complex systems, uncertainty is normal. It does not mean the science is bad.<ref name=":10" /> The same problem appears in [[nutritional science]]. It is hard to study [[diet]] because people eat many things at once, and other factors (like [[sleep]] or [[exercise]]) affect [[health]] too. This can lead to confusing or changing advice about what is healthy.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Vitolins|first1=Mara Z.|last2=Case|first2=Talsi L.|date=2020|title=What Makes Nutrition Research So Difficult to Conduct and Interpret?|journal=Diabetes Spectrum: A Publication of the American Diabetes Association|volume=33|issue=2|pages=113–117|doi=10.2337/ds19-0077|issn=1040-9165|pmc=7228817|pmid=32425447}}</ref> Even in areas with experiments, like genetics, scientists have learned that things are more complicated than they once thought. Many diseases cannot be explained by a single [[gene]]. Instead, they are caused by interactions between many genes and environmental factors. This shows that [[reductionism]], studying only small parts of a problem, can miss the bigger picture when dealing with [[complex system]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Manolio|first1=Teri A.|last2=Collins|first2=Francis S.|last3=Cox|first3=Nancy J.|last4=Goldstein|first4=David B.|last5=Hindorff|first5=Lucia A.|last6=Hunter|first6=David J.|last7=McCarthy|first7=Mark I.|last8=Ramos|first8=Erin M.|last9=Cardon|first9=Lon R.|last10=Chakravarti|first10=Aravinda|last11=Cho|first11=Judy H.|date=2009|title=Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=461|issue=7265|pages=747–753|doi=10.1038/nature08494|pmid=19812666 |pmc=2831613 |bibcode=2009Natur.461..747M |issn=1476-4687}}</ref>
Science often uses controlled experiments to find clear answers. But some problems are too complex for this method to work perfectly. Fields like climate science, epidemiology (the study of diseases), and ecology deal with systems that have many parts working together. Because of this, scientists must use models and probabilities to make predictions. For example, climate models look at how things like greenhouse gases, ocean currents, and weather patterns interact. These models can show possible future trends, but they cannot predict exactly what will happen in a specific place at a specific time many years ahead. Sometimes people misunderstand this. They think that if science is uncertain, it must be wrong. But in complex systems, uncertainty is normal. It does not mean the science is bad.<sup>[241]</sup> The same problem appears in nutritional science. It is hard to study diet because people eat many things at once, and other factors (like sleep or exercise) affect health too. This can lead to confusing or changing advice about what is healthy.<sup>[383]</sup> Even in areas with experiments, like genetics, scientists have learned that things are more complicated than they once thought. Many diseases cannot be explained by a single gene. Instead, they are caused by interactions between many genes and environmental factors. This shows that reductionism, studying only small parts of a problem, can miss the bigger picture when dealing with complex systems.<sup>[384]</sup>


Science is a powerful way to learn about the natural world, but it has limits. Some important questions cannot be answered by science alone. These include [[Normativity|normative]] (what we should do), [[Existentialism|existential]] (why we exist), and [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] (beyond the physical world) questions. For example, science cannot fully answer “What is the meaning of life?”, “Is there a God?”, “What is morally right or wrong?”, or “What is consciousness?”. Science can study things we can see and test, like how the brain works. For instance, [[neuroscience]] can show how parts of the brain light up when we make [[choice]]s. But it cannot tell us what we should do [[Morality|morally]]. This is known as the [[is–ought problem]], explained by philosopher [[David Hume]]. In the same way, [[evolutionary biology]] can explain how helping others ([[altruism]]) may have developed in humans. But it cannot say whether we should be kind from a moral point of view. These types of questions are explored through [[philosophy]], [[religion]], [[ethics]], and the [[humanities]] (like [[history]] and [[literature]]). Thinking that science is the only way to gain knowledge is called the [[Scientism|scientism fallacy]]. It ignores the important insights from other areas of human thought, like art, culture, and spiritual traditions.<ref name=":9" /><ref>{{Cite book|title=Defending science - within reason: between scientism and cynicism|last=Haack|first=Susan|date=2007|publisher=Prometheus Books|isbn=978-1-59102-458-3|edition=Paperback|location=Amherst, NY}}</ref>
Science is a powerful way to learn about the natural world, but it has limits. Some important questions cannot be answered by science alone. These include normative (what we should do), existential (why we exist), and metaphysical (beyond the physical world) questions. For example, science cannot fully answer “What is the meaning of life?”, “Is there a God?”, “What is morally right or wrong?”, or “What is consciousness?”. Science can study things we can see and test, like how the brain works. For instance, neuroscience can show how parts of the brain light up when we make choices. But it cannot tell us what we should do morally. This is known as the is–ought problem, explained by philosopher David Hume. In the same way, evolutionary biology can explain how helping others (altruism) may have developed in humans. But it cannot say whether we should be kind from a moral point of view. These types of questions are explored through philosophy, religion, ethics, and the humanities (like history and literature). Thinking that science is the only way to gain knowledge is called the scientism fallacy. It ignores the important insights from other areas of human thought, like art, culture, and spiritual traditions.<sup>[260][385]</sup>


People’s trust in science is not the same everywhere. It depends on their background, politics, and past experiences. In some places, people see science as something only for experts or something that does not care about their real-life problems. This is especially true in communities that have been treated unfairly by scientific institutions in the past.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Cologna|first1=Viktoria|last2=Mede|first2=Niels G.|last3=Berger|first3=Sebastian|last4=Besley|first4=John|last5=Brick|first5=Cameron|last6=Joubert|first6=Marina|last7=Maibach|first7=Edward W.|last8=Mihelj|first8=Sabina|last9=Oreskes|first9=Naomi|last10=Schäfer|first10=Mike S.|last11=van der Linden|first11=Sander|date=2025|title=Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries|journal=Nature Human Behaviour|language=en|volume=9|issue=4|pages=713–730|doi=10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5|pmid=39833424 |pmc=7617525 |issn=2397-3374}}</ref> One well-known case is that of [[Henrietta Lacks]], an African-American woman whose cancer cells were taken without her permission in the 1950s. Her cells were used in many scientific breakthroughs, but her family was never asked or informed. This case is still discussed today in conversations about [[bioethics]] (the ethics of medical and scientific research) and trust in science.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks|url=https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_h0q7|last=Skloot|first=Rebecca|date=2010|publisher=Crown Publishers|isbn=978-1-4000-5217-2|location=New York}}</ref> To build trust, it is not enough to just explain science better. Scientists also need to include different communities, listen to their concerns, and make research more open and fair.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wynne|first=Brian|date=2006|title=Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?|url=https://karger.com/article/doi/10.1159/000092659|journal=Public Health Genomics|language=en|volume=9|issue=3|pages=211–220|doi=10.1159/000092659|pmid=16741352 |issn=1662-4246}}</ref> People also get confused when scientific advice changes. For example, during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], guidelines about wearing masks changed as scientists learned more. Some people saw this as a sign that science was unreliable. But in reality, this shows how science works, it updates when new [[evidence]] becomes available. That is a strength, not a weakness, but it must be clearly explained so the public understands why advice sometimes changes.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ioannidis|first=John P. A.|date=2020|title=Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non-evidence-based measures|journal=European Journal of Clinical Investigation|language=en|volume=50|issue=4|article-number=e13222 |doi=10.1111/eci.13222|pmid=32191341 |issn=0014-2972|pmc=7163529}}</ref>
People’s trust in science is not the same everywhere. It depends on their background, politics, and past experiences. In some places, people see science as something only for experts or something that does not care about their real-life problems. This is especially true in communities that have been treated unfairly by scientific institutions in the past.<sup>[386]</sup> One well-known case is that of Henrietta Lacks, an African-American woman whose cancer cells were taken without her permission in the 1950s. Her cells were used in many scientific breakthroughs, but her family was never asked or informed. This case is still discussed today in conversations about bioethics (the ethics of medical and scientific research) and trust in science.<sup>[387]</sup> To build trust, it is not enough to just explain science better. Scientists also need to include different communities, listen to their concerns, and make research more open and fair.<sup>[388]</sup> People also get confused when scientific advice changes. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines about wearing masks changed as scientists learned more. Some people saw this as a sign that science was unreliable. But in reality, this shows how science works, it updates when new evidence becomes available. That is a strength, not a weakness, but it must be clearly explained so the public understands why advice sometimes changes.<sup>[389]</sup>


== References ==
== ၽိုၼ်ဢၢင်ႈဢိင် ==
Science. (n.d.). In Simple English Wikipedia. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science


# Science. (n.d.). In ''Simple English Wikipedia''. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from <nowiki>https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science</nowiki>


[[Category:Science| ]]
[[Category:Science| ]]
[[Category:ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ]]
[[Category:ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ]]

Latest revision as of 08:36, 29 October 2026

ပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်လွင်ႈဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁဵတ်းသၢင်ႈ တႃႇတေႁူႉလွင်ႈလူၵ်ႈၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ မီးလၢႆလၢႆၸိူဝ်ႉ လၢႆလၢႆမဵဝ်းဝႆႉယူႇ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇၽိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်(natural science) လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ် လႄႈ လွင်ႈလူၵ်ႈတူဝ်ႁၢင်ႊ။ ၼႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ တေပႃး ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ၸႂ်(biology)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊပိုတ်ႇထၢတ်ႈ(chemistry)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလိၼ်(geology)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်(astronomy)၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊႁၢင်ႊတူဝ်(phyics)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵၼ်ႊၵူၼ်း(social science)သမ်ႉ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈၵူၼ်း လႄႈ လွင်ႈဝႃႈ တူင်ႇဝူင်းၵူၼ်းပဵၼ်ၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်။ ၼႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ ပႃးဝႆႉ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊၸႂ်(psychology)၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊၵၼ်ႊၵူၼ်း(sciology)၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးမၢၵ်ႈမုၼ်း(economics)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇလွင်ႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း(applied sciences) သမ်ႉ ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းလွင်ႈတၢင်းဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁဵၼ်းႁူႉမႃးတီႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊသေယဝ်ႉ ဢဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၵေႈလိတ်ႈလွင်ႈၶွင်ႈၶမ်။ ၼႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ ပႃးဝႆႉ ပၢႆးၸၢင်ႊၾူးၵၢၼ်(engineering) လႄႈ ပၢႆးယႃႈယႃ(medicine)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လႆႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပၢႆးၼပ်ႉ(mathematics)၊ ပၢႆးသၢႆၾၢႆႇၶွမ်း(computer science)၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးလေႃးၵျိၵ်ႉ(logics) သေ၊ ပၢႆးၾၢႆႇၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ မၢင်ႊပွၵ်ႈႁိၵ်ႈႁိၵ်ႉႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊတၢင်းၵၢၼ်”(formal science)။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လႆႈႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်ႉတူၺ်း လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းတူၺ်း။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ႁဵတ်းဢွၵ်ႇပၼ် ၶေႃႈတေႉ(fact)၊ ပိူင်ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ(scientific laws)၊ လႄႈ ၾိင်ႈတႅတ်ႈ(theory) တင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ။ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ယိူင်းထိုင်ပႃး ပိုၼ်ႉႁူႉတၢင်းမေႃၼမ်လၢႆး ဢၼ်ႁူပ်ႉႁၼ်ၼႂ်းၽွင်းၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၶၵ်ႉတွၼ်ႊၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉပႃးယူႇ။

ၵၢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်း လႆႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း လွၵ်းလၢႆးပၢႆးသၢႆႊ(scientific method)။ ၵၢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်းလၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ လႆႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၶေႃႈၶိုပ်ႊလၢမ်း(hypothesis) ဢၼ်ဢိင်ၼိူဝ်တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်(ideas) ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် တၢင်းႁူႉဢၼ်မီးမႃးမိူဝ်ႈဢွၼ်တၢင်း၊ ၶိုၼ်းလႆႈမႄးၸႅၵ်ႈတၢင်းႁူႉ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ၸွမ်းၼင်ႇႁူဝ်ၶေႃႈလႂ်ႁူဝ်ၶေႃႈၼၼ်ႉ။ ဢဝ်ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းသေ ထတ်းတူၺ်းၶေႃႈၶိုပ်ႊလၢမ်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ။ ၵူၼ်းၸိူဝ်းဢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း တင်း ဢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်းလွင်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လႄႈ ၵူၼ်းၸိူဝ်းဢၼ်ၶတ်းၸႂ်ႁူႉၵူႊၸိူဝ်ႉၵူႊလွင်ႈၼၼ်ႉ ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ”။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈတၢင်းတင်းလၢႆ လူၺ်ႈ လၢႆးၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်းတူၺ်းလီလီ၊ လူၺ်ႈလၢႆးတႅၵ်ႈယင်ႇတူၺ်းလီလီ၊ လႄႈ လူၺ်ႈလၢႆးထတ်းၸၢမ်း လႄႈ ထတ်းထိၼ်တူၺ်း လွင်ႈတၢင်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ႁႃလၢႆးသပ်းလႅင်းပၼ်ဝႃႈ ၵွပ်ႈသင်လႄႈ လွင်ႈတၢင်းလႆႈပဵၼ်ၸိူင်ႉၼင်ႇ မၼ်းပဵၼ်ဝႆႉမီးဝႆႉ၊ လႄႈ ၶၢတ်ႈလၢမ်းပႃးဝႃႈ တေၵိူတ်ႇပဵၼ်ဢီႈသင်မႃး။

သၢႆပိုၼ်းလွင်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ ႁိုင်ၼၢၼ်းမႃးလၢႆႁဵင်ပီႊမိူင်းယူႇ။ လွင်ႈတႄႇႁႅၵ်ႈမီးမႃး ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်မႂ်ႇၼႆႉ ၸၢင်ႊၶႆႈၶိုၼ်းၵႂႃႇထိုင် ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်မိူင်းဢီႇၸိပ်ႉမိူဝ်ႈ ၵွၼ်ႇ လႄႈ ပၢၼ်မိူင်းမႅတ်ႇသူဝ်ႇပူဝ်ႇတေးမီးယႂ်း(မွၵ်ႇဢ.ပ.ၶ ၃၀၀၀-၁၂၀၀) ပီႊပူၼ်ႉမႃး။ ၸိူဝ်းၶဝ်ႁုၼ်ႈမုၼ်းမႃး တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်လွင်ႈ ပၢႆးၼပ်ႉ၊ ပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးယႃႈယႃ။ တၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉတၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ႁူမ်ႇငမ်းၼိူဝ် ၸၢဝ်းၵရိၵ်ႉမႃး၊ ၸၢဝ်းၵရိၵ်ႉၶဝ်သမ်ႉ ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပိူင်ပဵၼ်ၼႂ်းၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်သေယဝ်ႉ ၶတ်းၸႂ်သပ်းလႅင်းၼေလွင်ႈတၢင်းဢၼ်ၵိူတ်ႇပဵၼ်ၼႂ်းလူၵ်ႈၼႆႉမႃး။ ဝၢႆးလင်ၼၼ်ႉမႃး ၽွင်းၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်သီၶမ်မိူင်းဢိၼ်းတီးယႂ်းၼၼ်ႉ တိူဝ်းမီးလွင်ႈၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈမႃး။ လႆႈမီးမႃးပႃး လွင်ႈၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈ ပၵ်းပိူင်တူဝ်ၼပ်ႉ ႁိၼ်ႇတူႇ-ဢႃႇရပ်ႉပိၵ်ႉၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃး။

ဝၢႆးသေမိူင်းတုမ်ႊၵႅၼ်ႇရူမ်းမႅၼ်းလူမ်ႉလႅဝ်ၵႂႃႇ ၽွင်းမိူဝ်ႈယၢမ်းၸဝ်ႉၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ၵၢင်(ပ.ၶ ၄၀၀-၁၀၀၀)ၼၼ်ႉ လွင်ႈၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈၾၢႆႇပၢႆးသၢႆႊ တီႈလိုမ်ယူးရူပ်ႉၵေႃႈ လႆႈတႄႇထိူင်းမႃး။ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ လွင်ႈၶိုၼ်ႈယႂ်ႇၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈမၼ်း ၶိုၼ်းတႄႇႁုၼ်ႈမႃးထႅင်ႈၵမ်းၼိူင်ႈ ၼႂ်းၽွင်းၶၢဝ်းသေၵၢပ်ႈသေပၢၼ်ၶိုၼ်း။ တီႈၼႂ်းလူၵ်ႈမိူင်းဢိတ်ႇသၢမ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ ၶူးမေႃၶဝ်တိုၵ်ႉသိုပ်ႇပႂ်ႉပႃးဝႆႉပၢႆးသၢႆႊ၊ သိုပ်ႇလဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ၊​ လႄႈ သိုပ်ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵရိၵ်ႉ တိူဝ်းလီလိူဝ်မႃး ၽွင်းၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်သီၶမ်းဢိတ်ႇသလၢမ်ႇၼၼ်ႉယူႇ။ ဝၢႆးလင်ၼၼ်ႉ မိူင်းတုမ်ႊၵႅၼ်ႇလူင်ပၢႆႇၸႅၼ်ႇထၢႆးၼ်(Byzantine Empire)ၵေႃႈ ဢူၼ်ႈဢွၼ်ႇမႃးသေ ၽူႈႁူႉမေႃမၼ်းၵေႃႈ တေႃႉ ဢဝ်ပပ်ႉၵရိၵ်ႉ ၵႂႃႇၸူးယူးရူပ်ႉပွတ်းတူၵ်း၊ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈတႄႇမီးမႃး ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ယဵၼ်ႇငႄႈမုၼ်းႁိူင်း(Renaissance) ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉမႃး။

တႄႇၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၀ တေႃႇၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၂ ၼၼ်ႉ ယူးရူပ်ႉတႄႇၶိုၼ်းလဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းၶိုၼ်းၵရိၵ်ႉ လႄႈ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းၶိုၼ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢိတ်ႇသလၢမ်ႇမႃး။ ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၵိူတ်ႇပဵၼ်မႃး ၵၢၼ်လုၵ်ႉၽိုၼ်ႉပၢႆးသၢႆႊ မိူဝ်ႈၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၆ ၼၼ်ႉမႃးယူႇယဝ်ႉ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ တႄႇလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃးတင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ။ လွင်ႈႁူပ်ႉႁၼ် ဢၼ်မႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ မႃးလူပ်းပႅတ်ႈတၢင်းယုမ်ႇယမ်ဢၼ်ၵဝ်ႇၵဝ်ႇ။ လွၵ်းလၢႆးပၢႆးသၢႆႊ တႄႇပဵၼ်ဢၼ်လမ်ႇလွင်ႈမႃ။ ထိုင်ၸူဝ်ႊပၢၵ်ႇပီႊ ၁၉ မႃး ပၢႆးသၢႆႊတႄႇတိူဝ်းပဵၼ် ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊလူမ်ႈ(professional) လႄႈ တိူဝ်းမီးပၵ်းမီးပိူင်မႃး။ တႅၼ်းတီႈႁွင်ႉႁိၵ်ႈဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉၾၢႆႇၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်ၼႆၼၼ်ႉ" တႄႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉမႃးဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇၽိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်” ၼႆမႃးယူႇယဝ်ႉ။

ငိူၼ်ငဝ်ႈထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်း လႄႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉ

သၢႆပိုၼ်းလွင်ႈထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "science"(သၢႆႊ) လႄႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉ ဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ မၼ်းလၢတ်ႈၼႄႁႂ်ႈႁဝ်းႁူႉဝႃႈ ပၢႆးၾၢႆႇဢၼ်ၼႆႉ လႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃးၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်လၢႆလၢႆလႄႈ သမ်ႉမီးတီႈပွင်ႇၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်ၼႂ်းလၢႆးလၢႆၽိင်ႈငႄႈ လႄႈ ၼႂ်းလၢႆလၢႆပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉ ဢၼ်ပႅၵ်ႇပိူင်ႈၵၼ်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉၼႆယူႇ။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်း ဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "science" (သၢႆႊ)ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼႆႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "သၢႆႊယႅၼ်းသျႃႇ(scientia)" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉမႃး၊​ မီးတီႈပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "တၢင်းႁူႉ"။ မၼ်းလုၵ်ႉတီႈၶေႃႈႁိၵ်ႈဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "scire" ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "(တႃႇ)ႁူႉ” ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး။ မိူဝ်ႈၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်မိူင်းရူမ်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇၼၼ်ႉတႄႉၵေႃႈ "သၢႆႊယႅၼ်းသျႃႇ” ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ပွင်ႇဝႃႈပဵၼ်တၢင်းႁူႉမဵဝ်းၼိူင်ႈ ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊႁဵၼ်းႁူႉဢဝ်လႆႈ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊတူဝ်ထူပ်းဢဝ်လႆႈၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ မၼ်း တေပႃး ပၢႆးၾၢႆႇတင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉ၊ ပၢႆးၵၢၼ်လၢၼ်ႈ၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးၼပ်ႉ။ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ မိူဝ်ႈပၢၼ်ၼၼ်ႉ မၼ်းဢမ်ႇပွင်ႇဝႃႈ ဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁူႉၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ။ မိူဝ်ႈပၢၼ်မိူင်းၵရိၵ်ႉမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ၼင်ႇၼၼ် ယၢမ်ႈႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ဢႄးၽိတ်ႉသတိမ်း”(epistēmē)။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ဢရိတ်ႉသထူဝ်းတလ်ႇ လႄႈ ပလေးတူဝ်ႇၶဝ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ ၸႂ်ႉထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႈၼႆႉသေယဝ်ႉ ယိူင်းၸူးထိုင်တၢင်းႁူႉ ဢၼ်ဢဝ်လွင်ႈဢဝ်တၢင်းသေ ၼႄလၵ်းထၢၼ်သၢၵ်ႈသေႇလႆႈ။ ၶဝ်ႁၼ်ဝႃႈ မၼ်းပိူင်ႈၵၼ်တင်း "doxa” ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ တၢင်းႁၼ်ထိုင်၊​ ဢၼ်ပဵၼ်မဵဝ်းဢမ်ႇၸႂ်ႉလွင်ႈမၢၼ်ႈမႅၼ်ႈ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊ။

တီႈပွင်ႇ "သၢႆႊ" တႄႇလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃး ၽွင်းၶၢဝ်းၵၢၼ်လုၵ်ႉၽိုၼ်ႉပၢႆးသၢႆႊ မိူဝ်ႈၸူဝ်ႊသိပ်းပီႊ ၁၅၀၀ လႄႈ ၸူဝ်ႊသိပ်းပီႊ ၁၆၀၀။ မိူဝ်ႈၽွင်းၶၢဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ Galileo Galilei၊ Johannes Kepler၊ Francis Bacon၊ လႄႈ Isaac Newton ၶဝ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ တႄႇၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈမႃးလွၵ်းလၢႆးမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ တႃႇလဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈလုမ်ႈၾႃႉ။ ၶဝ်တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း ၵၢၼ်ၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်းတူၺ်း၊ ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်း၊ လႄႈ ပၢႆးၼပ်ႉၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉသေ သွၵ်ႈႁႃၶေႃႈတွပ်ႇ။ လွၵ်းလၢႆးဢၼ်ၼႆႉ ၸွၺ်ႈသၢင်ႈပၼ်မႃး ပိူင်ပိုၼ်ႉထၢၼ်မဵဝ်းၼိူင်ႈ ဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊပၢၼ်မႂ်ႇ"(modern science)ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ မိူဝ်ႈၼၼ်ႉတႄႉၵေႃႈ ဢမ်ႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉ ဝႃႈ "သၢႆႊ" ၼႆၼင်ႇၵဝ်ႇ၊ ၶဝ်ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉၾၢႆႇၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်" ၼႆ၊ ပိူင်လူင်မၼ်း ပဵၼ်မိူဝ်ႈဢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း လူၵ်ႈၶူင်းတူဝ်ႁၢင်ႊ ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ လွင်ႈ တူင်ႉၶၢႆႉ၊ လွင်ႈလူၵ်ႈ၊​ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် လွင်ႈသၢႆလႅင်း။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ/scientist" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ တေႃႇထိုင်ပီႊ ၁၈၃၄ ၸင်ႇၵွၺ်ႈမီးမႃး။ ၵူၼ်းၵေႃႉၸိုဝ်ႈဝႃႈ William Whewell ၼၼ်ႉ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈသၢႆပိုၼ်း လႄႈ ပၢႆးဝူၼ်ႉၶပ်ႉလွင်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊသေယဝ်ႉ ၶူင်ႊၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႈၼၼ်ႉဢွၵ်ႇမႃး။

ၶေႃႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ(ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ)ၼႆႉ လႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃးၸွမ်းၵၢပ်ႈၸွမ်းပၢၼ် ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊၸွမ်းၵၢပ်ႈၸွမ်းပၢၼ်မႃးယူႇ ၼင်ႇၵဝ်ႇ။ မိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ ၶေႃႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼၼ်ႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉ လႄႈ ၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇမႃး၊ ယွၼ်ႉဝႃႈ ၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉ လႄႈ ၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇ ပဵၼ်ၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်ၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၵူၼ်းႁူႉၵူၼ်းမေႃၶဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပဵၼ်ပိူင်လူင် တီႈယူးရူပ်ႉတႃႇလၢႆလၢႆပၢၵ်ႇပီႊမိူင်းၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၿၢႆႇဢူဝ်ႇလူဝ်ႇၵျီႇ"(biology) ၼႆႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းတီႈၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၿၢႆႊဢူသ်ႉ"(bios) ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "ၸူဝ်ႊပၢၼ်" လႄႈ "လူဝ်းၵူသ်ႉ”(logos) ဢၼ်ပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း” ၼႆမႃးလႄႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၿၢႆႇဢူဝ်ႇလူဝ်ႇၵျီႇ" ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ၸင်ႇမီးတီႈပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "ၵၢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈၸူဝ်ႊပၢၼ်" ၼႆၼၼ်ႉ ယဝ်ႉ။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ၾီးသိၵ်ႇ”(physics)သမ်ႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈ ၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "physis"(ၾီးသိသ်ႉ) ဢၼ်မီးတီႈပွင်ႇဝႃႈ "ၾိင်ႈတိုၼ်းပဵၼ်"(nature) ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး။ ပၢႆးၶႄးမီး(ပိုတ်ႇထၢတ်ႈ) သမ်ႉ လႅပ်ႈလုၵ်ႉမႃးတီႈၵႂၢမ်းဢရပ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "al-kīmiyā" မႃး၊ ငဝ်ႈႁၢၵ်ႈမၼ်းလုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းဢီႇၸိပ်ႉမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇ လႄႈ ၵႂၢမ်းၵရိၵ်ႉသေမႃး၊ ပဵၼ်လွၵ်းလၢႆး ဢၼ်ဢၢၼ်းၶႂ်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊ ၶူဝ်းၶွင် လႄႈ တႃႇႁူႉဝႃႈ ၶိူင်ႈၶူဝ်းတင်းလၢႆ ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။

ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉလမ်ႇလွင်ႈတေႉတေႉ ယွၼ်ႉဝႃႈ ၶဝ်ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် လၢတ်ႈတီႈပွင်ႇမၼ်းတႅတ်ႈတႅတ်ႈတၢႆႊတၢႆႊ၊ လၢတ်ႈၸႅင်ႈၸႅင်ႈ လႅင်းလႅင်း လႄႈ ၶပ်ႉတၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉလႄႈတင်းၶေႃႈမုၼ်းလႆႈလီလီ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇလႂ်ၼင်ႇၾၢႆႇၼၼ်ႉၼႆႉ မီးထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၶိုၵ်ႉတွၼ်းႁင်းၽႂ်မၼ်း တႃႇသပ်းလႅင်း ၼႄပၼ်လွင်ႈတၢင်းဢၼ်ၶဝ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်း။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ႁၢင်ႊၼၼ်ႉ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ “momentum”၊ “entropy”၊ လႄႈ “quantum” ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ တီႈပွင်ႇၶဝ် ပိူင်ႈတင်းၵႂၢမ်းလၢတ်ႈဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၵူႊဝၼ်းဝၼ်းဝႆႉ။ ၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ၸႂ်သမ်ႉ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပၵ်းပိူင်ဢၼ် ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "Linnaean binomial nomenclature” ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉသေ တၢင်ႇၸိုဝ်ႈတူဝ်မီးၸႂ်တင်းလၢႆ။ ပၵ်းပိူင်ဢၼ်ၼႆႉ ပဵၼ်ၵၢၼ်တၢင်ႇၸိုဝ်ႈတူဝ်မီးၸႂ် ၵူႊတူဝ် တင်းၵႂၢမ်းလႅတ်ႇတိၼ်ႇသေ မီးၸိုဝ်ႈသွင်တွၼ်ႊ။ သၢႆၸႆႉ(genus) လႄႈ သၢႆၾၼ်း(species)။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း ၵူၼ်းႁဝ်းၼႆႉ ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "ႁူဝ်းမူဝ်ႇ သေးပျႅၼ်း”(Homo Sapines)။ လွင်ႈမီးလၵ်းၸဵင်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ လမ်ႇလွင်ႈပုၼ်ႈတႃႇႁႂ်ႈၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းၵူႊၵမ်းၵမ်းၼၼ်ႉ မၢၼ်ႇမႅၼ်ႈ၊ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ၸၢင်ႊထတ်းတူၺ်းၵၢၼ်လမ်းတိုၼ်းပိူၼ်ႈ၊ လႄႈ သမ်ႉဝႃႈ ၽႃႇသႃႇၵႂၢမ်းလၢတ်ႈၶိူဝ်းၶဝ် ပိူင်ႈၵၼ်သေတႃႉၵေႃႈ ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ်ပတ်းပိုၼ်ႉလူၵ်ႈလူင်ၼႆႉ ႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၸွမ်းၵၼ်လႆႈ။

ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်း ဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊတင်းၼမ်တင်းလၢႆ ၼႂ်းဝၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈလဵဝ်ၼႆႉ လုၵ်ႉတီႈသၢႆပိုၼ်း လႄႈ ၽိင်ႈၶိူဝ်းၵူၼ်း ဢၼ်တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမႃးဢွၼ်တၢင်းပိူၼ်ႈၼၼ်ႉလွၼ်ႉလွၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊမၢင်ႊၶေႃႈၼႆႉ လၢတ်ႈလဵၼ်ႈလၢတ်ႈလေႃႈ ႁႂ်ႈလီၶႂ်ႈၶူဝ်သေပဵၼ်မႃး၊ မၢင်ႊပွၵ်ႈၶေႃႈ လႆႈၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈတေႉတေႉဝႃႈဝႃႈ၊ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် မၢင်ႊၶေႃႈၵေႃႈ ပဵၼ်ၶေႃႈသပ်းလႅင်းယူဝ်းယူဝ်းဢွၼ်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉလႂ်ယူႇယဝ်ႉ၊ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ သမ်ႉလႆႈပဵၼ်မႃးၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၶဝ်ႈတၢင်းၵၢၼ် ယွၼ်ႉၵွပ်ႈၵူၼ်းတင်းလၢႆ တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမႃးၼမ်ၼမ်ၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ ထွၺ်ႈၸႂ်ႉဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "Big Bang"(ၾၢႆႇတႆး - တႅၵ်ႇၾူင်ႉလူင်) ၼႆၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ် ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ် Fred Hoyle တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမႃးပွၵ်ႈဢွၼ်တၢင်းသုတ်း မိူဝ်ႈမၼ်းဢွၵ်ႇလၢတ်ႈတီႈၼႂ်းဢွမ်လူမ်း(ရေႇတီႇဢူဝ်ႇ) မိူဝ်ႈပီႊ ၁၉၄၉။ မၼ်းဢမ်ႇယုမ်ႇၾိင်ႈတႅတ်ႈလွင်ႈတႅၵ်ႇၾူင်ႉလူင်လႄႈ ၸင်ႇၸႂ်ႉၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႊၼၼ်ႉသေ လၢတ်ႈၵိူဝ်ႉလဵၼ်ႈ။ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ ပိူၼ်ႈသိုပ်ႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႊၼၼ်ႉသေယဝ်ႉလႄႈ ယၢမ်းလဵဝ် ပဵၼ်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းသပ်းလႅင်းလၢတ်ႈဝႃႈ ၾႃႉမိုၼ်ႇမုင်ႊလူင် ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်တႄႇမီးမႃးၼႆဝႆႉယူႇၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ ထႅင်ႈဢၼ်ၼိူင်ႈတႄႉ ပဵၼ်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "quark" ဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းတႃႇလၢတ်ႈလွင်ႈ ၽွင်မုၼ်ႈလဵၵ်ႉလဵၵ်ႉဢွၼ်ႇ ဢၼ်ၽွတ်ႇပဵၼ် ပရူဝ်ႇတွၼ်ႇ လႄႈ ၼိဝ်ႇထရွၼ်ႇ။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးလႅင်ႊႁၢင်ႊတူဝ် Murray Gell-Mann လိူၵ်ႈဢဝ်ထွၺ်ႈၼႆႉမႃးတီႈၼႂ်းပပ်ႉလိၵ်ႈ Finnegans Wake ဢၼ်ၽူႈတႅမ်ႈမၼ်းပဵၼ် James Joyce။ လွင်ႈၼႆႉ မၼ်းၼႄပၼ်ဝႃႈ လွင်ႈတၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈ လႄႈ လွင်ႈၽႃႇသႃႇၼႆႉ လမ်ႇလွင်ႈတီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၸိူင်ႉႁိုဝ်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။

ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ ၵႆႉလုၵ်ႉတီႈၵႂၢမ်းၽိင်ႈတႅၵ်ႈ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ၵႂၢမ်းၼိူင်းသေယဝ်ႉ ၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၵူၼ်းႁဝ်း ပွင်ႇၸႂ်တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်/တၢင်းဝူၼ်ႉ ဢၼ်သပ်းသွၼ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇ - ၶေႃႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "သႅလ်း”(cell) တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊတူဝ်ၸႂ်ၼၼ်ႉ ၽူႈတႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းမၼ်း ပဵၼ် Robert Hooke မိူဝ်ႈပီႊ ၁၆၆၅။ မိူဝ်ႈမၼ်းဢဝ်သႅင်ၶႂၢၵ်ႈသေ တူၺ်းပိူၵ်ႇမႆႉၼၼ်ႉ မၼ်းႁၼ်မီးႁူးပဝ်ႇပဵၼ်လွၵ်းလဵၵ်ႉလဵၵ်ႉဢွၼ်သေ မိူၼ်ၼင်ႇႁွင်ႈလဵၵ်ႉလဵၵ်ႉ တီႈဢၼ်မုၼ်ၸဝ်ႈၼွၼ်းဝႆႉ။ ၵွပ်ႈၼႆလႄႈ ၸင်ႇမီးထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "သႅလ်း” ၼႆပေႃႇမႃးၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးၶွမ်းသမ်ႉ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "ဝၢႆးရသ်ႉ” သမ်ႉ တႄႇဢဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း သပ်းလႅင်းလၢတ်ႈလွင်ႈ ပရူဝ်ႇၵရမ်ႇဢၼ်ၸၢင်ႊထုတ်ႇမိူၼ်(ၵွပ်ႇပီႇ)ၶိုၼ်းတူဝ်ၵဝ်ႇသေယဝ်ႉ ၵႂႃႇၸပ်းတင်းတၢင်ႇပရူဝ်ႇၵရမ်ႇ၊ မိူၼ်ၼင်ႇမႅင်းဝၢႆးရသ်ႉတေႉတေႉ ႁဵတ်းလႆႈတီႈၼႂ်းတူဝ်ၵူၼ်းႁဝ်း။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၸိုဝ်ႈဢၼ်ၼႆႉ ယွၼ်ႉပိူဝ်ႈမၼ်းၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈၵူၼ်းႁဝ်းပွင်ႇၸႂ်ဝႃႈ ပရူဝ်ႇၵရမ်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ မၼ်းမီးၽေးၸိူင်ႉႁိုင်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ ၼႄပၼ်ဝႃႈ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ပေႃႇမီးမႃး၊​ လႄႈ သမ်ႉၸွၺ်ႈႁႂ်ႈႁဝ်းပွင်ႇၸႂ် တၢင်းႁပ်ႉႁၼ်မႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ ဢမ်ႇ ၼၼ်တၢင်းႁပ်ႉႁၼ်ဢၼ်ယၢပ်ႇယၢပ်ႇၼၼ်ႉ လူၺ်ႈၼွင်ႇဢဝ်လွင်ႈတၢင်းမဵဝ်းဢၼ်ႁဝ်းႁူႉၸၵ်းဝႆႉၼၼ်ႉၼႆယဝ်ႉ။

ၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၼႆႉ လႆႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊမႃး တႃႇတိူဝ်းမီးလွင်ႈၽဵင်ႇပဵင်း၊ မီးလွင်ႈၸႅင်ႈလႅင်း လႄႈ မီးလွင်ႈပႃးလူမ်ႈ။ မိူဝ်ႈပူၼ်ႉမႃး ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸႂ်ႉၼႂ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵမ်ႈၼမ်ၼမ် လႆႈဢိင်ၼိူဝ်တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ် ဢၼ်ပၵ်းၸႂ်ၼိူဝ်လွင်ႈၵူၼ်း၊ လွင်ႈယူးရူပ်ႉ ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် လွင်ႈၸၢဝ်းငႅင်ႊဢၼ်လဵဝ်ႁႅင်း။ ထိုင်ၶၢဝ်းယၢမ်းႁိုင်မႃး ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ်တႄႇဢဝ်ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်တိူဝ်းပဵၼ်ၵၢင်ႊ လႄႈ ဢၼ်တိူဝ်းယမ်ၼၼ်ႉ မႃးပုတ်ႈတႅၼ်းတၢင်။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း တီႈၼႂ်းပၢႆးလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်ၼႆႉ ယူႇတီႈၸုမ်းၽွမ်ႉႁူမ်ႈၾၢႆႇလႅင်ႊလၢဝ်ၵူႊမိူင်းမိူင်း(the International Astronomical Union)ၶဝ် ၶိုၼ်းမႄးၽုၺ်ႇတီႈပွင်ႇထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းဢၼ်ဝႃႈ "planet" (လူၵ်ႈ)ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး ႁႂ်ႈၶဝ်ႈပိူင်တၢင်းၵၢၼ် မိူဝ်ႈပီႊ ၂၀၀၆။ ၵွပ်ႈလွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊၼႆႉသေယဝ်ႉ ပလူးတူဝ်းၵေႃႈ ဢမ်ႇလႆႈသိုပ်ႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉပဵၼ်လူၵ်ႈတဵမ်တူဝ်၊ ၵူၺ်းၼႃႇ ပဵၼ်လူၵ်ႈဢွၼ်ႇၼႆလႄႈ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈပဵၼ်မႃး လွင်ႈဢၼ်လႆႈထဵင်ၵၼ်တေႉတေႉဝႃႈဝႃႈမႃးယူႇ။ ၵႂၢမ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵူႊဝၼ်းဝၼ်းၵေႃႈ တႄႇႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ "human" တႅၼ်းတၢင် "man” ၊ လႄႈ တႄႇၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း "humankind" တႅၼ်းတီႈ "mankind" ၼႆၼၼ်ႉမႃး။ လွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႊၸိူဝ်းၼႆ့ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊပဵၼ် ပၢႆးဢၼ်တိူဝ်းႁပ်ႉတွၼ်ႈတေႃႇၵူၼ်းၵူႊသႅၼ်းမႃး။

ၸွမ်းၼင်ႇပၢႆးသၢႆႊ သိုပ်ႇသေၶိုပ်ႈၼႃႈမႃးတိၵ်းတိၵ်းၼၼ်ႉသေ ၵၢၼ်ၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်ႁူပ်ႉႁၼ်မႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇၵေႃႈ ႁဵတ်းႁႂ်ႈမီးထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇမႃး။ တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇမၼ်း ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ်ႁူပ်ႉႁၼ် CRISPR ဢၼ်ပဵၼ်ၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်း တႃႇမႄးၸႆႉၸိူဝ်ႉ(genes)။ ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၶေႃႈၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်တူဝ်ယေႃႈ ၶေႃႊဢၼ်ဝႃႈ Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats ။ မၼ်းၼႄဝႃႈ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၶဝ် ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ၸႂ်ႉထွၺ်ႈပွတ်းပွတ်းသေယဝ်ႉ သပ်းလႅင်း တၢင်းၶႆႈၸႂ်ဢၼ်ယႂ်ႇလူင် လႄႈ ဢၼ်သပ်းသွၼ်ႉၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ ၾၢႆႇမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇ ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ လွင်ႈၸၢၵ်ႈႁဵၼ်းႁူႉ(machine learning)၊ လွင်ႈၺၢၼ်ႇလႅၵ်း(ဢေႇဢၢႆႇ) လႄႈ လွင်ႈၵၢၼ်ၼပ်းၶႂၢၼ်ႇတမ်ႇ(quantum computing) ၶဝ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉၼၼ်ႉၵေႃႈ ၶူင်ႊသၢင်ႈမႃး ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းမႂ်ႇမႂ်ႇဝႆႉယူႇ။ လူဝ်ႇလႆႈမီး လွင်ႈမႄးၽုၺ်ႇတီႈပွင်ႇၶိုၼ်း ထွၺ်ႈၵႂၢမ်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ႁႂ်ႈၸႅင်ႈၸႅင်ႈလႅင်းလႅင်း ၼင်ႇႁိုဝ်ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊ လၢႆလၢႆၾၢႆႇလၢႆလၢႆလႅၼ်ႊၵေႃႈ တေပွင်ႇၸႂ်ၵၼ် လႄႈ တေဢမ်ႇမီးတၢင်းၵႂင်သင်သေ ႁူမ်ႈႁဵတ်းၵၢၼ်ၸွမ်းၵၼ်လႆႈ။

သၢႆပိုၼ်း

ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်း(ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ ပိုၼ်းၵၢတ်ႇဢွၼ်ႇ)

သတူၼ်းႁဵၼ်းၶျ်ႉ(Stonehenge) ပဵၼ်ႁိၼ်ယႂ်ႇလူင် ဢၼ်ၵူၼ်းၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်းၶဝ် ၵေႃႇသၢင်ႇမႃး။

ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်းၼၼ်ႉ ပႃးဝႆႉ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်ၵဝ်ႇ(Palaeolithic)၊ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်(Mesolithic)၊ လႄႈ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်မႂ်ႇ(Neolithic) ၼႆသေ ႁိုင်ၼၢၼ်းတႄႇဢဝ်မွၵ်ႈ ၂.၅ လၢၼ်ႉပီႊတေႃႇထိုင်မွၵ်ႈ ဢ.ပ.ၶ ၃၀၀၀ ၼၼ်ႉယဝ်ႉ။ သမ်ႉဝႃႈ လွင်ႈတၢင်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ဢမ်ႇၸႂ်ႈ "ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ" ၼင်ႇႁဝ်းႁူႉဝၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈလဵဝ်သေတႃႉၵေႃႈ မၼ်းၼႄပၼ်လွင်ႈ ၵၢၼ်ၾၢင်ႉၵႅမ်းတူၺ်းလီလီ၊ ၵၢၼ်ထတ်းၸၢမ်းတူၺ်း၊ လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်တႄႇဝူၼ်ႉပဵၼ်ပၵ်းပဵၼ်ပိူင် ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃးယူႇ။ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊဢၼ်ၸဝ်ႉသုတ်းပိူၼ်ႈ လႄႈ ဢၼ်လမ်ႇလွင်ႈသုတ်းပိူၼ်ႈ လႄႈ ဢၼ်ႁႅၵ်ႈသုတ်းပိူၼ်ႈဢၼ်ၼိူင်ႈတႄႉၵေႃႈ ပဵၼ်ၵၢၼ်ႁဵတ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်းႁိၼ်ၼႆယဝ်ႉ။ တႄႇမႃးတီႈပူႇမွၼ်ႇၼၢႆးယႃႊၸၢဝ်းၵူၼ်း ဢၼ်ႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ ႁူဝ်းမူဝ်ႇ ႁႃႇၿီးလိသ်ႉ(Homo habilis) ဢၼ်ဝႃႈၼၼ်ႉသေ သိုပ်ႇမႃးထိုင် ၽိင်ႈၶိူဝ်းၵူၼ်းၵွၼ်ႇပိုၼ်း ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ၽိင်ႈၶိူဝ်း Acheulean, Mousterian လႄႈ ၵၢပ်ႈပၢၼ်ႁိၼ်ၵဝ်ႇပွတ်းၼိူဝ်(Upper Paleolithic) ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃး။ ၵူၼ်းႁဝ်း ႁဵတ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်း ၸိူဝ်ႉၼင်ႇ ၶႂၢၼ်(တႃႇမႅတ်း)၊ ၶိူင်ႈၶုတ်း၊ ၸေႃး၊ လႄႈ လႅမ်ပၢႆႁွၵ်ႇ ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉမႃး။ တႃႇတေႁဵတ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်းၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ ၶဝ်လႆႈႁူႉဝႃႈ မၢၵ်ႇႁိၼ်ႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်တႅၵ်ႇလႆႈ၊ မၢၵ်ႇႁိၼ်မဵဝ်းလႂ်ၶႅမ်ႉသုတ်း၊ လႄႈ တေလႆႈသႂ်ႇႁႅင်းတၢၼ်ႇလႂ်သေထုပ်ႉတွၺ်ႇ ၸဵမ်ၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉယူႇ။ ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးလမ်းတိုၼ်းၶူဝ်းၵွၼ်ႇ (ၸဝ်ႈပၢႆးသၢႆႊၸိူဝ်းဢၼ်လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းလွင်ႈပိုၼ်းၸၢဝ်းၵူၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇၵွၼ်ႇ)ၶဝ် လႆႈႁူပ်ႉႁၼ်လၵ်းထၢၼ်ဝႃႈ ၵူၼ်းမိူဝ်ႈၵွၼ်ႇႁူဝ်တီးၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ တင်းႁဵတ်းၽိတ်းႁဵတ်းထုၵ်ႇသေ လဵပ်ႈႁဵၼ်းမႃး၊​ ယဝ်ႉၵေႃႈ ၸိူဝ်းၶဝ်သိုပ်ႇပိုၼ်ႊၽေတၢင်းႁူႉပၼ်ပိူၼ်ႈမႃး။ ၶၢဝ်းႁိုင်မႃးသေယဝ်ႉ ၶဝ်ၵေႃႈ တိူဝ်းႁုၼ်ႈမုၼ်းၶိူင်ႈမိုဝ်းၶဝ် ႁႂ်ႈတိူဝ်းၵႅၼ်ႇၶႅင် လႄႈ ႁႂ်ႈတိူဝ်းၶဝ်ႈတၢင်းတိုဝ်းမႃး။ ၵၢၼ်ႁဵၼ်းႁူႉၸွမ်းတူဝ်ထူပ်းတေႉတေႉ လႄႈ ၵၢၼ်သိုပ်ႇယိုၼ်ႈမႅင်ႇ ၼမ်ႉၵတ်ႉၸိူဝ်းၼႇႉၼၼ်ႉ ပဵၼ်တူဝ်ယၢင်ႇဢၼ်ၸဝ်ႉသုတ်း လွင်ႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းပၢႆးသၢႆႊသေ ၵေႈလွင်ႈၶွင်ႈၶမ်ယူႇ၊ ပိူင်လူင်မၼ်း တီႈလွင်ႈမေႃပွင်ႇၸႂ်ၶူဝ်းၶွင် လႄႈ လွင်ႈႁူႉဝႃႈ တေႁဵတ်းႁိုဝ်ၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်းၶူဝ်း ၶွင်ၸိူဝ်းၼၼ်ႉ၊ လွင်ႈၼႆႉ ႁဝ်းႁိၵ်ႈႁွင်ႉဝႃႈ ပၢႆးသၢႆႊၾၢႆႇၶူဝ်းၶွင်(materials science)။

Early humans also showed basic knowledge of astronomy, the study of the sky. This can be seen in archaeological discoveries like the Blanchard bone (around 30,000 BCE) and the Lascaux Cave paintings (around 17,000 BCE). These objects and drawings may show that early people were watching the Moon’s phases or recognizing star groups like the Pleiades constellation.[40][41] One of the earliest sky-watching structures is the Nabta Playa stone circle in southern Egypt, built around 6000 BCE. It is one of the oldest known examples of people using megaliths (large stones) to line up with the summer solstice sunrise, the longest day of the year. It may also have helped track seasonal rains, which were very important for survival in that dry area.[42] These structures show that early people spent years carefully watching the sky, noticing patterns, and trying to predict natural cycles, like when rain or seasons would come. This was an early step toward the science of astronomy.[43]

Another major scientific step happened during the Neolithic Revolution, around 10,000 BCE, when humans started farming. This time period was extremely important because people learned to grow plants and raise animals. They had to understand soil, water, and weather patterns to grow food successfully. Early farmers in places like the Fertile Crescent (in the Middle East), China’s Yellow River valley, and Mesoamerica (Central America) grew crops like wheat, barley, millet, rice, and maize (corn).[44] They watched how these plants grew over many generations and chose the ones with the best traits, like more food, better taste, or the ability to survive without much water. This careful choosing is the beginning of genetics (even though they did not know that word), and their work helped people settle down, build villages, and eventually start civilizations. These farming skills are the beginning of what we now call agricultural science.[45][46][47]

Even though prehistoric people did not write things down, they still had surprisingly advanced medical knowledge. One of the most amazing examples is trepanation, a kind of surgery where people removed parts of the skull. Scientists have found skulls from as far back as 7000 BCE in Europe, Africa, and South America that show signs of this surgery, and some of the skulls even show healing, which means people survived the operation.[48] This suggests that early humans had basic knowledge of the body, special tools, and may have used natural medicines, like herbs, to reduce pain or stop infection. Another example is Ötzi the Iceman, a frozen body found in the Alps from around 3300 BCE. His body had tattoos that lined up with places used in acupuncture, a method of healing still used today. He was also carrying a medicinal fungus called Fomitopsis betulina, which may have been used to fight infection.[49][50]

People in prehistoric times also began using math and measurement. They made tools like tally sticks to help them count. One of the oldest is the Lebombo bone from about 35,000 BCE, and another is the Ishango bone from around 20,000 BCE. These bones have carved marks that might show number patterns, multiples, or even prime numbers. Some scientists think they may also have tracked lunar cycles (the phases of the moon).[51][52] Later, in places like Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley, early people started using standard measurements. They needed these for storing grain, trading goods, and building things. They created systems to measure volume and weight, which helped them with farming, business, and early forms of engineering.[53][54]

In prehistoric times, early people showed amazing skills in building large stone structures, which we now call megalithic architecture. One of the oldest examples is Göbekli Tepe, built around 9600 BCE in what is now Turkey. It has huge stone pillars carved with animals, arranged in circles. These stones are very heavy, and moving and placing them would have taken many people working together, using simple tools and their understanding of leverage (how to move heavy things using force and angles). They probably also used basic measuring tools to plan where to put the stones.[55] Other examples, like Stonehenge in England (about 3000 BCE) and the stone lines at Carnac in France, show that people in different places had similar building knowledge. These projects needed not just strength, but also careful planning, measuring, and even watching the sky to line up stones with seasons or sunrise points. This shows early knowledge of engineering and astronomy.[56][57][58]

Early humans were also smart about taking care of the environment. They used fire in helpful ways. For example, Australian Aboriginals practiced something called fire-stick farming. They burned certain areas on purpose to help new plants grow, bring animals to the area, and make the land easier to manage.[59] In the Andes Mountains (in South America), ancient farming communities built terraces (step-like farms on hills) and irrigation systems to control water. This helped them farm on steep land and stop soil from washing away. These people understood how to manage natural resources, like water and soil, in ways that are similar to today’s ideas of sustainability (protecting the environment while meeting human needs).[60][61]

People also started to create ways to record and share information. Early forms of writing included cave art, petroglyphs (pictures carved in rock), and tokens (small clay objects used for counting). In Mesopotamia, around 8000 BCE, people used clay tokens to keep track of food and goods. Over time, this system turned into writing, known as cuneiform. Writing allowed people to store knowledge, like farm records and star charts, and pass it on to future generations. This step, moving from oral traditions (speaking stories and knowledge) to writing things down, helped humans build on knowledge over time. It was the beginning of being able to record science and discoveries so they would not be forgotten.[62]

Ancient science

The Plimpton 322 tablet by the Babylonians records Pythagorean triples, written c. 1800 BCE

Ancient science was the early scientific knowledge and inventions created by some of the first civilizations in places like Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley, ancient China, and Mesoamerica (Central America). This period lasted from around 3000 BCE to 600 BCE.[63] In Mesopotamia, one of the first places where civilization began, science was used in areas like farming, government, and astronomy. The Sumerians and Babylonians created number systems, including one based on 60 (sexagesimal). This is why we still use 60 minutes in an hour and 360 degrees in a circle today.[64] They were also great at studying the sky. On clay tablets written in cuneiform writing, they recorded things like star charts, calendars, and math problems. Babylonian astronomers carefully watched the Moon and planets, and used math to predict eclipses (when the Moon or Sun is covered) and planet alignments.[65] One of their most important discoveries was the Metonic cycle, which is a 19-year cycle where the Moon’s phases happen on the same days of the calendar again.[66][67]

Ancient Egyptian science was closely tied to farming, timekeeping, and building large monuments. The Egyptians created a 365-day calendar by watching the star Sirius (which they called Sopdet). Every year, Sirius rose in the sky just before the Nile River flooded. This was a very important event that made the soil good for growing crops. To prepare for this, the Egyptians had to be good at measuring the sky and water levels.[68] They also used science to build huge structures like the pyramids. These amazing buildings needed careful planning, geometry (math involving shapes), and knowledge of materials and surveying (measuring land). Egyptian engineers were skilled at all of these things.[69] A famous document called the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, written around 1650 BCE, shows that Egyptian students learned math such as fractions, areas, volumes, and ratios.[70][71]

The Indus Valley Civilization (around 2600 to 1900 BCE) also had amazing science and technology, even though we still do not fully understand it because their writing system has not been decoded yet.[72] Cities like Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa were built in neat grid patterns, had advanced drainage systems, and used standard sizes for things like weights and bricks.[73] At a site called Lothal, scientists found a dockyard, which shows that people there understood how tides worked and how to build for the sea. The use of uniform bricks and measuring tools also shows they had organized production and possibly government systems to manage it. All of this points to high-level technical knowledge and careful planning.[74][75][76]

In ancient China, science grew together with philosophy and government. People studied nature because they wanted to understand it better and use that knowledge to rule wisely. One early book called the I Ching (also called the Book of Changes) was written by at least the late 2nd millennium BCE. It used patterns and binary logic (ideas based on two choices, like yes/no or dark/light) to explain natural cycles and how the universe worked.[77][78] By the time of the Zhou Dynasty (around 1046–256 BCE), Chinese scientists had invented many useful tools and ideas. They created early earthquake detectors (called seismographs),[79] studied the stars (astronomy),[80] used plants as medicine (herbal medicine),[81] and learned how to work with metals and chemicals (metallurgy). They also made a complex calendar based on both the Moon’s phases and solar seasons. This calendar used a 60-part cycle (called the sexagenary cycle) and showed that they had a very advanced way of measuring time using math.[82][83] The Chinese were also experts in bronze casting, making tools and objects out of melted metal. They made alloys (mixtures of metals) that had the same recipe every time, using careful control of heat and basic understanding of chemistry.[84]

In Mesoamerica, the Olmec (around 1500–400 BCE) and later the Maya made amazing discoveries in astronomy, math, and building. The Maya used a base-20 number system (instead of base-10 like we use).[85][86] They invented long count calendars that could track time for thousands of years.[87] They watched the sky carefully and recorded things like the movements of Venus, eclipses, solstices, and planet alignments. Some of this information was written in books called codices, like the Dresden Codex. The Maya used these observations to plan religious festivals, decide when to plant crops, and even schedule political events. They built pyramids and temples that lined up perfectly with events in the sky. They were constantly watching the sky and collecting data, just like modern scientists.[88]

In all of these ancient civilizations, medicine was based on practical experience and observation, even though it was often connected to religion or spiritual beliefs. In Ancient Egypt, a medical text called the Edwin Smith Papyrus (written around 1600 BCE) showed that Egyptian doctors had a logical and scientific approach to treating injuries. It includes detailed instructions for doing surgery and describes how to treat injuries to the head, spine, and arms or legs. It even gave predictions (called prognosis) about how serious the injuries were and what might happen to the patient, depending on where the injury was.[89] In Mesopotamia, doctors used a book called the Diagnostic Handbook by a man named Esagil-kin-apli (around 1069 BCE). This book helped doctors figure out what was wrong with a patient by looking at their symptoms, then choosing treatments. These treatments might include herbal medicine, chants or prayers, and physical treatments like bandages or surgeries.[90] In Ancient China, a book called the Shennong Bencaojing (written in the first millennium BCE) listed hundreds of medicinal herbs and their effects on the body. This book became the base of Traditional Chinese Medicine. It showed how Chinese doctors tested herbs, classified their properties, and wrote down their results, which helped build knowledge over many generations.[91][92]

These early sciences also depended on good recordkeeping, which allowed people to share and pass on knowledge over time. Each civilization created its own writing system, including cuneiform in Mesopotamia, hieroglyphs in Egypt, oracle bone script in China, and Maya script in Mesoamerica. These writing systems helped people write down important information, like star charts and astronomy, math tables, medical recipes, and instructions for building things Because this knowledge was written down, it could be passed from one generation to the next, even if science back then was usually done by priests, scribes, or royal advisors, not scientists like we think of today.[93]

Classical antiquity

Plato's Academy mosaic, made between 100 BCE and 79 CE, shows many Greek philosophers and scholars

Classical science started in ancient Greece, especially in a city called Miletus. There, early thinkers like Thales (around 624–546 BCE) tried to explain how the world works without using stories about gods or magic. Thales believed that water was the basic substance that everything came from. This idea started a new way of thinking called natural philosophy, which focused on finding natural causes for things we observe in the world.[94] After Thales, other thinkers from Miletus also had big ideas. Anaximander said everything came from something called the apeiron (which means “the boundless” or unlimited). Anaximenes thought air was the most important element.[95]

Another important thinker was Pythagoras (around 570–495 BCE). He believed that numbers and math were the true key to understanding the universe. His school studied geometry, music, and numbers. They discovered that when strings of certain lengths were plucked, they made sounds that matched simple number ratios. This showed a connection between music and math, and supported the idea that the whole universe had a kind of mathematical harmony, a concept called the “music of the spheres.”[96] In medicine, a famous Greek named Hippocrates (around 460–370 BCE) made big changes. He said that illness was not caused by angry gods or magic, but by natural causes like diet, environment, and the balance of fluids in the body. He taught doctors to carefully observe patients, keep records, and study the effects of things like climate and food on health. Hippocrates also created the four-humor theory, which said the body had four fluids: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile. People believed for many centuries that staying healthy meant keeping these in balance. He also introduced ethical rules for doctors, such as those in the Hippocratic Oath, which is still remembered today. Because of Hippocrates, medicine became more scientific and professional.[97]

Aristotle (384–322 BCE) was one of the most important thinkers in ancient science. He was a student of Plato and later became the teacher of Alexander the Great. Aristotle wrote about many subjects, including biology, physics, astronomy, psychology, and logic. In biology, Aristotle studied sea animals and did some of the first dissections (cutting open bodies to learn how they work). He grouped animals by their physical traits, which helped create early classification systems. In physics and astronomy, he believed the Earth was at the center of the universe (geocentric model), and that everything in the sky moved in perfect circles made of a special substance called aether. He thought the heavens were unchanging, unlike Earth, which was made of earth, water, air, and fire, things that could decay and change. Aristotle also created a famous way of thinking about why things happen, called the four causes. The material cause was what something is made of, the formal cause was the shape or structure of the thing, the efficient cause was what caused it to happen, and the final cause was its purpose or goal.[98]

One of Aristotle’s students, Theophrastus (around 371–287 BCE), took these ideas further, especially in plant science. He wrote books like Enquiry into Plants and On the Causes of Plants, where he tried to classify and describe plants in a clear and organized way. He noticed details like where plants grow, how they reproduce, and how people use them. He divided plants into groups like trees, shrubs, and herbs, and because of his work, he is known as the “father of botany”. His ideas about plants were so good that scientists still read them over a thousand years later.[99] After Alexander the Great died, Greek science continued to grow during the Hellenistic period (323–31 BCE). One of the most famous centers of learning was Alexandria, in Egypt. It had a huge library, scholars from many cultures, and support from powerful leaders. One of the most important scientists there was Euclid (around 300 BCE). He wrote a book called The Elements, which organized everything known about geometry into 13 books. He proved shapes and math rules using logic and step-by-step thinking. This method, called the axiomatic method, became the model for how scientists and mathematicians would work for thousands of years.[100]

Archimedes of Syracuse (about 287–212 BCE) was a brilliant ancient scientist and inventor. He made important discoveries in physics, engineering, and math. One of his most famous ideas is called Archimedes' principle. It says that when you put something in water (or another liquid), the liquid pushes up on it with a force equal to the weight of the liquid the object pushes out of the way. This explains why some things float and others sink. Archimedes also studied levers, pulleys, and other machines, helping to create the basic rules of mechanical engineering. He figured out how to calculate the area and volume of different shapes and came up with a very good estimate for the number pi (π).[101]

Eratosthenes (about 276–194 BCE) was the head librarian at the Library of Alexandria, one of the greatest learning centers of the ancient world. He was good at math, astronomy, and geography, and used these skills to measure the size of the Earth very accurately. He did this by comparing shadows in two cities at the same time during the summer solstice (the longest day of the year). He also invented a system of latitude and longitude to map locations, just like the grid system used in maps today. Eratosthenes tried to create a map of the entire known world.[102] Aristarchus of Samos (about 310–230 BCE) was an early astronomer who had a bold idea: the Sun is at the center of the solar system, not the Earth. This idea is called the heliocentric model. At the time, most people believed the Earth was at the center, so his theory was not accepted, partly because they did not have strong telescopes or enough evidence. Even though his idea was ignored back then, his work later inspired scientists like Copernicus, who helped start the modern understanding of the solar system.[103]

Claudius Ptolemy (about 100–170 CE) lived in Roman Egypt and was a famous ancient astronomer and scientist. He believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe, and he wrote a big book called the Almagest, where he explained this idea using a model called the geocentric model. To explain how the Sun, Moon, and planets move in the sky, he used epicycles, deferents, and equants, complicated ways of showing orbits that looked like circles within circles. Even though this model was wrong (we now know the Sun is at the center), Ptolemy’s system worked well for making predictions and was used for over 1,400 years. Ptolemy did not just study space, he also worked on optics (how light and vision work), maps, and music. He even wrote about astrology.[104]

The Romans were more focused on practical science than on theories. They were great engineers and used science to build things like aqueducts (which carried water), roads, bridges, and concrete buildings. They understood how water flows, how to balance weight, and how to use strong building materials.[105] A Roman engineer named Vitruvius wrote a book called De Architectura in the 1st century BCE, where he talked about architecture, human body proportions, and machines. He combined art and science to show how buildings should look beautiful but also work well.[106] In medicine, a Roman doctor named Galen (around 129–200 CE) became very important. He studied how the body works by examining animals, learning about organs, bones, and how diseases spread. He believed in the four humors (like Hippocrates) and thought that keeping these in balance kept people healthy. Galen’s medical ideas were used in Europe and the Islamic world for many hundreds of years.[107]

Islamic Golden Age

The Christian physician Hunayn ibn Ishaq led the translation of works. Improvements to the astrolabe were one of the achievements of this era

Science during the Islamic Golden Age (from about the 8th to the 14th century CE) was one of the most creative and important times in history. During this period, Muslim scholars made huge advances in astronomy, math, medicine, physics, chemistry, geography, and engineering.[108][109] This progress happened because of several things which included leaders supported science, especially the Abbasid caliphs who helped fund research and learning.[110] Books from Greece, India, Persia, and China were translated into Arabic, allowing people to learn from many different cultures,[111] and Islamic culture encouraged learning (called ‘ilm in Arabic) and logical thinking.[112] One of the most important places during this time was the House of Wisdom (Bayt al-Hikma) in Baghdad, created by Caliph Harun al-Rashid and expanded by his son Al-Ma'mun. It was a major center where scholars gathered to translate, study, and improve scientific knowledge. They translated famous works from Greek, Persian, and Indian scientists, like Aristotle, Galen, Euclid, and Ptolemy, into Arabic.[113][114] One key figure was Hunayn ibn Ishaq, who translated over 100 medical books.[115]

In astronomy, Muslim scientists made many improvements to older models from Greece and India. Al-Battani (also known as Albatenius, around 858–929 CE) carefully studied the Sun and calculated the length of the year as 365.2422 days, almost exactly what is known today.[116] Al-Zarqali (also called Arzachel) made the Toledan Tables, which helped European scientists and even influenced Copernicus hundreds of years later.[117] Al-Tusi (1201–1274 CE), working at the Maragheh observatory, invented a math model called the Tusi couple, which helped improve future ideas about how planets move.[118] Muslim astronomers also built observatories (places to study the stars) in cities like Baghdad, Maragheh, Samarkand, and Shiraz. They invented tools like the astrolabe, sextant, and spherical instruments to measure stars and planets very precisely. These tools were used to find the correct times for prayer, determine the direction of Mecca (Qibla), and create Islamic calendars.[119]

In the field of mathematics, Islamic scholars made major breakthroughs, especially in algebra, arithmetic, geometry, and trigonometry. One important mathematician, Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi (around 780–850 CE), wrote a book called Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wal-Muqabala. This book laid the foundation for algebra. The word "algebra" actually comes from al-jabr, meaning "completion." Al-Khwarizmi also created step-by-step ways to solve quadratic equations and methods for doing calculations. In fact, the word “algorithm” comes from his name.[120] Another scholar, Omar Khayyam (1048–1131), figured out how to solve cubic equations using geometry.[121] Al-Kashi (died 1429) calculated the number pi to 16 decimal places and improved the way decimal numbers were used, something very important for modern math.[122] In trigonometry, scientists like Al-Biruni and Nasir al-Din al-Tusi made accurate tables for sine, cosine, and tangent, helping to turn trigonometry into its own branch of mathematics.[123][118]

In medicine, Islamic scientists made great progress by using ideas from ancient Greek thinkers and combining them with careful observation and testing. A famous doctor named Al-Razi (also known as Rhazes, 854–925) wrote a huge 25-volume medical book called Kitab al-Hawi. He was the first to clearly tell the difference between smallpox and measles and believed in learning through watching and testing patients.[124] Another well-known doctor, Ibn Sina (also called Avicenna, 980–1037), combined medical knowledge from Greece, Persia, and India in his book The Canon of Medicine. This book was used as a guide in both Europe and the Islamic world for more than 600 years. He introduced important medical ideas like testing medicines, using quarantine to stop diseases from spreading, checking a patient’s pulse, and understanding how infections work.[125] Muslim doctors also invented surgical tools, used antiseptics to stop infections, and developed special treatments for eye problems.[126] One doctor, Ammar ibn Ali al-Mawsili, even invented a syringe to remove cataracts from the eye.[127]

In the study of light and physics, Ibn al-Haytham (also called Alhazen, 965–1040) made discoveries that helped shape modern science. In his book Book of Optics, he showed that the Greek idea of vision, where light was thought to come out of the eyes, was wrong. He explained that light bounces off objects and goes into the eye, and he correctly described how the retina and lens work. Ibn al-Haytham tested his ideas with experiments using things like mirrors, lenses, and a camera obscura (an early version of a camera). He believed in forming hypotheses, testing them, and repeating experiments. These are ideas that are important to the modern scientific method. He also studied motion, mechanics, and inertia, and his work influenced later scientists in Europe, like Roger Bacon and Kepler.[128]

In early Islamic times, chemistry was called alchemy, and Muslim scientists made big discoveries while trying to understand how materials change. One of the most important alchemists was Jabir ibn Hayyan (also called Geber), who lived in the 8th century. He wrote hundreds of books about how to heat, purify, and mix substances using methods like distillation and crystallization. He even described how to make aqua regia, a powerful acid that can dissolve gold. Jabir believed in testing ideas through careful experiments and recording results, which helped move alchemy closer to real, practical chemistry. He also used special lab tools like alembics (for distilling liquids), crucibles (for heating substances), and furnaces, helping to shape the way modern chemistry labs would work.[129]

Muslim scientists also made great progress in geography, which is the study of the Earth and how it is measured. They traveled, observed nature, and made better maps. A brilliant scholar named Al-Biruni (973–1048) used math and trigonometry to measure the size of the Earth from the top of a mountain, and his answer was very close to what we know today. He also collected the exact locations (latitude and longitude) of over 600 cities and even suggested that the Earth spins, hundreds of years before scientists in Europe did.[123] Another scholar, Al-Khwarizmi, corrected mistakes in older maps from the Greek scientist Ptolemy.[120] Later, Al-Idrisi made a famous world map in 1154 for a European king, using knowledge from Arab traders, sailors, and explorers.[130]

Islamic scientists also made amazing progress in engineering and building machines. They designed clever devices like early robots (called automata), water clocks, and machines that used water and air to move. In the 9th century, three brothers known as the Banu Musa wrote The Book of Ingenious Devices, which described over 100 inventions using gears, valves, and tubes called siphons. Later, a brilliant inventor named Al-Jazari (1136–1206) built fancy water clocks, mechanical toys that could be programmed to move, and one of the first crankshafts, a tool still used in engines today. These machines were not just for show; they were used in palaces, public fountains, and farming systems to help people in everyday life.[131][132]

To spread knowledge, the Islamic world created many places for learning. These included schools called madrasas, hospitals known as bimaristans, libraries, and observatories where people could study the stars. Famous schools like the Nezamiyeh in Baghdad, Al-Qarawiyyin in Fez (Morocco), and Al-Azhar in Cairo became major centers for science and education. Scholars traveled from place to place, shared ideas, and copied books so they could be studied in different parts of the world. From Spain and North Africa all the way to Central Asia and India, science and learning were an important part of Islamic culture.[133]

Medieval and Renaissance Europe

Drawing of the heliocentric model as proposed by the Copernicus's De revolutionibus orbium coelestium

During the early Middle Ages (around the 5th to 10th centuries), science in Western Europe slowed down after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Many ancient books and ideas were at risk of being lost. Luckily, monks in monasteries helped save this knowledge by copying old texts written in Latin. These included the works of famous thinkers like Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, Galen, and Boethius.[134] One important scholar from this time was Isidore of Seville (around 560–636), who tried to collect and organize all human knowledge into one big book called Etymologiae. People at the time believed that studying nature helped them better understand God’s creation.[135] Even though science was limited during this period, learning started to improve under Charlemagne (who ruled from 768–814). He supported education and helped start cathedral schools, which taught subjects like math, geometry, music, and astronomy (called the quadrivium), along with grammar, logic, and writing (the trivium).[136]

Between the 11th and 13th centuries, science in Europe came back to life thanks to a big effort to translate ancient books. In places like Spain, Sicily, and parts of the Middle East, European scholars came in contact with the Islamic world and the Byzantine Empire. From them, they got access to many old Greek and Roman ideas, now improved by Arabic scholars.[134] Translators like Gerard of Cremona worked hard to turn important Arabic and Greek books by Aristotle, Avicenna, Alhazen, and Galen into Latin so more people in Europe could understand them. These books taught about astronomy, medicine, math, and optics.[137] This sparked the rise of universities in cities like Bologna, Paris, Oxford, and Salamanca.[138] A new way of thinking called scholasticism became popular. Scholastic thinkers like Thomas Aquinas mixed Greek philosophy with Christian beliefs,[139] and others like Albertus Magnus and Roger Bacon encouraged people to observe nature and do experiments to learn how the world works.[140][141]

By the 14th century, some smart thinkers in Europe were starting to question old ideas about how things move. Two of these thinkers, Nicole Oresme and Jean Buridan, worked at the University of Paris and had new ideas about physics. Jean Buridan came up with a theory called impetus, which was an early idea similar to what we now call inertia. He said that once something is moving, it can keep moving on its own. It does not need to be pushed forever. This was a big change from the old belief (by Aristotle) that something had to keep being pushed to keep moving.[142] Nicole Oresme did not agree with the old idea that Earth was the center of the universe (geocentric model). He also used graphs to show how things move, which was an early step toward kinematics, the study of motion.[143]

The Renaissance (from the 1300s to the 1600s) was a time when science began to change a lot. People started to focus more on observing nature, doing experiments, and re-reading old science texts from ancient Greece. Scholars like Leonardo Bruni and Marsilio Ficino helped translate these important works so others could study them in more depth.[144][145] One of the most famous Renaissance thinkers was Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519). He is known for being a "universal man", or someone who could do many things well. He was an amazing artist, but he also studied anatomy (the human body), how water flows, and how machines work. Leonardo dissected human bodies and made some of the most accurate drawings of muscles, bones, and the heart for his time. He figured out many things about how the vascular system (blood vessels) and body parts worked, even though he never published his findings while he was alive.[146]

A big moment in astronomy happened with a scientist named Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543). He suggested a heliocentric model of the universe, which means that the Sun is at the center, not the Earth. This idea was published in his book On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. In his model, Earth spins every day and goes around the Sun once a year. At the time, most people believed the Ptolemaic model, which said Earth was the center of everything. Even though Copernicus kept some old ideas like epicycles (small loops in orbits), his model was a huge change and led to a new way of thinking about the universe.[147] Another important astronomer was Tycho Brahe (1546–1601). He did not use a telescope, but he made very careful observations of the stars and planets using special instruments. His data was extremely accurate and helped later scientists understand how the planets move.[148]

Johannes Kepler (1571–1630), who used Tycho’s data, discovered three laws of planetary motion. He showed that planets do not move in perfect circles, but in elliptical orbits (oval-shaped). He also found that planets move faster when they are closer to the Sun.[149] Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) combined experiments and astronomy. He used one of the first telescopes to look at the sky and made amazing discoveries. He saw craters on the Moon, sunspots, the phases of Venus, and moons orbiting Jupiter. All these things disproved the old idea that everything revolved around Earth and helped support Copernicus’s heliocentric model. Galileo also studied how objects fall, how pendulums swing, and how things move through the air. He showed that the laws of nature follow math rules, and we can understand them by doing experiments. In 1632, he wrote a book called Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems that supported heliocentrism. Because of this, he got in trouble with the Catholic Church, which still believed Earth was the center of the universe. Galileo was put on trial and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.[150]

During the Renaissance, there were huge changes in medicine and anatomy (the study of the human body). A scientist named Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) made a big breakthrough by dissecting real human bodies and studying them carefully. Before this, people mostly followed the ideas of an ancient doctor named Galen, but Vesalius found that Galen had made many mistakes because he studied animals, not humans. Vesalius wrote a book called De humani corporis fabrica (which means On the Fabric of the Human Body), where he corrected hundreds of errors and showed that anatomy should be based on direct observation. This helped make anatomy a real science based on what doctors could see and study for themselves.[151] Later, another important doctor named William Harvey (1578–1657) discovered how blood moves through the body. He showed that the heart pumps blood in a circle, a system called circulation, which was very different from the old idea that blood came from the liver and just moved back and forth. Harvey proved this through experiments and live animal dissection (called vivisection). His work helped change medicine from just guessing and theory to something based on evidence and real body functions.[152]

In math and physics, the Renaissance also saw big advances. A man named Simon Stevin (1548–1620) came up with decimal fractions, which made it easier to do math with numbers. For example, instead of writing 1/10 or 1/100, people could now write 0.1 or 0.01, something used all the time today.[153] René Descartes (1596–1650), a French thinker, invented analytic geometry, which connected algebra with shapes and space. This helped scientists describe the world more clearly using equations.[154] Another important figure was Francis Bacon (1561–1626). He believed science should be based on observation and experiments, not just guessing or using old books. In his book Novum Organum, he explained how scientists should use inductive reasoning, starting with observations and then finding general rules. His ideas became the philosophy of science and influenced many future scientists.[155] Finally, Isaac Newton (1642–1727) brought together the work of earlier scientists like Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes. In the early 1700s, he created a complete system of physics and astronomy that explained how planets move and how objects fall on Earth. His work marked the end of the Renaissance and the start of the Scientific Revolution, a time when modern science truly began.[156]

Age of Enlightenment

Title page of the 1687 first edition of Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton

The Enlightenment was greatly influenced by the ideas of the Scientific Revolution, especially the work of Isaac Newton (1642–1727). In 1687, Newton wrote a book called Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, where he explained the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation. He showed that the same force that makes an apple fall also keeps the Moon in orbit around the Earth. Newton also explained that planets move in elliptical (oval-shaped) paths because of gravity. He invented calculus (at the same time as another scientist named Gottfried Leibniz) to help describe things that change, like speed and movement. His experiments with light proved that white light is made up of many colors.[157]

Because of Newton, many Enlightenment thinkers started to use math and science to understand more than just space or motion. In chemistry, Robert Boyle (1627–1691) was an important figure. In his book The Sceptical Chymist (1661), he rejected old ideas from Aristotle and alchemy and introduced new scientific ideas about matter. He discovered Boyle’s Law, which says that when you make a gas container smaller, the pressure goes up (as long as the temperature stays the same). This showed that gases behave in ways that can be measured and predicted. Boyle also believed that science should be based on careful experiments that could be repeated.[158] The move from alchemy (an early, unscientific form of chemistry) to modern chemistry was led by Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794), who is often called the “father of modern chemistry.” Lavoisier discovered and named the elements oxygen and hydrogen, and he proved that the old phlogiston theory (which said things burned by releasing a strange substance) was wrong. He showed that in a chemical reaction, the total mass stays the same, which is now known as the law of conservation of mass. Lavoisier also created a clear system for naming chemicals, which helped scientists better organize and classify the elements.[159]

In biology and anatomy, scientists during the Enlightenment started to focus more on how living things are organized. Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778) invented the system we still use today for naming living things, called binomial nomenclature. He gave each plant or animal two names, a genus and a species. This helped scientists all over the world talk about the same organisms clearly and consistently. His book, Systema Naturae, first published in 1735, listed and organized thousands of plants and animals and became the foundation of modern taxonomy, the science of classification. At the same time, scientists were learning more about how the human body works.[160] Albrecht von Haller studied things like how nerves work, how muscles move, and how the heart beats. Through experiments, he helped people understand how parts of the body function automatically, without us thinking about them. This was a big step forward in the science of physiology.[161]

During the Enlightenment, astronomy made big advances thanks to better telescopes and the growth of observatories. Edmond Halley (1656–1742) used Newton’s laws to predict when a certain comet would come back. He was right, and that comet is now named Halley's Comet. This showed that gravity could explain how objects move in space.[162] Later, William Herschel (1738–1822) discovered a new planet, Uranus, in 1781. He also found over 2,500 objects in the night sky, like nebulae (clouds of gas and dust) and star clusters. He built some of the biggest telescopes of his time. His work helped scientists realize that the universe is much bigger than just the Milky Way galaxy.[163] Astronomy became more professional, with major observatories in cities like Greenwich, Paris, and Berlin. These places also helped improve navigation, which was important for travel and trade.[164]

Scientific institutions were very important during the Enlightenment. The Royal Society of London (founded in 1660) and the French Academy of Sciences (founded in 1666) brought scientists together to share ideas. They published journals, like Philosophical Transactions, that explained experiments, new discoveries, and theories. These groups helped make science more organized, trustworthy, and easy to understand by others. They also started the idea of peer review, where other scientists check your work. As more people learned to read and write, science started to spread outside of just schools and universities. Salons, coffeehouses, and public lectures became places where people talked about science. Scientists were no longer just private thinkers, they became public figures who shared their knowledge with everyone.[165]

During the Enlightenment, medicine improved because doctors started focusing more on observing patients and learning through hospital training. One important doctor, Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682–1771), helped create modern diagnosis by showing that symptoms were linked to specific organs, not just to old ideas like imbalances of body fluids. This helped doctors understand that diseases could be traced to problems in certain parts of the body.[166] Another key figure was Edward Jenner (1749–1823), who made the first successful vaccine. He noticed that people who got cowpox did not catch smallpox, a deadly disease. He tested this idea and proved that cowpox could protect people. In 1798, he published his results, starting the science of immunology and vaccination.[167]

During this time, science became more separate from religion and was seen as a way to improve society. Famous thinkers like Denis Diderot, Voltaire, and Jean le Rond d’Alembert believed that science and reason could free people’s minds and make the world better. They worked on a big project called the Encyclopédie (1751–1772), which was like an early encyclopedia. It collected all known scientific and technical knowledge into one place and made it easier for people to learn about how things work, from optics and anatomy to mining and tools.[165] Engineering and technology also made huge progress. James Watt made important changes to the steam engine in the 1760s and 1770s by adding a separate condenser, which made the engine much more efficient. His improvements helped power factories and machines, leading to the Industrial Revolution.[168]

19th Century Science

The first diagram of an evolutionary tree made by Charles Darwin in 1837

During the 1800s, science made big changes, especially in how we understand heat, energy, electricity, and atoms. In the study of heat and energy, thermodynamics, scientists created the laws of thermodynamics. These laws helped people understand how steam engines work and how to make them more efficient. In 1824, a scientist named Sadi Carnot came up with the idea of the Carnot cycle, which showed that an engine’s efficiency depends on the temperature difference between where the heat comes from and where it goes. This idea helped lead to the second law of thermodynamics, which explains how energy spreads out.[169] Later, Rudolf Clausius introduced the idea of entropy, which measures how energy becomes more disordered over time.[170] Scientists William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and James Prescott Joule created the first law of thermodynamics, which says that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only changed from one form to another.[171][172]

In electricity and magnetism, scientists discovered that these two forces are connected. Michael Faraday, in the 1830s and 1840s, did experiments that showed how moving magnets can create electricity, a process called electromagnetic induction. This discovery is what makes electric generators and transformers work. Faraday also came up with the idea of fields, which are invisible areas where electric or magnetic forces can act.[173] Later, in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell built on Faraday’s work and wrote four equations, called Maxwell's equations, that explain how electric and magnetic fields move and interact. These equations also predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves, which led to the invention of things like radios, TVs, and wireless communication.[174]

At the beginning of the century, John Dalton brought back the idea of atomic theory. He said that every element (like oxygen or iron) is made up of its own kind of atom, and these atoms combine in fixed amounts to make compounds (like water or carbon dioxide). His ideas helped explain important chemistry rules, like the law of multiple proportions, which says that elements always combine in certain number patterns.[175] Later, in 1869, Dmitri Mendeleev created the periodic table. He arranged the elements in order by atomic mass and grouped them by chemical properties. Mendeleev’s table was so smart that it even predicted new elements, like gallium and germanium, before they were discovered. When scientists later found these elements and they matched his predictions, it showed that the periodic law was a powerful way to understand and organize chemistry.[176]

Meanwhile, biology was also changing in a major way. In 1859, Charles Darwin published a book called On the Origin of Species. In it, he explained his theory of evolution by natural selection. Darwin said that living things change over time. These changes happen because of small differences that are passed from parents to offspring. If a trait helps an organism survive and have more babies, that trait becomes more common over generations. This is how new species can form. Darwin got many of his ideas by observing animals and plants during his long trip on the ship HMS Beagle. He was also influenced by Thomas Malthus, who wrote about how populations grow, and Charles Lyell, who studied how the Earth changes slowly over time. Darwin’s theory replaced older ideas that species never change. It gave scientists a new way to understand life, one that was based on evidence, change, and history. It also started many important discussions about science, religion, and philosophy.[177]

At the same time as other big discoveries in the 1800s, scientists also developed the cell theory, which says that all living things are made of cells, and that the cell is the basic unit of life. This idea was first introduced in the 1830s by Matthias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann. Later, Rudolf Virchow added that all cells come from other cells, which he summed up in the Latin phrase "omnis cellula e cellula". The invention and improvement of the light microscope helped scientists look more closely at cells. They were able to discover important parts inside cells, like the nucleus, mitochondria, and other tiny structures called organelles. These discoveries helped build the foundation for molecular biology and genetics, which study how cells work and how traits are passed down.[178]

In medicine, the 1800s were a turning point as it began to become more scientific. This progress was made thanks to new knowledge in disease research, germs, surgery, and public health. One of the most important scientists was Louis Pasteur. He showed that tiny organisms (microbes) can cause disease and spoil food. This idea became known as the germ theory of disease. Pasteur proved that germs do not just appear out of nowhere (a belief called spontaneous generation). He also invented vaccines for rabies and anthrax, and created pasteurization, a method to heat food and drinks to kill harmful microbes and keep them from spoiling.[179] Another important scientist was Robert Koch. He discovered the specific bacteria that cause tuberculosis, cholera, and anthrax. Koch also created new lab methods, like using agar plates to grow bacteria and staining techniques to make microbes easier to see under a microscope. He developed Koch’s postulates, a set of rules that scientists use to prove that a certain germ causes a specific disease.[180]

In the 1840s, doctors began using anesthesia, like ether and chloroform, to perform pain-free surgeries. This was a huge breakthrough because it allowed surgeons to do more complex operations without hurting the patient.[181] Around the same time, Joseph Lister started using carbolic acid (also called phenol) to clean wounds and tools, which greatly reduced the number of people who died from infections after surgery. His work helped start the use of antiseptic techniques in hospitals and led to the modern idea of clean, germ-free medical care. Because of these changes, hospitals became places of real healing and science, not just places where the sick were kept.[182] At the same time, big cities were facing many diseases due to crowding and pollution from the Industrial Revolution. This led to early public health reforms.[183] One important figure was Florence Nightingale, who worked during the Crimean War. She pushed for clean hospitals, better nursing, and proper training, which helped improve medical care all over the world.[184]

In the study of geology, scientists began to understand that Earth is very old, much older than people once believed. Charles Lyell wrote a famous book called Principles of Geology (1830–1833), where he explained that natural processes like erosion (wearing down of land) and sedimentation (building up of layers) happen slowly and steadily over a long time. This idea is called uniformitarianism. Lyell’s work was important because it challenged the biblical view that Earth was only a few thousand years old. It also gave Charles Darwin the long time span needed for his theory of evolution to work.[185] Other areas of geology, like stratigraphy (studying rock layers) and fossil correlation (matching fossils to different layers), helped scientists piece together Earth’s history. Studies in mineralogy (minerals) and paleontology (fossils) also helped explain what the Earth is made of and what life used to be like.[186]

During the 19th century, people began to study human behavior and society in a more scientific way. This was the beginning of the social sciences. A thinker named Auguste Comte came up with the idea of positivism, which said that we should study society using facts and observations, just like scientists study nature. This led to the creation of sociology, a field that tries to understand how things like cities, factories, and social classes affect people’s lives.[187] In economics, early ideas from Adam Smith were built upon by other thinkers like David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus, and John Stuart Mill. They used math and statistics to study how money, jobs, and resources are shared in society.[188]

At the same time, science became more organized in every area. Countries created national science academies and professional journals where scientists could publish and share their discoveries. Universities and research institutes trained new scientists, and governments or private groups started to fund science projects. Science also became something the public could enjoy and learn about. Museums and big events like the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London showed off new inventions and discoveries, proving that science was important for progress.[189] Some amazing inventions of the time included the telegraph (for long-distance communication), the steamship, the electric light, and photography. These changes showed how science could improve daily life and move society forward.[190]

20th and 21st Century Science

Video simulation of the merger GW150914, showing spacetime distortion from gravity as the black holes orbit and merge, showcasing Albert Einstein´s theory of relativity

At the start of the 20th century, scientists realized that the old ideas of physics (called classical mechanics) could not fully explain how very small things (like atoms) or very large things (like galaxies) work. This led to the birth of modern physics.[191] In 1905, a young scientist named Albert Einstein wrote four important papers that changed science forever. One of these introduced the special theory of relativity, which showed that time and space are not fixed. Instead, time can slow down and lengths can shrink when objects move very fast, close to the speed of light. He also came up with the famous equation E = mc², showing that mass and energy are two forms of the same thing.[192] Later, in 1915, Einstein created the general theory of relativity, which explained gravity in a new way. Instead of thinking of gravity as a pulling force, he said that mass bends spacetime, and this bending is what is felt as gravity. This idea helped scientists understand things like black holes, gravitational lensing (how light bends around stars), and how the universe is expanding.[193]

At the same time, a different kind of physics called quantum mechanics was being developed to understand how things work at the level of atoms and tiny particles. In 1900, Max Planck said that energy comes in small amounts, called quanta.[194] Niels Bohr created a model of the atom where electrons move in specific orbits, helping to explain how atoms give off light.[195] Werner Heisenberg and Bohr developed the Copenhagen interpretation, which included the uncertainty principle. This says we cannot know exactly where a particle is and how fast it is moving at the same time.[196] Erwin Schrödinger came up with wave mechanics, which showed how particles can also act like waves.[197] Paul Dirac combined quantum theory with Einstein’s ideas and predicted the existence of antimatter.[198] These discoveries helped create many modern technologies, like semiconductors (used in computers), lasers, nuclear power, and even the new field of quantum computing.[199][200]

In the 20th century, a new area of science called nuclear physics became very important and had a big impact on the world. It started when Henri Becquerel discovered radioactivity, and Marie and Pierre Curie studied it further. They learned how atoms can break apart in a process called atomic decay. In 1938, scientists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann discovered something called nuclear fission, which is when the nucleus of an atom splits, releasing a huge amount of energy. Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch explained how it worked. This discovery led to the creation of the Manhattan Project, a secret program where scientists like Enrico Fermi and J. Robert Oppenheimer developed the first atomic bomb, which was used in World War II in 1945. But nuclear physics was not just used for weapons. It also led to the development of nuclear power plants, which generate electricity, and medical technologies like PET scans (used to see inside the body) and radiation therapy (used to treat cancer).[201]

Meanwhile, in biology, scientists began to understand how traits are passed from parents to children. This started with the rediscovery of Gregor Mendel’s laws of inheritance, which led to the science of genetics. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, using X-ray images from Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins, discovered the double helix structure of DNA. This showed how genetic information is stored in the sequence of nucleotides (the building blocks of DNA).[202] This discovery led to molecular biology, which helped scientists understand how genes make proteins and how certain diseases are caused by genetic problems.[203] Later, a huge international project called the Human Genome Project finished in 2003. Scientists mapped out all the DNA in a human, which includes over 3 billion base pairs and more than 20,000 genes. This started the field of genomics, and helped create new ways to study and treat diseases through personalized medicine and bioinformatics (the use of computers in biology).[204]

Biotechnology in the late 1900s and early 2000s gave scientists amazing new tools to work with DNA and genes. These included Recombinant DNA technology which lets scientists combine DNA from different sources.[205] PCR (polymerase chain reaction) is a method to quickly make millions of copies of a piece of DNA.[206] CRISPR-Cas9, on the other hand, is a tool that lets scientists edit genes very precisely, like using scissors to cut and change DNA.[207] These tools are now used in many ways. To create genetically modified crops, make medicines like insulin, perform gene therapy to treat diseases, and do quick and accurate disease testing.[208] In medicine, a huge breakthrough came in 1928, when Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, the first antibiotic. This completely changed how bacterial infections were treated and saved millions of lives.[209] Later, vaccines were developed for deadly diseases like polio, measles, and HPV. More recently, mRNA vaccines (like some COVID-19 vaccines) have helped fight new diseases and protect public health around the world.[210]

At the same time, information technology and computer science became a big part of science and everyday life. During World War II, the first electronic computers, ENIAC and Colossus, were built.[211][212] Alan Turing created early ideas about how computers work and also helped crack secret codes during the war.[213] In 1947, three scientists at Bell Labs, Bardeen, Brattain, and Shockley, invented the transistor, a tiny part that made it possible to build smaller and faster electronic devices. This led to the microprocessor and started the digital revolution.[214] Later, scientists created the internet, which began as a government project called ARPANET. The internet grew into a huge, worldwide system that allows people to communicate, learn, shop, and share information.[215]

Space science made huge leaps forward in the 20th century as humans began to explore beyond Earth for the first time. In 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite.[216] Then, in 1961, Yuri Gagarin became the first human in space.[217] One of the biggest milestones came in 1969, when NASA’s Apollo Program sent Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the Moon, making them the first people to walk on the Moon.[218] Robots also helped us explore space. The Voyager probes, launched in 1977, sent back amazing information about the outer planets and are still traveling through interstellar space (the space between stars).[219] In 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope was launched into orbit. It took detailed pictures of galaxies, nebulae, and supernovae, helping scientists learn more about the expanding universe.[220] In the 21st century, space exploration has kept growing. NASA’s Mars rovers explore the Red Planet.[221] Space telescopes like Kepler and TESS search for exoplanets (planets around other stars).[222][223] Private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin are working on things like Mars missions and even space tourism.[224]

At the same time, climate and environmental science became very important. Back in 1896, scientist Svante Arrhenius said that carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the air could raise Earth’s temperature. This is called the greenhouse effect. By the late 1900s, scientists had strong evidence that human activities, like burning fossil fuels, were changing the climate. They got this data from things like ice cores, satellites, and ocean studies. Today, scientists around the world work together through groups like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to study climate change and warn about its dangers. They say it is urgent to reduce CO₂ emissions to protect the planet. To help with this, we now use tools like climate models, remote sensing (using satellites to study Earth), and renewable energy (like solar and wind power) to fight climate change and find better ways to live sustainably.[225][226]

Neuroscience and cognitive science are the sciences that study the brain and how we think, feel, and make decisions. In recent years, scientists have made big discoveries thanks to new brain scanning tools like fMRI and PET scans, which show real-time images of brain activity. These tools helped researchers find out that the prefrontal cortex (the front part of the brain) is important for decision-making, and the amygdala (a small part deep in the brain) helps process emotions like fear and anger.[227] Today, scientists are trying to map all the connections in the brain. This is called connectomics.[228] Also, brain-computer interfaces have been developed. These allow people who are paralyzed to move robotic arms or prosthetic limbs using only their brain signals.[229] At the same time, fields like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, which used to be mostly theory, are now real tools. They help with things like voice assistants, face recognition, medical diagnoses, and self-driving cars.[230]

In the 21st century, scientists from different fields began working together more closely, creating powerful new areas of research. These include nanotechnology (the science of building tiny machines and materials at the scale of atoms and molecules), synthetic biology (designing and creating new living systems, such as bacteria that produce medicine), quantum information science (using the strange laws of quantum physics to make ultra-powerful computers), and systems biology (studying how all the parts of a living system work together). One of the biggest science projects of this century was at CERN, where scientists used the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a huge machine that smashes particles together, to discover the Higgs boson in 2012. This particle helps explain how other particles get mass and is a key part of the Standard Model of physics.[231] Scientists are also still trying to solve big mysteries like dark matter, dark energy, and how to unite quantum physics with gravity, which could lead to a unified theory of everything in the universe.[232]

Branches

Natural sciences

The natural sciences seek to understand how the world and universe around us works. There are five major branches, indicated by the photos above taken clockwise from top left: astronomy, chemistry, Earth science, biology, and physics.

Natural sciences are a major area of science that focuses on understanding the natural world. Scientists in this field study how things in nature work by watching carefully, doing experiments, and creating models or theories. These models help explain why things happen and can even predict what might happen next. Natural sciences depend on evidence that can be seen, measured, and repeated. Scientists use the scientific method, which means they make guesses (called hypotheses), test them through experiments, and change their ideas if the results do not match. This process helps make sure that scientific conclusions are as accurate as possible.[233]

There are several main areas of natural science, including physics, chemistry, biology, earth sciences, and astronomy. Each area focuses on different parts of nature, but they often work together in today’s research. Physics is the study of matter, energy, and the forces that affect them. Physicists explore everything from the tiniest particles, like electrons and quarks, to giant objects like stars and galaxies. They use different theories depending on the scale. Quantum mechanics for tiny particles and general relativity for huge cosmic objects. Physics has led to important laws and ideas that help explain the universe, such as Newton's laws of motion, the laws of thermodynamics, Maxwell's equations for electricity and magnetism, and the Standard Model, which organizes the basic building blocks of matter.[234]

Chemistry is often called the central science because it connects physics and biology. It focuses on what matter is made of, how it is structured, how it behaves, and how it changes during reactions. Chemists study atoms and molecules to understand how they bond together, break apart, and move energy during chemical changes. Chemistry is divided into different areas. Organic chemistry studies compounds that contain carbon (like living things do). Inorganic chemistry looks at compounds without carbon. Physical chemistry explores how chemistry and physics work together. Analytical chemistry focuses on measuring and identifying substances. Biochemistry applies chemistry to biological systems like cells and DNA. Because of chemistry, there are drugs, plastics, batteries, fertilizers, and many other useful materials and tools.[235]

Biology is the science of living things. It explores how organisms are built, how they work, how they grow, where they come from, and how they change over time. Biology includes many branches, such as cell biology (which studies the basic units of life, cells), genetics (which looks at heredity and DNA), ecology (which studies how organisms interact with each other and the environment), evolutionary biology (which looks at how life has changed over millions of years), and molecular biology (which focuses on life at the smallest scales, like proteins and genes). Biologists use tools like microscopes, DNA sequencing, and gene editing to explore life. Biology is important in health, farming, nature protection, and biotechnology, helping us make vaccines, improve crops, and protect endangered species.[236]

Earth sciences, also called geosciences, are the sciences that study the Earth and everything that affects it. This includes the solid ground, the atmosphere (air and weather), the hydrosphere (water and oceans), and the biosphere (all living things). Earth scientists use ideas from physics, chemistry, and biology to understand how Earth’s systems work together. Earth sciences include geology, which looks at the layers of the Earth, rocks, and the history of the planet; meteorology, which studies weather and the atmosphere; oceanography, which focuses on oceans and sea life; and climatology, which examines long-term climate patterns and how they change. These studies are important for learning about natural disasters like earthquakes, volcanoes, and hurricanes, and for helping us manage natural resources and protect the environment.[237]

Astronomy is the science that studies space, planets, stars, galaxies, and the universe. Astronomers observe the sky using telescopes and use theories and math to understand what they see. Modern astronomy is closely connected to physics, especially in a branch called astrophysics, which uses physical laws to explain how space objects behave. Astronomy has helped us discover just how huge the universe is and that there are other solar systems beyond our own. Scientists study amazing objects in space like black holes, neutron stars, and dark matter, a mysterious substance that we cannot see directly. Astronomy also helps us explore big questions, like where the universe came from, how it has changed over time, and what might happen to it in the future.[238]

The natural sciences all use similar methods to learn about the world. First, scientists use empirical observation, which means they carefully collect data using tools or by studying things in nature. They also do experiments, where they test ideas in controlled settings to see what happens. Another method is mathematical modeling, where scientists use math and computers to describe and predict how things work. To make sure results are trustworthy, scientists follow rules like peer review (where other experts check their work), reproducibility (so others can repeat the experiment), and falsifiability (the idea that scientific claims must be testable and could be proven wrong). Scientists use numbers and statistics to support their conclusions with solid, unbiased evidence.[233]

Today, the natural sciences often combine different subjects to solve big problems. These mixed areas are called interdisciplinary fields, like biophysics (biology + physics), astrochemistry (astronomy + chemistry), geobiology (geology + biology), and climate science (which combines many fields).[239][240] These new fields help scientists understand complex challenges, such as climate change, disease outbreaks, clean energy, and space exploration. For example, studying the climate means using knowledge from physics, chemistry, biology, and computer modeling.[241] Scientists in astrobiology use ideas from space science, chemistry, and biology to search for life on other planets.[242]

The natural sciences have led to amazing technology and discoveries that have changed our lives. Physics helped create nuclear energy, computers, and electronics.[243] Chemistry made new medicines, better farming products, and useful materials like plastics.[244] Biology and medicine led to vaccines, treatments for genetic diseases, and ways to grow or repair body parts.[245] Earth science helps us predict natural disasters and take care of the environment.[246] Astronomy has led to better telescopes, cameras, and even new ways to process big data.[247] Finally, the natural sciences are very important for education, government, and solving world problems. Understanding science helps people make smart choices about things like global warming, health, and new technology.[248] Governments use science to make rules, spend money wisely, and protect people and nature.[249] Many big science projects, like CERN (which studies tiny particles), the IPCC (which studies climate change), or the Human Genome Project (which mapped all human genes), show how countries and scientists work together around the world to learn and make progress.[250][251][252]

Core Principles and Characteristics

Empiricism

Empiricism is a basic idea in science. It says that we learn things by using our senses, like seeing, hearing, or measuring, not just by guessing or following tradition.[253][254] Instead of relying only on what people believe or think is true, science depends on what we can actually observe, test, and measure. This is why scientists use special tools like telescopes, microscopes, and sensors, to help them see things that are too small, too far, or otherwise invisible to the human eye.[255] For example, when scientists look for planets outside our solar system, called exoplanets, they cannot see the planets directly. Instead, they look at tiny changes in the brightness of a star. If the star gets a little dimmer at regular times, it might mean a planet is passing in front of it. This method is based on careful observation, which is what empiricism is all about.[256][257]

Empiricism also means that scientific results should be reproducible. This means that if someone does an experiment again, they should get the same results. A good example is Gregor Mendel’s pea plant experiments, where he discovered how traits are passed down from parents to offspring. Scientists were able to repeat his work and get the same patterns, showing that the results were reliable.[258] The idea of empiricism was supported by philosophers like John Locke, who believed that people are not born with knowledge. Instead, he said the mind starts out like a blank slate, and everything we learn comes from experience.[253] This idea is different from rationalism, which says we are born with certain ideas or that we can learn everything through logic alone.[259] In science, empiricism helps make sure our knowledge is based on real-world evidence.[260]

Empirical methods in science are not just about watching things happen, they also include doing careful experiments to test ideas. These experiments are done in a controlled way to help scientists figure out which things cause certain results.[254] For example, when Alexander Fleming saw that a certain type of mold killed bacteria, it was not enough just to notice it. Scientists had to do more experiments to prove that the mold, later called Penicillium notatum, could really fight infections. This led to the discovery of penicillin, an important medicine.[261] This kind of testing is how scientists confirm what works and what does not. Galileo also used experiments with ramps (inclined planes) to show that objects do not need a force to keep moving, which went against the old ideas from Aristotle.[262] In more recent times, scientists used special detectors at LIGO to find gravitational waves, tiny ripples in space predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity 100 years earlier. This discovery was another example of how scientists use careful observation and testing to confirm or disprove scientific theories.[263] Empirical methods are also used in big, complex areas like climate science. Scientists collect information from things like ice cores, satellites, and even tree rings to learn about Earth’s climate over time. These different sources of data help build models to understand and predict how the planet is changing.[241]

Even though empiricism, the idea that knowledge comes from observation and experience, is a key part of science, it is not always simple. One challenge is deciding what counts as a valid observation and how to understand what we see. Sometimes, what scientists notice or pay attention to depends on the theories they already believe in. This idea is called “theory-laden observation.” Philosopher Thomas Kuhn explained that scientists often use models or ideas they already have to decide what to look for and how to explain it. For example, early astronomers had trouble understanding why planets sometimes seemed to move backward in the sky (called retrograde motion) until they used models like the Ptolemaic system or the later Copernican model, which helped them interpret what they were seeing.[264] In some parts of science, such as quantum physics, things get even harder. Scientists cannot always observe tiny particles directly. Instead, they have to use mathematical models and experiments to figure out what is happening. Phenomena like quantum entanglement or wavefunction collapse are known through indirect evidence and complex data.[265] In the social sciences (like psychology or sociology), empiricism works a bit differently. Scientists use tools like surveys, interviews, and experiments with people to gather data. But this kind of research can have its own problems. For example, people might give answers they think are expected (this is called social desirability bias), or they might act differently because they know they are being watched (called the Hawthorne effect or observer bias).[266]

Rationality and Logic

Rationality and logic are very important in science. They help scientists make sure their ideas make sense, their theories fit together, and their conclusions are based on good reasoning. Rational thinking in science means using reason carefully. Scientists use it to come up with ideas (called hypotheses), to plan experiments, to understand results, and to compare different explanations. This helps make sure that conclusions come from real evidence, not just guesses. Logic gives rules for how to go from one idea to another. It helps scientists check if their arguments are valid.[267] For example, in biology, if all mammals are warm-blooded and whales are mammals, then whales must be warm-blooded. This is a basic kind of logical thinking called deductive reasoning.[268] Science also uses the rule of non-contradiction. This means something cannot be both true and not true at the same time. For example, a chemical cannot both contain and not contain the same element under the same conditions. This helps scientists make clear and reliable chemical models.[269] There are also formal types of logic, like propositional logic, predicate logic, and modal logic. These are used in areas like computer science, artificial intelligence, and mathematical biology. They help scientists build computer programs, design experiments, and understand complex systems.[270]

Logic and rational thinking are important in science not just to support good ideas, but also to find mistakes, hidden problems, or wrong assumptions in scientific theories. In physics, the discovery of quantum mechanics made scientists question old ideas. For example, classical physics said that objects behave in clear, predictable ways (called determinism) and that things far apart cannot affect each other instantly (called locality). But quantum mechanics showed that very small particles often behave in strange and random ways, so scientists had to use new kinds of logic to understand them. There is also a big problem between two important theories: general relativity and quantum field theory. Relativity explains how big things like planets and galaxies work, while quantum theory explains tiny particles. But the two theories do not fully agree with each other. This has led scientists to search for a new theory that combines both, such as string theory or loop quantum gravity.[271][272][273] Science often uses a method called hypothetico-deductive reasoning. This means scientists start with a theory, then use logic to make predictions that can be tested. If experiments agree with the prediction, the theory is stronger. If not, the theory may need to change.[5] For example, we know that antibiotics kill bacteria, not viruses. This logical idea helps doctors avoid giving antibiotics for viral infections, which helps prevent antibiotic resistance.[274] In social sciences, logic is also important. Game theory is a tool that uses logic and reasoning to study how people make choices in situations where others are also making decisions. It helps explain things like voting, diplomacy between countries, and even how governments sell licenses for things like radio frequencies. Game theory helps people make better decisions by thinking logically about the actions of others.[275][276]

Scientific thinking also includes the idea of parsimony, which is often called Occam's Razor. This idea says that if there are different explanations for something, the simplest one that still explains the facts should be chosen. This rule helps scientists choose the best theories in many fields, such as biology and climate science. For example, a long time ago, people believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe (the geocentric model). But this model needed many complicated parts, like epicycles, to explain how planets moved. Later, Copernicus suggested that the Sun was at the center instead (the heliocentric model). This simpler idea explained the same facts more easily, so it became the better choice.[277] In brain science, a new idea called the Bayesian brain hypothesis says that the brain works by using probability to update what it believes. This means the brain uses logic and evidence, like a smart guesser. This idea is also used in computer fields like robotics and machine learning.[278] Logic is also very important in doing science in a fair and careful way. For example, decision theory is a part of logic that helps scientists decide how to run medical studies. It helps them think clearly about risks, benefits, and what is unknown when testing new treatments.[279]

Scientific method

Today, "science" usually refers to a way of pursuing knowledge, not just the knowledge itself. It is mainly about the phenomena of the material world. The Greek works into Western Europe from the 6th to 7th century B.C. revived "Philosophy".[280] In the 17th and 18th centuries scientists increasingly sought to formulate knowledge in terms of laws of nature such as Newton's laws of motion. And during the 19th century, the word "science" became more and more associated with the scientific method itself. It was seen as a way to study the natural world, including physics, chemistry, geology and biology.

It was also in the 19th century that the term scientist was created by William Whewell. He meant it to tell the difference between those who looked for knowledge on nature from those who looked for other types of knowledge.[281]

The scientific method is the name given to the methods used by scientists to find knowledge. The main features of the scientific method are:

  1. Scientists identify a question or a problem about nature. Some problems are simple, such as "how many legs do flies have?" and some are very deep, such as "why do objects fall to the ground?"
  2. Next, scientists investigate the problem. They work at it, and collect facts. Sometimes all it takes is to look carefully.
  3. Some questions cannot be answered directly. Then scientists suggest ideas, and test them out. They do experiments and collect data.
  4. Eventually, they find what they think is a good answer to the problem. Then they tell people about it.
  5. Later, other scientists may agree or not agree. They may suggest another answer. They may do more experiments. Anything in science might be revised if we find out the previous solution was not good enough.

An example

A famous example of science in action was the expedition led by Arthur Eddington to Principe Island in Africa in 1919. He went there to record where the stars were around the Sun during a solar eclipse. The observation of where the stars were shown that the apparent star positions close to the Sun were changed. In effect, the light passing the Sun was pulled towards the Sun by gravitation. This confirmed predictions of gravitational lensing made by Albert Einstein in the general theory of relativity, published in 1915. Eddington's observations were considered to be the first solid proof in favour of Einstein's theory.

Practical impacts of scientific research

Discoveries in fundamental science can be world-changing. For example:

Research Impact
Static electricity and magnetism (1600)

Electric current (18th century)

All electric appliances, dynamos, electric power stations, modern electronics, including electric lighting, television, electric heating, magnetic tape, loudspeaker, plus the compass and lightning rod.
Diffraction (1665) Optics, hence fiber optic cable (1840s), cable TV and internet
Germ theory (1700) Hygiene, leading to decreased transmission of infectious diseases; antibodies, leading to techniques for disease diagnosis and targeted anticancer therapies.
Vaccination (1798) Leading to the elimination of most infectious diseases from developed countries and the worldwide eradication of smallpox.
Photovoltaics (1839) Solar cells (1883), hence solar power, solar powered watches, calculators and other devices.
The strange orbit of Mercury (1859) and other research

leading to special (1905) and general relativity (1916)

Satellite-based technology such as GPS (1973), satnav and communications satellites.[282]
Radio waves (1887) Used in broadcast: radio (1906) and television (1927) entertainment. It is used in telephony, emergency services, radar (navigation and weather forecasting), medicine, astronomy, wireless communications, and networking. Radio research led to microwave cooking.
Radioactivity (1896) and antimatter (1932) Cancer treatment (1896), Radiometric dating (1905), nuclear reactors (1942) and weapons (1945), PET scans (1961), and medical research (with isotopic labelling)
X-rays (1896) Medical imaging, including computer tomography
Crystallography and quantum mechanics (1900) Semiconductor devices (1906), hence modern computing and telecommunications including the integration with wireless devices: the mobile phone[282]
Plastics (1907) Starting with bakelite, many types of artificial polymers for numerous applications in industry and daily life
Antibiotics (1880's, 1928) Salvarsan, Penicillin, doxycycline. In 2018 Amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were the most frequently used.[283]
Nuclear magnetic resonance (1930's) Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1946), magnetic resonance imaging (1971), functional magnetic resonance imaging (1990's).
Genomics (1990s) Genomics = genetics + medicine. It is the structure, function, evolution, mapping, and editing of genomes. A genome is an organism's complete set of DNA (or RNA). This makes up its genes. Vaccines for viruses are built by genomics.

Philosophy of science

For Kuhn, the addition of epicycles in Ptolemaic astronomy was "normal science" within a paradigm, whereas the Copernican Revolution was a paradigm shift

The philosophy of science is a subject that looks closely at how science works and what it really means. It asks big questions like: How do we know something is true in science? How do scientific ideas change over time? Can science truly be objective? People who study the philosophy of science try to understand the methods scientists use, the rules they follow, and how their discoveries affect the world.[260] This field connects to other areas of philosophy, such as epistemology (the study of knowledge), metaphysics (the study of what exists), ethics, and logic.[284] It also looks at how science is actually done in both natural sciences (like physics and biology) and social sciences (like psychology and sociology).[254]

One of the biggest questions in the philosophy of science is called the demarcation problem. This means trying to figure out what counts as real science and what does not, like pseudoscience, which pretends to be scientific but doesn't follow the same rules.[285] A famous philosopher named Karl Popper said that real science should be falsifiable. This means a scientific idea must make clear predictions that could be proven wrong with evidence. For example, Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted that light would bend during a solar eclipse. Scientists tested this and confirmed it, showing the theory was falsifiable. On the other hand, Popper criticized things like Freud’s psychoanalysis, which tried to explain human behavior in ways that could not really be tested or proven wrong, because it could twist its explanations to fit any situation.[286] Some later philosophers, like Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, said that science is not always so simple. They pointed out that many great scientific ideas started out as vague or hard to test. So, the question of what counts as real science is still debated, and there may not be one easy answer.[287]

Scientific realism and anti-realism are two different ways of thinking about what science is really doing. People who support scientific realism, like Hilary Putnam and Richard Boyd, believe that scientific theories describe the world as it actually is, even the parts we cannot see, like electrons or black holes.[288][289] They argue that science works so well, like making accurate predictions and helping us build amazing technology, because its ideas are mostly true, or at least close to the truth.[290] On the other side, anti-realists, like Bas van Fraassen, believe something different. They say the job of science is not to find the absolute truth, but to come up with ideas and models that correctly predict what we can observe. This is called empirical adequacy.[291] For example, in quantum mechanics (the science of very tiny particles), the math can predict things very well, but different scientists have totally different beliefs about what is really happening. Some realists believe in things like the Many-worlds Interpretation,[292][293] while anti-realists prefer ideas like the Copenhagen Interpretation, which focus only on what we can measure and see.[294][295]

Another big idea in the philosophy of science is how science explains things. One early idea was the deductive-nomological model, created by Carl Hempel. He said that to explain something scientifically, you had to show how it follows from general laws and starting conditions. For example, explaining why a planet moves in an ellipse (oval shape) using Newton's laws of gravity and motion.[296] But not everyone agreed with this model. Some philosophers thought it did not explain things in everyday life or in complicated sciences like biology.[297] So, newer thinkers, like Nancy Cartwright and James Woodward, introduced different ways to explain things, especially using causes and mechanisms.[298][299] In this newer view, a good explanation tells us how something works step by step. For instance, if we want to explain how the heart pumps blood, we do not just give a law, we show how parts like pacemaker cells, ion channels, and muscle fibers all work together to make the heart beat. This kind of explanation is especially useful in subjects like neuroscience and medicine, where understanding the parts and how they interact is key.[300]

One big question in the philosophy of science is called the problem of induction. This idea was first brought up by a philosopher named David Hume in the 1700s. He asked: How do we really know that what happened in the past will keep happening in the future? For example, we believe the sun will rise tomorrow because it has always done so. But Hume pointed out that we do not have a perfect reason to believe that, just past experience.[301] Science often depends on these kinds of patterns, but there is no absolute proof that they will always hold true. Later on, a philosopher named Nelson Goodman added to this puzzle. He showed that it is not always easy to decide which patterns are meaningful. He created a strange example using the color “grue,” which means something is green before a certain time and blue after. This example showed that choosing which patterns to trust is harder than it seems.[302] Today, some philosophers and scientists try to solve this problem using probability. This is called Bayesian reasoning, where people adjust their beliefs based on how likely something is and what they already know.[303] But even this method has challenges, like being hard to calculate and including some personal judgment.[304]

Another important thinker was Thomas Kuhn, who wrote a famous book in 1962 called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. He said that science does not always grow in a straight line by slowly adding new facts. Instead, he said science works through paradigms, big ideas or frameworks that shape how scientists think, what they study, and what evidence they trust. Scientists work within a paradigm for a long time during “normal science,” but eventually they find anomalies, things that do not fit. When enough of these build up, a scientific revolution happens, and the old paradigm is replaced with a new one. For example, when scientists moved from Newton’s laws to Einstein’s theory of relativity, or from Ptolemy’s geocentric model (Earth at the center) to Copernicus’s heliocentric model (Sun at the center), these were paradigm shifts.[264] Kuhn also said that different paradigms can be incommensurable, meaning they are so different that they cannot easily be compared. This idea was controversial. Philosophers like Karl Popper and Imre Lakatos disagreed with Kuhn. Karl Popper, for example, believed that science moves forward by falsification. This means that scientists should constantly test their ideas and try to prove them wrong. If a theory fails the test, it should be rejected. Popper thought that a good scientific theory must be one that could be proven false if the evidence does not support it. For example, saying “All swans are white” is a scientific idea because it can be tested, and even disproven by finding just one black swan.[5] Another philosopher, Imre Lakatos, offered a different view. He did not think science was as dramatic as Kuhn’s idea of sudden "paradigm shifts," but he also did not fully agree with Popper. Lakatos said that science works through research programmes, groups of theories and ideas that develop over time. These programmes may face problems and make mistakes, but if they keep improving and helping us understand more, then they are still making progress. Lakatos believed science should still be rational and goal-directed, even if it changes slowly and builds on earlier ideas.[305]

The philosophy of science does not just focus on how we know things or what reality is made of. It also asks important questions about ethics (what is right or wrong) and politics (how science affects society). These questions are especially important in fields like environmental science, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and how we respond to pandemics.[306][307] For example, when scientists or governments use computer models to make decisions about public health or climate change, philosophers ask: Are these models reliable? Are they being used fairly?[308] Scientists also have to think about responsibility, how their discoveries might help or harm people.[309] One idea that comes up is called the precautionary principle. This means that if a new technology might be dangerous and we do not fully understand the risks, we should be careful and not rush into using it.[310] This idea is based on epistemic humility, which means recognizing the limits of our knowledge.[311] A good example is CRISPR, a powerful gene-editing tool. While it can be used to treat diseases, it also raises big questions: Should we change human DNA? Should we allow “designer babies”? These are not just scientific questions, they are philosophical and ethical ones, too.[312]

Philosophers also talk about whether there is only one correct way to do science. Some thinkers, like Paul Feyerabend, believed that there is no single method that all science must follow. He called this idea epistemological anarchism, which means that even unusual or untraditional approaches can lead to progress.[313] This way of thinking is called pluralism, and it accepts that different fields of science may need different tools and ways of thinking.[314][315] For instance, in climate science, scientists use a mix of physics, statistics, and information about human behavior to make predictions. In medicine, both controlled experiments and patient stories give useful, but very different, kinds of evidence. This shows that science does not always follow just one path. Instead, different methods can work together to give us a better understanding of the world.[316]

Science and society

During the COVID-19 pandemic, groups like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gave advice based on science. They told people how to stay safe using masks, vaccines, and social distancing.

Scientific discoveries have played a big role in changing the world. They have helped improve how people live, work, and communicate. Some important examples include the invention of the printing press, the rise of factories during the Industrial Revolution, and modern tools like electricity, antibiotics, and the internet. These discoveries changed not only technology, but also how societies are organized.[317] For example, in the 1700s, James Watt improved the steam engine. This invention made it easier to move goods and power machines. It helped build large cities and connect countries through trade.[318] In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, the first antibiotic. This medicine saved many lives by treating infections and changed the way doctors and hospitals work all over the world.[261]

Science also helps governments make better decisions. When leaders use evidence and facts, they can solve big problems like climate change, diseases, and food shortages.[249] For example, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) studies thousands of scientific papers to give advice about global warming.[251] In 1987, the Montreal Protocol helped protect the ozone layer by banning harmful gases called CFCs. Scientists showed that CFCs were damaging the atmosphere, and the agreement helped the ozone layer begin to heal.[319][320] During the COVID-19 pandemic, groups like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gave advice based on science. They told people how to stay safe using masks, vaccines, and social distancing.[321][322] However, not everyone followed or trusted this advice equally.[323] Science also helps countries work together. This is called science diplomacy. Projects like the International Space Station (ISS) or joint research in the Arctic bring scientists from different countries together. These efforts can build peace and cooperation between nations.[324]

The connection between science and society goes both ways. Science changes the world, but society also shapes how science is done. People's values, culture, money, and politics all influence what research is supported and how results are used.[306] For example, during the Cold War, the U.S. focused heavily on space research after the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1 in 1957. This led to the creation of NASA and more investment in science and engineering education. Politics and fear of falling behind in space technology drove this big push.[325][326] Social movements can also change science. In the 1970s, feminist groups pointed out that medical research mostly focused on men. Because of this, rules changed so women had to be included in clinical trials. This helped scientists understand how treatments can work differently in men and women.[327] In farming, many people worry about genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This public concern has led to different rules in different places. For example, Europe uses the precautionary principle, which means being more careful about approving new GMO products than in countries like the U.S.[328] Even the way scientific papers are shared is shaped by money and business models. Many journals charge people to read studies, which has caused debates about whether scientific knowledge should be free and open to everyone.[329][330]

Science also helps grow economies and create new jobs. Many big industries, like biotechnology, renewable energy, artificial intelligence, and aerospace, are based on years of scientific research.[331] For example, the semiconductor industry, which makes computer chips, came from early work in solid-state physics. Today, it is a global industry worth trillions of dollars.[332] Governments often help science and technology grow by giving tax breaks, supporting patents, and creating partnerships between public and private groups.[333] In countries like South Korea and Israel, spending more than 4% of the country’s income on research and development (R&D) has helped build strong technology industries.[334] However, new technology can also cause problems. Sometimes, machines and computers take over jobs that people used to do. This is called technological unemployment.[335] It raises hard questions about what to do when people lose their jobs because of automation. Ideas like universal basic income, job training programs, and better education are being discussed to help people adapt to these changes.[336]

Understanding science is important for everyone. It helps people make smart choices, stay healthy, and take part in important debates. This is called scientific literacy.[337] When people understand basic science, they can check if information is true and avoid being misled. If many people do not understand science, it can lead to misinformation. For example, some people still believe vaccines cause autism. This false idea came from a study that was later proven wrong and taken down, but the anti-vaccine movement still exists and causes real harm.[338][339] Other examples include denying climate change or following pseudoscientific health ideas that are not supported by evidence.[340] To help the public understand science better, many things are being done. Schools are improving science classes, scientists give public talks, and science journalists write easy-to-understand articles.[341] Organizations like the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the British Science Association also organize science festivals and help scientists learn how to talk clearly to the public.[342] People can also take part in citizen science. These are projects where regular people help collect data for scientific studies. Examples include watching birds through eBird or testing water through FreshWater Watch. These projects help people feel more connected to science and show that science is for everyone, not just experts.[343]

As science becomes more powerful, it also raises ethical and philosophical questions.[344] New technologies like gene editing, brain-computer links, and geoengineering can change human life and the planet in big ways.[345][346] People must think carefully about what is right or wrong when using these tools.[347] For example, a tool called CRISPR-Cas9 might one day cure genetic diseases. But it could also be used to create “designer babies,” which may increase unfairness in society or bring back dangerous ideas like eugenics.[348][312] Artificial intelligence (AI) is another case. When AI is used to help police or choose job applicants, it can carry hidden biases from the data it was trained on.[349] This has led to calls for fair and transparent AI systems.[350][351] To deal with these big issues, there are special groups that work on science and ethics. These include The Hastings Center, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, and UNESCO’s Bioethics Program.[352][353][354] They help create rules and ideas that respect human rights, justice, and the limits of science. These discussions are not just for scientists. They also involve ethicists, lawyers, religious leaders, and the general public. This helps make sure that science is used in ways that are fair and good for everyone.[307][355]

Many of today’s biggest problems, like diseases, climate change, and food shortages, affect the whole world. Solving them requires international cooperation and fair access to scientific knowledge. But there are still big differences between richer and poorer countries, often called the Global North and the Global South. Wealthy countries usually lead in science. They have more money for research, better equipment, and more universities.[356] In contrast, many low- and middle-income countries struggle with problems like not enough funding, brain drain (when scientists leave to work in richer countries), and limited access to scientific tools and journals.[357][358] Some groups are working to close this gap. For example, TWAS (The World Academy of Sciences) and INASP (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications) help support science in developing countries. They promote regional cooperation, open-access publishing, and training programs to build research skills.[359][360] The idea of open science, supported by UNESCO, says that scientific knowledge should be freely available to everyone. It also encourages scientists to work together, share results, and be transparent about how they do their research.[361] A good example of open science is what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientists around the world used platforms like GISAID to quickly share data about the virus’s genes. This helped track new versions of the virus and develop better responses faster.[362][363] However, there are still challenges. Sometimes, patents and intellectual property rules make it hard for poorer countries to get important technologies, like vaccines or medical treatments.[364][365] This shows that fairness in science is not just about sharing knowledge, it is also about making sure everyone can use it.[366]

Criticisms and limitations

This funny image is an example of data dredging or p-hacking, where people find patterns in data that do not really mean anything. It shows a fake connection between the number of letters in the winning word of the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the number of people in the U.S. who died from venomous spider bites. These two things have nothing to do with each other, but the graph makes it look like they do. It shows how data can be misleading if not used carefully.

Science is the best tool humans have for understanding and predicting how nature works. But it is not perfect. Science has limits, and it is not always free from mistakes or bias.[367][368] Science depends on observation, testing, and the idea that ideas should be falsifiable, which means they can be proven wrong if new evidence shows up.[5] Because of this, science cannot answer questions that are metaphysical (about things beyond the physical world), emotional, or based on personal values. These kinds of questions cannot be tested or measured with tools and experiments.[369] For example, science can study what happens in the brain during meditation, but it cannot fully explain what a person feels during that experience. This is part of a big question in philosophy and brain science called the problem of consciousness.[254] Scientists also disagree about how best to explain complex systems. Some believe that everything can be broken down into smaller parts (reductionism), while others think that new properties appear when parts come together (emergentism). This is an important debate in areas like neuroscience and systems biology.[370]

Some philosophers have said that science is not as objective as it may seem. For example, Thomas Kuhn argued that what scientists observe is affected by the theories they already believe. This idea is called theory-ladenness. In his famous book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), Kuhn said that science does not always move forward step by step. Instead, it goes through big changes called paradigm shifts, times when one way of thinking is replaced by another. A good example is how Einstein’s relativity replaced Newton’s mechanics. Kuhn also said that during these shifts, scientists working under different theories may not agree on what counts as proof or even what questions are important. This makes it hard to compare old and new ideas fairly.[264] Another thinker, Paul Feyerabend, said that there is no single "scientific method" that always works. In his book Against Method (1975), he said that in the history of science, sometimes “anything goes.” He believed that too many strict rules in science can actually stop progress.[313] One example is how Galileo’s telescope was at first seen as untrustworthy by many scientists of his time. People did not trust what it showed because it was new and did not fit their existing ideas. This shows that new tools and ideas are sometimes rejected, not because they are wrong, but because they challenge the way people already think.[371]

One basic problem in science is called the problem of induction. It was explained by philosopher David Hume in the 1700s. The problem asks: how can we be sure that something will always happen just because it has happened many times before? For example, the sun has risen every day in history, but that does not guarantee it will rise tomorrow. Yet, science often assumes that nature follows regular patterns like this.[301] Philosopher Karl Popper tried to solve this problem by saying that science should focus on proving ideas false, not just confirming them. This is called falsifiability. According to Popper, science moves forward by getting rid of wrong theories. But this approach also has problems. If an experiment gives unexpected results, scientists do not always throw out the theory. Sometimes they blame the tools, the way the data was read, or unknown factors. For example, if a telescope shows strange data about a planet, the issue might be with the telescope, not the theory. So it is not always clear when a theory has truly been disproven. This shows that scientific ideas are not final truths. They can change when new evidence appears or when old evidence is understood in a new way.[260]

Social and cultural factors also affect science. They influence what gets studied, who gets to do the research, and how results are shared. Most science today is led by institutions in the Western world, and it is often written in English. This has raised concerns about epistemic colonialism, where knowledge from non-Western cultures, like Indigenous traditions or ancient medical systems, is ignored or only accepted when explained in Western scientific terms.[372] For example, Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese medicine have been used for thousands of years. But in modern science, they are often not taken seriously unless specific parts of them are tested in lab conditions or clinical trials.[373][374] There are also problems inside the scientific community. Many researchers are under pressure to publish lots of papers to keep their jobs. This is called "publish or perish." It can lead to rushed studies, weak results, and even bad practices like p-hacking (changing data to get the desired result).[375][376] These issues are part of what's known as the replication crisis, when other scientists try to repeat a study but do not get the same results. One big study in 2015, called the Open Science Collaboration, tried to repeat 100 famous psychology experiments. Only 36% of them gave similar results. This showed that many scientific findings may not be as reliable as once thought.[377]

Science works best when it is honest and independent. But sometimes, economic and political pressures can affect what scientists study, how results are shared, and whether the truth is told. For example, in the 1900s, tobacco companies paid for studies that made smoking look safer than it really was. They tried to hide the fact that smoking causes cancer. This delayed laws to protect people and led to millions of deaths. The fossil fuel industry has done something similar. By funding certain research groups and articles, they tried to make people doubt the strong scientific agreement that human actions are causing climate change. These actions are examples of corporate influence over science, which can reduce public trust and keep people from knowing the full truth.[378][379] Governments can also interfere with science. During the early COVID-19 pandemic, some leaders delayed sharing important data or ignored the advice of health experts. This may have made the pandemic worse and hurt people’s trust in science and government decisions.[380][381] To keep science honest, there must be transparency (open sharing of methods and results) and safeguards that protect scientists from outside pressure.[382]

Science often uses controlled experiments to find clear answers. But some problems are too complex for this method to work perfectly. Fields like climate science, epidemiology (the study of diseases), and ecology deal with systems that have many parts working together. Because of this, scientists must use models and probabilities to make predictions. For example, climate models look at how things like greenhouse gases, ocean currents, and weather patterns interact. These models can show possible future trends, but they cannot predict exactly what will happen in a specific place at a specific time many years ahead. Sometimes people misunderstand this. They think that if science is uncertain, it must be wrong. But in complex systems, uncertainty is normal. It does not mean the science is bad.[241] The same problem appears in nutritional science. It is hard to study diet because people eat many things at once, and other factors (like sleep or exercise) affect health too. This can lead to confusing or changing advice about what is healthy.[383] Even in areas with experiments, like genetics, scientists have learned that things are more complicated than they once thought. Many diseases cannot be explained by a single gene. Instead, they are caused by interactions between many genes and environmental factors. This shows that reductionism, studying only small parts of a problem, can miss the bigger picture when dealing with complex systems.[384]

Science is a powerful way to learn about the natural world, but it has limits. Some important questions cannot be answered by science alone. These include normative (what we should do), existential (why we exist), and metaphysical (beyond the physical world) questions. For example, science cannot fully answer “What is the meaning of life?”, “Is there a God?”, “What is morally right or wrong?”, or “What is consciousness?”. Science can study things we can see and test, like how the brain works. For instance, neuroscience can show how parts of the brain light up when we make choices. But it cannot tell us what we should do morally. This is known as the is–ought problem, explained by philosopher David Hume. In the same way, evolutionary biology can explain how helping others (altruism) may have developed in humans. But it cannot say whether we should be kind from a moral point of view. These types of questions are explored through philosophy, religion, ethics, and the humanities (like history and literature). Thinking that science is the only way to gain knowledge is called the scientism fallacy. It ignores the important insights from other areas of human thought, like art, culture, and spiritual traditions.[260][385]

People’s trust in science is not the same everywhere. It depends on their background, politics, and past experiences. In some places, people see science as something only for experts or something that does not care about their real-life problems. This is especially true in communities that have been treated unfairly by scientific institutions in the past.[386] One well-known case is that of Henrietta Lacks, an African-American woman whose cancer cells were taken without her permission in the 1950s. Her cells were used in many scientific breakthroughs, but her family was never asked or informed. This case is still discussed today in conversations about bioethics (the ethics of medical and scientific research) and trust in science.[387] To build trust, it is not enough to just explain science better. Scientists also need to include different communities, listen to their concerns, and make research more open and fair.[388] People also get confused when scientific advice changes. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines about wearing masks changed as scientists learned more. Some people saw this as a sign that science was unreliable. But in reality, this shows how science works, it updates when new evidence becomes available. That is a strength, not a weakness, but it must be clearly explained so the public understands why advice sometimes changes.[389]

ၽိုၼ်ဢၢင်ႈဢိင်

  1. Science. (n.d.). In Simple English Wikipedia. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science
Retrieved from "https://taipedia.com/index.php?title=ပၢႆးသၢႆႊ&oldid=417"